Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3/2018

08.06.2016 | SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment

verfasst von: Luigia Petti, Monica Serreli, Silvia Di Cesare

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this review is to investigate the methodology of social life cycle assessment (SLCA) through its application to case studies. In addition, the following research aims to define the trends related to the SLCA by researchers and consultants. This study will help to map the current situation and to highlight the hot spots and weaknesses of the application of the SLCA theory.

Methods

The SLCA could be considered as a useful methodology to provide decision support in order to compare products and/or improve the social effects of the life cycle of a product. Furthermore, the results of the case studies analyzed may influence decision makers significantly. For this reason, a systematic literature review of case studies was carried out in which SLCA was applied in order to analyze closely the application of the stages of this methodology. In this study, the major phases of the technical framework for a SLCA were analyzed. Specific attention was paid to detect the positive impacts that emerged in the case studies, which were also studied by administering a questionnaire to the authors of the analyzed case studies and to a number of experts in the field of SLCA.

Results and discussion

The 35 case studies examined in this paper, even though they do not deviate from the 40 identified by the previous processing, are still significantly different in terms of outcome produced. It is important to clarify that the authors who developed the case studies considered the steps defined in the SETAC/SETAC guidelines, borrowed from the ISO 14044 standard.

Conclusions

The data resulting from this analysis could help both practitioners and researchers to understand what the issues are, on which it is still necessary to investigate and work, in order to solidify the SLCA methodology and define its role in the context of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA).

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
According to Farace and Frantzen (2005), grey literature regards “information produced on all levels of government, academia, business, and industry in electronic and print formats not controlled by commercial publishing, i.e., where publishing is not the primary activity of the producing body” and includes the following documents: technical and project reports, working papers, discussion papers, technical manuals, information sheets, conference papers, and theses.
 
2
“Type I” IA method assesses social impacts on the base of a score that is attributed by using performance reference points, taken from international and national standards and best practices. Also, internationally accepted minimum performance levels are taken as a reference (e.g., those contained in ILO conventions, ISO 26,000 guidelines, and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises) (Parent et al. 2010). “Type II,” closer to E-LCA, assesses social impacts identifying the relations between cause and effect, called pathways, including an easily observed variable and the effect or impact related to it. Pathways are formulated on the basis of scientific evidence (Parent et al. 2010; Chhipi-Shrestha et al. 2015).
 
3
“Social impacts” are caused by changes in the context, which originate effects related to changes in life expectancy, health, social status, etc. Because of the difficulty of the authors to obtain all data useful for calculations, they stopped at an intermediate point, therefore neglecting the evaluation of a part of the impacts. To acknowledge the inability to calculate the true social impact when this concern is relevant, the term “social effect” instead of “social impact” will be used. “‘Social performances’ are neither social effects nor social impacts of changes. Social performances are […] features of a situation in a relevant organization (or features of the value chain of organizations shaping the life cycle), referring more or less to social issues” (Macombe et al. 2013, p. 205).
 
4
Can be defined as “methodology” a guideline for solving problems, through specific components (e.g., phases, tasks, methods, techniques, and tools) (Robson 1997).
 
5
Jørgensen et al. (2010) consider the child labor indicator as a context-related positive impact, given that it can be considered as a positive impact in some situations (e.g., helping children to develop discipline, responsibility, self-confidence, and independence; teaching them how to manage money; and providing them with working skills) (Di Cesare et al. 2016).
 
6
Footprint is defined as the sum of “all the negative impacts of pollution released and resources consumed over the entire supply chain and life cycle of the product” (Norris 2013, p. 125).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht S, Brandstetter P, Beck T et al (2013) An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1549–1567CrossRef Albrecht S, Brandstetter P, Beck T et al (2013) An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1549–1567CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013a) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1106–1115CrossRef Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013a) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1106–1115CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013b) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128CrossRef Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013b) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arcese G, Lucchetti M, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5:3275–3287CrossRef Arcese G, Lucchetti M, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5:3275–3287CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? Opting for an empirically based approach to social life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:517–527CrossRef Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? Opting for an empirically based approach to social life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17:517–527CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef Benoît-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît-Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S et al (2013) The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). http://bit.ly/1Ma98vt. Accessed. 28 May 2015 Benoît-Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S et al (2013) The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). http://​bit.​ly/​1Ma98vt. Accessed. 28 May 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 1:60–65 Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 1:60–65
Zurück zum Zitat Busset G, Belaud J-P, Montréjaud-Vignoles M et al (2014) Integration of social LCA with sustainability LCA: a case study on virgin olive oil production. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 73–80 Busset G, Belaud J-P, Montréjaud-Vignoles M et al (2014) Integration of social LCA with sustainability LCA: a case study on virgin olive oil production. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 73–80
Zurück zum Zitat Chang Y-J, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S et al (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP 293–298 Chang Y-J, Sproesser G, Neugebauer S et al (2015) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of welding technologies. Procedia CIRP 293–298
Zurück zum Zitat Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) “Socializing” sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:579–596CrossRef Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) “Socializing” sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:579–596CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clift R (2014) Social life cycle assessment: what are we trying to do. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th international seminar in social LCA. 19th-21st November. FruitropThema, Montpellier, France, pp 11–16 Clift R (2014) Social life cycle assessment: what are we trying to do. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th international seminar in social LCA. 19th-21st November. FruitropThema, Montpellier, France, pp 11–16
Zurück zum Zitat Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2013) Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. http://bit.ly/1Hup87n. Accessed 13 April 2015 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2013) Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. http://​bit.​ly/​1Hup87n. Accessed 13 April 2015
Zurück zum Zitat De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A et al (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–14 De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A et al (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in Southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9999:1–14
Zurück zum Zitat Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Petti L (2014) The role of indicators in social life cycle assessment : results from a literature review. http://bit.ly/1O9gf5F. Accessed 30 May 2015 Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Petti L (2014) The role of indicators in social life cycle assessment : results from a literature review. http://​bit.​ly/​1O9gf5F. Accessed 30 May 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S et al. (2016) Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess (this issue–under review) Di Cesare S, Silveri F, Sala S et al. (2016) Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess (this issue–under review)
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E (2013) Tracking down social impacts of products with social life cycle assessment. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Ekener-Petersen E (2013) Tracking down social impacts of products with social life cycle assessment. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143CrossRef Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:127–143CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154CrossRef Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2014) Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energy Policy 73:416–426CrossRef Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2014) Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energy Policy 73:416–426CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farace DJ, Frantzen J (2005) Sixth international conference on grey literature: work on grey in progress, GL 2004 Conference Proceedings, New York, 6–7 December 2004, TextRelease, Amsterdam Farace DJ, Frantzen J (2005) Sixth international conference on grey literature: work on grey in progress, GL 2004 Conference Proceedings, New York, 6–7 December 2004, TextRelease, Amsterdam
Zurück zum Zitat Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M et al (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRef Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M et al (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T (2013) Life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSA) of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Environ Dev Sustain 15:783–806CrossRef Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T (2013) Life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSA) of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Environ Dev Sustain 15:783–806CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379CrossRef Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:366–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1793–1803CrossRef Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1793–1803CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jesson J, Lacey F (2006) How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharm Educ 6:139–148CrossRef Jesson J, Lacey F (2006) How to do (or not to do) a critical literature review. Pharm Educ 6:139–148CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299CrossRef Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA—a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social sustainability social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15 Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social sustainability social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde V, Macombe C (2013) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:171–184CrossRef Lagarde V, Macombe C (2013) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:171–184CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M et al (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M et al (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339. doi: b2700. 10.1136/bmj.b2700 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339. doi: b2700. 10.​1136/​bmj.​b2700
Zurück zum Zitat Luthe T, Kägi T, Reger J (2013) A systems approach to sustainable technical product design. J Ind Ecol 17:605–617CrossRef Luthe T, Kägi T, Reger J (2013) A systems approach to sustainable technical product design. J Ind Ecol 17:605–617CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, Montpellier Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) (2014) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, Montpellier
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C, Feschet P, Garrabé M, Loeillet D (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:940–943. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0331-5 Macombe C, Feschet P, Garrabé M, Loeillet D (2011) 2nd International Seminar in Social Life Cycle Assessment—recent developments in assessing the social impacts of product life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:940–943. doi:10.​1007/​s11367-011-0331-5
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRef Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P et al (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P et al (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mattioda RA, Mazzi A, Canciglieri O Jr, Scipioni A (2015) Determining the principal references of the social life cycle assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1155–1165CrossRef Mattioda RA, Mazzi A, Canciglieri O Jr, Scipioni A (2015) Determining the principal references of the social life cycle assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1155–1165CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–270CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–270CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18:1629–1638CrossRef Moriizumi Y, Matsui N, Hondo H (2010) Simplified life cycle sustainability assessment of mangrove management: a case of plantation on wastelands in Thailand. J Clean Prod 18:1629–1638CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muthu SS (ed) (2015) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore Muthu SS (ed) (2015) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore
Zurück zum Zitat Nemarumane T, Mbohwa C (2015) Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 71–113 Nemarumane T, Mbohwa C (2015) Social impact assessment of sugar production operations in South Africa: a social life cycle assessment perspective. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 71–113
Zurück zum Zitat Norris GA (2013) The new requirement for social leadership: healing. In: Groschl S (ed) Uncertainty, diversity and the common good: changing norms and new leadership paradigms. Gower Publ, London Norris GA (2013) The new requirement for social leadership: healing. In: Groschl S (ed) Uncertainty, diversity and the common good: changing norms and new leadership paradigms. Gower Publ, London
Zurück zum Zitat Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:164–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies impact assessment method. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 34–41 Petti L, Ugaya CML, Di Cesare S (2014) Systematic review of social-life cycle assessment (S-LCA) case studies impact assessment method. In: Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) Pre-proceedings of the 4th International Seminar in Social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, pp 34–41
Zurück zum Zitat Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A et al (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:842–853CrossRef Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A et al (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:842–853CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Revéret J-P, Couture J-M, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 25–69 Revéret J-P, Couture J-M, Parent J (2015) Socioeconomic LCA of milk production in Canada. In: Muthu SS (ed) Social life cycle assessment—an insight. Springer, Singapore, pp 25–69
Zurück zum Zitat Robson W (1997) Strategic management and information systems: an integrated approach. Pitman Publishing, London Robson W (1997) Strategic management and information systems: an integrated approach. Pitman Publishing, London
Zurück zum Zitat Rugani B, Benetto E, Igos E et al (2014) Towards prospective life cycle sustainability analysis: exploring complementarities between social and environmental life cycle assessments for the case of Luxembourg’s energy system. Matériaux & Techniques, p 102 Rugani B, Benetto E, Igos E et al (2014) Towards prospective life cycle sustainability analysis: exploring complementarities between social and environmental life cycle assessments for the case of Luxembourg’s energy system. Matériaux & Techniques, p 102
Zurück zum Zitat Shau EM, Traverso M, Lehmann A et al (2011) Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment—a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability 3:2268–2288CrossRef Shau EM, Traverso M, Lehmann A et al (2011) Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment—a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability 3:2268–2288CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079CrossRef Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Umair S, Björklund A, Ekener-Petersen E (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using SETAC SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57CrossRef Umair S, Björklund A, Ekener-Petersen E (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using SETAC SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J et al (2012) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685CrossRef Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J et al (2012) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C et al (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:445–455CrossRef Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C et al (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:445–455CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod 84:281–288CrossRef Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod 84:281–288CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilhelm M, Hutchins M, Mars C, Benoit-Norris C (2015) An overview of social impacts and their corresponding improvement implications: a mobile phone case study. J Clean Prod 102:302–315CrossRef Wilhelm M, Hutchins M, Mars C, Benoit-Norris C (2015) An overview of social impacts and their corresponding improvement implications: a mobile phone case study. J Clean Prod 102:302–315CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6:4200–4226CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yu M, Halog A (2015) Solar photovoltaic development in Australia—a life cycle sustainability assessment study. Sustainability 7:1213–1247CrossRef Yu M, Halog A (2015) Solar photovoltaic development in Australia—a life cycle sustainability assessment study. Sustainability 7:1213–1247CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:373–376CrossRef Zamagni A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:373–376CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:596–598CrossRef Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:596–598CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buttol P et al (2012) Finding life cycle assessment research direction with the aid of meta-analysis. J Ind Ecol 16:S39–S52CrossRef Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buttol P et al (2012) Finding life cycle assessment research direction with the aid of meta-analysis. J Ind Ecol 16:S39–S52CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zumsteg JM, Cooper JS, Noon MS (2012) Systematic review checklist. J Ind Ecol 16:12–21CrossRef Zumsteg JM, Cooper JS, Noon MS (2012) Systematic review checklist. J Ind Ecol 16:12–21CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
verfasst von
Luigia Petti
Monica Serreli
Silvia Di Cesare
Publikationsdatum
08.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1135-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Preface