nach oben

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Erschienen in:

19.07.2016 | SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS

Evaluation for social and humanity demand on green residential districts in China based on SLCA

verfasst von: Lei Fan, Bo Pang, Yurong Zhang, Xiangjie Zhang, Yiwen Sun, Yuanfeng Wang

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

In recent years, green building has become a social hotspot and raised much concern of academic. However, traditional researches of green building mostly focused on technology, while research on social and humanity demand on green residential districts is still scarce. To complement the gap of research and reality, this paper is intended to establish a quantitative evaluation method for social humanity needs of green residential districts based on social life cycle assessment (SLCA).

Methods

Based on the SLCA method, an evaluation indicator system for social and humanity demand of green residential districts was proposed, considering different stakeholders (real estate developers, construction enterprises, community residents, and decision makers). Additionally, the adopted evaluation indicator system was applied to a practical community in China as a case study by questionnaire surveys and the method of analytic hierarchy process.

Results and discussion

Case study results show that the residents prefer to pay more for a better living environment, and the real estate developers are willing to increase the investment moderately on the projects. Meanwhile, the local government likes to support the development of green residential districts, as well.

Conclusions

Analysis results are in line with the social demand for high-quality living environment of Chinese residents and the public concern about buildings’ comprehensive benefits.

Vorheriger Artikel Social sustainability in trade and development policy

Nächster Artikel Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Ali HH, AL Nsairat SF (2009) Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countrieS: case of Jordan. Build Environ 44(5):1053–1064

Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1106–1115CrossRef

Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527CrossRef

Benoît C, Parent J, Kuenzi I, Revéret J-P (2007) Presentation: developing a methodology for social life cycle assessment: the North American tomato’s CSR case, 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, August 27–29, Zürich, Switzerland

Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA . Int J LCA 16(7):682–690

Blom M, Solmar C (2009) How to socially assess biofuels: a case study of the UNEP/SETAC code of practice for social-economical LCA. Luleå University of Technology, Stockholm

Casado Cañeque F (2002) Evaluación de la situación laboral de empresas: El análisis del ciclo de vida como herramienta para el desarrollo sostenible. Universitat de Barcelona, Divisió de Ciències Juridíques, Economiques i Socials, Barcelona, Spain (in Spanish)

Catherine BN, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6(10):6973–6984

Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) ‘Socializing’ sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17(3):579–596

Daozhai Z (2014) Study on evaluation of building energy efficiency policies, master thesis. Department of Economics and Mangement, Jiaotong University, Beijing (In Chinese)

Dreyer L (2009) Inclusion of social aspects in life cycle assessment of products. Technical University of Denmark, Danemark

Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–89CrossRef

Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143CrossRef

Fava J, Consoli F, Denson R, Dickson K, Mohin T, Vigon B (1993) A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. Workshop Report, Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC. Foundation for Environmental Education, Inc, Pensacola

Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171CrossRef

Gabriella A, Maria CL, Roberto M (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5(8):3275–3287

Gervásio H, da Silva LS (2013) Life-cycle social analysis of motorway bridges. Struct Infrastruct E 9(10):1019–1039CrossRef

Golić K, Kosorić V, Furundžić AK (2011) General model of solar water heating system integration in residential building refurbishment—potential energy savings and environmental impact. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(3):1533–1544CrossRef

Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645CrossRef

Hu FF (2010) The comparison of green (sustainable) building evaluation standard in China, Britain and United State. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing (in Chinese)

Hughes BR, Chaudhry HN, Ghani SA (2011) A review of sustainable cooling technologies in buildings. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3112–3120CrossRef

Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382CrossRef

Lee SE, Rajagopalan P (2008) Building energy efficiency labeling programme in Singapore. Energ Policy 36(10):3982–3992CrossRef

Lee YS (2011) Lighting quality and acoustic quality in LEED-certified buildings using occupant evaluation. J Green Build 6(2):139–155CrossRef

Li DH, Yang L, Lam JC (2013) Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications—a review. Energy 554:1–10

Li JN (2009) Analysis on the standard of American LEED. Constr Conserv Energ 37(1):60–64 in Chinese

Lucon OD et al (2014) Buildings. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press

Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1386–1392CrossRef

Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514CrossRef

Menikpura SNM, Gheewala SH, Bonnet S (2012) Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand. Waste Manag Res 30(7):708–719CrossRef

Norris G (2003) Life cycle approach to sustainable consumption: conceptual design of a methodological framework. Final report. The Society of Non-Traditional Technology (AIST), Tokyo

O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237CrossRef

Pacheco R, Ordóñez J, Martínez G (2012) Energy efficient design of building: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(6):3559–3573CrossRef

Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Reveret JP (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171CrossRef

Praene JP, David M, Sinama F, Morau D, Marc O (2012) Renewable energy: progressing towards a net zero energy island, the case of Reunion Island. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(1):426–442CrossRef

Rahman SM, Khondaker AN (2012) Mitigation measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon capture and storage in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2446–2460CrossRef

Sadineni SB, Madala S, Boehm RF (2011) Passive building energy savings: a review of building envelope components. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(8):3617–3631CrossRef

UNEP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Program, Paris

UNEP/SETAC (2010) Methodological sheets for 31 sub-Categories of impact for a social LCA of products. www.estis.net/sites/lcinit/. Accessed October 2014

Weidema Bp(2006) Social impact categories, indicators, characterization and damage modeling. Presentation for the 29th Swiss LCA Discussion Forum

Yahong D (2014) Life cycle sustainability assessment modeling of building construction. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Yao H (2009) A dynamic approach for evaluating the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

Yip S, Hongjun L, Ling S (2013) Study on the economics of greening buildings in China. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

Yuan H (2012) A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Waste Manag 32(6):1218–1228CrossRef

Yuan X, Wang X, Zuo J (2013) Renewable energy in buildings in China—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24(10):1–8CrossRef

Zabaneh GA (2011) Zero net house: preliminary assessment of suitability for Alberta. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3237–3242CrossRef

Zuo J, Zhao ZY (2014) Green building research–current status and future agenda: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30(2):271–281CrossRef

Titel: Evaluation for social and humanity demand on green residential districts in China based on SLCA
verfasst von: Lei Fan
Bo Pang
Yurong Zhang
Xiangjie Zhang
Yiwen Sun
Yuanfeng Wang
Publikationsdatum: 19.07.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1166-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

An Italian tomato “Cuore di Bue” case study: challenges and benefits using subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment

A historical perspective on the engineering ideologies of sustainability: the case of SLCA

Social sustainability in trade and development policy

Hotspot identification in the clothing industry using social life cycle assessment—opportunities and challenges of input-output modelling

Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil

Back to basics—the school lunch