nach oben

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015 | Original Article

LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition

verfasst von: Darko Katić, Chantal Julliard, Anna-Laura Wekerle, Hannes Kenngott, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Rüdiger Dillmann, Stefanie Speidel, Pierre Jannin, Bernard Gibaud

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The rise of intraoperative information threatens to outpace our abilities to process it. Context-aware systems, filtering information to automatically adapt to the current needs of the surgeon, are necessary to fully profit from computerized surgery. To attain context awareness, representation of medical knowledge is crucial. However, most existing systems do not represent knowledge in a reusable way, hindering also reuse of data. Our purpose is therefore to make our computational models of medical knowledge sharable, extensible and interoperational with established knowledge representations in the form of the LapOntoSPM ontology. To show its usefulness, we apply it to situation interpretation, i.e., the recognition of surgical phases based on surgical activities.

Methods

Considering best practices in ontology engineering and building on our ontology for laparoscopy, we formalized the workflow of laparoscopic adrenalectomies, cholecystectomies and pancreatic resections in the framework of OntoSPM, a new standard for surgical process models. Furthermore, we provide a rule-based situation interpretation algorithm based on SQWRL to recognize surgical phases using the ontology.

Results

The system was evaluated on ground-truth data from 19 manually annotated surgeries. The aim was to show that the phase recognition capabilities are equal to a specialized solution. The recognition rates of the new system were equal to the specialized one. However, the time needed to interpret a situation rose from 0.5 to 1.8 s on average which is still viable for practical application.

Conclusion

We successfully integrated medical knowledge for laparoscopic surgeries into OntoSPM, facilitating knowledge and data sharing. This is especially important for reproducibility of results and unbiased comparison of recognition algorithms. The associated recognition algorithm was adapted to the new representation without any loss of classification power. The work is an important step to standardized knowledge and data representation in the field on context awareness and thus toward unified benchmark data sets.

Vorheriger Artikel Ultrasound-guided spinal injections: a feasibility study of a guidance system

Nächster Artikel A study of crowdsourced segment-level surgical skill assessment using pairwise rankings

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Woods DD, Patterson ES, Roth EM (2002) Can we ever escape from data overload? A cognitive systems diagnosis. Cognit Technol Work 4(1):22–36CrossRef

Joyce JP, Lapinski GW (1983) A history and overview of the safety parameter display system concept. IEEE Nucl Sci 30:744–749CrossRef

Kranzfelder M, Staub C, Fiolka A, Schneider A, Gillen S, Wilhelm D, Friess H, Knoll A, Feussner H (2013) Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations. Surg Endosc 27(5):1681–1688PubMedCrossRef

Lemke HU, Ratib OM, Horii SC (2005) Workflow in the operating room: a summary review of the arrowhead 2004 seminar on imaging and informatics. Int Congr Ser 1281:862–867CrossRef

Cleary K, Chung H, Mun S (2005) Or 2020: the operating room of the future. In: CARS 2005: computer assisted radiology and surgery, Proceedings of the 19th international congress and exhibition, International congress series, vol 1281, pp 832–838

Lalys F, Jannin P (2013) Surgical process modelling: a review. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(3):495–511. doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0940-5

Blum T, Padoy N, Feussner H, Navab N (2008) Workflow mining for visualization and analysis of surgeries. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(5):379–386CrossRef

Bouarfa L, Jonker PP, Dankelman J (2010) Discovery of high-level tasks in the operating room. J Biomed Inform 44(3):455–462PubMedCrossRef

Ahmadi A, Sielhorst T, Stauder R, Horn M, Feussner H, Navab N (2007) Recovery of surgical workflow without explicit models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(Pt 1):420–428

10.

Stauder R, Okur A, Peter L, Schneider A, Kranzfelder M, Feussner H, Navab N (2014) In: Random forests for phase detection in surgical workflow analysis the 5th international conference on information processing in computer-assisted interventions (IPCAI)

11.

Reiley C, Lin H, Varadarajan B, Vagolgyi B, Khudanpur S, Yuh D, Hager G (2008) Automatic recognition of surgical motions using statistical modeling for capturing variability. Stud Health Technol Inform 132:396–401

12.

Lalys F, Riffaud L, Morandi X, Jannin P (2011) Surgical phases detection from microscope videos by combining SVM and HMM. Med Comput Vis Recognit Tech Appl Med Imaging

13.

Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, Feussner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2010) Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal 16(3):632–641PubMedCrossRef

14.

Blum T, Feussner H, Navab N (2010) Modeling and segmentation of surgical workflow from laparoscopic video. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv

15.

Suzuki T, Sakurai Y, Yoshimitsu K, Nambu K, Muragaki Y, Iseki H (2010) Intraoperative multichannel audio-visual information recording and automatic surgical phase and incident detection. In: 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, 1190–1193

16.

Neumuth T, Jannin P, Schlomberg J, Meixensberger J, Wiedemann P, Burgert O (2011) Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(1):59–71PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Burgert O, Neumuth T, Lempp F, Mudunuri R, Meixensberger J, Strauss G, Dietz A, Jannin P, Lemke HU (2006) Linking top-level ontologies and surgical workflows. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(1):437–438

18.

Jannin P, Morandi X (2007) Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery. Neuroimage 37(3):783–791PubMedCrossRef

19.

Neumuth T, Kaschek B, Neumuth D, Ceschia M, Meixensberger J, Strauss G, Burgert O (2010) An observation support system with an adaptive ontology-driven user interface for the modeling of complex behaviors during surgical interventions. Behav Res Methods 42(4):1049–1058

20.

Neumuth D, Loebe F, Herre H, Neumuth T (2011) Modeling surgical processes: a four-level translational approach. Artif Intell Med 51(3):147–161PubMedCrossRef

21.

Lalys F, Bouget B, Riffaud R, Jannin P (2013) Automatic knowledge-based recognition of low-level tasks in ophthalmological procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg CARS 8:39–49CrossRef

22.

Oropesa I, Snchez-Gonzlez P, Lamata P, Chmarra MK, Pagador JB, Snchez-Margallo JA, Snchez-Margallo FM, Gmez EJ (2011) Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 171(1):81–95CrossRef

23.

Blake C, Keogh E, Merz CJ (1998) UCI repository of machine learning databases, http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html

24.

Katic Katic, Wekerle AL, Grtner F, Kenngott HG, Müller-Stich BP, Dillmann R, Speidel S (2014) Knowledge-driven formalization of laparoscopic surgeries for rule-based intraoperative context-aware assistance. Information processing in computer-assisted interventions, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8498, pp 158–167

25.

Gibaud B, Penet C, Pierre J (2014) OntoSPM: a core ontology of surgical procedure models, SURGETICA

26.

Grenon P, Smith B (2004) SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spat Cognit Compuat 1(4):69–103

27.

Rosse C, Mejino JLV (2007) The foundational model of anatomy ontology. Anat Ontol Bioinf Princ Pract 6:59–117

28.

Information Artifact Ontology. https://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology

29.

Unit Ontology. https://code.google.com/p/unit-ontology/

30.

Speidel S, Benzko J, Sudra G, Azad P, Müller-Stich BP, Gutt C, Dillmann R (2009) Automatic classification of minimally invasive instruments based on endoscopic image sequences. SPIE Med Imaging 7261

31.

Neumuth T, Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Lemke HU, Burgert O (2006) Acquisition of process descriptions from surgical interventions. DEXA2006

32.

Xiang Z, Courtot M, Brinkman RR, Ruttenberg A, He Y (2010) OntoFox: web-based support for ontology reuse. BMC Res Notes 3:175PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

O’Connor MJ, Das A (2009) SQWRL: a query language for OWL OWL: experiences and directions (OWLED). In: 6th International Workshop

34.

Shearer R, Motik B, Horrocks I (2008) HermiT: a highly-efficient OWL reasoner. In: 5th International workshop on OWL: experiences and directions

35.

O’Connor MJ, Knublauch H, Tu SW, Grossof B, Dean M, Grosso WE, Musen MA (2005) Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL. In: 4th International semantic web conference (ISWC) LNCS 3729:974–986

36.

Horridge M, Bechhofer S (2011) The OWL API: a Java API for OWL ontologies. Semanti Web J Spec Issue Semant Web Tools Syst 2(1):11–21

37.

http://protege.stanford.edu/

38.

Neumuth T, Jannin P, Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Burgert O (2009) Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(1):72–80. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2748 PMCID: PMC2605601

39.

Cornet R, de Keizer N (2008) Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8(Suppl 1):S2PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Titel: LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition
verfasst von: Darko Katić
Chantal Julliard
Anna-Laura Wekerle
Hannes Kenngott
Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Rüdiger Dillmann
Stefanie Speidel
Pierre Jannin
Bernard Gibaud
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1222-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

A multi-vertebrae CT to US registration of the lumbar spine in clinical data

Ultrasound-guided spinal injections: a feasibility study of a guidance system

Classification approach for automatic laparoscopic video database organization

Automatic lung tumor segmentation with leaks removal in follow-up CT studies

Simulated field maps for susceptibility artefact correction in interventional MRI

Assessment of registration accuracy during computer-aided oncologic limb-salvage surgery