nach oben

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Erschienen in:

01.06.2010 | Original Empirical Research

Product competitiveness and beating analyst earnings target

verfasst von: Xueming Luo

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

While Wall Street closely watches financial analysts’ earnings forecasts, Main Street often scrutinizes product quality relative to competition. Do firms with superior product competitiveness enjoy greater likelihood of beating analyst earnings target? And if so, is there contingency in this impact? We show that positive changes in product competitiveness contribute to the firm’s likelihood of beating analyst earnings target, while negative changes in product competitiveness account for missed earnings target. In addition, this impact of product competitiveness on the likelihood of beating analyst earnings target is more positive in the situations of high firm future growth opportunity and low financial environment uncertainty. These findings innovatively use analyst forecast metrics to reinforce the relationship between product quality, competitive advantage, and financial performance. Our study also cultivates a contingency theory of the marketing-finance interface and allows marketing and finance executives to find common ground in strategic discourse. Overall, this research offers brand new financial analysts-based implications of product competitiveness.

Nächster Artikel On the importance of complaint handling design: a multi-level analysis of the impact in specific complaint situations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

This line of reasoning is also based on efficient market hypothesis (EMH) theory because this theory suggests that financial markets are at least semi strongly efficient and that investors only react to surprises (i.e., positive/negative earnings surprises or, in our context, beating/missing financial analysts’ earnings forecasts).

An implicit assumption is that contingency theory motivates our moderating hypotheses, beyond the main effect hypotheses. For contingency variables, we select firm-level factor (future growth opportunity) because quality programs may benefit more in firms with more growth opportunity, industry-level factor (industry concentration) because of the importance of industry competition for most marketing initiatives, and analyst-level factor (forecast dispersion) due to asymmetric information theory and the fact that higher dispersion can infer more noisy and uncertain financial environment on Wall Street.

Note that our data on product competitiveness is not about other marketing variables such as customers’ perceptions/attitudes or brand recognition. But rather, each year, Fortune polls more than 10,000 senior executives, financial analysts, and investors to determine the perceived product competitiveness. In this sense, we also feel that product competitiveness information may enter the investment marketplace in such a fashion as to help investors make choices. Further, we check the world top 100 brand value ratings (2001-2005) from BusinessWeek and run a correlation between product competitiveness and brand values. We find that the two variables have relatively low but significant correlation (r = .17, p < .05). Product competitiveness and brand values should be correlated (though not too highly correlated as they are separate constructs), because superior product quality is an antecedent of brand equity. Thus, these steps help establish the validity of the Fortune data for product competitiveness.

Following the accounting literature (Bartov et al. 2002; Lim and Tan 2008), we use the latest (or most recent) analysts’ median consensus forecasts that are no earlier than 2 months before the date of earnings announcements. In addition, COMPUSTAT provides more accurate data on firms’ reported earnings per share than I/B/E/S does.

The robust covariance matrix is: \( \hat\sum {HW} = \frac{T}{T - k}\left( {X\prime X} \right)^{- 1} \Omega \left( {X\prime X} \right)^{- 1} \), \( \Omega = \frac{T}{T - k}\left[ {\sum\limits_{t = 1}^T {u_t^2 x_t x_t^{\prime } + \sum\limits_{v = 1}^q {\left( {\left( {1 - \frac{v}{q + 1}} \right)\sum\limits_{t = v + 1}^T {\left( {x_t u_t u_{{t - \nu }} x_{t - v}^{\prime } + x_{t - v} u_{t - v} u_t x_t^{\prime } } \right)} } \right)} } } \right] \), and q (the truncation lag) = floor (4(T/100) ^2/9 (Maddala 1983).

We acknowledge one anonymous reviewer for bringing this implication to our attention.

We focus here on healthy practices (i.e., quality improvement) of earnings surprises management rather than misguided earnings management (under- or over-accounting reporting) which may be unhealthy for firm shareholder value.

Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994). The financial information content of perceived quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 191–201.CrossRef

Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Mazvancheryl, S. K. (2004). Customer satisfaction and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing, 68, 172–185.CrossRef

Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299.CrossRef

Bartov, E., Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2002). The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 33(2), 173–204.CrossRef

Boulding, W., Kalra, A., & Staelin, R. (1999). The quality double whammy. Marketing Science, 18(4), 463–484.CrossRef

Brown, L. D., Hagerman, R. L., Griffin, P. A., & Zmijewski, M. E. (1987). Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 9, 61–87.CrossRef

Bryan, D. M., & Tiras, S. L. (2007). The influence of forecast dispersion on the incremental explanatory power of earnings, book value, and analyst forecasts on market prices. Accounting Review, 82, 651–677.CrossRef

Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.CrossRef

Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures, and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22, 128–140.CrossRef

Cheng, Q., & Warfield, T. D. (2005). Equity incentives and earnings management. Accounting Review, 80, 441–476.CrossRef

Cho, H.-J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–75.CrossRef

Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns of stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.CrossRef

Fama, E., & French, K. (2008). Dissecting anomalies. Working Paper, University of Chicago.

Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The american customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7–18.CrossRef

Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70, 3–14.CrossRef

Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 40, 3–73.CrossRef

Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., & Weston, J. P. (2004). Advertising, breadth of ownership and liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, 17(2), 439–61.CrossRef

Gupta, S., & Zeithaml, V. (2006). Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–39.CrossRef

Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (1996). Quality awards and the market value of the firm: An empirical investigation. Management Science, 42, 415–436.CrossRef

Jacobson, R., & Aaker, D. A. (1987). The strategic role of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 51, 31–44.CrossRef

Kasznik, R., & McNichols, M. F. (2002). Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 727–759.CrossRef

Keller, K., & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740–59.CrossRef

Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79.CrossRef

Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53–71.

Lim, C.-Y., & Tan, H.-T. (2008). Non-audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Journal of Accounting Review, 46(1), 199–246.

Lopez, T. J., & Rees, L. (2002). The effect of beating and missing analysts' forecasts in the information content of unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(2), 155–84.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1–18.CrossRef

Luo, X. (2007). Consumer negative voice and firm-idiosyncratic stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 75–88.CrossRef

Luo, X. (2008). When marketing strategy first meets wall street: Marketing spendings and firms’ initial public offerings (IPOs). Journal of Marketing, 72, 98–109.CrossRef

Luo, X., & Homburg, C. (2008). Satisfaction, complaint, and the stock value gap. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 29–43.CrossRef

Luo, X. (2009). Quantifying the long-term impact of negative word of mouth on cash flows and stock prices. Marketing Science, 28(1), 148–65.CrossRef

Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Matsumoto, D. A. (2002). Management's incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Accounting Review, 77, 483–514.CrossRef

McAnally, M., Srivastava, A., & Weaver, C. (2008). Executive stock options, missed earnings targets, and earnings management. Accounting Review, 83(1), 185–216.CrossRef

Mitra, D., & Golder, P. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Management Science, 25(3), 230–47.

Mittal, V., Anderson, E. W., Sayrak, A., & Tadikamalla, P. (2005). Dual emphasis and the long-term financial impact of customer satisfaction. Marketing Science, 24(4), 544–55.CrossRef

Phillips, L. W., Chang, D. R., & Buzzell, R. D. (1983). Product quality, cost position and business performance: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Marketing, 47, 26–43.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: The Free.

Rust, R., Zahorik, A. J., & Keiningham, T. L. (1995). Return on quality (ROQ): Making service quality financially accountable. Journal of Marketing, 59, 58–70.CrossRef

Rust, R., Moorman, C., & Dickson, P. R. (2002). Getting return on quality: Revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? Journal of Marketing, 66, 7–24.CrossRef

Rust, R., Lemon, K., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004a). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68, 109–24.CrossRef

Rust, R., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004b). Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of marketing, 68, 76–89.CrossRef

Sadka, R., & Scherbina, A. (2007). Analyst disagreement, mispricing, and liquidity. Journal of Finance, 62, 2367–2403.CrossRef

Slotegraaf, R. J., & Inman, J. J. (2004). Longitudinal shifts in the drivers of satisfaction with product quality: The role of attribute resolvability. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 269–280.CrossRef

Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Marketing and firm value: Metrics, methods, findings and future directions. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 293–312.CrossRef

Steenkamp, J.-B., Nijs, V. R., Hanssens, D. M., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2005). Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Science, 24(1), 35–54.CrossRef

Stewart, D. (2009). Marketing accountability: Linking marketing actions to financial results. Journal of Business Research, 62(6), 636–643.CrossRef

Tellis, G. J., & Fornell, C. (1988). The relationship between advertising and product quality over the product life cycle: A contingency theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 64–71.CrossRef

Tellis, G. J., & Johnson, J. (2007). The value of quality. Marketing Science, 26(6), 758–73.CrossRef

Thomas, S. (2002). Firm diversification and asymmetric information: Evidence from analysts' forecast and earnings announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 373–396.CrossRef

Womack, K. L. (1996). Do brokerage analysts' recommendations have investment value? Journal of Finance, 51, 137–167.CrossRef

Titel: Product competitiveness and beating analyst earnings target
verfasst von: Xueming Luo
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2010
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0158-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Customer relationship management and firm performance: the mediating role of business strategy

On the importance of complaint handling design: a multi-level analysis of the impact in specific complaint situations

The differing and mediating roles of trust and relationship commitment in service relationship maintenance and development

The service quality-satisfaction link revisited: exploring asymmetries and dynamics

Sales promotions and channel coordination

Great expectations and broken promises: misleading claims, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation and consumer distrust