Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 2/2013

01.04.2013

Towards a Task-Aware Proactive Sociable Robot Based on Multi-state Perspective-Taking

verfasst von: Amit Kumar Pandey, Muhammad Ali, Rachid Alami

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Robots are expected to cooperate with humans in day-to-day interaction. One aspect of such cooperation is behaving proactively. In this paper we will enable our robots, equipped with visuo-spatial perspective-taking capabilities, to behave proactively based on reasoning ‘where’ its human partner might perform a particular task with different effort levels. For this, the robot analyzes the agents’ abilities not only from the current state but also from a set of different states the agent might attain.
Depending on the task and the situation, the robot exhibits different types of proactive behaviors, such as, reaching out, suggesting a solution and providing clues by head movement, for two different tasks performed by the human partner: give and make accessible. These proactive behaviors are intended to be informative to reduce confusion of the human partner, to communicate the robot’s ability and intention and to guide the partner for better cooperation.
We have validated the behaviors by user studies, which suggest that such proactive behaviors reduce the ‘confusion’ and ‘effort’ of the users. Further, the participants reported the robot to be more ‘supportive and aware’ compared to the situations where the robot was non-proactive.
Such proactive behaviors could enrich multi-modal interaction and cooperation capabilities of the robot as well as help in developing more complex socially expected and accepted behaviors in the human centered environment.
Vorheriger Artikel Planning for Human–Robot Interaction in Socially Situated Tasks
Nächster Artikel EMYS—Emotive Head of a Social Robot

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Alili S, Alami R, Montreuil V (2009) A task planner for an autonomous social robot. In: Asama H, Kurokawa H, Ota J, Sekiyama K (eds) Distributed autonomous robotic systems, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, pp 335–344
2.
Berlin M, Gray J, Thomaz AI, Breazeal C (2006) Perspective taking: an organizing principle for learning in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 21st national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI’06), vol 2. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 1444–1450
3.
Breazeal C (2009) Role of expressive behaviour for robots that learn from people. Phil Trans R Soc B, Biol Sci 364:3527–3538 CrossRef
4.
Broquère X, Sidobre D, Nguyen K (2010) From motion planning to trajectory control with bounded jerk for service manipulator robots. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 4505–4510
5.
Buss M, Carton D, Gonsior B, Kuehnlenz K, Landsiedel C, Mitsou N, de Nijs R, Zlotowski J, Sosnowski S, Strasser E, Tscheligi M, Weiss A, Wollherr D (2011) Towards proactive human-robot interaction in human environments. In: 2nd international conference on cognitive infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2011, pp 1–6
6.
Cakmak M, Srinivasa S, Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2011) Human preferences for robot-human hand-over configurations. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2011, pp 1986–1993
7.
Carlson T, Demiris Y (2008) Human-wheelchair collaboration through prediction of intention and adaptive assistance. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3926–3931
8.
Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Pecora F, Rasconi R (2007) Supporting interaction in the robocare intelligent assistive environment. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring symposium on interaction challenges for intelligent assistants. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 18–25
9.
Chella A, Dindo H, Infantino I (2006) A cognitive framework for imitation learning. Robot Auton Syst 54(5):403–408 CrossRef
10.
Choi HJ, Mark LS (2004) Scaling affordances for human reach actions. Hum Mov Sci 23(6):785–806 CrossRef
11.
Clark HH (2003) Pointing and placing. In: Kita S (ed) Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 243–268
12.
Clodic A, Cao H, Alili S, Montreuil V, Alami R, Chatila R (2009) Shary: a supervision system adapted to human-robot interaction. In: Khatib O, Kumar V, Pappas G (eds) Experimental robotics. Springer tracts in advanced robotics, vol 54. Springer, Berlin, pp 229–238 CrossRef
13.
Cramer HS, Kemper NA, Amin A, Evers V (2009) The effects of robot touch and proactive behaviour on perceptions of human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction (HRI), pp 275–276 CrossRef
14.
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 362(1480):679–704 CrossRef
15.
Dehais F, Sisbot EA, Alami R, Causse M (2011) Physiological and subjective evaluation of a human-robot object hand-over task. Appl Ergon 42(6):785–792 CrossRef
16.
Duong T, Bui H, Phung D, Venkatesh S (2005) Activity recognition and abnormality detection with the switching hidden semi-Markov model. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 838–845
17.
Eimler SC, Krämer NC, Patten AMVD (2010) Prerequisites for human-agent- and human-robot interaction: towards an integrated theory. In: Trappl R (ed) European meetings on cybernetics and systems research (EMCSR)
18.
19.
Gardner DL, Mark LS, Ward JA, Edkins H (2001) How do task characteristics affect the transitions between seated and standing reaches? Ecol Psychol 13(4):245–274 CrossRef
20.
Gharbi M, Cortes J, Simeon T (2008) A sampling-based path planner for dual-arm manipulation. In: IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, pp 383–388
21.
Gredeback G, Kochukhova O (2010) Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study. Exp Brain Res 202:493–497 CrossRef
22.
Kozima HY (2001) In search of otogenetic prerequisites for embodied social intelligence. In: Proceedings of the workshop on emergence and development on embodied cognition (EDEC-2001); international conference on cognitive science (ICCS-2001), pp 30–34
23.
Hoffman G (2010) Anticipation in human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring symposium
24.
Holthaus P, Lutkebohle I, Hanheide M, Wachsmuth S (2010) Can I help you? In: Ge S, Li H, Cabibihan JJ, Tan Y (eds) Social robotics. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6414. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–334 CrossRef
25.
26.
Huber M, Knoll A, Brandt T, Glasauer S (2009) Handing over a cube. In: Basic and clinical aspects of vertigo and dizziness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol 1164, pp 380–382
27.
Iio T, Shiomi M, Shinozawa K, Akimoto T, Shimohara K, Hagita N (2011) Investigating entrainment of people’s pointing gestures by robot’s gestures using a WOz method. Int J Soc Robot 3:405–414. doi:10.​1007/​s12369-011-0112-0 CrossRef
28.
Imai M, Ono T, Ishiguro H (2003) Physical relation and expression: joint attention for human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 50(4):636–643 CrossRef
29.
Jordan JS, Hunsinger M (2008) Learned patterns of action effect anticipation contribute to the spatial displacement of continuously moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 113–124
30.
Kemp C, Edsinger A, Torres-Jara E (2007) Challenges for robot manipulation in human environments. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):20–29 CrossRef
31.
Kennedy WG, Bugajska MD, Harrison AM, Trafton JG (2009) “like-me” simulation as an effective and cognitively plausible basis for social robotics. Int J Soc Robot 1(2):181–194 CrossRef
32.
Khatib O, Demircan E, Sapio VD, Sentis L, Besier T, Delp S (2009) Robotics-based synthesis of human motion. J Physiol 103:211–219
33.
Kockler H, Scheef L, Tepest R, David N, Bewernick B, Newen A, Schild H, May M, Vogeley K (2010) Visuospatial perspective taking in a dynamic environment: perceiving moving objects from a first-person-perspective induces a disposition to act. Conscious Cogn 19(3):690–701 CrossRef
34.
Kwon WY, Suh IH (2010) Probabilistic temporal prediction for proactive action selection. In: IROS workshop on probabilistic graphical models in robotics, GraphBot
35.
Kwon WY, Suh IH (2011) Towards proactive assistant robots for human assembly tasks. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI’11. ACM, New York, pp 175–176
36.
L’Abbate M (2007) Modelling proactive behaviour of conversational interfaces. Ph.D. thesis, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt
37.
Lemaignan S, Ros R, Sisbot E, Alami R, Beetz M (2012) Grounding the interaction: anchoring situated discourse in everyday human-robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 4:181–199 CrossRef
38.
39.
Lohse M (2010) Investigating the influence of situations and expectations on user behavior-empirical analyses in human-robot interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Bielefeld
40.
Louwerse M, Bangerter A (2005) Focusing attention with deictic gestures and linguistic expressions. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society
41.
Marin-Urias L, Sisbot E, Pandey A, Tadakuma R, Alami R (2009) Towards shared attention through geometric reasoning for human robot interaction. In: 9th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids), pp 331–336
42.
Nicolescu M, Mataric M (2001) Learning and interacting in human-robot domains. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part A, Syst Hum 31(5):419–430 CrossRef
43.
Pandey A, Alami R (2010) Mightability maps: a perceptual level decisional framework for co-operative and competitive human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 5842–5848
44.
Pandey AK, Alami R (2011) Towards task understanding through multi-state visuo-spatial perspective taking for human-robot interaction. In: IJCAI workshop on agents learning interactively from human teachers (ALIHT-IJCAI)
45.
Pardowitz M, Dillmann R (2007) Towards life-long learning in household robots: the piagetian approach. In: IEEE 6th international conference on development and learning (ICDL), pp 88–93
46.
Ros R, Lemaignan S, Sisbot E, Alami R, Steinwender J, Hamann K, Warneken F (2010) Which one? Grounding the referent based on efficient human-robot interaction. In: IEEE RO-MAN, 2010, pp 570–575
47.
Salichs M, Barber R, Khamis A, Malfaz M, Gorostiza J, Pacheco R, Rivas R, Corrales A, Delgado E, Garcia D (2006) Maggie: a robotic platform for human-robot social interaction. In: IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics, pp 1–7
48.
Sapio V, Warren J, Khatib O (2006) Predicting reaching postures using a kinematically constrained shoulder model. In: Lennarcic J, Roth B (eds) Advances in robot kinematics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–218 CrossRef
49.
Saut JP, Sahbani A, Perdereau V (2011) A generic motion planner for robot multi-fingered manipulation. Adv Robot 25(1–2):23–46 CrossRef
50.
Saut JP, Sidobre D (2012) Efficient models for grasp planning with a multi-fingered hand. Robot Auton Syst 60(3):347–357 CrossRef
51.
52.
Schmid A, Weede O, Worn H (2007) Proactive robot task selection given a human intention estimate. In: 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 726–731
53.
Schrempf O, Hanebeck U, Schmid A, Worn H (2005) A novel approach to proactive human-robot cooperation. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (Ro-MAN), pp 555–560
54.
55.
Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2009) Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Top Cogn Sci 1(2):353–367 CrossRef
56.
Simeon T, Laumond PJ, Lamiraux F (2001) Move3d: a generic platform for path planning. In: 4th international symposium on assembly and task planning, pp 25–30
57.
Sisbot EA, Alami R (2012) A human-aware manipulation planner. IEEE Trans Robot 28(5):1045–1057 CrossRef
58.
Taha T, Miro JV, Dissanayake G (2008) Pomdp-based long-term user intention prediction for wheelchair navigation. In: ICRA, pp 3920–3925
59.
Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28(5):675–691
60.
Zwickel J (2009) Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking. Psychon Bull Rev 16:1089–1093 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Towards a Task-Aware Proactive Sociable Robot Based on Multi-state Perspective-Taking
verfasst von
Amit Kumar Pandey
Muhammad Ali
Rachid Alami
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0181-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

International Journal of Social Robotics 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Planning for Human–Robot Interaction in Socially Situated Tasks

OriginalPaper

EMYS—Emotive Head of a Social Robot

OriginalPaper

Recommendation Effects of a Social Robot for Advertisement-Use Context in a Shopping Mall

OriginalPaper

Making Social Robots More Attractive: The Effects of Voice Pitch, Humor and Empathy

OriginalPaper

Self-talk Discrimination in Human–Robot Interaction Situations for Supporting Social Awareness

OriginalPaper

Quantifying the Human Likeness of a Humanoid Robot

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise