Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Social Robotics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2017

14.01.2016

Does A Robot’s Touch Encourage Human Effort?

verfasst von: Masahiro Shiomi, Kayako Nakagawa, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Reo Matsumura, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norihiro Hagita

Erschienen in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper investigated the effects on a person being touched by a robot to motivate her. Human science literature has shown that touches to others facilitate efforts of touched people. On the other hand, in the human–robot interaction research field, past research has failed to focus on the effects of such touches from robots to people. A few studies reported negative impressions from people, even if a touch from a person to a robot left a positive impression. To reveal whether robot touch positively affects humans, we conducted an experiment where a robot requested participants to perform a simple and monotonous task with/without touch interaction between a robot and participants. Our experiment’s result showed that both touches from the robot to the participants and touches from the participants to the robot facilitated their efforts.
Vorheriger Artikel Editorial
Nächster Artikel The Influence of Prior Expectations of a Robot’s Lifelikeness on Users’ Intentions to Treat a Zoomorphic Robot as a Companion

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Nakagawa K, Shiomi M, Shinozawa K, Matsumura R, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Effect of robot’\(s\) active touch on people’\(s\) motivation. In: 6th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI2011), pp 465–472
2.
Aiello JR, Douthitt EA (2001) Social facilitation from triplett to electronic performance monitoring. Group Dyn 5:163–180CrossRef
3.
Forsyth D (1999) Group dynamics. Brooks/Cole-Wadsworth, New York
4.
Rickenberg R, Reeves B (2000) The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 49–56
5.
Woods S, Dautenhahn K, Kaouri C (2005) Is someone watching me?—consideration of social facilitation effects in human–robot interaction experiments. In: IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, pp 53–60
6.
Riether N, Hegel F, Wrede B, Horstmann G (2012) Social facilitation with social robots? In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 41–47
7.
BURGOON JUDEEK, BULLER DAVIDB, HALE JEROLDL, de TURCK MARKA (1984) Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Commun Res 10(3):351–378CrossRef
8.
Takemura K (1993) The effect of interpersonal sentiments on behavioral intention of helping behavior among japanese students. J Soc Psychol 133:675–681CrossRef
9.
Fisher JD, Rytting M, Heslin R (1976) Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry 39:416–421CrossRef
10.
Gueguen N (2002) Touch, awareness of touch, and compliance with a request. Percept Motor Skills 95(2):355–360CrossRef
11.
Gueguen N, Jacob C, Boulbry G (2007) The effect of touch on compliance with a restaurant’s employee suggestion. Int J Hosp Manag 26(4):1019–1023CrossRef
12.
Willis F, Smith D, Gier J (1982) Interpersonal touch and compliance with a marketing request. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 3:35–38CrossRef
13.
Hornik J (1992) Effects of physical contact on customersf shopping time and behavior. Market Lett 3:49–55CrossRef
14.
Goller M, Kerscher T, Ziegenmeyer M, Ronnau A, Zollner JM, Dillmann R (2009) Haptic control for the interactive behavior operated shopping trolley InBOT. In: Proceedings of the new frontiers in human–robot interaction workshop convention on AISB2009
15.
Onishi M, Luo ZW, Odashima T, Hirano S, Tahara K, Mukai T (2007) Generation of human care behaviors by human-interactive robot ri-man. In: ICRA, pp 3128–3129
16.
Wada Kazuyoshi, Shibata Takanori (2007) Living with seal robots: its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):972–980CrossRef
17.
Shibata T, Tanie K (2001) Physical and affective interaction between human andmental commit robot. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on robotics & automation, Seoul, Korea. pp 2572–2577. Accessed on 21–26 May 2001
18.
Chaplin WF, Phillips JB, Brown JD, Clanton NR, Stein JL (2000) Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 79:110–117CrossRef
19.
Nakagawa Kayako, Shiomi Masahiro, Shinozawa Kazuhiko, Matsumura Reo, Ishiguro Hiroshi, Hagita Norihiro (2012) Effect of robot’s whispering behavior on people’s motivation. Int J Soc Robot 4(2):5–16
20.
Salter T, Michaud F, Létourneau D, Lee DC, Werry IP (2007) Using proprioceptive sensors for categorizing human–robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI ’07, ACM, New York, pp 105–112
21.
Cooney MD, Becker-Asano C, Kanda T, Alissandrakis A, Ishiguro H (2010) Full-body gesture recognition using inertial sensors for playful interaction with small humanoid robot. In: IROS’10, pp 2276–2282
22.
Dan Stiehl W, Lee JK, Toscano RL, Breazeal C (2008) The design of a semi-autonomous robot avatar for family communication and education. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN2008), pp 166–173
23.
Cramer H, Kemper N, Amin A, Wielinga B, Evers V (2009) ‘give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy on people’s responses to embodied social agents. Comput Anim Virtual Worlds 20(2–3):437–445CrossRef
24.
Cramer H, Kemper N, Amin A, Evers V (2009) Touched by robots: effects of physical contact and robot proactiveness. In: Workshop on the Reign of Catz and Dogz in CHI
25.
Chen TL, King C-H, Thomaz AL, Kemp CC (2011) Touched by a robot: an investigation of subjective responses to robot-initiated touch. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction, HRI ’11, ACM, New York, pp 457–464
26.
Kahn PH, Freier NG, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Ruckert JH, Severson RL, Kane SK (2008) Design patterns for sociality in human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction (HRI2008), pp 97–104
27.
Melson GF, Kahn PH Jr, Beck AM, Friedman B, Roberts T, Garrett E (2005) Robots as dogs?: children’s interactions with the robotic dog aibo and a live australian shepherd. In: CHI ’05: extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 1649–1652
28.
Kawai H, Toda T, Ni J, Tsuzaki M, Tokuda K (2004) XIMERA: a new TTS from ATR based on corpus-based technologies. In: Proceedings of fifth ISCA workshop on speech synthesis (SSW), pp 179–184
29.
Essick GK, James A, McGlone FP (1999) Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch. Neuroreport 10(10):2083–2087CrossRef
30.
Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: a tale of two markets. Am Psychol Soc 15(11):787–793
31.
Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann
32.
Fukuda H, Shiomi M, Nakagawa K, Ueda K (2012) emidas touchf in human–robot interaction: evidence from event-related potentials during the ultimatum game. In: Proceedings of 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 131–132
33.
Nomura T, Takagi S (2011) Exploring effects of educational backgrounds and gender in human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on user science and engineering, pp 24–29
34.
Nomura T, Sasa M (2009) Investigation of differences on impressions of and behaviors toward real and virtual robots between elder people and university students. In: IEEE 11th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 934–939
35.
Nomura T, Tasaki T, Kanda T, Shiomi M, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Questionnaire-based social research on opinions of japanese visitors for communication robots at an exhibition. AI Soc 21(1–2):167–183
36.
Shibata Takanori (2011) Importance of physical interaction between human and robot for therapy. HCI 8:437–447
Metadaten
Titel
Does A Robot’s Touch Encourage Human Effort?
verfasst von
Masahiro Shiomi
Kayako Nakagawa
Kazuhiko Shinozawa
Reo Matsumura
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Norihiro Hagita
Publikationsdatum
14.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0339-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour

Editorial

Editorial

OriginalPaper

Teaching Psychomotor Skills to Autistic Children by Employing a Robotic Training Kit: A Pilot Study

OriginalPaper

The Influence of Prior Expectations of a Robot’s Lifelikeness on Users’ Intentions to Treat a Zoomorphic Robot as a Companion

OriginalPaper

Towards Engagement Models that Consider Individual Factors in HRI: On the Relation of Extroversion and Negative Attitude Towards Robots to Gaze and Speech During a Human–Robot Assembly Task

OriginalPaper

A Model for Generating Socially-Appropriate Deictic Behaviors Towards People

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise