nach oben

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Erschienen in:

06.10.2018

An online course design checklist: development and users’ perceptions

verfasst von: Sally J. Baldwin, Yu-Hui Ching

Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study examines users’ perceptions of an online course design checklist. We created the Online Course Design Checklist (OCDC) to help highlight very basic criteria that may improve the quality of online courses. The OCDC highlights criteria that should not be ignored during online course development. It is based on components of established instructional design principles and existing online course design evaluation instruments. To understand course designers’ perception of the OCDC, we surveyed nineteen current and prospective online instructors on their use of it. Participants found the OCDC facilitated online course design by providing criteria to consider before, during, and after online course design.

Vorheriger Artikel Understanding the continued use of flipped classroom instruction: a personal beliefs model in Chinese higher education

Nächster Artikel Examining the acceptance and use of online social networks by preservice teachers within the context of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Arriaga, A. F., Bader, A. M., Wong, J. M., Lipsitz, S. R., Berry, W. R., Ziewacz, J. E., et al. (2013). Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1204720.CrossRef

Baldwin, S. J. (2017). Adaptation and acceptance in online course design from four-year college and university instructors: An analysis using grounded theory. Doctoral dissertation. https://doi.org/10.18122/B28T4W.

Baldwin, S., Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2018). Online course design: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215.

Berk, R. A. (2013). Face-to-face versus online course evaluations: A “consumer’s guide” to seven strategies. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 140–148.

Blackboard. (2017). Blackboard exemplary course program rubric. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://community.blackboard.com/docs/DOC-3505-blackboard-exemplary-course-program-rubric.

California Community College Online Education Initiative. (2016). Course design rubric for the online education initiative. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://ccconlineed.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/OEI_CourseDesignRubric_Nov2016-3.pdf.

California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2016). Online course design standards. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://ccconlineed.org/faculty-resources/professional-development/online-course-design-standards/.

California State University. (2015a). Quality assurance for blended and online courses. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://courseredesign.csuprojects.org/wp/qualityassurance/quality-matters/.

California State University. (2015b). CSU QLT informal review instruments. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://courseredesign.csuprojects.org/wp/qualityassurance/qlt-non-award-instruments/.

Chao, I. T., Saj, T., & Hamilton, D. (2010). Using collaborative course development to achieve online course quality standards. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 106–126.CrossRef

Choi, S. Y., & Ahn, S. H. (2010). Quality assurance for online programs. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 2(4), 88–94.CrossRef

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.CrossRef

Fink, L. D. (2003). A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma, 27, 1–33.

Garrett, R., & Legon, R. (2017). The changing landscape of online education (CHLOE) 2017. Quality Matters and Eduventures. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/CHLOE-First-Survey-Report.pdf.

Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Stoney, S., & Willis, J. (2001). Quality guidelines for online courses: The development of an instrument to audit online units. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.) Meeting at the crossroads: Proceedings of ASCILITE 2001 (pp. 263–270). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.

Hoffman, G. L. (2012). Using the Quality Matters rubric to improve online cataloging courses. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(2–3), 158–171.CrossRef

Hosie, P., Schibeci, R., & Backhaus, A. (2005). A framework and checklists for evaluating online learning in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500187097.CrossRef

Huguet, M. P. C. (2008). Rethinking instructional design: Considering the instructor—A case study. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (UMI No. 3319550).

Illinois Online Network. (2015). Quality online course initiative rubric & checklist. University of Illinois. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://www.ion.uillinois.edu/resources/qoci.asp.

Johnson, H., Mejia, M. C., & Cook, K. (2015, June). Successful online courses in California community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_615HJR.pdf.

Kleen, B., & Soule, L. (2010). Reflections on online course design—Quality Matters™ evaluation and student feedback: An exploratory study. Issues in Information Systems, 11(2), 152–161.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.CrossRef

Mandernach, B. J., Donnelli, E., Dailey, A., & Schulte, M. (2005). A faculty evaluation model for online instructors: Mentoring and evaluation in the online classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(3), 1–10.

Mann, B. L. (2006). Conducting formative evaluations of online instructional materials. In B. L. Mann (Ed.), Selected styles in web-based educational research (pp. 232–242). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.CrossRef

Mariasingam, M. (2005). Quality criteria and benchmarks for online degree programs. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (UMI No. 305378650).

Mathes, J. (2017). OSCQR course design review for quality of online course design. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/oscqrquality/.

McGahan, S. J., Jackson, C. M., & Premer, K. (2015). Online course quality assurance: Development of a quality checklist. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 126–140.

Oliver, M. (2000). An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 20–30.

Online Learning Consortium. (2015). The open SUNY COTE quality review (OSCQR) process and rubric. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from http://oscqr.org/.

Online Learning Consortium. (2017). OLC OSCQR course design review. Retrieved October 5, 2018 from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/oscqr-course-design-review/.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2002). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Parscal, T., & Riemer, D. (2010). Assuring quality in large-scale online course development. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(2), 1–6.

Patton, M. Q. (2003). Utilization-focused evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 223–242). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Quality Matters. (2016). Course design rubric standards. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric.

Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset. Volume II: The paradox of faculty voices—Views and experiences with online learning. Results of a national faculty survey, part of the online education benchmarking study. Conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning. Association of Public and Land-grant Universities.

Simpson, J. M. (2012). Student perceptions of quality and satisfaction in online education. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3550086).

Taylor, A., & McQuiggan, C. (2008). Faculty development programming: If we build it, will they come? Educause Quarterly, 31(3), 28–37.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York, NY: Penguin.

The Open SUNY Center for Online Teaching Excellence. (2016). OSCQR. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://bbsupport.sln.suny.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/OSCQR/OSCQR-Links-BKP-2016-08-09.html.

Weschke, B., & Canipe, S. (2010). The faculty evaluation process: The first step in fostering professional development in an online university. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 45–57.

Yang, Y., & Cornelious, L. F. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, VIII(c), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.118.

York, C. S., & Ertmer, P. A. (2011). Towards an understanding of instructional design heuristics: An exploratory Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 841–863.CrossRef

Titel: An online course design checklist: development and users’ perceptions
verfasst von: Sally J. Baldwin
Yu-Hui Ching
Publikationsdatum: 06.10.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9199-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Modeling educational usage of social media in pre-service teacher education

3D learning spaces and activities fostering users’ learning, acceptance, and creativity

An analysis of the orthographic errors found in university students’ asynchronous digital writing

An investigation of plagiarism software use and awareness training on English as a foreign language (EFL) students

Professional development for online faculty: instructors’ perspectives on cultivating technical, pedagogical and content knowledge in a distance program

Using Twitter as a pedagogical tool in two classrooms: a comparative case study between an education and a communication class

Premium Partner