Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cognitive Computation
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation 2/2015

01.04.2015

Sentilo: Frame-Based Sentiment Analysis

verfasst von: Diego Reforgiato Recupero, Valentina Presutti, Sergio Consoli, Aldo Gangemi, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sentilo is an unsupervised, domain-independent system that performs sentiment analysis by hybridizing natural language processing techniques and semantic Web technologies. Given a sentence expressing an opinion, Sentilo recognizes its holder, detects the topics and subtopics that it targets, links them to relevant situations and events referred to by it and evaluates the sentiment expressed on each topic/subtopic. Sentilo relies on a novel lexical resource, which enables a proper propagation of sentiment scores from topics to subtopics, and on a formal model expressing the semantics of opinion sentences. Sentilo provides its output as a RDF graph, and whenever possible it resolves holders’ and topics’ identity on Linked Data.
Vorheriger Artikel Resonance Elicits Diffusion: Modeling Subjectivity for Retweeting Behavior Analysis
Nächster Artikel Word Embedding Composition for Data Imbalances in Sentiment and Emotion Classification

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
EuroSentiment EU FP7 project. http://​eurosentiment.​eu/​, 2014.
 
2
F1 measures.
 
4
 
5
F1 measures.
 
8
Prefix dul: stands for http://​www.​ontologydesignpa​tterns.​org/​ont/​dul/​DUL.​owl and prefix rdf: stands for http://​www.​w3.​org/​1999/​02/​22-rdf-syntax-ns#; prefix fred: refers to a locally defined namespace that can be customized by users.
 
9
Prefix vn.data: refers to VerbNet [5].
 
10
Notice that this process can be recursive, and the role of main topic/subtopic in such cases would be contextual to the current iteration.
 
13
Users can choose between the two by means of a selection box included in the graphical user interface of Sentilo prototype available at http://​wit.​istc.​cnr.​it/​sentilo-release/​sentilo.
 
14
We also include in the table the respective sentiment scores.
 
15
We omit the prefix sentilo: for the sake of readability and brevity.
 
Literatur
1.
Alm CO, Roth D, Sproat R. Emotions from text: machine learning for text-based emotion prediction. In: Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP, Vancouver, Canada, 2005. p. 347–54.
2.
Baccianella A, Esuli S, Sebastiani F. SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Calzolari N, Choukri K, Maegaard B, Mariani J, Odijk J, Piperidis S, Rosner M, Tapias D, editors. Proceedings of the seventh conference on international language resources and evaluation (LREC’10). Malta: Valletta; 2010.
3.
Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T. Linked data: the story so far. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst. 2009;5(3):1–22.CrossRef
4.
Bos J. Wide-coverage semantic analysis with Boxer. In: Proceedings of the 2008 conference on semantics in text processing (STEP ’08), Stroudsburg, USA, 2008. p. 277–86.
5.
Brown SW, Dligach D, Palmer M. VerbNet class assignment as a WSD task. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on computational semantics (IWCS ’11), Stroudsburg, USA, 2011. p. 85–94.
6.
Cai K, Spangler S, Chen Y, Zhang L. Leveraging sentiment analysis for topic detection. Web Intell Agent Syst. 2010;8(3):291–302.
7.
Cambria E, Grassi M, Hussain A, Havasi C. Sentic computing for social media marketing. Multimed Tools Appl. 2012;59(2):557–77.CrossRef
8.
Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic computing: techniques, tools, and applications, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
9.
Cambria E, Hussain A, Havasi C, Eckl C. Common sense computing: from the society of mind to digital intuition and beyond. In: Fierrez J, Ortega-Garcia J, Esposito A, Drygajlo A, Faundez-Zanuy M, editors. Biometric ID management and multimodal communication. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 5707. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 252–9.CrossRef
10.
Cambria E, Schuller B, Xia Y, Havasi C. New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intell Syst. 2013;28(2):15–21.CrossRef
11.
Cambria E, Song Y, Wang H, Hussain A. Isanette: a common and common sense knowledge base for opinion mining. In: Spiliopoulou M, Wang H, Cook D, Pei J, Wang W, Zaiane O, Wu X, editors. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM), 2011; p. 315–22.
12.
Cambria E, Olsher D, Rajagopal D. Senticnet 3: a common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition–driven sentiment analysis. In: Brodley CE, Stone P, editors. Twenty-eight AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press; 2014.
13.
Chen H, Wuand Z, Cudré-Mauroux P. Semantic web meets computational intelligence: state of the art and perspectives. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2012;7(2):67–74.CrossRef
14.
Das D, Bandyopadhyay S. Sentence-level emotion and valence tagging. Cognit Comput. 2012;4(4):420–35.CrossRef
15.
Elliott CD. The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system. PhD thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, USA, 1992. UMI O. No. GAX92-29901.
16.
Fellbaum C. WordNet: an electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1998.
17.
Gangemi A, Presutti V. Towards a pattern science for the semantic web. Semant. Web. 2010;1(1,2):61–8.
18.
Gangemi A, Presutti V, Reforgiato Recupero D. Frame-based detection of opinion holders and topics: a model and a tool. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2014;9(1):20–30.
19.
Goertzel B, Silverman K, Hartley C, Bugaj S, Ross M. The baby webmind project. In: Proceedings of The annual conference of the society for the study of artificial intelligence and the simulation of behaviour (AISB); 2000. p. 147–48
20.
Hu M, Liu B. Mining opinion features in customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 19th national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI’04); 2004. p. 755–60
21.
Johansson R, Moschitti A. Relational features in fine-grained opinion analysis. Comput Linguist. 2013;39(3):473–509.CrossRef
22.
Kamp H. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk JAG, Janssen TMV, Stokhof MBJ, editors. Formal methods in the study of language, vol. 1. Amsterdam, NE: Mathematisch Centrum; 1981. p. 277–322.
23.
Kazemzadeh A, Lee S, Narayanan SS. Fuzzy logic models for the meaning of emotion words. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2013;8(2):34–49.CrossRef
24.
Lau R, Xia Y, Ye Y. A probabilistic generative model for mining cybercriminal networks from online social media. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2014;9(1):31–43.CrossRef
25.
Lehmann J, Isele R, Jakob M, Jentzsch A, Kontokostas D, Mendes PN, et al. DBpedia - a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semantic Web J. 2014.
26.
Levin B. English verb classes and alternations a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993.
27.
Lin C, He Y, Everson R, Ruger S. Weakly supervised joint sentiment-topic detection from text. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2012;24(6):1134–45.CrossRef
28.
Liu B. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies. Morgan&Claypool Publishers; 2012.
29.
Nicolov N, Salvetti F, Martin J, Liberman M. Computational approaches to analysing weblogs: papers from 2006 AAAI spring symposium. Menlo Park, USA: AAAI Press; 2006.
30.
Pang B, Lee L. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL ’04), Barcelona, Spain, 2004.
31.
Pang B, Lee L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis, volume 2 of Foundations and trends in information retrieval. now Publishers Inc., Delft, Netherlands, 2008.
32.
Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP ’02), vol. 10, Stroudsburg, USA, 2002. p. 79–86.
33.
Presutti V, Draicchio F, Gangemi A. Knowledge extraction based on discourse representation theory and linguistic frames. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, volume 7603 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, DE: Springer; 2012. p. 114–29.
34.
Saif H, He Y, Alani H.: Semantic sentiment analysis of twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on the semantic web (ISWC’12), volume Part I. Boston, MA: Springer; 2012. p. 508–24
35.
36.
37.
Socher R, Perelygin A, Wu J, Chuang J, Manning C, Ng A, Potts C. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2013), 2013.
38.
39.
Somasundaran S, Wiebe J, Ruppenhofer J. Discourse level opinion interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING ’08), vol. 11, Manchester, UK; 2008. p. 801–8.
40.
Sood SO, Owsley S, Hammond KJ, Birnbaum L. Reasoning through search: a novel approach to sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 16th international world wide web (WWW) conference, Banff, Canada, 2007.
41.
Sood SO, Vasserman L. ESSE: exploring mood on the web. In: Proceedings of the international conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM), Seattle, USA, 2009.
42.
Tam DN. Computation in emotional processing: quantitative confirmation of proportionality hypothesis for angry unhappy emotional intensity to perceived loss. Cognit Comput. 2011;3(2):394–415.CrossRef
43.
Titov I, McDonald R. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In: Proceedings of the 17th international world wide web (WWW) conference, Beijing, China, 2008. p. 111–20.
44.
Turney PD. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL ’02), Philadelphia, PA, 2002. p. 417–24.
45.
46.
Wiebe J, Wilson T, Cardie C. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Lang Resour Eval. 2005;39(2–3):165–210.CrossRef
47.
Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing (HLT ’05), Vancouver, Canada, 2005. p. 347–54
Metadaten
Titel
Sentilo: Frame-Based Sentiment Analysis
verfasst von
Diego Reforgiato Recupero
Valentina Presutti
Sergio Consoli
Aldo Gangemi
Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9302-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Cognitive Computation 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Twitter Sentiment Analysis for Large-Scale Data: An Unsupervised Approach

OriginalPaper

AspNet: Aspect Extraction by Bootstrapping Generalization and Propagation Using an Aspect Network

OriginalPaper

Word Embedding Composition for Data Imbalances in Sentiment and Emotion Classification

OriginalPaper

Propagating and Aggregating Fuzzy Polarities for Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis

OriginalPaper

Resonance Elicits Diffusion: Modeling Subjectivity for Retweeting Behavior Analysis

EditorialNotes

Sentic Computing

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise