Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 5/2010

01.10.2010 | Research Paper

Proposal for Components of Method Design Theories

Increasing the Utility of Method Design Artefacts

verfasst von: Dr. Philipp Offermann, Dipl.-Inform. Sören Blom, Dipl.-Ing. Olga Levina, Dr. Udo Bub

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Gregor and Jones have proposed components for design theories, building on theory concepts from behavioural sciences and prior publications. Their design theory structure addresses IT artefacts in general, not specific to any type, such as constructs, models, methods or instantiations. Their work is an important contribution to the academic discussion of design theories. The authors are building on this and believe that specialised design theory structures for different types of artefacts further increases utility, usability and acceptance of the components for both academia and practise. They have analysed each of the components published by Gregor and Jones and proposed refinements specific to method design artefacts wherever applicable. For each component, they derive evaluation criteria and present examples of method publications fulfilling the criteria. They argue that by presenting method design theories according to this structure the contribution of method design artefacts to the body of knowledge will increase.
Vorheriger Artikel Consortium Research
Nächster Artikel Enterprise Mashup Systems as Platform for Situational Applications

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Abeck S, Link S, Mayerl C, Mehl O, Vogel T (2005) A system supported method to design IT services. In: IEEE conference on integrated management (IM 2005), Nice
Aier S (2007) Integrationstechnologien als Basis einer nachhaltigen Unternehmensarchitektur – Abhängigkeiten zwischen Organisation und Informationstechnologie. GITO, Berlin
Aier S, Fischer C (2009a) Dokumentation und Fortschrittsbestimmung von Methoden zur Gestaltung soziotechnischer Systeme am Beispiel einer Methode zum Service Engineering. In: Hansen HR, Karagiannis D, Fill H-G (eds) 9. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik – Band 1, Wien
Aier S, Fischer C (2009b) Scientific progress of design research artefacts. In: 17th European conference on information systems, Verona
Alter S (2002) Sidestepping the IT artifact, scrapping the IS silo, and laying claim to “systems in organizations”. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12:494–526
Basili VR, Rombach HD (1987) Tailoring the software process to project goals and environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on software engineering, Monterey
Bass L, Clements P, Kazman R (2003) Software architecture in practise, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Braun C, Wortmann F, Hafner M, Winter R (2005) Method construction – a core approach to organizational engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on applied computing, Santa Fe
Brinkkemper S (1996) Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 38:275–280 CrossRef
Brinkkember S, Saeki M, Harmsen F (1999) Meta-modelling based assembly techniques for situational method engineering. Information Systems 24(3):209–228 CrossRef
Bucher T, Klesse M, Kurpjuweit S, Winter R (2007) Situational method engineering – on the differentiation of “context” and “project type”. In: Situational method engineering: fundamentals and experiences. Springer, Boston, pp 33–48 CrossRef
Cockburn A (2007) Agile software development. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River
Cushing BE (1990) Frameworks, paradigms and scientific research in management information systems. Journal of Information Systems 4(2):38–59
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–340 CrossRef
Davis FD, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8):982–1003 CrossRef
Dubin R (1978) Theory building. The Free Press, New York
Eberlein A, Jiang L (2007) Description of a process development methodology. Software Process Improvement and Practice 12:101–118 CrossRef
Fitzgerald B, Russo N, O’Kane T (2000) An empirical study of system development method tailoring in practise. In: Hansen HR, Bichler M, Mahrer H (eds) Proceedings of the eighth European conference on information systems, Vienna
Goldkuhl G (2004) Design theories in information systems – a need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2):59–72
Gregor S (2002) A theory of theories in information systems. In: Gregor S, Hart D (eds) Information systems foundations: building the theoretical base. Australian National University, Canberra, pp 1–20
Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3):611–642
Gregor S (2009) Building theory in the sciences of the artificial. In: DESRIST’09, Malvern
Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5):312–335
Greiffenberg S (2004) Methodenentwicklung in Wirtschaft und Verwaltung. Dr. Kovač, Hamburg
Guba EG (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communications and Technology Journal 29(2):75–91
Hafner MJ (2005) Entwicklung einer Methode für das Management der Informationssystemarchitektur im Unternehmen. Difo-Druck, Bamberg
Hafner M, Winter R (2005) Vorgehensmodell für das Management der unternehmensweiten Applikationsarchitektur. In: Ferstl O (ed) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005: eEconomy – eGovernment – eSociety. Bamberg
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1):75–105
Iivari J (2002) The IS core – VII: Towards information systems as a science of meta-artifacts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12:568–581
Iivari J, Hirschheim R, Klein HK (1998) A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Information Systems Research 9(2):164–193 CrossRef
Iivari J, Hirschheim R, Klein HK (2000–2001) A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3):179–218
ISO (2000) Industrial automation systems – requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies. ISO 15704
Jones D, Gregor S, Lynch T (2003) An information systems design theory for web-based education. In: IASTED international symposium on web-based education, Rhodes
Karlsson F (2008) A wiki-based approach to method tailoring. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on the pragmatic web: innovating the interactive society, Uppsala
Karlsson F, Ågerfalk PJ (2004) Method configuration: adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets. Information and Software Technology 46:619–633 CrossRef
Kitchenham B, Pickard L, Pfleeger SL (1995) Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software 12(4):52–62 CrossRef
March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15:251–266 CrossRef
Markus ML, Majchrzak A, Gasser L (2002) A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly 26(3):179–212
Moody DL (2003) The method evaluation model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: Ciborra CU, Mercurio R, de Marco M, Martinez M, Carignani A (eds) Proceedings of the eleventh European conference on information systems, Naples
Oei H, Falkenberg E (1994) Harmonisation of information systems modelling and specification techniques. In: Verrijn-Stuart AA, Olle TW (eds) Methods and associated tools for the information systems life Cycle. Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 151–168
Offermann P (2009) Eine Methode zur Konzeption betrieblicher Software mit einer Serviceorientierten Architektur. GITO, Berlin
Offermann P, Bub U (2009a) Empirical comparison of methods for information systems development according to SOA. In: 17th European conference on information systems, Verona
Offermann P, Bub U (2009b) A Method for information systems development according to SOA. In: AMCIS 2009 proceedings, Paper 108
Offermann P, Levina O, Schönherr M, Bub U (2009) Outline of a design science research process. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology, Philadelphia
Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2008) A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3):45–77 CrossRef
Plihon V, Rolland C (1997) Using a generic approach to support the construction of methods. In: Database and expert systems applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 663–672 CrossRef
Puketza NJ, Zhang K, Chung M, Mukherjee B, Olsson RA (1996) A methodology for testing intrusion detection systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22(10):719–729 CrossRef
Purao S (2002) Design research in the technology of information systems: truth or dare. GSU Department of CIS Working Paper
Ralyté J, Deneckère R, Rolland C (2003) Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In: Advanced information systems engineering. Springer, Berlin
Rossi M, Tolvanen J-P, Ramesh B, Lyytinen K, Kaipala J (2000) Method rationale in method engineering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii
Rossi M, Ramesh B, Lyytinen K, Tolvanen J-P (2004) Managing evolutionary method engineering by method rationale. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(9):356–391
Siau K, Rossi M (1998) Evaluation of information modeling methods – a review. In: Proc 31st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii
Simon H (1981) Sciences of the artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Song X, Osterweil LJ (1992) Toward objective, systematic design-method comparisons. IEEE Software 9(3):43–53 CrossRef
Stojanović Z (2005) A method for cComponent-based and service-oriented software systems engineering. Delft University of Technology
ter Hofstede AHM, Verhoef TF (1997) On the feasibility of situational method engineering. Information Systems 22(6/7):401–422 CrossRef
Travis J (1999) Exploring the constructs of evaluative criteria for interpretivist research. In: Proc. 10th Australasian conference on information systems
Vaishnavi VK, Kuechler W (2007) Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology. Auerbach
Venable JR (2006) The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In: DESRIST 2006, Claremont
Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1):36–59 CrossRef
Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (2004) Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 6(2):43–58
Walsham G (1995) Interpretative case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4(2):74–81 CrossRef
Wilde T, Hess T (2007) Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik – Eine empirische Untersuchung. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 49(4):280–287 CrossRef
Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing, Norwood
Metadaten
Titel
Proposal for Components of Method Design Theories
Increasing the Utility of Method Design Artefacts
verfasst von
Dr. Philipp Offermann
Dipl.-Inform. Sören Blom
Dipl.-Ing. Olga Levina
Dr. Udo Bub
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
SP Gabler Verlag
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2010
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-010-0120-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2010

Business & Information Systems Engineering 5/2010 Zur Ausgabe

State of the Art

Enterprise Mashup Systems as Platform for Situational Applications

Profile

Interview with Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. on “Toward a Broader Vision of IS Research”

Catchword

Ambient Intelligence

Imprint

Imprint

Research Paper

Explanatory Design Theory

Research Paper

Consortium Research