nach oben

Environmental Earth Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.08.2010 | Original Article

Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis

verfasst von: Aykut Akgun, Necdet Türk

Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents the results of geographical information system (GIS)-based landslide susceptibility mapping in Ayvalık, western Turkey using multi-criteria decision analysis. The methodology followed in the study includes data production, standardization, and analysis stages. A landslide inventory of the study area was compiled from aerial photographs, satellite image interpretations, and detailed field surveys. In total, 45 landslides were recorded and mapped. The areal extent of the landslides is 1.75 km². The identified landslides are mostly shallow-seated, and generally exhibit progressive character. They are mainly classified as rotational, planar, and toppling failures. In all, 51, 45, and 4% of the landslides mapped are rotational, planar, and toppling types, respectively. Morphological, geological, and land-use data were produced using existing topographical and relevant thematic maps in a GIS framework. The considered landslide-conditioning parameters were slope gradient, slope aspect, lithology, weathering state of the rocks, stream power index, topographical wetness index, distance from drainage, lineament density, and land-cover and vegetation density. These landslide parameters were standardized in a common data scale by fuzzy membership functions. Then, the degree to which each parameter contributed to landslides was determined using the analytical hierarchy process method, and the weight values of these parameters were calculated. The weight values obtained were assigned to the corresponding parameters, and then the weighted parameters were combined to produce a landslide susceptibility map. The results obtained from the susceptibility map were evaluated with the landslide location data to assess the reliability of the map. Based on the findings obtained in this study, it was found that 5.19% of the total area was prone to landsliding due to the existence of highly and completely weathered lithologic units and due to the adverse effects of topography and improper land use.

Vorheriger Artikel Hyperspectral remote sensing monitoring of pyrite mine wastes: a record of climate variability (Pyrite Belt, Spain)

Nächster Artikel Salt mapping in the Lower Macquarie area, Australia, using airborne electromagnetic data

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Akgun A (2007) GIS-based erosion and landslide susceptibility assessment of Ayvalık and ıts surrounding areas. Ph.D. thesis. Institute of Applied Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir (In Turkish), 400 p

Akgun A, Bulut F (2007) GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region. Env Geol 51:1377–1387CrossRef

Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Env Geol 54(6):1127–1143CrossRef

Akinci A, Taktak AG, Ergintav S (1994) Attenuation of coda waves in western Anatolia. Phys. Earth Planet Inter 87:155–165CrossRef

Akyol N, Zhu L, Mitchell B, Sozbilir H, Kekovali K (2006) Crustal structure and local seismicity in western Anatolia. Geophys J Int 166(3):1259–1269CrossRef

Akyurek B, Soysal Y (1981) Basic geological properties of the south part of Biga Peninsula (Savaştepe-Kırkağaç-Bergama Ayvalık). MTA J 95-96:1–13 (In Turkish)

Altunkaynak Ş, Yilmaz Y (1998) The Mount Kozak magmatic complex, Western Anatolia. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 85:211–231CrossRef

Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65:15–31CrossRef

Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslide in Sado Island of Japan: Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparison of results from two methods and verifications. Eng Geol 81:432–445CrossRef

Butler DR, Walsh SJ (1990) Lithologic, structural and topographic influences on snow-avalanche path location, Eastern Glacier National Park, Montana. Ann Assoc Am Geog 80(3):362–378CrossRef

Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessment of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three subcatchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72:250–271CrossRef

Carrara A (1983) A multivariate model for landslide hazard evaluation. Math Geol 15:403–426CrossRef

Carrara A, Cardinalli M, Detti R, Guzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Land 16(5):427–445CrossRef

Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzetti F, Reichenbach P (1995) GIS-based techniques for mapping landslide hazard. http://deis158.deis.unibo.it

Castellanos Abella EA, Van Westen CJ (2007) Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment by multicriteria analysis: a case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantanamo, Cuba. Geomorphology 94(3–4):453–466

Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environ Geol 44:949–962CrossRef

Chacon J, Irigaray C, Fernandez T, El Hamdouni R (2006) Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:341–411CrossRef

Chen X (2002) Using remote sensing and GIS to analyse land cover change and its impacts on regional sustainable development. Int J Remote Sens 23:107–124CrossRef

Chen H, Lee CF (2003) A dynamic model for rainfall-induced landslides on natural slopes. Geomorphology 51:269–288CrossRef

Chigira M, Yokoyama O (2005) Weathering profile of non-welded ignimbrite and the water infiltration behavior within it in relation to the generation of shallow landslides. Eng Geol 78:187–207CrossRef

Clerici A, Perego S, Tellini C, Vescovi P (2002) A procedure for landslide susceptibility zonation by the conditional analysis method. Geomorphology 48:349–364CrossRef

Congalton RG, Mead RA (1983) A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photointerpretation. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 49:69–74

Conrad O (2002) Digitales Gelände-modell (DiGeM) terrain analysis software. http://www.geogr.uni-goettingen.de/pg/saga/digem/. 18 April 2006

CORINE (1995) Land cover technical guide. European Commission, Luxemburg, pp 21–53

Dai FC, Lee CF (2001) Terrain-based mapping of landslide susceptibility using a geographical information systems: a case study. Can Geotech J 38:911–923CrossRef

Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modelling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–228CrossRef

Dai FC, Lee CF, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3):381–391CrossRef

De Fries RS, Chan JC-W (2000) Multiple criteria for evaluating machine learning algorithms for land cover classification from satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 74:503–515CrossRef

Donati L, Turrini MC (2002) An objective method to rank the importance of the parameters predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Appennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol 63:277–289CrossRef

Duman TY, Can T, Emre O, Kecer M, Dogan A, Ates S, Durmaz S (2005) Landslide inventory of Northwestern Anatolia. Eng Geol 77:99–114CrossRef

Eastman JR (1993) Decision theory and GIS. Proceedings, Africa GIS 93, UNITAR, Geneva

Eastman JR (2004) IDRISI Kilimanjaro: guide to GIS and ımage processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester, p 328

Ercan T, Satır M, Turkecan A, Akyurek B, Cevikbas A, Gunay E, Ates M, Can B (1986) Ayvalık çevresinin jeolojisi ve volkanik kayaların petrolojisi. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 27:11–19

Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730CrossRef

Ermini L, Filippo C, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66:327–343CrossRef

ESRI (2002) Getting to start ArcGIS. ESRI Books, USA

Gemitzi A, Petalas C, Tsihrintzis VA, Pisinaras V (2006) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a combination of GIS, fuzzy logic and decision making techniques. Environ Geol 49(5):653–673CrossRef

Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44:147–161CrossRef

Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81:65–83CrossRef

Gupta RP (2003) Remote sensing geology, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 655

Guzetti F, Carrarra A, Cardinal M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multiscale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216CrossRef

Hall FG, Towhshend JR, Engman ET (1995) Status of remote sensing algorithms for estimation of land surface state parameters. Remote Sens Environ 51:138–156CrossRef

Haralick RM, Sternberg SR, Zhuang X (1987) Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 9(4):532–550CrossRef

Huang X, Jensen R (1997) A machine-learning approach to automated knowledge-base building for remote sensing image analysis with GIS data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63:1185–1194

Hung LQ, Batelaan O, De Smedt F (2005) Lineament extraction and analysis, comparison of Landsat ETM and ASTER imagery. Case study: Suoimuoi tropical karst catchment, Vietnam. In: Ehlers M, Michel U (eds) Remote sensing for environmental monitoring. GIS applications, and geology V. Proceedings of the SPIE, vol 5983, pp 182–193

Ildır B (1995) Turkiyede heyelanlarin dagilimi ve afetler yasası ile ilgili uygulamalar. In: Onalp A (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd national landslide symposium. Sakarya University, Turkey, pp 1–9

ISRM (1981) In: Brown ET (ed) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring—ISRM suggested methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

Jensen JR (2000) Indroductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 319

Jollifee IT, Stephenson DB (2003) Forecast verification. A practitioner’s guide in atmospheric science. Wiley, New York, p 240

Kam TS (1995) Integrating GIS & RS techniques for urban land cover and land use analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57:655–668

Kavzoglu T, Mather PM (2003) The use of back-propagating artificial neural networks in land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 24:4907–4938CrossRef

Kıncal C, Akgun A, Koca MY (2009). Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Izmir (West Anatolia,Turkey) city center and its near vicinity by the logistic regression method. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0070-0

Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74:17–28CrossRef

Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle river, p 663

Lee S (2004) Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the universal soil loss equation and geographic ınformation system: a case study at Boun, Korea. Env Geol 45(4):457–465CrossRef

Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491CrossRef

Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113CrossRef

Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41CrossRef

Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2006) The application of artificial neural networks to landslide susceptibility mapping at Janghung, Korea. Math Geol 38(2):199–219CrossRef

Liu JG, Mason P, Hilton F, Lee H (2004) Detection of rapid erosion in SE Spain: a GIS approach based on ERS SAR coherence imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70(10):1197–1185

Lunetta RS, Elvidge CD (1998) Remote sensing change detection: environmental monitoring methods and applications. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, p 318

Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York, p 392

Mason PJ, Rosenbaum MS (2002) Geohazard mapping for predicting landslides: an example from the Langhe Hills in Piemonte, NW Italy. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 35:317–326CrossRef

Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 13(4):305–320

Moore ID, Lewis A, Gallant JC (1993) Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects. In: Jakeman AJ, Beek MJ, McAleer MJ (eds) Modelling change in environmental systems. Wiley, London

Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 94(3–4):401–418CrossRef

Ohlmacher CG, Davis CJ (2003) Using multiple regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69:331–343CrossRef

Pandey A, Dabral PP, Chowdary VM, Yadav NK (2007) Landslide hazard zonation using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Dikrong river basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Env Geol 54(7):1517–1529CrossRef

Pereıra JMC, Duckstein L (1993) A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Int J Geograph Inform Syst 75:407–424CrossRef

Popescu ME (1996) From landslide causes to landslide remediation. In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides. Proceedings of the 7th ınternational symposium of landslides. Trondheim, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 75–96

Rashed T, Weeks J (2003) Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 17(6):547–576CrossRef

Remondo J, Gonzalez A, Diaz De Teran JR, Cendrero A, Fabbri A, Cheng CF (2003) Validation of landslide susceptibility maps: examples and applications from a case study in Northern Spain. Nat Hazards 30(3):437–449CrossRef

Ridd KM, Liu J (1998) A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sens Environ 63:95–100CrossRef

Rogan J, Chen DM (2004) Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and lan-use change. Progress Plann 61(4):301–325CrossRef

Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

Sakellariou MG, Ferentinou MD (2001) GIS-based estimation of slope stability. Nat Hazards Rev 2(1):12–21CrossRef

Schuster RL, Fleming RW (1986) Economic losses and fatalities due to landslides. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 23:11–28

Selby MJ (1980) A rock mass strength classification for geomorphic purposes: with tests from Antarctica and New Zealand. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 24:31–51

Soeters R, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition analysis and zonation. In: Turner KT, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Special report no 247, Washington, DC, pp 129–177

Sunar F, Kaya S (1997) An assessment of geometric accuracy of remotely sensed images. Int J Remote Sens 18:3069–3074CrossRef

Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004a) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu Catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321CrossRef

Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004b) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679CrossRef

Terlien MT, Van Westen CJ, Van Asch ThW (1995) Deterministic modelling in GIS-based landslide hazard assessment. In: Carrara A, Guzetti F (eds) Geographical information Systems in assessing in natural hazards. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 57–77

USGS (1993) USCS data user guide 5 for DEM’s. ftp://mapping.usgs.gov/pub/ti/DEM/demguide. Accessed 12 April 2006

Vaiopoulos D, Nikolakopoulos K, Skianis G, Korompilis G, Antonakakis A (2002) Erosion risk and desertification risk at Pyrgos, Greece. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Management information systems 2002: GIS and remote sensing, vol 26, 448 pp

Van Westen CJ, Bonilla JBA (1990) Mountain hazard analysis using PC-based GIS. 6th IAEG Congress, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 265–271

Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30(3):399–419CrossRef

Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65:167–184CrossRef

Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides analysis and control. Special Report, vol 176. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, New York, pp 12–33

Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion Ltd, London

Weier J, Herring D (2005) Measuring vegetation (NDVI and EVI), Earth Observatory Library of NASA

Wood EF, Sıvapalan M, Beven KJ (1990) Similarity and scale catchment storm response. Rev Geophys 28:1–18CrossRef

Yalcın A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 1:1–12

Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a moderate scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79:251–266CrossRef

Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 12(2):94–102CrossRef

Titel: Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis
verfasst von: Aykut Akgun
Necdet Türk
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2010
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Environmental Earth Sciences / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0373-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Household dust and street sediment as an indicator of recent heavy metals in atmospheric emissions: a case study on a previously heavily contaminated area

Upcoming international events

A geostatistical approach for mapping and uncertainty assessment of geogenic radon gas in soil in an area of southern Italy

Application of chemometric methods to analyze the distribution and chemical fraction patterns of metals in sediment from a metropolitan river

Hydrogeochemistry of Roccamonfina volcano (Southern Italy)

Salt mapping in the Lower Macquarie area, Australia, using airborne electromagnetic data