Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics
Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 5/2020

02.03.2020 | Original Article

A general conflict analysis model based on three-way decision

verfasst von: Guangming Lang

Erschienen in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In a three-valued situation table, researchers have investigated the relationship between two agents by using auxiliary and distance functions, and proposed several models of conflict analysis for trisecting the set of all pairs of agents. But we have not observed a unification of these conflict analysis models. In this paper, we introduce the concepts of conditional alliance and conflict evaluations of two agents towards a subset of issues. In the framework of three-way decision, we propose a general model of three-way conflict analysis, and study three levels of conflict between two agents. We illustrate that five models of conflict analysis for trisecting the set of all pairs of agents are special cases of the general model, and provide a deep insight into the models of conflict analysis based on three-way decision.
Vorheriger Artikel Using single axioms to characterize L-rough approximate operators with respect to various types of L-relations
Nächster Artikel Optimal scale selection by integrating uncertainty and cost-sensitive learning in multi-scale decision tables

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
1.
Azam N, Zhang Y, Yao JT (2017) Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets. Eur J Oper Res 261:704–714MathSciNetMATH
2.
Deja R (2002) Conflict analysis. Int J Intell Syst 17:235–253MATH
3.
Deja R (2003) Rough set approach to conflict analysis. In: Inuiguchi M, Hirano S, Tsumoto S (eds) Rough set theory and granular computing. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer, Berlin, 211 pMATH
4.
Deng XF, Yao YY, Yao JT (2014) On interpreting three-way decisions through two-way decisions. In: International symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems, ISMIS2014, Roskilde, Denmark, June 25-27, LNCS(LNAI), vol 8502, pp 73–82
5.
Fan Y, Qi JJ, Wei L (2018) A conflict analysis model based on three-way decisions. In: International joint conference on rough sets, IJCRS 2018, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 20-24, LNCS(LNAI), vol 11103, pp 522–532
6.
Hao C, Li JH, Fan M, Liu WQ, Eric CC (2017) Tsang, Optimal scale selection in dynamic multi-scale decision tables based on sequential three-way decisions. Inf Sci 415–416:213–232
7.
He XL, Wei L, She YH (2018) L-fuzzy concept analysis for three-way decisions: basic definitions and fuzzy inference mechanisms. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1857–1867
8.
Hu MJ, Yao YY (2019) Structured approximations as a basis for three-way decisions in rough set theory. Knowl-Based Syst 165:92–109
9.
Huang CC, Li JH, Mei CL, Wu WZ (2017) Three-way concept learning based on cognitive operators: an information fusion viewpoint. Int J Approx Reason 83:218–242MathSciNetMATH
10.
11.
12.
Lang GM, Miao DQ, Cai MJ (2017) Three-way decision approaches to conflict analysis using decision-theoretic rough set theory. Inf Sci 406–407:185–207MATH
13.
14.
Li JH, Huang CC, Qi JJ, Qian YH, Liu WQ (2017) Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity. Inf Sci 378:244–263MATH
15.
Liang DC, Wang MW, Xu ZS, Liu D (2020) Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Inf Sci 507:585–605MathSciNet
16.
Liu D, Liang DC (2017) Three-way decisions in ordered decision system. Knowl-Based Syst 137:182–195
17.
Liu Y, Lin Y (2015) Intuitionistic fuzzy rough set model based on conflict distance and applications. Appl Soft Comput 31:266–273
18.
19.
Luo C, Li TR, Huang YY, Fujita H (2019) Updating three-way decisions in incomplete multi-scale information systems. Inf Sci 476:274–289
20.
Pawlak Z (1984) On conflicts. Int J Man Mach Stud 21:127–134MATH
21.
22.
Pawlak Z (2005) Some remarks on conflict analysis. Eur J Oper Res 166:649–654MATH
23.
Przybyla-Kasperek M, Wakulicz-Deja A (2014) Global decision-making system with dynamically generated clusters. Inf Sci 70:172–191MathSciNetMATH
24.
Przybyla-Kasperek M, Wakulicz-Deja A (2016) The strength of coalition in a dispersed decision support system with negotiations. Eur J Oper Res 252:947–968MathSciNetMATH
25.
Przybyla-Kasperek M, Wakulicz-Deja A (2017) Dispersed decision-making system with fusion methods from the rank level and the measurement level-A comparative study. Inf Syst 69:124–154
26.
Qian T, Wei L, Qi JJ (2017) Constructing three-way concept lattices based on apposition and subposition of formal contexts. Knowl-Based Syst 116:39–48
27.
Ramanna S, Peters J, Skowron A (2007) Approaches to conflict dynamics based on rough sets. Fundam Inform 75:453–468MathSciNetMATH
28.
Singh PK (2017) Three-way fuzzy concept lattice representation using neutrosophic set. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8:69–79
29.
Singh PK (2018) Three-way n-valued neutrosophic concept lattice at different granulation. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1839–1855
30.
Shivhare R, Cherukuri AK (2017) Three-way conceptual approach for cognitive memory functionalities. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8:21–34
31.
Skowron A, Deja R (2002) On some conflict models and conflict resolutions, Romanian. J Inf Sci Technol 5:69–82
32.
Sun BZ, Chen XT, Zhang LY, Ma WM (2020) Three-way decision making approach to conflict analysis and resolution using probabilistic rough set over two universes. Inf Sci 507:809–822MathSciNet
33.
Sun BZ, Ma WM (2015) Rough approximation of a preference relation by multi-decision dominance for a multi-agent conflict analysis problem. Inf Sci 315:39–53MathSciNetMATH
34.
Sun BZ, Ma WM, Zhao HY (2016) Rough set-based conflict analysis model and method over two universes. Inf Sci 372:111–125MATH
35.
Wang XZ, Li JH (2018) Three-way decisions, concept lattice and granular computing: Editorial. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9:1765–1766
36.
Wang PX, Shi H, Yang XB, Mi JS (2019) Three-way k-means: integrating k-means and three-way decision. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10:2767–2777
37.
Yan YT, Wu ZB, Du XQ, Chen J, Zhao S, Zhang YP (2019) A three-way decision ensemble method for imbalanced data oversampling. Int J Approx Reason 107:1–16MathSciNetMATH
38.
39.
Yao YY (2020) Three-way granular computing, rough sets, and formal concept analysis. Int J Approx Reason 116:106–125MathSciNetMATH
40.
Yao YY (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: International conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, RSCTC 2012, Chengdu, China, August 17-20, LNCS(LNAI), vol 7413, pp 1–17
41.
Yao YY (2016) Three-way decisions and cognitive computing. Cogn Comput 8:543–554
42.
Yao YY (2017) Interval sets and three-way concept analysis in incomplete contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8:3–20
43.
Yao YY (2018) Three-way decision and granular computing. Int J Approx Reason 103:107–123MATH
44.
Yao YY (2019) Three-way conflict analysis: reformulations and extensions of the Pawlak model. Knowl-Based Syst 180:26–37
45.
46.
47.
Yu HY, Li QG, Cai MJ (2018) Characteristics of three-way concept lattices and three-way rough concept lattices. Knowl-Based Syst 146:181–189
48.
Yu T, Liang X, Shen GQ, Shi Q, Wang G (2019) An optimization model for managing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China. J Clean Prod 212:537–547
49.
Zhai JH, Zhang Y, Zhu HY (2017) Three-way decisions model based on tolerance rough fuzzy set. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8:35–43
50.
Zhang QH, Lv GX, Chen YH, Wang GY (2018) A dynamic three-way decision model based on the updating of attribute values. Knowl-Based Syst 142:71–84
51.
Zhang YJ, Miao DQ, Zhang ZF, Xu JF, Luo S (2018) A three-way selective ensemble model for multi-label classification. Int J Approx Reason 103:394–413MathSciNetMATH
52.
53.
Zhang XY, Yang JL, Tang LY (2020) Three-way class-specific attribute reducts from the information viewpoint. Inf Sci 507:840–872MathSciNet
54.
Zhi HL, Qi JJ, Qian T, Ren RS (2020) Conflict analysis under one-vote veto based on approximate three-way concept lattice. Inf Sci 516:316–330MathSciNet
55.
Zhi HL, Qi JJ, Qian T, Wei L (2019) Three-way dual concept analysis. Int J Approx Reason 114:151–165MathSciNetMATH
Metadaten
Titel
A general conflict analysis model based on three-way decision
verfasst von
Guangming Lang
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1868-8071
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-808X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01100-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Optimal scale selection by integrating uncertainty and cost-sensitive learning in multi-scale decision tables

Original Article

Discernible neighborhood counting based incremental feature selection for heterogeneous data

Original Article

Complex network analysis of three-way decision researches

Original Article

An efficient three-way clustering algorithm based on gravitational search

Original Article

Three-way active learning through clustering selection

Original Article

A comparison study of optimal scale combination selection in generalized multi-scale decision tables

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise