nach oben

Transportation in Developing Economies

Erschienen in:

01.04.2022 | Original Article

Measuring and Modelling Electric Vehicle Adoption of Indian Consumers

verfasst von: Furqan A. Bhat, Meghna Verma, Ashish Verma

Erschienen in: Transportation in Developing Economies | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Advancements in energy-efficient sustainable mobility technologies like electric vehicles are considered as one of the essential responses to minimizing the greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In spite of financial and non-financial incentives being provided to both consumers and manufacturers in India, the acceptance and adoption of electric vehicles remains very low. Based on the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model, this study uses structural equation modelling to analyze the effects of eight factors viz. environmental enthusiasm, technological enthusiasm, anxiety (or perceived risk), social image, social influence, perceived benefits, performance expectancy and facilitating conditions on the consumers’ intention to adopt electric vehicles. The study is analytically examined based on the data obtained from 675 students in Bengaluru, India. Results indicate that environmental enthusiasm, technological enthusiasm, social image, social influence, perceived benefits, and performance expectancy are positively related to adoption intention whereas facilitating conditions and anxiety have negative influence on a consumer’s intention to adopt an electric vehicle. This study adds to the limited literature on this subject in the context of developing economies. In practice, the results from this study can be useful to planners and policy makers to improve the adoption rate of electric vehicles.

Vorheriger Artikel Commuters' Willingness-to-Pay for the Attributes of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle: A Case Study in Kolkata, India

Nächster Artikel Socio-economic and Trip Characteristics Influencing the Travel Time Perception of Cyclists: A Case Study of a Residential Academic Campus

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kahn Ribeiro S, Kobayashi S, Hata H et al (2007) Transport and its infrastructure. In: Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

U.S. EIA (2017) International Energy Outlook 2016

IEA (2009) World Energy Outlook 2009. IEA, Paris

IEA (2020) Tracking Transport 2020. IEA, Paris

Lefevre B, Enriquez A (2014) Transport Sector Key to Closing the World’s Emissions Gap|World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/insights/transport-sector-key-closing-worlds-emissions-gap. Accessed 6 May 2021

MoRTH (2020) Ministry of road transport and highways annual report 2020–2021

Wu T, Zhao H, Ou X (2014) Vehicle ownership analysis based on GDP per capita in China: 1963–2050. Sustainability (Switzerland) 6:4877–4899. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6084877CrossRef

Lu H, Ma H, Sun Z, Wang J (2017) Analysis and prediction on vehicle ownership based on an improved stochastic gompertz diffusion process. J Adv Transp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4013875CrossRef

IEA (2020) World energy balances: overview. IEA, Paris

10.

IQ Air (2019) World Air Quality Report 2019

11.

Eckstein D, Kunzel V, Schafer L (2021) Global Climate Risk Index 2021

12.

UN environment (2018) Emissions Gap Report 2018. Kenya

13.

Bakker S, Jacob Trip J (2013) Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 25:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.005CrossRef

14.

Sierzchula W (2014) Factors influencing fleet manager adoption of electric vehicles. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 31:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.022CrossRef

15.

Romm J (2006) The car and fuel of the future. Energy Policy 34:2609–2614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.025CrossRef

16.

Lieven T, Mühlmeier S, Henkel S, Waller JF (2011) Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 16:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001CrossRef

17.

Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

18.

Egbue O, Long S (2012) Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48:717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009CrossRef

19.

Skippon S, Garwood M (2011) Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 16:525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005CrossRef

20.

Wang S, Fan J, Zhao D et al (2016) Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation 43:123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9CrossRef

21.

Stern PC, Dietz T, Abel TD et al (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev 6:81–97

22.

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRef

23.

Ozaki R, Sevastyanova K (2011) Going hybrid: an analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Elsevier 39:2217–2227

24.

Carley S, Krause RM, Lane BW, Graham JD (2013) Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: a survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 18:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007CrossRef

25.

Krupa JS, Rizzo DM, Eppstein MJ et al (2014) Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 64:14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.019CrossRef

26.

Han L, Wang S, Zhao D, Li J (2017) The intention to adopt electric vehicles: driven by functional and non-functional values. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 103:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.033CrossRef

27.

He X, Zhan W, Hu Y (2018) Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: the roles of perception and personality. J Clean Prod 204:1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.260CrossRef

28.

Afroz R, Rahman A, Masud MM et al (2015) How individual values and attitude influence consumers’ purchase intention of electric vehicles—some insights from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Environ Urban Asia 6:193–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425315589160CrossRef

29.

Sheth JN, Newman BI, Gross BL (1991) Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. J Bus Res 22:159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8CrossRef

30.

Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J Consum Res 9:132. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906CrossRef

31.

Levy M (1999) Revolutionizing the retail pricing game discount store news | course hero. Discount Store News 38(September):15

32.

Holbrook MB (1996) Special session summary customer value C a framework for analysis and research. ACR North American Advances NA-23

33.

Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52:2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302CrossRef

34.

Gwinner KP, Gremler DD, Bitner MJ (1998) Relational benefits in services industries: the customer’s perspective. J Acad Mark Sci 26:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398262002CrossRef

35.

Roy A (1994) Correlates of mall visit frequency. J Retail 70:139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90012-4CrossRef

36.

Babin BJ, Darden RD, Griffin M (1994) Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J Consum Res 20:644–656CrossRef

37.

Sheth JN (1983) An integrative theory of patronage preference and behavior. In: Darden WR, Lusch RF (eds) Patronage behavior and retail management. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York

38.

Forsythe S, Liu C, Shannon D, Gardner LC (2006) Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. J Interact Mark 20:55–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20061CrossRef

39.

Rezvani Z, Jansson J, Bodin J (2015) Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: a review and research agenda. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 34:122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010CrossRef

40.

Heffner RR, Kurani KS, Turrentine TS (2007) Symbolism and the adoption of fuel-cell vehicles. World Electr Veh J 1:24–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj1010024CrossRef

41.

Heffner RR, Kurani KS, Turrentine TS (2007) Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 12:396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2007.04.003CrossRef

42.

Bunce L, Harris M, Burgess M (2014) Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 59:278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.001CrossRef

43.

Glerum A, Stankovikj L, Thémans M, Bierlaire M (2014) Forecasting the demand for electric vehicles: accounting for attitudes and perceptions. Transp Sci 48:483–499. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2013.0487CrossRef

44.

She ZY, Sun Q, Ma JJ, Xie BC (2017) What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transp Policy 56:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001CrossRef

45.

Bjerkan KY, Nørbech TE, Nordtømme ME (2016) Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 43:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.002CrossRef

46.

Sierzchula W, Bakker S, Maat K, van Wee B (2014) The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 68:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043CrossRef

47.

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27:425–478CrossRef

48.

Martins C, Oliveira T, Popovič A (2014) Understanding the internet banking adoption: a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. Int J Inf Manag 34:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002CrossRef

49.

Maillet É, Mathieu L, Sicotte C (2015) Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an Electronic Patient Record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT. Int J Med Inform 84:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.004CrossRef

50.

Kabra G, Ramesh A, Pervaiz A, Dash MK (2017) Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: insights from humanitarian practitioners. Telemat Inform 34:1250–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.010CrossRef

51.

Khalilzadeh J, Ozturk AB, Bilgihan A (2017) Security-related factors in extended UTAUT model for NFC based mobile payment in the restaurant industry. Comput Hum Behav 70:460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001CrossRef

52.

Yeung SPM (2004) Teaching approaches in geography and students’ environmental attitudes. Environmentalist 24:101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-004-4801-1CrossRef

53.

Fujii S (2006) Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. J Environ Psychol 26:262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.003CrossRef

54.

Pagiaslis A, Krontalis AK (2014) Green consumption behavior antecedents: environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychol Mark 31:335–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20698CrossRef

55.

Sinnappan P, Rahman AA (2011) Antecedents of green purchasing behavior among Malaysian consumers. Int Bus Manag 5:129–139. https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2011.129.139CrossRef

56.

Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of innovations; a cross-cultural approach, 2nd edn. Free Press, New York

57.

Turrentine TS, Kurani KS (2007) Car buyers and fuel economy? Energy Policy 35:1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.005CrossRef

58.

Liu Y, Li H, Carlsson C (2010) Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: an empirical study. Comput Educ 55:1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018CrossRef

59.

Parveen F, Sulaiman A (2008) Technology complexity, personal innovativeness and intention to use wireless internet using mobile devices in Malaysia. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 4:1–20

60.

Jansson J (2011) Consumer eco-innovation adoption: assessing attitudinal factors and perceived product characteristics. Bus Strateg Environ 20:192–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.690CrossRef

61.

Kim C, Mirusmonov M, Lee I (2010) An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Comput Hum Behav 26:310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.013CrossRef

62.

Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst 27:657–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036552CrossRef

63.

Lu J, Liu C, Yu CS, Wang K (2008) Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Inf Manag 45:52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.002CrossRef

64.

Meuter ML, Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Brown SW (2005) Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: an investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. J Mark 69:61–83. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.61.60759CrossRef

65.

Oliver J, Rosen D (2010) Applying the environmental propensity framework: a segmented approach to hybrid electric vehicle marketing strategies. J Market Theory Pract 18:377–393. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180405CrossRef

66.

Sweeney JC, Soutar GN (2001) Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J Retail 77:203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0CrossRef

67.

Schuitema G, Anable J, Skippon S, Kinnear N (2013) The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 48:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004CrossRef

68.

Eppstein MJ, Grover DK, Marshall JS, Rizzo DM (2011) An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy 39:3789–3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.007CrossRef

69.

Chen CF, Xu X, Frey S (2016) Who wants solar water heaters and alternative fuel vehicles? Assessing social-psychological predictors of adoption intention and policy support in China. Energy Res Soc Sci 15:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.006CrossRef

70.

Jansson J, Marell A, Nordlund A (2010) Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. J Consum Mark 27:358–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011052396CrossRef

71.

Zhang X, Wang K, Hao Y et al (2013) The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: the evidence from China. Energy Policy 61:382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.114CrossRef

72.

Kang MJ, Park H (2011) Impact of experience on government policy toward acceptance of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Energy Policy 39:3465–3475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.045CrossRef

73.

Verma M, Verma A, Khan M (2020) Factors influencing the adoption of electric vehicles in Bengaluru. Transp Dev Econ 6:17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-0100-xCrossRef

74.

Junquera B, Moreno B, Álvarez R (2016) Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 109:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006CrossRef

75.

Verma M, Manoj M, Verma A (2017) Analysis of aspiration for owning a car among youths in a city of a developing country, India. Transp Dev Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-017-0037-xCrossRef

76.

Hoelter JW (1983) The analysis of covariance structures: goodness-of-fit indices. Sociol Methods Res 11:325–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183011003003CrossRef

77.

Garver M, Mentzer J (1999) Logistics research methods: employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. J Bus Logist 20:33–57

78.

Stevens JP, New RT, London Y (2012) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 5th edn. Routledge, New YorkCrossRef

79.

Merlin S (2018) India has 42 varsities in Asia rankings but gender gap matter of concern. https://theprint.in/india/governance/india-42-varsities-asia-rankings-widening-gender-gap-matter-concern/34805/. Accessed 1 May 2021

80.

Barbarossa C, Beckmann S (2015) A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: a cross-cultural comparative study. Elsevier, Amsterdam

81.

Noppers E, Keizer K, Milovanovic M, Steg L (2019) The role of adoption norms and perceived product attributes in the adoption of Dutch electric vehicles and smart energy systems. Energy Res Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101237CrossRef

82.

Kline RB (2015) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edn. The Guilford PressMATH

83.

Hair JH, Balck WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2009) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

84.

MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1:130–149CrossRef

85.

Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 26:106–121CrossRef

86.

Byrne BM (2016) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming, 3rd edn. Routledge Academy, LondonCrossRef

87.

Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588CrossRef

88.

Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312CrossRef

89.

Field A (2009) Discopering statistics using SPSS. Sage

90.

Chiu CM, Wang ETG (2008) Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf Manag 45:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003CrossRef

91.

Anderson JC, Gerbing GW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423CrossRef

92.

Wang N, Tang L, Pan H (2018) Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicles: an empirical study in Shanghai. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 126:284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.011CrossRef

Titel: Measuring and Modelling Electric Vehicle Adoption of Indian Consumers
verfasst von: Furqan A. Bhat
Meghna Verma
Ashish Verma
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2022
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Transportation in Developing Economies / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 2199-9287
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-9295
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-021-00143-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Socio-economic and Trip Characteristics Influencing the Travel Time Perception of Cyclists: A Case Study of a Residential Academic Campus

A Review on Bus Signal Priority Systems

Modeling Modified Intermittent Bus Lane Integrated with Transit Signal Priority Under Mixed Traffic Condition

Structural and Attitudinal Barriers to Bicycle Ownership and Cycle-Based Transport in Gauteng, South Africa

Implementation Framework for Bus Queue Jump Lane in Urban Corridors with Heterogeneous Traffic Operations

Quality of Life (QoL) Effects of Sustainable Transport Policy Framework in Developing Economies

Premium Partner