Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Granular Computing 6/2023

06.07.2023 | Original Paper

Group decision-making method with Pythagorean fuzzy rough number for the evaluation of best design concept

verfasst von: Muhammad Akram, Sadaf Zahid

Erschienen in: Granular Computing | Ausgabe 6/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A rough set is important for the reduction of attributes of an information system, since it approximates a subset of a universal set based on some binary connection. A Pythagorean fuzzy set, on the other hand, provides specific information about the extent to which a statement is true or false. Both of these theories address various types of uncertainty and can be combined to maximize their combined advantages. In the current study, we aim to build a broader structure of fuzzy rough numbers, known as Pythagorean fuzzy rough numbers. The proposed framework addresses some of the limitations of traditional fuzzy rough numbers and provides a more practical and effective solution for dealing with uncertainty in decision-making. Our main objective is to develop a new method based on Pythagorean fuzzy rough numbers, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the Technique of Ranking by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The suggested approach is tested on a case study which involves the selection of a product design concept for a new heat exchanger. The Pythagorean fuzzy rough AHP technique is implemented to assess the significance of each factor in the design process, and the Pythagorean fuzzy rough TOPSIS approach is used to rank the design concepts in order of their overall quality. The outcomes demonstrates that the suggested methodology efficiently assesses design concepts, making it helpful for the design industry in decision-making process. This study highlights the importance of integrating the AHP-TOPSIS method based on Pythagorean fuzzy rough numbers for a comprehensive evaluation of design concepts, taking into account both qualitative and quantitative factors to aid complex decision-making processes. The proposed method is thoroughly compared with some other existing decision-making methods.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Nawaz HS, Deveci M (2023) Attribute reduction and information granulation in Pythagorean fuzzy formal contexts. Expert Syst Appl 222:119794CrossRef Akram M, Nawaz HS, Deveci M (2023) Attribute reduction and information granulation in Pythagorean fuzzy formal contexts. Expert Syst Appl 222:119794CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Zafar F (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods under soft rough fuzzy knowledge. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(3):3507–3528CrossRef Akram M, Zafar F (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods under soft rough fuzzy knowledge. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(3):3507–3528CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Zafar F (2019) A new approach to compute measures of connectivity in rough fuzzy network models. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):449–465CrossRef Akram M, Zafar F (2019) A new approach to compute measures of connectivity in rough fuzzy network models. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):449–465CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Kahraman C, Zahid K (2021) Extension of TOPSIS model to the decision-making under complex spherical fuzzy information. Soft Comput 25:10771–10795CrossRef Akram M, Kahraman C, Zahid K (2021) Extension of TOPSIS model to the decision-making under complex spherical fuzzy information. Soft Comput 25:10771–10795CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Luqman A, Alcantud JCR (2021) Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: Hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl 33:5675–5703CrossRef Akram M, Luqman A, Alcantud JCR (2021) Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: Hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Neural Comput Appl 33:5675–5703CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Dudek WA, Ilyas F (2019) Group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method. Int J Intell Syst 34(17):1455–1475CrossRef Akram M, Dudek WA, Ilyas F (2019) Group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method. Int J Intell Syst 34(17):1455–1475CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Arshad M (2019) A novel trepazoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584CrossRef Akram M, Arshad M (2019) A novel trepazoidal bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Niaz Z, Feng F (2023) Extended CODAS method for multi-attribute group decision-making based on 2-tuple linguistic Fermateen fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator. Granul Comput 8:441–466CrossRef Akram M, Niaz Z, Feng F (2023) Extended CODAS method for multi-attribute group decision-making based on 2-tuple linguistic Fermateen fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator. Granul Comput 8:441–466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Akram M, Martino A (2023) Multi-attribute group decision making based on \(T\)-spherical fuzzy soft rough average aggregation operators. Granul Comput 8:171–207CrossRef Akram M, Martino A (2023) Multi-attribute group decision making based on \(T\)-spherical fuzzy soft rough average aggregation operators. Granul Comput 8:171–207CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Atanassov KT (1983) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the VII ITKR Session, Sofia, Bulgaria (Deposed in Central Sci.- Techn. Library of Bulg. Acad. of Sci., 1697/84) (in Bulgaria) Atanassov KT (1983) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the VII ITKR Session, Sofia, Bulgaria (Deposed in Central Sci.- Techn. Library of Bulg. Acad. of Sci., 1697/84) (in Bulgaria)
Zurück zum Zitat Ayag Z (2005) A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Trans 37:827–842CrossRef Ayag Z (2005) A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Trans 37:827–842CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bai ZY (2013) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on an improved score function. Sci World J 879089:1–6 Bai ZY (2013) An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on an improved score function. Sci World J 879089:1–6
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655MATHCrossRef Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SJ, Hwang CL, Hwang FP (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 375:289–486CrossRef Chen SJ, Hwang CL, Hwang FP (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Lect Notes Econ Math Syst 375:289–486CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SM, Niou SJ (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38:3865–3872CrossRef Chen SM, Niou SJ (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38:3865–3872CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SM, Wang CH (2009) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using a-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5576–81MathSciNetCrossRef Chen SM, Wang CH (2009) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using a-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5576–81MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SM, Phuong BD (2017) Fuzzy time series forecasting based on optimal partitions of intervals and optimal weighting vectors. Knowl Based Syst 118:204–216CrossRef Chen SM, Phuong BD (2017) Fuzzy time series forecasting based on optimal partitions of intervals and optimal weighting vectors. Knowl Based Syst 118:204–216CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SJ, Chen SM (2001) A new method to measure the similarity between fuzzy numbers. In: 10th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Vol 3, p 1123–1126 Chen SJ, Chen SM (2001) A new method to measure the similarity between fuzzy numbers. In: 10th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Vol 3, p 1123–1126
Zurück zum Zitat Corsini P, Leoreanu V (2002) Fuzzy sets and join spaces associated with rough sets. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 51(3):527–536MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Corsini P, Leoreanu V (2002) Fuzzy sets and join spaces associated with rough sets. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 51(3):527–536MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong J, Wan S, Chen SM (2021) Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making. Inf Sci 547:1080–1104MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Dong J, Wan S, Chen SM (2021) Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making. Inf Sci 547:1080–1104MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209MATHCrossRef Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17:191–209MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan J, Yuanyuan L, Xingyuan W (2019) An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Syst Appl 127:241–255CrossRef Fan J, Yuanyuan L, Xingyuan W (2019) An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Syst Appl 127:241–255CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali MI (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14(9):899–911MATHCrossRef Feng F, Li C, Davvaz B, Ali MI (2010) Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach. Soft Comput 14(9):899–911MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feng F (2011) Soft rough sets applied to multicriteria group decision making. Ann Fuzzy Math Inf 2(1):69–80MathSciNetMATH Feng F (2011) Soft rough sets applied to multicriteria group decision making. Ann Fuzzy Math Inf 2(1):69–80MathSciNetMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Geng X, Chu X, Zhang Z (2010) A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets. Expert Syst Appl 37:6629–6638CrossRef Geng X, Chu X, Zhang Z (2010) A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets. Expert Syst Appl 37:6629–6638CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gündoǧdu FK, Kahraman C (2019) Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):337–352CrossRef Gündoǧdu FK, Kahraman C (2019) Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):337–352CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang HZ, Bo R, Chen W (2006) An integrated Computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation. Mech Mach Theory 41:567–583MATHCrossRef Huang HZ, Bo R, Chen W (2006) An integrated Computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation. Mech Mach Theory 41:567–583MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making, vol 186. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191CrossRef Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making, vol 186. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–191CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hayat K, Ali MI, Karaaslan F, Cao BY, Shah MH (2020) Design concept evaluation using soft sets based on acceptable and satisfactory levels: an integrated TOPSIS and Shannon entropy. Soft Comput 24:2229–2263CrossRef Hayat K, Ali MI, Karaaslan F, Cao BY, Shah MH (2020) Design concept evaluation using soft sets based on acceptable and satisfactory levels: an integrated TOPSIS and Shannon entropy. Soft Comput 24:2229–2263CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Luqman A, Akram M, Alcantud JCR (2021) Digraph and matrix approach for risk evaluations under Pythagorean fuzzy information. Expert Syst Appl 170:114–518CrossRef Luqman A, Akram M, Alcantud JCR (2021) Digraph and matrix approach for risk evaluations under Pythagorean fuzzy information. Expert Syst Appl 170:114–518CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nadaban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I (2016) Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Procedia Comput Sci 91:823–831MATHCrossRef Nadaban S, Dzitac S, Dzitac I (2016) Fuzzy TOPSIS: a general view. Procedia Comput Sci 91:823–831MATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura A (1988) Fuzzy rough sets. Note Multiple-Valued Logic Jpn 9(8):1–8 Nakamura A (1988) Fuzzy rough sets. Note Multiple-Valued Logic Jpn 9(8):1–8
Zurück zum Zitat Negi DS (1989) Fuzzy analysis and optimization. Department of Industrial Engineering, Thesis, p 9005074 Negi DS (1989) Fuzzy analysis and optimization. Department of Industrial Engineering, Thesis, p 9005074
Zurück zum Zitat Pamučar D, Petrović I, Ćirović G (2018) Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: a novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Syst Appl 91:89–106CrossRef Pamučar D, Petrović I, Ćirović G (2018) Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: a novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Syst Appl 91:89–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pamučar D, Žižović M, Duričić D (2022) Modification of the CRITIC method using fuzzy rough numbers. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2:362–371CrossRef Pamučar D, Žižović M, Duričić D (2022) Modification of the CRITIC method using fuzzy rough numbers. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2:362–371CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T (2015) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems. Eur J Oper Res 242:920–932MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Roszkowska E, Wachowicz T (2015) Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems. Eur J Oper Res 242:920–932MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Satty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. Mcgraw-Hill, New York Satty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. Mcgraw-Hill, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Sarwar M, Akram M, Shahzadi S (2023) Distance measures and \(\delta \)-approximations with rough complex fuzzy models. Granul Comput 7:1–24 Sarwar M, Akram M, Shahzadi S (2023) Distance measures and \(\delta \)-approximations with rough complex fuzzy models. Granul Comput 7:1–24
Zurück zum Zitat Sarwar M, Gulzar W, Ashraf S (2023) Improved risk assessment model based on rough integrated clouds and ELECTRE-II method: an application to intelligent manufacturing process. Granul Comput 1–28 Sarwar M, Gulzar W, Ashraf S (2023) Improved risk assessment model based on rough integrated clouds and ELECTRE-II method: an application to intelligent manufacturing process. Granul Comput 1–28
Zurück zum Zitat Shidpour H, Cunha CD, Bernard A (2016) Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory. Expert Syst Appl 64:633–644CrossRef Shidpour H, Cunha CD, Bernard A (2016) Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory. Expert Syst Appl 64:633–644CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RMS, Kabil MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116CrossRef Taylan O, Bafail AO, Abdulaal RMS, Kabil MR (2014) Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput 17:105–116CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tiwari V, Jain PK, Tandon P (2016) Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method. Adv Eng Inf 30:16–25CrossRef Tiwari V, Jain PK, Tandon P (2016) Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method. Adv Eng Inf 30:16–25CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Z, Liao H (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:749–761CrossRef Xu Z, Liao H (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:749–761CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). Edmonton, AB, Canada 6608375:57–61 Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). Edmonton, AB, Canada 6608375:57–61
Zurück zum Zitat Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965CrossRef Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249 Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8:199–249
Zurück zum Zitat Zafar F, Akram M (2017) A novel decision making method based on rough fuzzy information. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20:1000–1014MathSciNetCrossRef Zafar F, Akram M (2017) A novel decision making method based on rough fuzzy information. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20:1000–1014MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Zhong ZW (2008) A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:613–624CrossRef Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Zhong ZW (2008) A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:613–624CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu GN, Hu J, Qi J, Gu CC, Peng YH (2015) An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Adv Eng Inf 29(3):408–418CrossRef Zhu GN, Hu J, Qi J, Gu CC, Peng YH (2015) An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number. Adv Eng Inf 29(3):408–418CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu GN, Ma J, Hu J (2021) Evaluating biological inspiration for biologically inspired design: an integrated DEMATEL-MAIRCA based on fuzzy rough numbers. Int J Intell Syst 36:6032–6065 Zhu GN, Ma J, Hu J (2021) Evaluating biological inspiration for biologically inspired design: an integrated DEMATEL-MAIRCA based on fuzzy rough numbers. Int J Intell Syst 36:6032–6065
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu GN, Hu J, Ren H (2020) A fuzzy rough number-based AHP-TOPSIS for design concept evaluation under uncertain environments. Appl Soft Comput 91:106228CrossRef Zhu GN, Hu J, Ren H (2020) A fuzzy rough number-based AHP-TOPSIS for design concept evaluation under uncertain environments. Appl Soft Comput 91:106228CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Group decision-making method with Pythagorean fuzzy rough number for the evaluation of best design concept
verfasst von
Muhammad Akram
Sadaf Zahid
Publikationsdatum
06.07.2023
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Granular Computing / Ausgabe 6/2023
Print ISSN: 2364-4966
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4974
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00391-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2023

Granular Computing 6/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner