nach oben

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2013 | Research

q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich Operators

verfasst von: Mehmet Ali Özarslan, Tuba Vedi

Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Ausgabe 1/2013

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Patentsuche

Aus

Abstract

In the present paper, we introduce the q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators. We give the Korovkin-type approximation theorem and obtain the rate of convergence of this approximation by means of the first and the second modulus of continuity. Moreover, we compute the order of convergence of the operators in terms of the elements of Lipschitz class functions and the modulus of continuity of the derivative of the function.

MSC: 41A10, 41A25, 41A36.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors completed the paper together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

1 Introduction

Some authors have defined general sequences of linear positive operators where the classical sequences can be achieved as particular cases. For instance, Schurer [1] proposed the following generalization of Bernstein operators in 1962. Let

C [a, b]

denote the space of a continuous function on

[a, b]

. For all

n \in N

f \in C [0, p + 1]

and fixed

p \in N_{0} = {0, 1, 2, \dots}

, the Bernstein-Schurer operators are defined by (see also, [2])

B_{n}^{p} (f; x) = \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} f (\frac{r}{n}) (\binom{n + p}{r}) x^{r} {(1 - x)}^{n + p - r}, x \in [0, 1] .

In 1987, q-based Bernstein operators were defined and studied by Lupaş [3]. In 1996, another q-based Bernstein operator was proposed by Phillips [4]. Then the q-based operators have become an active research area (see [5‐9] and [10]).

Muraru [11] introduced and investigated the q-Bernstein-Schurer operators. She obtained the Korovkin-type approximation theorem and the rate of convergence of the operators in terms of the first modulus of continuity. These operators were defined, for fixed

p \in N_{0}

and for all

x \in [0, 1]

, by

B_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) = \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} f (\frac{[r]}{[n]}) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x),

(1.1)

where

0 < q < 1

. If we choose

p = 0

in (1.1), we get the classical q-Bernstein operators [4].

Recall that for each nonnegative integer r,

[r]

is defined as

[r] = {\begin{matrix} (1 - q^{r}) / (1 - q), & q \neq 1, \\ r, & q = 1, \end{matrix}

and the q-factorial of the integer r is defined by

[r]! = {\begin{matrix} [r] [r - 1] \dots [1], & r = 1, 2, 3, \dots, \\ 1, & r = 0 . \end{matrix}

For integers n and r, with

0 \leq r \leq n

, q-binomial coefficients are defined by [12]

[\begin{array}{c} n \\ r \end{array}] = \frac{[n]!}{[n - r]! [r]!} .

Afterwards, several properties and results of the operators defined by (1.1), such as the order of convergence of these operators by means of Lipschitz class functions, the first and the second modulus of continuity and the rate of convergence of the approximation process in terms of the first modulus of continuity of the derivative of the function, were given by the authors [13]. On the other hand, q-Szasz-Schurer operators were discussed in [14].

Kantorovich considered the linear positive operators

K_{n} (f; x) : L_{1} [0, 1] \to L_{1} [0, 1]

which are defined for

f \in L_{1} [0, 1]

as follows:

K_{n} (f; x) = (n + 1) \sum_{k = 0}^{n} p_{n, k} (x) \int_{k / n + 1}^{(k + 1) / (n + 1)} f (u) d u,

where

p_{n, k} (x) = (\binom{n}{k}) x^{k} {(1 - x)}^{n - k}

. After this definition, the integral variants of classical and general operators have attracted a great interest (see [15‐18] and [19]).

In 2007, Dalmanoğlu defined Kantorovich-type q-Bernstein operators by [20]

B_{n}^{*} (f; q; x) = [n + 1] \sum_{k = 0}^{n} q^{- k} [\begin{array}{c} n \\ k \end{array}] x^{k} \prod_{s = 0}^{n - k - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \int_{[k] / [n + 1]}^{[k + 1] / [n + 1]} f (t) d_{q} t .

Notice that, the q-Jackson integral is defined on the interval

[0, b]

as follows:

\int_{0}^{b} f (t) d_{q} t = (1 - q) b \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty} f (q^{j} b) q^{j}, 0 < q < 1 .

(1.2)

Then she obtained the first three moments and gave the rate of convergence of the approximation process in terms of the first modulus of continuity [20].

In our definition, the integral that we consider in the q-Schurer-Bernstein-Kantorovich operator is

\int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t)}^{k} d_{q} t, k \in N_{0}, 0 < q < 1 .

So, throughout this paper, we will use the following results, which are computed directly by the tools of q-calculus.

Using (1.2), we can find the following results:

\int_{0}^{1} d_{q} t = (1 - q) \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty} q^{j} = (1 - q) \frac{1}{1 - q} = 1,

(1.3)

where

0 < q < 1

. On the other hand, by (1.2) and (1.3) we get

\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) d_{q} t \\ = \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} \int_{0}^{1} t d_{q} t + \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} \int_{0}^{1} d_{q} t \\ = \frac{1}{[n + 1]} (1 - q) \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty} q^{2 j} + \frac{q [r]}{[n + 1]} = \frac{1}{[n + 1]} (1 - q) \frac{1}{1 - q^{2}} + \frac{q [r]}{[n + 1]} \\ = \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} + 2 \frac{q [r]}{[2] [n + 1]} . \end{aligned}

(1.4)

Since

\int_{0}^{1} t^{2} d_{q} t = (1 - q) \sum_{j = 0}^{\infty} q^{2 j} q^{j} = (1 - q) \frac{1}{1 - q^{3}} = \frac{1}{1 + q + q^{2}} = \frac{1}{[3]},

we have

\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t)}^{2} d_{q} t \\ = \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{{[r]}^{2}}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} + 2 \frac{[r] (1 + (q - 1) [r])}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} t + \frac{{(1 + (q - 1) [r])}^{2}}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} t^{2}) d_{q} t \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} ({(1 + (q - 1) [r])}^{2} \int_{0}^{1} t^{2} d_{q} t + 2 [r] (1 + (q - 1) [r]) \int_{0}^{1} t d_{q} t + {[r]}^{2} \int_{0}^{1} d_{q} t) \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {(1 + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[2]} + \frac{{(q - 1)}^{2}}{[3]}) {[r]}^{2} + (\frac{2}{[2]} + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[3]}) [r] + \frac{1}{[3]}} . \end{aligned}

(1.5)

Recall that the first three moments of the q-Bernstein-Schurer operators were given by Muraru in [11] as follows.

Lemma 1.1 For the first three moments of

B_{n}^{p} (f; q; x)

we have:

(i)

B_{n}^{p} (1; q; x) = 1

(ii)

B_{n}^{p} (t; q; x) = \frac{[n + p]}{[n]} x

(iii)

B_{n}^{p} (t^{2}; q; x) = \frac{[n + p - 1] [n + p]}{{[n]}^{2}} q x^{2} + \frac{[n + p]}{{[n]}^{2}} x

We organize the paper as follows.

Firstly, in section two, we define the q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators and obtain the moments of them. In section three, we obtain the rate of convergence of the q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators in terms of the first modulus of continuity. Also we give the order of approximation by means of Lipschitz class functions and the first and the second modulus of continuity. Furthermore, we compute the degree of convergence of the approximation process in terms of the first modulus of continuity of the derivative of the function.

2 Construction of the operators

For fixed

p \in N_{0}

, we introduce the q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators

K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x)

C [0, p + 1] \to C [0, 1]

K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) = \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \int_{0}^{1} f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) d_{q} t

(2.1)

for any real number

0 < q < 1

, and

f \in C [0, p + 1]

. It is clear that

K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x)

is a linear and positive operator for

x \in [0, 1]

For the first three moments and the first and the second central moment, we state the following lemma.

Lemma 2.1 For the q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich operators we have

(i)

K_{n}^{p} (1; q; x) = 1,

(ii)

K_{n}^{p} (u; q; x) = \frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]},

(iii)

\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{p} (u^{2}; q; x) = & \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {(\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3]}) [n + p - 1] [n + p] x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3]}) [n + p] x + \frac{1}{[3]}}, \end{aligned}

(iv)

K_{n}^{p} ((u - x); q; x) = (2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]},

(v)

\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x) = & (\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 4 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 1) x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] - \frac{2}{[2] [n + 1]}) x + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} . \end{aligned}

Proof (i) From (1.3), we get

K_{n}^{p} (1; q; x) = \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) = 1 .

(ii)

Using (1.1), (1.4) and Lemma 1.1, we have

\begin{array}{rcl} K_{n}^{p} (u; q; x) & = & \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) (\frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} + \frac{2 q [r]}{[2] [n + 1]}) \\ = & \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \frac{2 q [r]}{[2] [n + 1]} \frac{[n]}{[n]} \\ = & \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} + \frac{2 q [n]}{[2] [n + 1]} B_{n}^{q} (t; q; x) \\ = & \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} + \frac{2 q [n]}{[2] [n + 1]} \frac{[n + p]}{[n]} x \\ = & \frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]} . \end{array}

(iii)

From (1.1), (1.4), (1.5) and then Lemma 1.1, we can calculate the

K_{n}^{p} (u^{2}; q; x)

as follows:

\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{p} (u^{2}; q; x) \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) (1 + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[2]} + \frac{{(q - 1)}^{2}}{[3]}) {[r]}^{2} \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) (\frac{2}{[2]} + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[3]}) [r] \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \frac{1}{[3]}} \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {(\frac{3 q - 1}{[2]} + \frac{{(q - 1)}^{2}}{[3]}) \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) {[r]}^{2} \frac{{[n]}^{2}}{{[n]}^{2}} \\ + (\frac{2}{[2]} + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[3]}) \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \frac{[r]}{[n]} [n] \\ + \frac{1}{[3]} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x)} \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {\frac{1}{[3]} + (\frac{2}{[2]} + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[3]}) [n] \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \frac{[r]}{[n]} \\ + (\frac{3 q - 1}{[2]} + \frac{{(q - 1)}^{2}}{[3]}) {[n]}^{2} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \frac{{[r]}^{2}}{{[n]}^{2}}} \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {\frac{1}{[3]} + (\frac{2}{[2]} + \frac{2 (q - 1)}{[3]}) [n] B_{n}^{p} (t; q; x) \\ + (\frac{3 q - 1}{[2]} + \frac{{(q - 1)}^{2}}{[3]}) {[n]}^{2} B_{n}^{p} (t^{2}; q; x)} . \end{aligned}

Finally, we get

\begin{array}{rcl} K_{n}^{p} (u^{2}; q; x) & = & \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {(\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3]}) [n + p - 1] [n + p] x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3]}) [n + p] x + \frac{1}{[3]}}, \end{array}

where

B_{n}^{p} (t; q; x)

and

B_{n}^{p} (t^{2}; q; x)

are the corresponding moments of the q-Bernstein-Schurer operators.

(iv)

It is obvious that

K_{n}^{p} ((u - x); q; x) = K_{n}^{p} (u; q; x) - x K_{n}^{p} (1; q; x) = (2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} .

(v)

Direct calculations yield,

\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x) \\ = K_{n}^{p} (u^{2}; q; x) - 2 x K_{n}^{p} (u; q; x) + x^{2} K_{n}^{p} (1; q; x) \\ = \frac{1}{{[n + 1]}^{2}} {(\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3]}) [n + p - 1] [n + p] x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3]}) [n + p] x + \frac{1}{[3]}} - 2 x \frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[n + 1] [2]} + x^{2} \\ = (\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 4 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 1) x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] - \frac{2}{[2] [n + 1]}) x + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} . \end{aligned}

(2.2)

By Korovkin’s theorem, we can state the following theorem. □

Theorem 2.2 For all

f \in C [0, p + 1]

, we have

lim_{n \to \infty} {∥ K_{n}^{p} (f; q_{n}, \cdot) - f (\cdot) ∥}_{C [0, 1]} = 0

provided that

q : = q_{n}

with

{lim}_{n \to \infty} q_{n} = 1

and that

{lim}_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{[n]} = 0

3 Rate of convergence

In this section, we compute the rate of convergence of the operators in terms of the modulus of continuity, elements of Lipschitz classes and the first and the second modulus of continuity of the function. Furthermore, we calculate the rate of convergence in terms of the first modulus of continuity of the derivative of the function.

Now, we give the rate of convergence of the operators by means of the first modulus of continuity. Recall that the first modulus of continuity of f on the interval

C [0, p + 1]

for

δ > 0

is given by

ω (f, δ) = \underset{x, x + h \in [0, p + 1]}{max_{| h | < δ}} | Δ_{h} f (x) | = \underset{x, x + h \in [0, p + 1]}{max_{| h | < δ}} | f (x + h) - f (x) |

or equivalently,

ω (f, δ) = \underset{t, x \in [0, p + 1]}{max_{| t - x | < δ}} | f (t) - f (x) | .

(3.1)

It is known that for all

f \in C [0, p + 1]

, we have

lim_{δ \to 0^{+}} ω (f, δ) = 0

and for any

δ > 0

| f (x) - f (y) | \leq ω (f, δ) (\frac{| x - y |}{δ} + 1) .

Theorem 3.1 Let

0 < q < 1

. If

f \in C [0, p + 1]

, we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq 2 ω (f, \sqrt{δ_{n, q} (x)}),

where

ω (f, \cdot)

is the modulus of continuity of f and

δ_{n, q} (x) : = K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)

, which is given as Lemma 2.1.

Proof Using the linearity and positivity of the operator, we get

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ = | \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \int_{0}^{1} (f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - f (x)) d_{q} t | \\ \leq \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \int_{0}^{1} | f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - f (x) | d_{q} t \\ \leq \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{| \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x |}{δ} + 1) ω (f, δ) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ = ω (f, δ) (\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x)) \\ + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} (\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} | \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x | [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t) . \end{aligned}

By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,

\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{1} | (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - x | d_{q} t \\ \leq {\int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{1}{2}} {\int_{0}^{1} 1 d_{q} t}^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ = {\int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{1}{2}} : = {a_{n, r} (x)}^{\frac{1}{2}} . \end{aligned}

Now we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq ω (f, δ) + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} {a_{n, r} (x)}^{\frac{1}{2}} p_{n, r} (q; x),

where

p_{n, r} (q; x) = [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x)

. Again applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we get

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ \leq ω (f, δ) + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} a_{n, r} (x) p_{n, r} (q; x)}^{\frac{1}{2}} {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} p_{n, r} (q; x)}^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ = ω (f, δ) + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} p_{n, r} (q; x) \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ = ω (f, δ) + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} {[K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)]}^{\frac{1}{2}} . \end{aligned}

So, we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq ω (f, δ) + \frac{ω (f, δ)}{δ} {K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)}^{1 / 2} .

Choosing

δ : δ_{n, q} (x) = K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)

, we obtain

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq 2 ω (f, \sqrt{K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)}) .

The proof is concluded. □

Now we give the rate of convergence of the operators

K_{n}^{p}

in terms of the Lipschitz class

{Lip}_{M} (α)

, for

0 < α \leq 1

. Note that a function

f \in C [0, p + 1]

belongs to

{Lip}_{M} (α)

| f (t) - f (x) | \leq M | t - x |^{α} (t, x \in [0, p + 1])

(3.2)

is satisfied.

Theorem 3.2 Let

f \in {Lip}_{M} (α)

, then

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq M {(δ_{n, q} (x))}^{\frac{α}{2}},

where

δ_{n, q} (x)

is the same as in Theorem 3.1.

Proof By the linearity and positivity, we have

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ \leq \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) \int_{0}^{1} | f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - f (x) | d_{q} t . \end{aligned}

Considering (3.2) and then applying the Hölder’s inequality with

p = \frac{2}{α}

and

q = \frac{2}{2 - α}

, we get

\begin{aligned} \int_{0}^{1} | f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - f (x) | d_{q} t \\ \leq M \int_{0}^{1} | \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x |^{α} d_{q} t \\ \leq M {\int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{α}{2}} {\int_{0}^{1} 1 d_{q} t}^{\frac{2 - α}{2}} \\ = M {\int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{α}{2}} = M {a_{n, r} (x)}^{\frac{α}{2}} . \end{aligned}

So, we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq M \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} {a_{n, r} (x)}^{\frac{α}{2}} p_{n, r} (q; x),

where

p_{n, r} (q; x) = [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x)

. Again applying Hölder’s inequality with

p = \frac{2}{α}

and

q = \frac{2}{2 - α}

, we get

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ \leq M {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} a_{n, r} (x) p_{n, r} (q; x)}^{\frac{α}{2}} {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} 1 \cdot p_{n, r} (q; x)}^{\frac{2 - α}{2}} \\ = M {\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} p_{n, r} (q; x) \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} d_{q} t}^{\frac{α}{2}} \\ = M {[K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)]}^{\frac{α}{2}} . \end{aligned}

Hence, the desired result is obtained. □

Now let us denote by

C^{2} [0, p + 1]

the space of all functions

f \in C [0, p + 1]

such that

f^{'}, f^{″} \in C [0, p + 1]

. Let

∥ f ∥

denote the usual supremum norm of f. The classical Peetre’s K-functional and the second modulus of smoothness of the function

f \in C [0, p + 1]

are defined, respectively, by

K (f, δ) : = inf_{g \in C^{2} [0, p + 1]} [∥ f - g ∥ + δ ∥ g^{″} ∥]

and

ω_{2} (f, δ) : = \underset{x, x + h \in [0, p + 1]}{sup_{0 < h < δ,}} | f (x + 2 h) - 2 f (x + h) + f (x) |,

where

δ > 0

. It is known that [[21], p.177] there exists a constant

A > 0

such that

K (f, δ) \leq A ω_{2} (f, \sqrt{δ}) .

(3.3)

Theorem 3.3 Let

q \in (0, 1)

x \in [0, 1]

and

f \in C [0, p + 1]

. Then, for fixed

p \in N_{0}

, we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq C ω_{2} (f, \sqrt{α_{n, q} (x)}) + ω (f, β_{n, q} (x))

for some positive constant C, where

\begin{aligned} α_{n, q} (x) : = & (4 \frac{{[n + p]}^{2}}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}} q^{2} + \frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 8 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 2) x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] + 4 \frac{[n + p]}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}} q - \frac{4}{[2] [n + 1]}) x \\ + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} + \frac{1}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}} \end{aligned}

(3.4)

and

β_{n, q} (x) : = (2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} .

(3.5)

Proof Define an auxiliary operator

K_{n, p}^{*} (f; q; x) : C [0, p + 1] \to C [0, 1]

K_{n, p}^{*} (f; q; x) : = K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (\frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} (2 [n + p] q x + 1)) + f (x) .

(3.6)

Then, by Lemma 2.1, we get

\begin{aligned} K_{n, p}^{*} (1; q; x) = 1, \\ K_{n, p}^{*} ((u - x); q; x) = 0 . \end{aligned}

(3.7)

Then, for a given

g \in C^{2} [0, p + 1]

, it follows by the Taylor formula that

g (y) - g (x) = (y - x) g^{'} (x) + \int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u, y \in [0, 1] .

Taking into account (3.7) and using (3.7), we get, for every

x \in (0, 1)

, that

\begin{aligned} | K_{n, p}^{*} (g; q; x) - g (x) | \\ = | K_{n, p}^{*} (g (y) - g (x); q; x) | \\ = | g^{'} (x) K_{n, p}^{*} ((u - x); q; x) + K_{n, p}^{*} (\int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u; q; x) | \\ = | K_{n, p}^{*} (\int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u; q; x) | . \end{aligned}

Then by (3.6),

\begin{aligned} | K_{n, p}^{*} (g; q; x) - g (x) | \\ = | K_{n, p} (\int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u; q; x) - \int_{x}^{\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]}} (\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[n + 1] [2]} - u) g^{″} (u) d u | \\ \leq | K_{n, p} (\int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u; q; x) | \\ + | \int_{x}^{\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]}} (\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[n + 1] [2]} - u) g^{″} (u) d u | . \end{aligned}

Since

| K_{n}^{p} (\int_{x}^{y} (y - u) g^{″} (u) d u; q; x) | \leq ∥ g^{″} ∥ K_{n}^{p} ({(y - x)}^{2}; q; x)

and

| \int_{x}^{\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]}} (\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]} - u) g^{″} (u) d u | \leq ∥ g^{″} ∥ {((2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]})}^{2},

we get

\begin{aligned} | K_{n, p}^{*} (g; q; x) - g (x) | \\ \leq ∥ g^{″} ∥ K_{n}^{p} ({(y - x)}^{2}; q; x) + ∥ g^{″} ∥ {((2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]})}^{2} . \end{aligned}

Hence Lemma 2.1 implies that

\begin{aligned} | K_{n, p}^{*} (g; q; x) - g (x) | \\ \leq ∥ g^{″} ∥ [x^{2} (\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 4 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 1) \\ + x (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] - \frac{2}{[2] [n + 1]}) + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} \\ + {((2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]})}^{2}] . \end{aligned}

(3.8)

Since

∥ K_{n, p}^{*} (f; q; \cdot) ∥ \leq 3

, considering (3.4) and (3.5), for all

f \in C [0, p + 1]

and

g \in C^{2} [0, p + 1]

, we may write from (3.8) that

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq & | K_{n, p}^{*} (f - g; q; x) - (f - g) (x) | \\ + | K_{n, p}^{*} (g; q; x) - g (x) | + | f (\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]}) - f (x) | \\ \leq & 4 ∥ f - g ∥ + α_{n, q} (x) ∥ g^{″} ∥ + | f (\frac{2 [n + p] q x + 1}{[2] [n + 1]}) - f (x) | \\ \leq & 4 (∥ f - g ∥ + α_{n, q} (x) ∥ g^{″} ∥) + ω (f, β_{n, q} (x)), \end{aligned}

which yields that

\begin{array}{rcl} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | & \leq & 4 K (f, α_{n, q} (x)) + ω (f, β_{n, q} (x)) \\ \leq & C ω_{2} (f, \sqrt{α_{n, q} (x)}) + ω (f, β_{n, q} (x)), \end{array}

where

\begin{aligned} α_{n, q} (x) : = & [(4 \frac{{[n + p]}^{2}}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}} q^{2} + \frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 8 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 2) x^{2} \\ + x (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] + 4 \frac{[n + p]}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}} q - \frac{4}{[2] [n + 1]}) \\ + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} + \frac{1}{{[2]}^{2} {[n + 1]}^{2}}] \end{aligned}

and

β_{n, q} (x) : = (2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} .

Hence we get the result. □

Now, we compute the rate of convergence of the operators

K_{n}^{p}

in terms of the modulus of continuity of the derivative of the function.

Theorem 3.4 Let

0 < q < 1

and

p \in N_{0}

be fixed. If

f (x)

has a continuous derivative

f^{'} (x)

and

ω (f^{'}, δ)

is the modulus of continuity of

f^{'} (x)

[0, p + 1]

, then

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) + ω (f^{'}, δ) (1 + \sqrt{δ_{n, q, p} (x)}),

where M is a positive constant such that

| f^{'} (x) | \leq M

(

0 \leq x \leq p + 1

\begin{aligned} δ_{n, q, p} (x) \\ = [(\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 4 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q + 1) x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] - \frac{2}{[2] [n + 1]}) x + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}}] \end{aligned}

and

ρ_{n, q} (x) = (2 \frac{[n + p]}{[2] [n + 1]} q - 1) x + \frac{1}{[2] [n + 1]} .

(3.9)

Proof Using the mean value theorem, we have

\begin{aligned} f (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t) - f (x) \\ = (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) f^{'} (ξ) \\ = (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) f^{'} (x) \\ + (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) (f^{'} (ξ) - f^{'} (x)), \end{aligned}

where

x < ξ < \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t

. Hence, we have

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ = | f^{'} (x) \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) \\ \times (f^{'} (ξ) - f^{'} (x)) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t | \\ \leq | f^{'} (x) | K_{n}^{p} ((u - x); q; x) \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) \\ \times | f^{'} (ξ) - f^{'} (x) | [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) \\ + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) \\ \times | f^{'} (ξ) - f^{'} (x) | [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t, \end{aligned}

where

ρ_{n, q} (x)

is given in (3.9). Hence,

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) + \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} ω (f^{'}, δ) (\frac{(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}{δ} + 1) \\ \times (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \end{aligned}

since,

ξ - x \leq \frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x .

From the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, for the first term, we get

\begin{aligned} | K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \\ \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) \\ + ω (f^{'}, δ) \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} (\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x) [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ + \frac{ω (f^{'}, δ)}{δ} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) \\ + ω (f^{'}, δ) (\sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} \\ {\times [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t)}^{1 / 2} \\ + \frac{ω (f^{'}, δ)}{δ} \sum_{r = 0}^{n + p} \int_{0}^{1} {(\frac{[r]}{[n + 1]} + \frac{1 + (q - 1) [r]}{[n + 1]} t - x)}^{2} [\begin{array}{c} n + p \\ r \end{array}] x^{r} \prod_{s = 0}^{n + p - r - 1} (1 - q^{s} x) d_{q} t \\ = M ρ_{n, q} (x) + ω (f^{'}, δ) \sqrt{K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x)} + \frac{ω (f^{'}, δ)}{δ} K_{n}^{p} ({(u - x)}^{2}; q; x) \\ = M ρ_{n, q} (x) + ω (f^{'}, δ) (1 + \sqrt{δ_{n, q, p} (x)}), \end{aligned}

where

\begin{aligned} δ : = & δ_{n, q, p} (x) = [(\frac{4 q^{4} + q^{3} + q^{2}}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p - 1] [n + p] - 4 \frac{[n + p]}{[n + 1] [2]} q + 1) x^{2} \\ + (\frac{4 q^{3} + 5 q^{2} + 3 q}{[2] [3] {[n + 1]}^{2}} [n + p] - \frac{2}{[2] [n + 1]}) x + \frac{1}{[3] {[n + 1]}^{2}}] . \end{aligned}

Finally, we have

| K_{n}^{p} (f; q; x) - f (x) | \leq M ρ_{n, q} (x) + ω (f^{'}, δ) (1 + \sqrt{δ_{n, q, p} (x)}) .

This completes the proof. □

4 Concluding remarks

In this paper, we obtain many results in the pointwise sense. On the other hand, we see that the interval is bounded and closed, and also f is continuous on it, so these results can be given in the uniform sense.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors completed the paper together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Vorheriger Artikel An iterative method for variational inequality problems

Nächster Artikel Sharp lower bounds involving circuit layout system

Schurer, F: Linear Positive Operators in Approximation Theory. Math. Inst., Techn. Univ. Delf Report (1962)

Barbosu D: A survey on the approximation properties of Schurer-Stancu operators. Carpath. J. Math. 2004, 20: 1–5.MATHMathSciNet

Lupaş AA: q -Analogue of the Bernstein operators. 9. Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus, University of Cluj-Napoca 1987, 85–92.

Phillips GM: On generalized bernstein polynomials. 98. In Numerical Analysis. World Scientific, River Edge; 1996:263–269.CrossRef

Büyükyazıcı İ, Sharma H: Approximation properties of two-dimensional q -Bernstein-Chlodowsky-Durrmeyer operators. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2012, 33(2):1351–1371.MATHMathSciNet

Büyükyazıcı İ, Atakurt Ç: On Stancu type generalization of q -Baskakov operators. Math. Comput. Model. 2010, 52(5–6):752–759. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.05.004MATHCrossRef

Gupta V, Finta Z: On certain q -Durrmeyer type operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 209(2):415–420. 10.1016/j.amc.2008.12.071MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Mahmudov NI, Sabancıgil P: q -Parametric Bleimann Butzer and Hahn operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2008., 2008: Article ID 816367

Ostrovska S: q -Bernstein polynomials and their iterates. J. Approx. Theory 2003, 123: 232–255. 10.1016/S0021-9045(03)00104-7MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

10.

Wang H, Wu XZ: Saturation of convergence for q -Bernstein polynomials in the case

q > 1

. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 337: 744–750. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.04.014MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Muraru CV: Note on q -Bernstein-Schurer operators. Stud. Univ. Babeş–Bolyai, Math. 2011, 56: 489–495.MathSciNet

12.

Kac V, Cheung P: Quantum Calculus. Springer, New York; 2002.MATHCrossRef

13.

Vedi T, Özarslan MA: Some properties of q -Bernstein-Schurer operators. J. Appl. Funct. Anal. 2013, 8(1):45–53.MATHMathSciNet

14.

Özarslan MA: q -Szasz Schurer operators. Miskolc Math. Notes 2011, 12: 225–235.MATHMathSciNet

15.

Duman O, Özarslan MA, Doğru O: On integral type generalizations of positive linear operators. Stud. Math. 2006, 176(1):1–12. 10.4064/sm176-1-1CrossRef

16.

Duman O, Özarslan MA, Vecchia BD: Modified Szasz-Mirakjan-Kantorovich operators preserving linear functions. Turk. J. Math. 2009, 33(2):151–158.MATH

17.

Özarslan MA, Duman O: Global approximation properties of modified SMK operators. Filomat 2010, 24(1):47–61. 10.2298/FIL1001047OMATHMathSciNetCrossRef

18.

Özarslan MA, Duman O: Local approximation behavior of modified SMK operators. Miskolc Math. Notes 2010, 11(1):87–99.MATHMathSciNet

19.

Özarslan MA, Duman O, Srivastava HM: Statistical approximation results for Kantorovich-type operators involving some special functions. Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 48(3–4):388–401. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.08.015MATHCrossRef

20.

Dalmanoğlu Ö: Approximation by Kantorovich type q -Bernstein operators. MATH’07: Proceedings of the 12th WSEAS Intenational Conference on Applied Mathematics Egypt, 2007, 29–31.

21.

DeVore RA, Lorentz GG: Constructive Approximation. Springer, Berlin; 1993.MATHCrossRef

Titel: q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich Operators
verfasst von: Mehmet Ali Özarslan
Tuba Vedi
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Ausgabe 1/2013
Elektronische ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-444

Springer Professional

q-Bernstein-Schurer-Kantorovich Operators

Abstract

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

1 Introduction

2 Construction of the operators

3 Rate of convergence

4 Concluding remarks

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

1 Introduction

2 Construction of the operators

3 Rate of convergence

4 Concluding remarks

Competing interests

Authors’ contributions

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

A kind of extension of the famous Young inequality

Complete moment convergence for randomly weighted sums of martingale differences

Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations in matrix normed spaces

Mean convergence theorems for weighted sums of random variables under a condition of weighted integrability

Some results on continuous pseudo-contractions in a reflexive Banach space

Periodic solutions for a class of diffusive Nicholson’s blowflies model with Dirichlet boundary conditions

Premium Partner