2 Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, let X and Y be real Hausdorff topological vector spaces, and let Z be a real topological space. We also assume that C is a pointed closed convex cone in Y with its interior . Let be the topological dual space of Y. Let be the dual cone of C, where denotes the value of ξ at y. Since , the dual cone of C has a weak∗ compact base. Let . Then is a weak∗ compact base of .
Suppose that
K is a nonempty subset of
X and
is a set-valued mapping. We consider the following generalized vector equilibrium problem (GVEP) of finding
such that
(2.1)
When the set
K and the mapping
F are perturbed by a parameter
μ which varies over a set
M of
Z, we consider the following parametric generalized vector equilibrium problem (PGVEP) of finding
such that
(2.2)
where
is a set-valued mapping,
is a set-valued mapping with
. For each
and
, the approximate solution set of (PGVEP) is defined by
where
. For each
and
, by
we denote the
ξ-approximate solution set of (PGVEP),
i.e.,
Definition 2.1 Let
D be a nonempty convex subset of
X. A set-valued mapping
is said to be:
(i)
C-
convex on
D if, for any
and for any
, we have
(ii)
C-
concave on
D if, for any
and for any
, we have
Let M and be topological vector spaces. Let D be a nonempty subset of M. A set-valued mapping is said to be uniformly continuous on D if, for any neighborhood V of , there exists a neighborhood of such that for any with .
Let
M and
be topological vector spaces. A set-valued mapping
is said to be:
(i)
Hausdorff upper semicontinuous (
H-
u.s.c.) at
if, for any neighborhood
V of
, there exists a neighborhood
of
such that
(ii)
Lower semicontinuous (
l.s.c.) at
if, for any
and any neighborhood
V of
x, there exists a neighborhood
of
such that
The following lemma plays an important role in the proof of the lower semicontinuity of the solution mapping .
Lemma 2.4 [[
21], Theorem 2]
The union of a family of l.s.c. set-valued mappings from a topological space X into a topological space Y is also an l.s.c. set-valued mapping from X into Y, where I is an index set.
3 Lower semicontinuity of the approximate solution mapping for (PGVEP)
In this section, we establish the lower semicontinuity of the approximate solution mapping for (PGVEP) at the considered point with .
Firstly, using the same argument as in the proof given in [[
22], Lemma 3.1], we can prove the following useful result.
Lemma 3.1 For each ,
,
if for each ,
is a convex set,
then
Proof For any
, there exists
such that
. Thus, we can obtain that
and
,
. Then, for each
and
,
, which arrives at
. It then follows that, for each
,
which gives that
. Hence,
. Conversely, let
be arbitrary. Then
and
,
. Thus, we have
and hence
Because
is a convex set, by the well-known Edidelheit separation theorem (see [
23], Theorem 3.16), there exist a continuous linear functional
and a real number
γ such that
for all , and . Since C is a cone, we have for all . Thus, for all , that is, . Moreover, it follows from , and the continuity of ξ that for all . Thus, for all , we have , i.e., . □
Theorem 3.2 We assume that for any given ,
there exists such that the ξ-
approximate solution set exists in ,
where is a neighborhood of .
Assume further that the following conditions are satisfied:
(i)
is nonempty convex;
(ii)
K is H-u.s.c. at and l.s.c. at ;
(iii)
for any , is C-concave on ;
(iv)
is uniformly continuous on .
Then the ξ-approximate solution mapping is l.s.c. at .
Proof Suppose to the contrary that
is not l.s.c. at
, then there exist
and a neighborhood
of
. For any neighborhoods
and
of
and
, respectively, there exist
and
such that
. In particular, there exist sequences
and
such that
(3.1)
For the above
, there exists a neighborhood
of
such that
We define a
ξ-set-valued mapping
by
Notice that
. Next, we claim that
is l.s.c. at 0. Suppose to the contrary that
is not l.s.c. at 0, then there exist
and a neighborhood
of
. For any neighborhood
U of 0, there exists
such that
. In particular, there exists a nonnegative sequence
such that
(3.3)
Since
, we choose
. Since
, there exists
such that
(3.4)
We claim that
. In fact, since
and
, for any
, we have
and
. Then, for any
,
(3.5)
and for any
,
(3.6)
By the
C-concavity of
, we have that
It follows that, for any
, there exist
,
and
such that
. It follows from the linearity of
ξ that
, which gives that
. For all
, by (3.5) and (3.6), we have
This implies that , that is, . By (3.4), we get that , which contradicts (3.3). Therefore, is l.s.c. at 0. Since is l.s.c. at 0, for above and for above , there exists a balanced neighborhood of 0 such that , . In particular, from , there exits such that . Let .
For any
, since
, there exists
such that
(3.7)
Since
is uniformly continuous on
, for above
, there exists a neighborhood
of
, a neighborhood
of
and a neighborhood
of
, for any
with
,
and
, we have
(3.8)
Since
K is H-u.s.c. at
, for above
, there exists a neighborhood
of
such that
(3.9)
We see that
. Since
K is l.s.c. at
, for
, there exists a neighborhood
of
such that
(3.10)
It follows from
that there exists a positive integer
such that
. Noting that (3.9) and (3.10), we obtain
(3.11)
and
(3.12)
By (3.12), we choose
(3.13)
Next, we prove that
. For any
, by (3.11), there exists
such that
. It follows from (3.13) that
. Noting that
and (3.8), we have
By (3.7), we have
(3.14)
Hence, for any
and
, there exist
and
such that
It follows from the linearity of
ξ that
for all
. This leads to
. Thus
Hence
. Also, since
and by (3.2) and (3.13), we have
This means that , which contradicts (3.1). This completes the proof. □
Theorem 3.3 We assume that for any given , there exists such that the approximate solution set exists in . Suppose that conditions (i)-(iv) as in Theorem 3.2 are satisfied. Assume further that for each , is a convex set. Then the approximate solution mapping is l.s.c. at .
Proof Since is a convex set for each , by virtue of Lemma 3.1, it holds that . It follows from Theorem 3.2 that for each , is l.s.c. at . Thus, in view of Lemma 2.4, we obtain that is l.s.c. at . □
The following example illustrates all of the assumptions in Theorem 3.3.
Example 3.4 Let
,
and
. Let
be the closed ball of radius
in
. Let
,
and the set-valued mapping
be defined by
where and . Define a set-valued mapping for all , by . We choose , , and . We can see that and . Further, for any , there exists such that . Hence, exists in . It is easy to observe that for any , is C-concave on . Clearly, condition (ii) is true. It is obvious that . Let , we can see that is uniformly continuous on . Finally, we can check that for each , is a convex set. Applying Theorem 3.3, we obtain that is l.s.c. at .
The following example illustrates that the concavity of F cannot be dropped.
Example 3.5 Let
,
and
. Let
,
and the set-valued mapping
be defined by
Define a set-valued mapping
for all
, by
. We choose
,
,
. Then, all the assumptions of Theorem 3.3 are satisfied except (iii). Indeed, taking
,
,
and
, we have
but
. The direct computation shows that
(3.15)
Clearly, we see that is even not l.s.c. at since is not C-concave on .