1 Introduction
Fractional calculus [1‐5] has kept attracting the interest of many authors in the last three decades or so. Some researchers have realized that finding new fractional derivatives with different singular or nonsingular kernels is essential in order to meet the need of modeling more real-world problems in different fields of science and engineering. In [6, 7] the authors studied a new type of fractional derivatives where the kernel is of exponential type and in [8, 9] the authors studied new different and interesting fractional derivatives with Mittag-Leffler kernels. Then the authors in [10, 11] studied the discrete counterparts of those new derivatives. We devote this work to an extension of the fractional calculus with Mittag-Leffler kernels to higher order, and we prove some existence and uniqueness theorems. The extension for right fractional operators and integrals is also considered to be used later by researchers in solving higher order fractional variational problems in the frame of Mittag-Leffler kernels by means of integration by parts depending on left and right fractional operators [12‐14].
As an application to our extension, we prove a Lypanouv type inequality for boundary value problems with fractional operators with Mittag-Leffler kernel and of order \(2< \alpha\leq3\). The limiting case of the obtained Lypanouv inequality as α tends to 2 from the right will give the following well-known classical Lyapunov inequality.
Anzeige
Theorem 1.1
[15] If the boundary value problem
has a nontrivial solution, where
q
is a real continuous function, then
$$y^{\prime\prime}(t)+q(t) y(t)=0,\quad t \in(a,b),\qquad y(a)=y(b)=0, $$
$$ \int_{a}^{b} \bigl\vert q(s) \bigr\vert \, ds> \frac{4}{b-a}. $$
(1)
The generalization of the above Lyapunov inequality to fractional boundary value problems have been the interest of some researchers in the last few years. For examples, we refer the reader to [16‐22]. For discrete fractional counterparts of Lyapunov inequalities we refer to [23] and for the q-fractional types we refer to [24].
The manuscript is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some basic and necessary concepts of fractional operators with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler kernels as discussed in [8, 9, 11]. In Section 3, we extend fractional operators with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler functions and their correspondent fractional integrals to arbitrary order \(\alpha>1\). In Section 4, we prove, using the Banach fixed point theorem, some existence and uniqueness theorems for Riemann (\(ABR\)) and Caputo (\(ABC\)) type initial value problems in the frame of fractional operators with Mittag-Leffler kernels, supported by some examples. In Section 5, We prove the Lyapunov type inequality for \(ABR\) boundary value problems and give an example of a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem. Finally, we finish by some conclusions in Section 6.
2 Preliminaries
Definition 2.1
[1]
Anzeige
For \(\alpha>0\), \(a \in\mathbb{R}\) and f a real-valued function defined on \([a,\infty)\), the left Riemann-Liouville fractional integral is defined by
The right fractional integral ending at b is defined by
$$\bigl({}_{a}I^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\alpha-1} f(s)\,ds. $$
$$\bigl(I_{b}^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_{t}^{b} (s-t)^{\alpha-1} f(s)\,ds. $$
Definition 2.2
Let \(f \in H^{1}(a,b)\), \(a< b\), \(\alpha\in[0,1]\), then the definition of the new (left Caputo) fractional derivative in the sense of Abdon and Baleanu becomes
and in the left Riemann-Liouville sense has the following form:
The associated fractional integral by
Here \(B(\alpha)>0\) is a normalization function satisfying \(B(0)=B(1)=1\). In the right case we have
and in the right Riemann-Liouville sense it has the following form:
The associated fractional integral by
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\frac{B(\alpha)}{1-\alpha} \int_{a}^{t} f^{\prime}(x)E_{\alpha}\biggl(-\alpha\frac{(t-x)^{\alpha}}{1-\alpha} \biggr)\,dx $$
(2)
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\frac{B(\alpha)}{1-\alpha}\frac{d}{dt} \int_{a}^{t} f(x)E_{\alpha}\biggl(-\alpha \frac{(t-x)^{\alpha}}{1-\alpha} \biggr)\,dx. $$
(3)
$$ \bigl({}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)= \frac{1-\alpha}{B(\alpha)}f(t)+\frac{\alpha }{B(\alpha)}\bigl( {}_{a}I^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t). $$
(4)
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABC}D_{b}^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)= \frac{-B(\alpha)}{1-\alpha} \int_{t}^{b} f^{\prime}(x)E_{\alpha}\biggl(-\alpha\frac{(x-t)^{\alpha}}{1-\alpha} \biggr)\,dx $$
(5)
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABR}D_{b}^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\frac{B(\alpha)}{1-\alpha}\frac{-d}{dt} \int _{t}^{b} f(x)E_{\alpha}\biggl(-\alpha \frac{(x-t)^{\alpha}}{1-\alpha} \biggr)\,dx. $$
(6)
$$ \bigl({}^{AB}I_{b}^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)= \frac{1-\alpha}{B(\alpha)}f(t)+\frac{\alpha }{B(\alpha)}\bigl(I_{b}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t). $$
(7)
In [8], it was verified that \(({}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}{}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\alpha}f)(t)=f(t)\) and \(({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\alpha}{}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}f)(t)=f(t)\). In the right case, it was verified in [9] that \(({}^{AB}I_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{ABR}D_{b}^{\alpha}f)(t)=f(t)\) and \(({}^{ABR}D_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{AB}I_{b}^{\alpha}f)(t)=f(t)\). From [8] or [9] we recall the relation between the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo new derivatives:
$$ \bigl({}^{ABC} _{a}D^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)=\bigl({}^{ABR} _{a}D^{\alpha}f\bigr) (t)- \frac {B(\alpha)}{1-\alpha} f(a)E_{\alpha}\biggl(-\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha }(t-a)^{\alpha}\biggr). $$
(8)
In the next section, we extend Definition 2.2 to arbitrary \(\alpha>0\).
Lemma 2.1
[11] For
\(0< \alpha< 1\), we have
and
$$ \bigl( {}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}{}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\alpha}f\bigr) (x)= f(x)-f(a) $$
$$ \bigl( {}^{AB}I_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{ABC}D_{b}^{\alpha}f\bigr) (x)= f(x)-f(b). $$
3 The higher order fractional derivatives and integrals
Definition 3.1
Let \(n<\alpha\leq n+1\) and f be such that \(f^{(n)} \in H^{1}(a,b)\). Set \(\beta=\alpha-n\). Then \(\beta\in(0,1]\) and we define
and in the left Riemann-Liouville sense it has the following form:
We have the associated fractional integral
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABC}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)=\bigl({}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\beta}f^{(n)} \bigr) (t) $$
(9)
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)=\bigl({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\beta}f^{(n)} \bigr) (t). $$
(10)
$$ \bigl({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)= \bigl( {}_{a}I^{n}{}^{AB}_{a}I^{\beta}f\bigr) (t). $$
(11)
Note that if we use the convention that \(( {}_{a}I^{0} f)(t)=f(t)\) then for the case \(0<\alpha\leq1\) we have \(\beta=\alpha\) and hence \(( {}_{a}\mathbf {I}^{\alpha}f)(t)=( {}_{a}I^{\alpha}f)(t)\). Also, the convention \(f^{(0)}(t)=f(t)\) leads to \(({}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}f)(t)= ({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\alpha}f)(t)\) and \(({}^{ABC}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}f)(t)= ({}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\alpha}f)(t)\) for \(0<\alpha\leq1\).
Remark 3.1
In Definition 3.1, if we let \(\alpha=n+1\) then \(\beta=1\) and hence \(( {}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}f)(t)=({}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{1} f^{(n)})(t)= f^{(n+1)}(t)\). Also, by noting that \(({}^{AB}_{a}I^{1}f)(t)=( {}_{a}I^{1} f)(t)\), we see that for \(\alpha=n+1\) we have \(({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf {I}^{\alpha}f)(t)=( {}_{a}I^{n+1} f)(t)\). Also, for \(0<\alpha\leq1\) we reobtain the concepts defined in Definition 2.2. Therefore, our generalization to the higher order case is valid.
Analogously, in the right case we have the following extension.
Definition 3.2
Let \(n<\alpha\leq n+1\) and f be such that \(f^{(n)} \in H^{1}(a,b)\). Set \(\beta=\alpha-n\). Then \(\beta\in(0,1]\) and we define
and in the right Riemann-Liouville sense it has the following form:
We have the associated fractional integral
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABC}\mathbf{D}_{b}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)=\bigl({}^{ABC}D_{b}^{\beta}(-1)^{n} f^{(n)}\bigr) (t), $$
(12)
$$ \bigl( {}^{ABR}\mathbf{D}_{b}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)=\bigl({}^{ABR}D_{b}^{\beta}(-1)^{n}f^{(n)} \bigr) (t). $$
(13)
$$ \bigl({}^{AB}\mathbf{I}_{b}^{\alpha}f \bigr) (t)= \bigl(I_{b}^{n}{}^{AB}I_{b}^{\beta}f\bigr) (t). $$
(14)
The next proposition explains the action of the higher order integral operator \({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) on the higher order \(ABR\) and \(ABC\) derivatives and, vice versa, the action of the \(ABR\) derivative on the AB integral.
Proposition 3.1
For
\(u(t)\)
defined on
\([a,b]\)
and
\(\alpha\in(n,n+1]\), for some
\(n \in\mathbb{N}_{0}\), we have:
-
\(( {}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}{}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)\).
-
\(({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}{}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{u^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (t-a)^{k}\).
-
\(({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}{}^{ABC}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{u^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (t-a)^{k}\).
Proof
• By Definition 3.1 and the statement after Definition 2.2 we have
where \(\beta=\alpha-n\).
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}{}^{AB}_{a} \mathbf{I}^{\alpha}u\bigr) (t) =& \biggl({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\beta}\frac{d^{n}}{dt^{n}} {}_{a}I^{n} {}^{AB}_{a}I^{\beta}u\biggr) (t) \\ =&\bigl({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\beta}{}^{AB}_{a}I^{\beta}u\bigr) (t)=u(t), \end{aligned}$$
(15)
• By Definition 3.1 and the statement after Definition 2.2 we have
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}{}^{ABR}_{a} \mathbf{D}^{\alpha}u\bigr) (t) =& \bigl( {}_{a}I^{n} {}^{AB}_{a}I^{\beta}{}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\beta}u^{(n)}\bigr) (t) \\ =& {}_{a}I^{n} u^{(n)}(t)= u(t)-\sum _{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{u^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (t-a)^{k}. \end{aligned}$$
(16)
• By Lemma 2.1 applied to \(f(t)=u^{(n)}(t)\) we have
□
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}[b] \bigl({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}{}^{ABC}_{a} \mathbf{D}^{\alpha}u\bigr) (t) &= {}_{a}I^{n} {}_{a}I^{\beta}{}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\beta}u^{(n)}(t) \\ &= {}_{a}I^{n} \bigl[ u^{(n)}(t)- u^{(n)}(a) \bigr] \\ &=u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{u^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (t-a)^{k}- u^{(n)}(a)\frac{ (t-a)^{n}}{n!} \\ &= u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{u^{(k)}(a)}{k!} (t-a)^{k}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(17)
Similarly, for the right case we have the following.
Proposition 3.2
For
\(u(t)\)
defined on
\([a,b]\)
and
\(\alpha\in(n,n+1]\), for some
\(n \in\mathbb{N}_{0}\), we have:
-
\(( {}^{ABR}\mathbf{D}_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{AB}\mathbf{I}_{b}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)\).
-
\(({}^{AB}\mathbf{I}_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{ABR}\mathbf{D}_{b}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \frac{(-1)^{k}u^{(k)}(b)}{k!} (b-t)^{k}\).
-
\(({}^{AB}\mathbf{I}_{b}^{\alpha}{}^{ABC}\mathbf{D}_{b}^{\alpha}u)(t)=u(t)-\sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{(-1)^{k}u^{(k)}(b)}{k!} (b-t)^{k}\).
Example 3.3
Consider the initial value problem:
where \(K(t)\) is continuous on \([0,b]\). We consider two cases depending on the order α:
$$ \bigl({}^{ABC}_{0}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}y \bigr) (t)=K(t),\quad t \in[0,b], $$
(18)
-
Assume \(0<\alpha\leq1\), \(y(0)=c\) and \(K(0)=0\). By applying \({}^{AB}_{0}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) and making use of Proposition 3.1, we get the solutionNotice that the condition \(K(0)=0\) verifies that the initial condition \(y(0)=c\). Also notice that when \(\alpha\rightarrow1\) we reobtain the solution of the ordinary initial value problem \(y^{\prime}(t)=K(t)\), \(y(0)=c\).$$y(t)=c+\frac{1-\alpha}{B(\alpha)}K(t)+\frac{\alpha}{B(\alpha)}\bigl( {}_{0}I^{\alpha}K(\cdot)\bigr) (t). $$
-
Assume \(1<\alpha\leq2\), \(K(0)=0 y(0)=c_{1}\), \(y^{\prime}(0)=c_{2}\): By applying \({}^{AB}_{0}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) and making use of Proposition 3.1 and Definition 3.1 with \(\beta=\alpha -1\), we get the solutionNotice that the solution \(y(t)\) verifies \(y(0)=c_{1}\) without the use of \(K(0)=0\). However, it verifies \(y^{\prime}(0)=c_{2}\) under the assumption \(K(0)=0\). Also, note that when \(\alpha\rightarrow2\) we reobtain the solution of the second order ordinary initial value problem \(y^{\prime \prime}(t)=K(t)\).$$y(t)=c_{1}+c_{2}t+\frac{2-\alpha}{B(\alpha-1)} \int_{0}^{t}K(s)\,ds+\frac{\alpha -1}{B(\alpha-1)\Gamma(\alpha)} \int_{0}^{t} (t-s)^{\alpha-1}K(s)\,ds. $$
Next section, we prove existence and uniqueness theorems for some types of \(ABC\) and \(ABR\) initial value problems.
Example 3.4
Consider the \(ABC\) boundary value problem
Then \(\beta=\alpha-1\) and by Proposition 3.1 applying the operator \({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) will result in the solution
But \(({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}q(\cdot)y(\cdot))(t)=\frac{1-\beta}{B(\beta )} \int_{a}^{t} q(s)y(s)\,ds+\frac{\beta}{B(\beta)} {}_{a}I^{\beta+1}q(t)y(t)\). Hence, the solution has the form
or
The boundary conditions imply that \(c_{1}=0\) and
Hence,
$$ \bigl({}^{ABC}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}y \bigr) (t)+q(t)y(t)=0,\quad 1< \alpha\leq2, a< t< b,\qquad y(a)=y(b)=0. $$
(19)
$$y(t)=c_{1}+c_{2}(t-a)-\bigl({}^{AB}_{a} \mathbf{I}^{\alpha}q(\cdot)y(\cdot)\bigr) (t). $$
$$y(t)=c_{1}+c_{2}(t-a)-\frac{2-\alpha}{B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} q(s)y(s)\,ds-\frac {\alpha-1}{B(\alpha-1)} {}_{a}I^{\alpha}q(t)y(t), $$
$$y(t)=c_{1}+c_{2}(t-a)-\frac{2-\alpha}{B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} q(s)y(s)\,ds-\frac {\alpha-1}{\Gamma(\alpha)B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\alpha-1}q(s)y(s)\,ds. $$
$$c_{2}=\frac{2-\alpha}{(b-a)B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{b} q(s)y(s)\,ds+\frac{\alpha -1}{(b-a)\Gamma(\alpha) B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{b} (b-s)^{\alpha-1}q(s)y(s)\,ds. $$
$$\begin{aligned} y(t) =& \frac{(2-\alpha)(t-a)}{(b-a)B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{b} q(s)y(s)\,ds-\frac{(\alpha-1)(t-a)}{\Gamma(\alpha)(b-a)B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{b} (b-s)^{\alpha-1}q(s)y(s)\,ds \\ &{}- \frac{2-\alpha}{B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} q(s)y(s)\,ds-\frac{\alpha -1}{\Gamma(\alpha)B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} (t-s)^{\alpha-1}q(s)y(s)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(20)
4 Existence and uniqueness theorems for the initial value problem types
In this section we prove existence uniqueness theorems for \(ABC\) and \(ABR\) type initial value problems.
Theorem 4.1
Consider the system
such that
\(f(a,y(a))=0\), \(A (\frac{1-\alpha}{B(\alpha)}+\frac {(b-a)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha) B(\alpha)})<1\), and
\(|f(t,y_{1})-f(t,y_{2})|\leq A |y_{1}-y_{2}|\), \(A>0\). Here
\(f:[a,b]\times\mathbb {R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\)
and
\(y:[a,b]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\). Then the system (21) has a unique solution of the form
$$ \bigl({}^{ABC}_{a}D^{\alpha}y\bigr) (t)=f\bigl(t,y(t)\bigr), \quad t\in[a,b], 0< \alpha\leq1, \qquad y(a)=c, $$
(21)
$$ y(t)=c+{}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha} f \bigl(t,y(t)\bigr). $$
(22)
Proof
First, with the help of Proposition 3.1, (8) and taking into account that \(f(a,y(a))=0\), it is straightforward to prove that \(y(t)\) satisfies the system (21) if and only if it satisfies (22).
Let \(X=\{x: \max_{t \in[a,b]}|x(t)|<\infty\}\) be the Banach space endowed with the norm \(\|x\|=\max_{t \in[a,b]}|x(t)|\). On X define the linear operator
Then, for arbitrary \(x_{1}, x_{2} \in X\) and \(t \in[a,b]\), we have by assumption
and hence T is a contraction. By the Banach contraction principle, there exists a unique \(x \in X\) such that \(Tx=x\) and hence the proof is complete. □
$$(Tx) (t)=c+{}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}f\bigl(t,x(t)\bigr). $$
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}[b] \bigl\vert (Tx_{1}) (t)-(Tx_{2}) (t) \bigr\vert &= \bigl\vert {}^{AB}_{a}I^{\alpha}\bigl[ f \bigl(t,x_{1}(t)\bigr)-f\bigl(t,x_{2}(t)\bigr)\bigr] \bigr\vert \\ &\leq A \biggl(\frac{1-\alpha}{B(\alpha)}+\frac{(b-a)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha ) B(\alpha)}\biggr) \|x_{1}-x_{2} \|, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(23)
Theorem 4.2
Consider the system
such that
\(\frac{A}{B(\alpha-1)} ((2-\alpha)(b-a)+\frac{(\alpha -1)(b-a)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1) } )<1\), and
\(|f(t,y_{1})-f(t,y_{2})|\leq A |y_{1}-y_{2}|\), \(A>0\). Here
\(f:[a,b]\times\mathbb {R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\)
and
\(y:[a,b]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\). Then the system (24) has a unique solution of the form
$$ \bigl({}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\alpha}y\bigr) (t)=f\bigl(t,y(t)\bigr), \quad t\in[a,b], 1< \alpha\leq2,\qquad y(a)=c, $$
(24)
$$\begin{aligned} y(t) =& c+{}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha} f\bigl(t,y(t)\bigr) \\ =& c+\frac{2-\alpha}{B(\alpha-1)} \int_{a}^{t} f\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr)\,ds+ \frac{\alpha -1}{B(\alpha-1)}\bigl( {}_{a}I^{\alpha}f\bigl(\cdot,y(\cdot) \bigr)\bigr) (t). \end{aligned}$$
(25)
Proof
If we apply \({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) to system (24) and make use of Proposition 3.1 with \(\beta=\alpha-1\) then we obtain the representation (25). Conversely, if we apply \({}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}\), make use of Proposition 3.1 and note that
we obtain the system (24). Hence, \(y(t)\) satisfies the system (24) if and only if it satisfies (25).
$${}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}={}^{ABR}_{a}D^{\beta} \frac{d}{dt}c=0, $$
Let \(X=\{x: \max_{t \in[a,b]}|x(t)|<\infty\}\) be the Banach space endowed with the norm \(\|x\|=\max_{t \in[a,b]}|x(t)|\). On X define the linear operator
Then, for arbitrary \(x_{1}, x_{2} \in X\) and \(t \in[a,b]\), we have by assumption
and hence T is a contraction. By the Banach contraction principle, there exists a unique \(x \in X\) such that \(Tx=x\) and hence the proof is complete. □
$$(Tx) (t)=c+{}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}f \bigl(t,x(t)\bigr). $$
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert (Tx_{1}) (t)-(Tx_{2}) (t) \bigr\vert =& \bigl\vert {}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\bigl[ f \bigl(t,x_{1}(t)\bigr)-f\bigl(t,x_{2}(t)\bigr)\bigr] \bigr\vert \\ \leq&\frac{A}{B(\alpha-1)} \biggl((2-\alpha) (b-a)+\frac{(\alpha -1)(b-a)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1) } \biggr) \|x_{1}-x_{2}\|, \end{aligned}$$
(26)
5 The Lyapunov inequality for the ABR boundary value problem
In this section, we prove a Lyapunov inequality for an \(ABR\) boundary value problem of order \(2\leq\alpha< 3\).
Consider the boundary value problem
$$ \bigl({}^{ABR}_{a}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}y \bigr) (t)+q(t)y(t)=0, \quad 2\leq\alpha< 3, t \in(a,b),\qquad y(a)=y(b)=0. $$
(27)
Lemma 5.1
\(y(t)\)
is a solution of the boundary value problem (27) if and only if it satisfies the integral equation
where
and
$$ y(t)= \int_{a}^{b} G(t,s) R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds, $$
(28)
$$G(t,s)= \left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{cc} \frac{(t-a) (b-s)}{b-a} & a \leq t \leq s\leq b, \\ ( \frac{(t-a) (b-s)}{b-a}-(t-s)) & a \leq s \leq t\leq b \end{array}\displaystyle \right \} $$
$$R\bigl(t,y(t)\bigr)=({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\beta}\bigl(q(\cdot)y(\cdot)\bigr) (t)=\frac{1-\beta }{B(\beta)}q(t)y(t)+\frac{\beta}{B(\beta)} \bigl( {}_{a}I^{\beta}q(\cdot)y(\cdot)\bigr) (t),\quad \beta= \alpha-2. $$
Proof
Apply the integral \({}^{AB}_{a}\mathbf{I}^{\alpha}\) to (27) and make use of Definition 3.1 and Proposition 3.1 with \(n=2\) and \(\beta=\alpha-2\) to obtain
$$\begin{aligned} y(t) =& c_{1}+c_{2} (t-a)-\bigl( {}_{a}I^{2} R\bigl(\cdot,y(\cdot)\bigr)\bigr) (t) \\ =& c_{1}+c_{2} (t-a)- \int_{a}^{t} (t-s)R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$
(29)
The condition \(y(a)=0\) implies that \(c_{1}=0\) and the condition \(y(b)=0\) implies that \(c_{2}=\frac{1}{b-a} \int_{a}^{b} (b-s)R(s,y(s)) \,ds\) and hence
Then the result follows by splitting the integral
□
$$y(t)=\frac{t-a}{b-a} \int_{a}^{b} (b-s)R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds- \int_{a}^{t} (t-s)q(s) R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds. $$
$$\int_{a}^{b} (b-s)R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds= \int_{a}^{t} (b-s)R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds+ \int_{t}^{b} (b-s)R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr) \,ds. $$
Lemma 5.2
The Green function
\(G(t,s)\)
defined in Lemma
5.1
has the following properties:
-
\(G(t,s)\geq0\) for all \(a\leq t,s \leq b\).
-
\(\max_{t \in[a,b]} G(t,s)=G(s,s)\) for \(s \in[a,b]\).
-
\(H(s,s)\) has a unique maximum, given by$$\max_{s \in[a,b]} G(s,s)= G\biggl(\frac{a+b}{2}, \frac{a+b}{2}\biggr)=\frac{(b-a)}{4}. $$
Proof
• It is clear that \(g_{1}(t,s)=\frac{(t-a) (b-s)}{b-a}\geq0\). Regarding the part \(g_{2}(t,s)=( \frac{(t-a) (b-s)}{b-a}-(t-s))\) we see that \((t-s)=\frac{t-a}{b-a}(b- (a+\frac{(s-a)(b-a)}{(t-a)}))\) and that \(a+\frac{(s-a)(b-a)}{(t-a)}\geq s\) if and only if \(s\geq a\). Hence, we conclude that \(g_{2}(t,s)\geq0\) as well. Hence, the proof of the first part is complete.
• Clearly, \(g_{1}(t,s)\) is an increasing function in t. Differentiating \(g_{2}\) with respect to t for every fixed s we see that \(g_{2}\) is a decreasing function in t.
• Let \(g(s)=G(s,s)=\frac{(s-a)(b-s)}{b-a}\). Then one can show that \(g^{\prime}(s)=0\) if \(s=\frac{a+b}{2}\) and hence the proof is concluded by verifying that \(g(\frac{a+b}{2})=\frac{b-a}{4}\). □
In the next lemma, we estimate \(R(t, y(t))\) for a function \(y \in C[a,b]\).
Lemma 5.3
For
\(y \in C[a,b]\)
and
\(2<\alpha\leq3\), \(\beta=\alpha-2\), we have for any
\(t \in[a,b]\)
where
$$\bigl\vert R\bigl(t,y(t)\bigr) \bigr\vert \leq T(t) \|y\|, $$
$$T(t)= \biggl[ \frac{3-\alpha}{B(\alpha-2)} \bigl\vert q(t) \bigr\vert + \frac{\alpha-2}{B(\alpha -2)} \bigl( {}_{a}I^{\alpha-2} \bigl\vert q(\cdot) \bigr\vert \bigr) (t) \biggr]. $$
Theorem 5.4
If the boundary value problem (27) has a nontrivial solution, where
\(q(t)\)
is a real-valued continuous function on
\([a,b]\), then
$$ \int_{a}^{b} T(s)\,ds> \frac{4}{b-a}. $$
(30)
Proof
Assume \(y \in Y=C[a,b]\) is a nontrivial solution of the boundary value problem (27), where \(\|y\|=\sup_{t \in[a,b]}|y(t)|\). By Lemma 5.1, y must satisfy
Then, by using the properties of the Green function \(G(t,s)\) proved in Lemma 5.2 and Lemma 5.3, we come to the conclusion that
$$y(t)= \int_{a}^{b} G(t,s) R\bigl(s,y(s)\bigr)\,ds. $$
$$\|y\|\leq\frac{b-a}{4} \int_{a}^{b} T(s)\,ds \|y\|. $$
From this (30) follows. □
Remark 5.1
Note that if \(\alpha\rightarrow2^{+}\), then \(T(t)\) tends to \(|q(t)|\) and hence one obtains the classical Lyapunov inequality (1).
Example 5.1
Consider the following \(ABR\) Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem (SLEP) of order \(2<\alpha\leq3\):
If λ is an eigenvalue of (31), then by Theorem 5.4 with \(q(t)=\lambda\), we have
$$ \bigl({}^{ABR}_{0}\mathbf{D}^{\alpha}y \bigr) (t)+\lambda y(t)=0,\quad 0< t< 1,\qquad y(0)=y(1)=0. $$
(31)
$$\begin{aligned} T(t) =& \biggl[ \frac{3-\alpha}{B(\alpha-2)}|\lambda|+\frac{\alpha -2}{B(\alpha-2)} {}_{0}I^{\alpha-2}|\lambda| \biggr] \\ =& |\lambda| \biggl[ \frac{3-\alpha}{B(\alpha-2)}+\frac{\alpha -2}{B(\alpha-2)} \frac{t^{\alpha-2}}{\Gamma(\alpha-1)} \biggr]. \end{aligned}$$
(32)
Hence, we must have
Notice that the limiting case \(\alpha\rightarrow2^{+}\) implies that \(|\lambda|>4\). This is the lower bound for the eigenvalues of the ordinary eigenvalue problem:
$$\int_{0}^{1} T(s)\,ds=|\lambda| \biggl[ \frac{3-\alpha}{B(\alpha-2)}+\frac {\alpha-2}{\Gamma(\alpha)B(\alpha-2)} {} \biggr]>4. $$
$$y^{\prime\prime}(t)+\lambda y(t)=0, \quad 0< t< 1,\qquad y(0)=y(1)=0. $$
6 Conclusions
We have extended the order of the fractional operators with nonsingular Mittag-Leffler function kernels from order \(\alpha\in [0,1]\) to arbitrary order \(\alpha>1\). Their corresponding higher order integral operators have been defined as well and confirmed. The right fractional extension is also considered. We proved existence and uniqueness theorems by means of the Banach fixed point theorem for initial value problems in the frame of \(ABC\) and \(ABR\) derivatives. We realized that the condition \(f(a,y(a))=0\) is necessary to guarantee a unique solution and hence the fractional linear initial value problem with constant coefficients results in the trivial solution unless the order is a positive integer. As an application to our extension, we proved a Lyapunov type inequality for a \(ABR\) boundary value problem with order \(2<\alpha\leq 3\) and then obtained the classical ordinary case when α tends to 2 from the right. This is different from the classical fractional case, where the Lyapunov inequality was proved for a fractional boundary problem of order \(1<\alpha\leq2\) and the classical ordinary case was recovered when α tends to 2 from the left.
Acknowledgements
The author(s) would like to thank Prince Sultan University for funding this work through the research group Nonlinear Analysis Methods in Applied Mathematics (NAMAM).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.