nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

21.08.2018

Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

verfasst von: S. Traversoni, J. Jutai, C. Fundarò, S. Salvini, R. Casale, A. Giardini

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Assistive technologies are widely implemented in clinical and research settings. Despite their dissemination, the psychosocial impact of their adoption still deserves further consideration. The aim of the present study is to determine the degree of compatibility between the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Methods

Six health professionals (two neurologists, one neuro-rehabilitation technician, two psychologists, one university professor of rehabilitation) created a technical board to discuss upon the PIADS–ICF linking. The standardized linking methodology was applied, and a Delphi technique was used to examine consensus.

Results

Five Delphi sessions were required to reach 100% of consensus and to finalize the procedure. Of the 26 PIADS’ items, 23 were linked to an ICF category: 9 items were endorsed at the 3rd ICF level, and 14 items at the 2nd ICF level. Two items were classified as “not defined” and 1 item as “not covered”.

Conclusion

The study highlighted the conceptual connection between the PIADS and the ICF framework and set a bio-psychosocial standpoint by which accounting the role of assistive devices in rehabilitation settings.

Vorheriger Artikel Assessment of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in a homogeneous population under lifetime arsenic exposure

Nächster Artikel Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

For further information, contact Jeffrey Jutai: jjutai@uottawa.ca.

Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., & Stucki, G. (2018). Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 54(1), 110–117.PubMed

De Moura, L., dos Santos, W. R., de Castro, S. S., et al. (2017). Applying the ICF linking rules to compare population-based data from different sources: An exemplary analysis of tools used to collect information on disability. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1370734.CrossRefPubMed

Prodinger, B., Tennant, A., Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Üstün, T. B. (2016). Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: Requirements and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21(4), 223–228.CrossRef

Stucki, G., Cieza, A., & Melvin, J. (2007). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(4), 279–285.CrossRef

Lucas, J. W., Greenberg, M., & Beavan, K. (2017). Research on physical disability in sociological social psychology: The state of the field and future directions. Social Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12555.CrossRef

World Health Organisation. (2001). ICF. Geneva: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Stucki, G., & Grimby, G. (2004). Foreword: Applying the ICF in medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 5–6.CrossRef

Escorpizo, R., Kostanjsek, N., Kennedy, C., et al. (2013). Harmonizing WHO’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Importance and methods to link disease and functioning. BMC Public Health, 13, 742.CrossRef

Stucki, G. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) a promising framework and classification for rehabilitation medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(10), 733–740.CrossRef

10.

Madden, R. H., & Bundy, A. (2018). The ICF has made a difference to functioning and disability measurement and statistics. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1431812.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(5), 281–282.CrossRef

12.

ICF Research Branch. (2018). Retrieved June 28, 2018 from https://www.icf-research-branch.org.

13.

Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., et al. (2002). Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 205–210.CrossRef

14.

Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., et al. (2005). ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(4), 212–218.CrossRef

15.

Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., et al. (2016). Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ballert, C., Hopfe, M., Kus, S., et al. (2016). Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: A systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14, 1–17.CrossRef

17.

Fayed, N., Cieza, A., & Bickenbach, J. E. (2011). Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: A systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(21–22), 1941–1951.CrossRef

18.

Letellier, M. E., Dawes, D., & Mayo, N. (2015). Content verification of the EORTC QLQ-C30/EORTC QLQ-BR23 with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research, 24, 757–768.CrossRef

19.

Nicol, R., Robinson, N. M., Hopfe, M., & Newell, D. (2016). Linking the Bournemouth Questionnaire for low back pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(11), 1089–1096.CrossRef

20.

Wong, A. W. K., Lau, S. C. L., Cella, D., et al. (2017). Linking of the quality of life in neurological disorders (Neuro-QoL) to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Quality of Life Research, 26(9), 2435–2448.CrossRef

21.

Azzopardi, R. V., Vermeiren, S., Gorus, E., et al. (2016). Linking Frailty Instruments to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.023.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Figueiredo, D. (2014). Linking the EASY-Care Standard to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(7), 593–599.CrossRef

23.

Sommer, R., Bullinger, M., Rohenkohl, A., et al. (2015). Linking a short-stature specific health-related quality of life measure (QoLISSY) to the International Classification of Functioning-Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(5), 439–446.CrossRef

24.

Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159–168.

25.

Day, H., Jutai, J., & Campbell, K. A. (2002). Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Lessons learned and the road ahead. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 31–37.CrossRef

26.

Garry, J., Casey, K., Cole, T. K., et al. (2016). A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care. Surgery, 159(3), 938–944.CrossRef

27.

Fundarò, C., Giardini, A., Maestri, R., Traversoni, S., Bartolo, M., & Casale, R. (2018). Motor and psychosocial impact of robot-assisted gait training in a real-world rehabilitation setting: A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 13(2), e0191894.CrossRef

28.

Borgestig, M., Falkmer, T., & Hemmingsson, H. (2013). Improving computer usage for students with physical disabilities through a collaborative approach: A pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(6), 463–470.CrossRef

29.

Pettersson, I., Ahlstrom, G., & Tornquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.CrossRef

30.

MacPhee, A. H., Kirby, R. L., Coolen, A. L., et al. (2004). Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(1), 41–50.CrossRef

31.

Andrich, R., Salatino, C., Converti, R. M., et al. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of powered wheelchairs: Findings of a study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 84–91.PubMed

32.

Kirby, R. L., & MacPhee, A. H. (2006). Re: An enhanced wheelchair-skills training program improved the competency of manual wheelchair users. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00567.x.CrossRef

33.

Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J. W. (2013). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17(3–4), 63–79.

34.

Ward, A. L., Hammond, S., Holsten, S., et al. (2015). Power wheelchair use in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Changes over time. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 238–245.CrossRef

35.

Salatino, C., Andrich, R., Converti, R. M., & Saruggia, M. (2016). An observational study of powered wheelchair provision in Italy. Assistive Technology, 28(1), 41–52.CrossRef

36.

Buning, M. E., Angelo, J. A., & Schmeler, M. R. (2001). Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: A pilot study. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 339–344.CrossRef

37.

Pousada García, T., Groba González, B., Rivero, N. L., et al (2015). Exploring the psychosocial impact of wheelchair and contextual factors on quality of life of people with neuromuscular disorders. Assistive Technology, 27(4), 246–256.CrossRef

38.

Pettersson, I., Ahlström, G., & Törnquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153.CrossRef

39.

Giesbrecht, E. M., Ripat, J. D., Quanbury, A. O., et al. (2009). Participation in community-based activities of daily living: Comparison of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(3), 198–207.PubMed

40.

Stucki, G. (2016). Olle Höök lectureship 2015: The World Health Organization’s paradigm shift and implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(6), 486–493.CrossRef

41.

World Health Organization. (1980). ICIDH. Geneva: International Classification of Impairments Disabilities and Handicaps.

42.

Trabacca, A., Moro, G., Gennaro, L., & Russo, L. (2012). When one plus one equals three: The ICF perspective of health and disability in the third millennium. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(4), 709–710.PubMed

43.

Stucki, G., Ewert, T., & Cieza, A. (2002). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(17), 932–938.CrossRef

44.

Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2013). Cook and Husseys’ assistive technologies, (4th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby

45.

Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107–111.

46.

Andrich, R., Pedroni, F., & Vanni, G. (2003). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Italian localization of the PIADS instrument. In G. Craddock et al. (Eds.), Assistive technology: Shaping the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

47.

Day, H., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., et al. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404.CrossRef

48.

Jutai, J., Day, H., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2004). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry, 74(5), 299–308.

49.

Demers, L., Monette, M., Lapierre, Y., et al. (2002). Reliability, validity and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 21–30.CrossRef

50.

Harada, N., Fong, S., Heiney, C., et al. (2014). Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Developmen, 51(2), 275–283.CrossRef

51.

Yachnin, D., Jutai, J., Gharib, G., et al. (2015). Can technology-assisted toilets improve quality of life for rehabilitating stroke patients? A pilot cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.101.CrossRef

52.

Wiklund Axelsson, S., Nyberg, L., Näslund, A., et al. (2013). The anticipated positive psychosocial impact of present web-based E-health services and future mobile health applications: An investigation among older Swedes. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/509198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1225–1237.CrossRef

54.

Darzins, S. W., Imms, C., & Di Stefano, M. (2016). Measurement of activity limitations and participation restrictions: Examination of ICF-linked content and scale properties of the FIM and PC-PART instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(10), 1025–1038.CrossRef

55.

Annicchiarico, R. (2012). Enhancing service delivering, improving quality of life, preserving independence through assistive technology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 180, 14–18.PubMed

56.

Hwang, C. S., Weng, H. H., Wang, L. F., et al. (2014). An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers burden. Journal of Motor Behavior, 46(4), 233–238.CrossRef

57.

Baldassin, V., Shimizu, H. E., & Fachin-Martins, E. (2018). Computer assistive technology and associations with quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 27(3), 597–607.CrossRef

58.

Eriksson, M., Jylli, L., Villard, L., Kroksmark, A. K., & Bartonek, A. (2018). Health-related quality of life and orthosis use in a Swedish population with arthrogryposis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364618774059.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Post, M. (2014). Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 20(3), 167–180.CrossRef

60.

Le, J., Dorstyn, D. S., Mpfou, et al. (2018). Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1885-5.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Hwang, K., & Mpofu, E. (2010). Health care quality assessments. In E. Mpofu & T. Oakland (Eds.), Rehabilitation and health assessment: Applying ICF guidelines (pp. 141–161). New York: Springer.

Titel: Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
verfasst von: S. Traversoni
J. Jutai
C. Fundarò
S. Salvini
R. Casale
A. Giardini
Publikationsdatum: 21.08.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1973-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2018

Impact of untreated dental caries severity on the quality of life of preschool children and their families: a cross-sectional study

Child maltreatment as a social determinant of midlife health-related quality of life in women: do psychosocial factors explain this association?

Factors associated with quality of life among married women in rural China: a cross-sectional study

Effectiveness of foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis related to disability and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Physical activity attenuates the impact of poor physical, mental, and social health on total and cardiovascular mortality in older adults: a population-based prospective cohort study

Identification and assessment of health-related quality of life issues in patients with sporadic desmoid-type fibromatosis: a literature review and focus group study

Premium Partner