Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Studies in Comparative International Development
Erschienen in: Studies in Comparative International Development 1/2009

01.03.2009

Making Decentralization Work: A Cross-national Examination of Local Governments and Natural Resource Governance in Latin America

verfasst von: Derek Kauneckis, Krister Andersson

Erschienen in: Studies in Comparative International Development | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There has been increased emphasis in the last three decades on the decentralization of natural resource governance decisions to local government in developing countries as a means of improving environmental quality, public service delivery, and the accountability of local officials. We examine the performance of decentralization of natural resource management services in a large sample of municipal governments in four Latin American countries. Our analysis includes a variety of factors discussed in the literature as important in influencing the responsiveness of government officials to local needs. We provide a nested institutional model in which local officials respond to incentives created by the structure of formal political institutions at both the local and national level. The results provide support for the importance of considering local and national institutional arrangements as these co-determine the political incentives within decentralized systems.
Vorheriger Artikel Exchange Rate Regime, Central Bank Independence, and Political Business Cycles in Brazil
Nächster Artikel Divergent Outcomes of Labor Reform Politics in Democratized Korea and Taiwan

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
These descriptions are drawn from Andersson, Gordillo de Anda, and van Laerhoven 2008.
 
2
The fieldwork was carried out by DESER (South Brazil), SEI (Northeast Brazil), Centro Ideas (Peru, Sierra and Selva), Instituto APOYO (Peru, coastal region), Gestión y Desarrollo (Chile), INDESO (Mexico, center and northern states), and Instituto MAYA (Mexico, southern states).
 
3
Two CBO’s were found and interviewed in all municipalities. In Chile, representatives of three community-based organizations were interviewed.
 
4
A variety of tests for multicollinearity were performed on the independent variables. The highest degree of correlation between variables (-0.67) was between leftist party candidates and local reelection, likely representing the wave of leftist parties taking power during the same period. Other variables with high collinearly include the obvious relationship between mayoral reelection and the length of their position (0.51).
 
5
Although a simple t-test comparing the average number of groups across centralized and decentralized regimes was performed, there is no significant difference.
 
Literatur
Agrawal A, Gibson CC. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev 1999;27(4):629–49.CrossRef
Agrawal A, Ostrom E. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 2001;29(4):485–30.CrossRef
Agrawal A, Ribot J. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. J Dev Areas 1999;33:473–502. (Summer).
Alesina A, Spolaore E. On the number and size of nations. Q J Econ 1997;112(4):1027–56.CrossRef
Ames B. Electoral rules, constituency pressures, and pork barrel: bases of Voting in the Brazilian congres. J Polit 1995;57(2):324–43.CrossRef
Andersson K. What motivates municipal governments? Uncovering the institutional incentives for municipal governance of forest resources in Bolivia. J Environ Dev 2003;12(1):5–27.CrossRef
Andersson K, van Laerhoven F. From local strongman to facilitator: institutional incentives for participatory municipal governance in Latin America. Comp Polit Stud 2007;40(9):1085–111.CrossRef
Andersson K, Gibson C, Lehoucq F. The politics of decentralizing natural resource policy. PS Polit Sci Polit 2004;37(3):421–26.
Andersson K, Gordillo de Anda G, van Laerhoven F. Local governments and rural development: comparing lessons from Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 2008.
Bardhan P, Mookherjee D. Capture and governance at local and national levels. Am Econ Rev 2000;90(2):135–39.
Bardhan P, Mookherjee D. Decentralization and accountability in infrastructure delivery in developing countries. Econ J 2006;116(508):101–27.CrossRef
Blair H. Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev 2000;28(1):21–39.CrossRef
Booth J, Richard PB. Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. J Polit 1998;60(3):780–800.CrossRef
Bowles S, Gintis H. Social capital and community governance. Econ J 2002;112:419–36.CrossRef
Brinkerhoff DW, Goldsmith AA. How citizens participate in macroeconomic policy: international experience and implications for poverty reduction. World Dev 2003;31:685–701.CrossRef
Brown CJ, Purcell M. There’s nothing inherent about scale: political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum 2005;36:607–24.CrossRef
Burki SJ, Perry GE. Decentralization and accountability of the public sector, 440. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1999.
Burki SJ, Perry G, Dillinger W, Griffin C, Gutman J, Rojas F, et al. Beyond the center — decentralizing the state, 124. Washington, D.C.: World Bank; 1999.
Calvo E, Murillo MV. Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. Am J Polit Sci 2004;48(4):742–57.CrossRef
Crook R, Manor J. Democracy and decentralization in Southeast Asia and West Africa: participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 1998.
Deininger K, Mpuga P. Does greater accountability improve the quality of public service delivery? Evidence from Uganda. World Dev 2005;33(1):171–91.CrossRef
Delury G. World encyclopedia of political systems and parties. New York: Facts on File New York; 1999.
Dillinger B. Decentralization, politics and public sector. In: Estache A, editor. Decentralizing infrastructure: advantages and limitations. World Bank Discussion Papers 290. Washington D.C.: World Bank; 1995.
Environmental Law Institute. Decentralization of environmental protection in Mexico: an overview of state and local laws and institutions. Washington D.C.: Environmental Law Institute; 1996.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Encuestas Munipales en Brasil, Chile, Mexico y Peru. Santiago, Chile: FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Carribbean; 2002.
Favareto A, de Marco D. Políticas Públicas, Participação Social E as Instituções Para O Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável. Uma Avaliação Dos Conselhos Municipais De Desenvolvimento Rural. São Paulo, Brasilia; 2002.
Fisman R, Gatti R. Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J Public Econ 2002;83(3):325–45.CrossRef
Fiszbein A. The emergence of local capacity: lessons from Colombia. World Dev 1997;25(7):1029–43.CrossRef
Fox J. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: lessons from Mexico. World Polit 1994;46(2):151–84.CrossRef
Gerber E, Kollman K. Introduction-authority migration: defining an emerging research agenda. Polit Sci Polit 2004;37:397–401.
Hooghe L, Marks G. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 2003;97(2):233–43.
IDB. Economic and social progress in Latin America: the politics of policies. In IPES. Washington DC: Interamerican Development Bank; 2006.
Joshi A. Institutions and service delivery in Asia. IDS Bulletin 2006;37(3):115–29.CrossRef
Kaufman D, Kraay A. Growth without governance. Economia 2002;3(1):169–229. (Fall).
King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am J Polit Sci 2000;44(2):341–55.CrossRef
Larson AM. Natural resources and decentralization in Nicaragua: are local governments up to the job? World Dev 2002;30(1):17–31.CrossRef
Levi M. Social and unsocial capital: a review essay of Robert Putnam’s making democracy work. Polit Soc 1996;24(1):45–55.CrossRef
Litvack JI, Ahmad J, Bird RM. Rethinking decentralization in developing countries, 52. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1998.CrossRef
Long SJ, Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station: Stata; 2003.
Manin B, Przeworski A, Stokes S. Elections and representation. In: Manin B, Przeworski A, Stokes S, editors. Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Manor J. The political economy of democratic decentralization, 145. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1999.CrossRef
McKinnon R. The logic of market-preserving federalism. Va Law Rev 1997;83(1521):1573–80.CrossRef
Meinzen-Dick R, Knox A, Di Gregorio M. Collective action, property rights and devolution of forest and protected area management. In: Arun and Elinor Ostrom Agrawal, editor. Collective action, property rights and devolution of natural resource management, 1999.
Montero A, Samuels D. Decentralization and democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 2004.
Nickson AR. Local government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 1995.
Oakerson R. Governing local public economies: creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, California: ICS; 1999.
Oates WE. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace and Jovanovich; 1972.
Ostrom E. Decentralization and development: the new panacea. In: Hughes J, Dowding K, Margetts H, editors. Psa yearbook: the challenge to democracy. New York: Macmillan; 2000.
Ostrom V, Tiebout C, Warren R. The organization of government in metropolitan areas. Am Polit Sci Rev 1961;55:831–42.CrossRef
Oyono PR. One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources managment decentralization in Cameroon. J Mod Afr Stud 2004;42(1):91–111.CrossRef
Panizza U. On the determinants of fiscal centralization: theory and evidence. J Publ Econ 1999;74(1):97–139.CrossRef
Paul S. Making voice work: the report card on Banglalore’s public service. In policy research working paper series. Washington DC: The World Bank; 1998.
Peterson G. Decentralization in Latin America: learning through experience. Washington DC: World Bank; 1997.
Prud’homme R. The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer (1995).
Purcell M, Brown JC. Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development. Prog Dev Stud 2005;5(4):279–97.CrossRef
Putnam R, Leonardi R, Nanetti R. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
Reilly C. New paths to democratic development in Latin America: the rise of Ngo-Municiple collaboration. Boulder: L. Rienner; 1995.
Ribot JC. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2002.
Ribot JC. Waiting for democracy: the politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2004.
Riker W. Federalism: origins, operation and significance. Little, Brown and Company; 1964.
Riker W, Schaps R. Disharmony in federal government. Behav Sci 1957;2:276–90.CrossRef
Rodden J. Comparative federalism and decentralization: on meaning and measurement. Comp Polit 2003;36(4):481–500.CrossRef
Rodden J, Rose-Ackerman S. Does federalism preserve markets? Va Law Rev 1997;83:1521–615.CrossRef
Rodden J, Wibbels E. Beyond the fiction of federalism. World Polit 2002;54(4):494–531.CrossRef
Rodriquez V. Decentralization in Mexico: from refora municipal to solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview; 1997.
Rondinelli DA, McCoullough JS, Johnson RW. Analyzing decentralization policies in developing countries: a political-economy framework. Dev Change 1989;20(1):5–27.CrossRef
Rose-Ackerman S. The economics and politics of federalism: tensions and complementarities. APSA-CP Newsletter. 2000.
Rothchild D. Strengthening African Local Initiative: Local Self-Governance, Decentralization, and Accountability," edited by Hamburg Institut fur Afrika-Kunde, 1994.
Rowland AM. Population as a determinant of local outcomes under decentralization: illustrations from small municipalities in Bolivia and Mexico. World Dev 2001;29(8):1373–89.CrossRef
Rubinfeld D. On federalism and economic development. Va Law Rev. 1997;83(1573).
Scott JC. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998.
Seabright P. Accountability and decentralization in government: an incomplete contracts model. Eur Econ Rev 1996;40(1):61–89.CrossRef
Stein E. Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. J Appl Econ 1999;2(2):357–91.
Stiglitz J. The role of government in the economies of developing countries. In: Malinvaud E, et al, editor. Development strategies and the management of the market economy, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon; 1997.
Tendler J. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1997.
Teune H. Local government and democratic political development. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 1996;540:11–23.CrossRef
Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 1956;64:416–24. October.CrossRef
Transparency International. Global corruption report 2005. Berlin: Transparency International; 2005.
Treisman D. The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Public Econ 2000;76(3):399–45.CrossRef
Ward P, Rodriquez V. Opposition government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 1995.
Ward P, Rodriquez V. New federalism and state government in Mexico. Vol. U.S.–Mexican Policy Report No. 9, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin; 2000.
WBRI. Governance matters iii: governance indicators 1996–2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper," edited by World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank Research Institute (WBRI); 2003.
Weingast BR. The economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. J Law Econ Organ 1995;11:1–31.
Wibbels E. Federalism and the politics of macroeconomic policy and performance. Am Polit Sci Rev 2000;44:687–702.CrossRef
Wildavsky A. A bias toward federalism: confronting the conventional wisdom on the delivery of governmental services. Publis. 1976:95–120.
Willis E, Garman C, Haggard S. The politics of decentralization in Latin America. Lat Am Res Rev 1999;34(1):7–50.
Woolcock M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Soc 1998;27:151–208.CrossRef
World Bank. Building institutions for markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
Zaz Friz Burga JESO. La Descentralización Política En La América Latina. Lima, Peru: Fondo Editorial Del Congreso de Perú; 2001.
Metadaten
Titel
Making Decentralization Work: A Cross-national Examination of Local Governments and Natural Resource Governance in Latin America
verfasst von
Derek Kauneckis
Krister Andersson
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Studies in Comparative International Development / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0039-3606
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-6167
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9036-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Studies in Comparative International Development 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Exchange Rate Regime, Central Bank Independence, and Political Business Cycles in Brazil

OriginalPaper

Divergent Outcomes of Labor Reform Politics in Democratized Korea and Taiwan

Acknowledgments

SCID Reviewers 2008

OriginalPaper

Authoritarian Co-optation, the Territorial Dimension: Provincial Political Representation in Post-Mao China

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise