Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2017

30.04.2015

Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives?

verfasst von: Olivier Boiral, Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The increasing pressures to conserve biodiversity—particularly for industries based on the exploitation of natural resources—have reinforced the need to implement specific measures in this area. Corporate commitment to preserving biodiversity is increasingly scrutinized by stakeholders and now represents an important aspect of business ethics. Although stakeholder involvement is often essential to the management of biodiversity, very few studies in the literature have focused on the details of this involvement. The objective of this paper is to analyze how mining and forestry companies can manage biodiversity issues through stakeholder involvement based on a content analysis of 430 sustainability reports using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. The paper elucidates the reasons for such involvement, the nature of stakeholders involved, and the types of measures employed to manage biodiversity. Stakeholders’ motives for becoming involved revolve around four main issues: complexity and knowledge management; self-regulation and relationships with public authorities; legitimacy and social responsiveness; and commercial and strategic objectives. The stakeholders involved in biodiversity initiatives are essentially non-governmental organizations, experts and universities, public authorities, and coalitions of companies. In the end, the initiatives identified can be grouped into three categories: management practices, socio-political actions, and research and conservation measures. The paper provides various examples of these initiatives and shows how they can be implemented in collaboration with different stakeholders depending on the company’s objectives. The contributions the study makes to the literature on biodiversity management and the managerial implications of the study are analyzed in the discussion section.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The global reporting initiative (GRI) is the most widely used international guideline for sustainability reporting.
 
2
The indicators related to the environmental dimension of sustainability reporting are codified with the EN abbreviation in the GRI model.
 
3
The format of, information made available (addition or removal of certain reports) and the Internet address of this database have changed overtime. Currently, this database is available at http://​www.​database.​globalreporting.​org/​search (consulted in February 2014).
 
4
Reports with a plus (A+, B+, C+) have been verified through an external assurance process. Levels A, B and C describe the completeness of the report in terms of disclosure on performance indicators, sector supplement indicators, and management approach (GRI 2006).
 
5
This estimation is based on single spaced text and does not take into account the images inserted in the reports.
 
6
Inter-coder reliability was analyzed for 32 reports and the two coders were in agreement for 81 % of passages, which can be considered acceptable (Miles and Huberman 1994; Campbell et al. 2013).
 
7
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification aims to promote the sustainable forest through the implementation of various environmental management practices, including consultations with the stakeholders affected by forestry operations.
 
8
Each initiative is associated with a specific sub-category resulting from the QDA categorization process.
 
9
ISO 14001 has therefore not been considered in this study.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639–662.CrossRef Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639–662.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRef Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bansal, P., & Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165–180.CrossRef Bansal, P., & Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165–180.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.CrossRef Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18(1), 127–146.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRef Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A + GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society & Natural Resources, 15(1), 41–64.CrossRef Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., & West, P. C. (2002). Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society & Natural Resources, 15(1), 41–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.CrossRef Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Butchart, S. H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P., Almond, R. E.,… & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164–1168. Butchart, S. H., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P., Almond, R. E.,… & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164–1168.
Zurück zum Zitat Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRef Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardskadden, H., & Lober, D. J. (1998). Environmental stakeholder management as business strategy: The case of the corporate wildlife habitat enhancement programme. Journal of Environmental Management, 52(2), 183–202.CrossRef Cardskadden, H., & Lober, D. J. (1998). Environmental stakeholder management as business strategy: The case of the corporate wildlife habitat enhancement programme. Journal of Environmental Management, 52(2), 183–202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chieh-Wen, S., & Ming-Chia, C. (2011). Is moral intensity applicable to natural environment issues? African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7533–7541. Chieh-Wen, S., & Ming-Chia, C. (2011). Is moral intensity applicable to natural environment issues? African Journal of Business Management, 5(17), 7533–7541.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16–37.CrossRef Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16–37.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of U.S. corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443.CrossRef Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of U.S. corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 319–335.CrossRef Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), 319–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.CrossRef Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Didham, R. K. (2011). Life after logging: Strategic withdrawal from the Garden of Eden or tactical error for wilderness conservation? Biotropica, 43(4), 393–395.CrossRef Didham, R. K. (2011). Life after logging: Strategic withdrawal from the Garden of Eden or tactical error for wilderness conservation? Biotropica, 43(4), 393–395.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dobele, A. R., Westberg, K., Steel, M., & Flowers, K. (2013). An examination of corporate social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the Australian mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 145–159.CrossRef Dobele, A. R., Westberg, K., Steel, M., & Flowers, K. (2013). An examination of corporate social responsibility implementation and stakeholder engagement: A case study in the Australian mining industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 145–159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher, B., Edwards, D. P., Larsen, T. H., Ansell, F. A., Hsu, W. W., Roberts, C. S., & Wilcove, D. S. (2011). Cost-effective conservation: Calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia. Conservation Letters, 4(6), 443–450.CrossRef Fisher, B., Edwards, D. P., Larsen, T. H., Ansell, F. A., Hsu, W. W., Roberts, C. S., & Wilcove, D. S. (2011). Cost-effective conservation: Calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia. Conservation Letters, 4(6), 443–450.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher, R. (2009). Ecotourism discourse: Challenging the stakeholders theory. Journal of Ecotourism, 8(3), 269–285.CrossRef Fletcher, R. (2009). Ecotourism discourse: Challenging the stakeholders theory. Journal of Ecotourism, 8(3), 269–285.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser, E. D., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRef Fraser, E. D., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.CrossRef Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRef Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257.CrossRef Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245–257.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.CrossRef Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 292–299.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRef Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam: GRI. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam: GRI.
Zurück zum Zitat GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2007). Biodiversity: A GRI reporting resource. Amsterdam: GRI. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2007). Biodiversity: A GRI reporting resource. Amsterdam: GRI.
Zurück zum Zitat GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2014). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: Frequently asked questions. Amsterdam: GRI. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2014). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines: Frequently asked questions. Amsterdam: GRI.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420.CrossRef Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 401–420.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholder for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.CrossRef Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholder for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson, L. L., Lopoukhine, N., & Hillyard, D. (1995). Ecological restoration: A definition and comments. Restoration Ecology, 3(2), 71–75.CrossRef Jackson, L. L., Lopoukhine, N., & Hillyard, D. (1995). Ecological restoration: A definition and comments. Restoration Ecology, 3(2), 71–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 271–284.CrossRef Jenkins, H., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 271–284.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2013). Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 668–687.CrossRef Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2013). Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 668–687.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor, I. (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), 269–279.CrossRef Kapoor, I. (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3), 269–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kitula, A. G. N. (2006). The environmental and socio-economic impacts of mining on local livelihoods in Tanzania: A case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 405–414.CrossRef Kitula, A. G. N. (2006). The environmental and socio-economic impacts of mining on local livelihoods in Tanzania: A case study of Geita District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3), 405–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat KPMG. (2013). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zurich: KPMG International. KPMG. (2013). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zurich: KPMG International.
Zurück zum Zitat Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRef Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mahanty, S., & Russell, D. (2002). High stakes: Lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Society & Natural Resources, 15(2), 179–188.CrossRef Mahanty, S., & Russell, D. (2002). High stakes: Lessons from stakeholder groups in the biodiversity conservation network. Society & Natural Resources, 15(2), 179–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRef O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, D., Swift, T., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRef Owen, D., Swift, T., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 38–64.CrossRef Pasquero, J. (1991). Supraorganizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 38–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRef Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ accountability on sustainability: The evolution of third-party assurance of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(2), 173–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pistorius, T., & Reinecke, S. (2013). The interim REDD + partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards? Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 80–86.CrossRef Pistorius, T., & Reinecke, S. (2013). The interim REDD + partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards? Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 80–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419–442.CrossRef Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419–442.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polonsky, M. J. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 29–46.CrossRef Polonsky, M. J. (1995). A stakeholder theory approach to designing environmental marketing strategy. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 29–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Prakash, A. (2002). Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 285–297.CrossRef Prakash, A. (2002). Green marketing, public policy and managerial strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 285–297.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.CrossRef Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Putz, F. E., Blate, G. M., Redford, K. H., Fimbel, R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Tropical forest management and conservation of biodiversity: An overview. Conservation Biology, 15, 7–20.CrossRef Putz, F. E., Blate, G. M., Redford, K. H., Fimbel, R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Tropical forest management and conservation of biodiversity: An overview. Conservation Biology, 15, 7–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rands, M. R., Adams, W. M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S. H., Clements, A., Coomes, D., & Vira, B. (2010). Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science, 329(5997), 1298–1303.CrossRef Rands, M. R., Adams, W. M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S. H., Clements, A., Coomes, D., & Vira, B. (2010). Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science, 329(5997), 1298–1303.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.CrossRef Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rimmel, G., & Jonäll, K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: Corporate disclosure and preparers’ views. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 746–778.CrossRef Rimmel, G., & Jonäll, K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: Corporate disclosure and preparers’ views. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 746–778.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers, E., & Weber, E. P. (2010). Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 546–567.CrossRef Rogers, E., & Weber, E. P. (2010). Thinking harder about outcomes for collaborative governance arrangements. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 546–567.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Salafsky, N., Cauley, H., Balachander, G., Cordes, B., Parks, J., Margoluis, C.,… & Margoluis, R. (2001). A Systematic Test of an Enterprise Strategy for Community‐Based Biodiversity Conservation. ConservationBiology, 15(6), 1585-1595. Salafsky, N., Cauley, H., Balachander, G., Cordes, B., Parks, J., Margoluis, C.,… & Margoluis, R. (2001). A Systematic Test of an Enterprise Strategy for Community‐Based Biodiversity Conservation. ConservationBiology15(6), 1585-1595.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarkis, J., González-Torre, P., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRef Sarkis, J., González-Torre, P., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartzman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2005). Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 721–727.CrossRef Schwartzman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2005). Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 721–727.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163–179.CrossRef Townley, B. (2002). The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 163–179.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Turcotte, M. F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464.CrossRef Turcotte, M. F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4), 447–464.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Unerman, J., Bebington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2007). Sustainability, Accounting and accountability. New York: Routhledge. Unerman, J., Bebington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2007). Sustainability, Accounting and accountability. New York: Routhledge.
Zurück zum Zitat VanLiempd, D., & Busch, J. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 833–872.CrossRef VanLiempd, D., & Busch, J. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 833–872.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65–90.CrossRef Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1991). Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 65–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381–403.CrossRef Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H. (1997). Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. Organization Science, 8(4), 381–403.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Winn, M. I., & Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26(2), 203–229.CrossRef Winn, M. I., & Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26(2), 203–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wishart, R. (2012). Coal River’s Last Mountain King Coal’s Après moi le déluge Reign. Organization & Environment, 25(4), 470–485.CrossRef Wishart, R. (2012). Coal River’s Last Mountain King Coal’s Après moi le déluge Reign. Organization & Environment, 25(4), 470–485.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Young, J. C., Jordan, A. R., Searle, K., Butler, A. S., Chapman, D., Simmons, P., & Watt, A. D. (2013). Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation, 158, 359–370.CrossRef Young, J. C., Jordan, A. R., Searle, K., Butler, A. S., Chapman, D., Simmons, P., & Watt, A. D. (2013). Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation, 158, 359–370.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Young, J., Richards, C., Fischer, A., Halada, L., Kull, T., Kuzniar, A., et al. (2007). Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the Central and Eastern European countries. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7), 545–550.CrossRef Young, J., Richards, C., Fischer, A., Halada, L., Kull, T., Kuzniar, A., et al. (2007). Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the Central and Eastern European countries. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7), 545–550.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmerman, B., Peres, C. A., Malcolm, J. R., & Turner, T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 10–22.CrossRef Zimmerman, B., Peres, C. A., Malcolm, J. R., & Turner, T. (2001). Conservation and development alliances with the Kayapó of south-eastern Amazonia, a tropical forest indigenous people. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 10–22.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Managing Biodiversity Through Stakeholder Involvement: Why, Who, and for What Initiatives?
verfasst von
Olivier Boiral
Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2668-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner