nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Managing Microfinance Institutions: Analyzing How Relationships Influence Entrepreneurial Behavior

verfasst von : Fernando A. Moya-Dávila, Ananya Rajagopal

Erschienen in: Innovation, Technology, and Market Ecosystems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Modern financial intermediation research has focused its attention on the role that relationship plays in the lender-borrower interaction. As information asymmetries are critical for financial intermediation at all levels of lending (especially for those lending to the poor), building relationship has been considered an alternative type of lending to diminish this problem. Microfinance institutions (MFI) while using the relationship to lend hold most of the risk of lending. How do they know whom to lend? What are the probabilities of the borrower to pay the loan back on time? What are the characteristics of the borrowers that influence a positive behavior to pay back the loan on time? Using a recent unique data set from a Mexican MFI (SOFIPA) we analyze 122,594 credits given to active entrepreneurial poor women in a joint liability-based group lending model. Our results suggest that social ties and a stronger relationship built between the MFI and the women determine a better repayment performance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Coal-Sourcing Options for Captive Power Plants of Aluminum Smelters in India: Issues and Challenges

Nächstes Kapitel Directing Institutional Capital to India’s Renewable Energy Sector

SOFIPA (Sociedad Financiera del Pacífico) is an MFI that operates in the state of Oaxaca, Mexico, lending to groups of women from the states of Puebla, Michoacán, Guerrero, and Oaxaca. http://www.sofipa.org.mx/.

From Tables 5.4 and 5.5, general information of regression (1) is disclosed.

Angelini, P., Di Salvo, R., & Ferri, G. (1998). Availability and cost of credit for small businesses: Customer relationships and credit cooperatives. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 925–954.CrossRef

Bauer, K., & Esqueda, O. A. (2017). Credit ratings, relationship lending and loan market efficiency. Studies in Economics and Finance, 34(1), 122–142.CrossRef

Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., & Udell, G. F. (2001). The ability of banks to lend to informational opaque small businesses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(12), 2127–2167.CrossRef

Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Universal banking and the future of small business lending. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 95–21.

Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2004). The institutional memory hypothesis and the procyclicality of bank lending behavior. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 458–495.CrossRef

Berlin, M., & Mester, L. J. (1998). On the profitability and cost of relationship lending. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 873–897.CrossRef

Bhattacharya, S., & Thakor, A. V. (1993). Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(1), 2–50.CrossRef

Boot, A., & Thakor, A. V. (1994). Moral hazard and secured lending in an infinitely repeated credit market game. International Economic Review, 35, 899–920.CrossRef

Boot, A. W. A. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 7–25.CrossRef

Burlingame, G. M., Davis, D. R., & Kirchhoefer, J. (2017). Self-help groups, in reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Cambridge and London.

Chodorow-Reich, G. (2014). The employment effects of credit market disruptions: Firm level evidence from 2008–09 financial crisis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 1–59.CrossRef

Clarke, G., Cull, R., Soledad, M., Peria, M., & Sanchez, S. (2003). Foreign bank entry: Experience, implications for developing economies and agenda for further research. World Bank Research Observer, 18(1), 25–59.CrossRef

Cole, R. A. (1998). The importance of relationships to the availability of credit. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 959–977.CrossRef

Daskalkis, N., Jarvis, R., & Schizas, E. (2013). Financing practices and preferences for micro and small firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(1), 80–101.CrossRef

De Meza, D. (2002). Overlending? The Economic Journal, 112(477), F17–F31.CrossRef

De Meza, D., & Webb, D. (1987). Too much investment: A problem of asymmetric. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(2), 281–292.CrossRef

Degryse, H., & Cayseele, P. V. (2000). Relationship lending within a bank-based system: Evidence from European small business data. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 90–109.CrossRef

Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393–414.CrossRef

Durguner, S. (2017). Do borrower-lender relationships still matter for small business loans? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 50, 98–118.CrossRef

Elsas, R., & Krahnen, J. P. (1998). Is relationship lending special? Evidence from credit-file data in Germany. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(10–11), 1283–1316.CrossRef

Ferri, G., & Messori, M. (2000). Bank-firm relationships and allocative efficiency in northeastern and Central Italy and in the south. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1067–1095.CrossRef

Ghosh, S. (2016). Partial privatization, lending relationships and executive compensation: Evidence from Indian state-owned banks. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(1), 125–153.CrossRef

Harhoff, D., & Körting, T. (1998). Lending relationships in Germany: Empirical results from survey data. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 1317–1354.CrossRef

Hasan, I., Kobeissi, N., Wang, H., & Zhou, M. (2017). Bank financing, institutions, and regional entrepreneurial activities: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 52(3), 257–267.CrossRef

Hering, I., & Musshoff, O. (2017). Forewarned is forearmed – Repayment delays in microfinance relationships. Agricultural Finance Review, 77(2), 218–238.CrossRef

Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2007). The empirics of microfinance: What do we know? The Economic Journal, 117, F1–F10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02013.xCrossRef

Hu, H., Lian, Y., & Su, C. H. (2016). Do bank lending relationships affect corporate cash policy? Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 384–425.CrossRef

Jia, X., Heidhues, F., & Zeller, M. (2010). Credit rationing of rural households in China. Agricultural Finance Review, 70(1), 37–54.CrossRef

Kakani, R. K., & Thakur, M. (2010). Baring private equity partners India limited: Banking services for poor in Bangladesh. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Keeton, W. (1995). Multi-office bank lending to small businesses: Some new evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 80, 45–57.

Keeton, W. R. (1996). Do bank mergers reduce lending to businesses and farmers? New evidence from tenth district states, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Economic Review, 81(3), 63–75.

Khandker, S. R. (2012). Grameen bank lending: Does group liability matter? Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6204, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRef

Kong, R., Turvey, C., Xu, X., & Liu, F. (2014). Borrower attitudes, lender attitudes, and agricultural lending in rural China. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 32(2), 104–129.CrossRef

Levonian, M., & Soller, J. (1995). Small banks, small loans, small business. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper.

Longhofer, S. D., & Santos, J. A. C. (1998). The importance of bank seniority for relationship lending. Working Papers (Old Series) 9808, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedcwp/9808.html

Longhofer, S. D., & Santos, J. A. C. (2000). The importance of bank seniority for relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, 9(1), 57–89.CrossRef

Lopez-Espinosa, G., Matordomo, S., & Moreno, A. (2017). When does relationship lending start to pay? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 31, 16–29.CrossRef

Machauer, A., & Weber, M. (2000). Number of bank relationships: An indicator of competition, borrower quality, or just size? (No. 2000/06). CFS Working Paper.

Mahmood, S. (2011). Microfinance and women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 265–274.CrossRef

Marconatto-Diego, A. B., Luciano, B. C., Renaud, L., & Danilo, C. D. (2013). Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean: The influence of territory on female repayment performance in a polarized region. Management Decision, 15(8), 1596–1612.CrossRef

Mathur, P., & Agarwal, P. (2017). Self-help groups: A seed for intrinsic empowerment of Indian rural women. Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(2), 182–196.CrossRef

Nakamura, L. I. (1993). Commercial bank information: Information for the structure of banking. In L. J. White & M. Klausner (Eds.), Structural change in banking. Homewood: Business One Irwin.

Naser, M. A., & Crowther, D. (2016). Microfinance and women empowerment. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and stakeholding (developments in corporate governance and responsibility) (Vol. 10, pp. 49–65). London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRef

Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2000). What determines the number of bank relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 26–56.CrossRef

Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2001). The duration of bank relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 449–475.CrossRef

Paramanandam, A. D., & Packiriswamy, P. (2015). An empirical study on the impact of micro-enterprises on women empowerment. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 9(4), 298–314.CrossRef

Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. S. (1996). Bank regulatory agreements and real estate lending. Real Estate Economics, 24(1), 55–73.CrossRef

Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. S. (1998). Bank consolidation and small business lending: It’s not just bank size that matters. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 799–819.CrossRef

Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small businesses. Journal of Finance, 49, 3–37.CrossRef

Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 407–443.CrossRef

Rajan, R. G. (1992). Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arms length debt. Journal of Finance, 47, 1367–1400.CrossRef

Ray, S., & Mahapatra, S. (2016). Penetration of MFIs among Indian states: An understanding through micro variables. International Journal of Development Issues, 15(3), 294–305.CrossRef

Scott, J. A., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1999). Bank consolidation and small business lending: A small firm perspective. Proceedings 760, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Sharpe, S. A. (1990). Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. Journal of Finance, 45, 1069–1087.

Singh, V., & Padhi, P. (2017). Loan demand by micro-finance borrowers: Do self-help groups and joint liability groups differ? A case study of Mirzapur district. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(12), 1892–1905.CrossRef

Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71, 393–410.

Strahan, P. E., & Weston, J. P. (1998). Small business lending and the changing structure of the banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 821–845.CrossRef

Vandewalle, L. (2017). The role of accountants in Indian self-help groups: A trade-off between financial and non-financial benefits. World Development, 93, 177–192.CrossRef

Wellalage, N., & Locke, S. (2017). Access to credit by SMEs in South Asia: Do women entrepreneurs face discrimination. Research in International Business Finance, 41(October), 336–346.CrossRef

Titel: Managing Microfinance Institutions: Analyzing How Relationships Influence Entrepreneurial Behavior
verfasst von: Fernando A. Moya-Dávila
Ananya Rajagopal
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Innovation, Technology, and Market Ecosystems
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23009-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-23010-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23010-4_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"