nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

17. Managing Requirements Knowledge: Conclusion and Outlook

verfasst von : A. K. Thurimella, W. Maalej

Erschienen in: Managing Requirements Knowledge

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter summarises the Managing Requirements Knowledge book and concludes with the future work. For this purpose, we performed a case-by-case review of the book chapters as well as other relevant publications and extracted the research issues, main contributions, benefits or lessons learned, and future research directions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework

Lutz R, Lavin M, Lux J, Peters K, Rouquette NF (2013) Mining requirements from operational experience. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 3 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

Carrillo de Gea JM, Nicolás J, Alemán JLF, Toval A, Vizcaíno A, Ebert C (2013) Reusing requirements in global software engineering. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 8 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

Classen A, Heymans P, Schobbens P (2008) What’s in a feature: a requirements engineering perspective. FASE’08, Lecturer notes in computer science, vol 4961. Budapest, pp 16–30

Ghaisas S, Ajmeri N (2013) Knowledge-assisted ontology-based requirements evolution. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 7 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg

Dutoit A, Paech B (2003) Eliciting and maintaining knowledge for requirements evolution. In: Aurum A, Jeffery R, Wohlin C, Handzic M (eds) Managing software engineering knowledge. Springer, New York

Thurimella AK, Bruegge B (2012) Issue-based variability management. Inform Softw Technol 54(9):933–950CrossRef

Daramola O, Stålhane T, Omoronyia I, Sindre G (2013) Using ontologies and machine learning for hazard identification and analysis. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 6 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

Soffer A, Dori D (2013) Model-based requirements engineering framework for systems lifecycle support. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 13 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg

Narayan N, Delater A, Paech B, Bruegge B (2011) Enhanced traceability in model-based CASE tools using ontologies and information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MaRK’11), Trento, 30 Aug 2011

10.

Hull E, Jackson K, Dick J (2004) Requirements engineering. Springer, London

11.

Gervasi V, Gacitua R, Rouncefield M, Sawyer P, Kof L, Ma L, Piwek P, de Roeck A, Willis A, Yang H, Nuseibeh B (2013) Unpacking tacit knowledge for requirements engineering. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 2 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

12.

Maalej W, Thurimella A (2008–2010) Managing requirements knowledge, international workshop on, 2008–2010, IEEE, Barcelona/Atlanta/Sydney/Trento

13.

Stoiber R, Glinz M (2009) Modelling and managing tacit product line requirements knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2009 second international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK ’09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 60–64

14.

Liang P, Avgeriou P, He K (2010) Rationale management challenges in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK), Sydney, Australia, pp 16–21

15.

Maalej W, Thurimella A (2013) DUFICE: practical guidelines for managing requirements knowledge. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 4 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

16.

Smith S, Harrison M (2005) Measuring reuse in hazard analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 89(1): 93–104CrossRef

17.

Franch X, Quer C, Renault S, Guerlain C, Palomares C (2013) Constructing and using software requirements patterns. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 5 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

18.

Supakkul S, Hill T, Oladimeji EA, Chung L (2009) Capturing, organizing, and reusing knowledge of NFRs: an NFR pattern approach, managing requirements knowledge, Atlanta, USA, pp 75–84

19.

Sim SE, Gallardo-Valencia GE (2013) Performative and lexical knowledge sharing in agile requirements. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 9 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

20.

Lim SL, Damian D, Ishikawa F, Finkelstein A (2013) Using Web 2.0 for stakeholder analysis: StakeSource and its application in ten industrial projects. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 10 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

21.

Castro-Herrera C, Cleland-Huang J (2009) A machine learning approach for identifying expert stakeholders, managing requirements knowledge, international workshop on, second international workshop on managing requirements knowledge, Atlanta, USA, pp 45–49

22.

Ruhe G, Saliu M (2005) The art and science of software release planning. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Softw 22(6): 47–53CrossRef

23.

Dardenne A, van Lamsweerde A, Fickas S (1993) Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Sci Comput Prog 20:3–50MATHCrossRef

24.

Sharma R, Biswas KK (2013) Resolving inconsistency and incompleteness issues in software requirements. In Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 11 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

25.

Elfaki A (2013) Automated verification of variability models using first order logic. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 12 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

26.

Lohmann S, Heim P, Auer S, Dietzold S, Riechert R (2008) Semantifying requirements engineering – the softWiki approach, I-SEMANTICS, Graz, pp 182–185

27.

Lohmann S, Riechert T, Auer S (2008) Collaborative development of knowledge bases in distributed requirements elicitation. Software engineering (Workshops): agile knowledge sharing for distributed software teams, Munich, Germany pp 22–28

28.

Felfernig A, Friedrich G, Jannach D, Stumptner M, Zanker M (2003) Configuration knowledge representations for semantic web applications. AIEDAM 17(2):31–50

29.

Haarslev V, Möller R (2001) RACER system description. In: IJCAR 2001, LNAI, vol 2083. Siena, pp 701–705

30.

Ruhe G, Eberlein A, Pfahl D (2003) Trade-off analysis for requirements selection. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng (IJSEKE) 13(4):354–366

31.

Schrijver A (1998) Theory of linear and integer programming. Wiley, New YorkMATH

32.

Felfernig A, Ninaus G, Grabner H, Reinfrank F, Weninger L, Pagano D, Maalej W (2013) An overview of recommender systems in requirements engineering. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 14 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

33.

Burke R (2000) Knowledge-based recommender systems. Encyclop Libr Inform Syst 69(32): 180–200

34.

Knauss E, Meyer S (2013) Experience-based requirements engineering tools. In: managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 15 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

35.

Jastram M (2013) The eclipse requirements modelling framework. In: Managing requirements knowledge (Chapter 16 in this volume). Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

36.

Uenalan O, Riegel N, Weber S, Doerr J (2008) Using enhanced wiki-based solutions for managing requirements, first international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK), Barcelona, Spain, pp 63–67

37.

Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Garden City

38.

Glinz M (2007) On non-functional requirements. In: IEEE RE2007, New Delhi, India, pp 21–26

39.

Ali R, Solis C, Omoronyia I, Salehie M, Nuseibeh B (2012) Social adaptation: when software gives users a voice. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on evaluation of novel approaches to software engineering (ENASE 2012), Wroclaw, 29–30 June 2012

40.

Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (2006) Rationale management in software engineering. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

41.

Maalej W, Happel H, Rashid A (2009) When users become collaborators: towards continuous and context-aware user input. In: Proceedings of OOPSLA 2009 (Onward!), ACM, Orlando, USA

42.

Maalej W Pagano D (2011) On the socialness of software. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social computing and its applications, IEEE, Sydney, Australia

43.

Ko AJ, DeLine R, Venolia G (2007) Information needs in collocated software development teams. In: Proceedings of the 29th internatinal conference on software engineering, Minneapolis, USA, pp 344–353

44.

Sillito J, Murphy GC, De Volder K (2008) Asking and answering questions during a programming change task. Trans Softw Eng 34:434–451CrossRef

45.

Robillard MP (2009) What makes APIs hard to learn? Answers from developers. IEEE Softw 26:27–34CrossRef

46.

Iyer J, Richards D (2004) Evaluation framework for tools that manage requirements inconsistency. In: 9th Australian workshop on requirements engineering (AWRE’04), Adelaide, Australia

47.

Felfernig A, Friedrich G, Jannach D, Stumptner M (2004) Consistency-based diagnosis of configuration knowledge bases. Artif Intell 152(2):213–234MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

48.

Grether D, Plott C (1979) Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. Am Econ Rev 69(4):623–638

49.

Bettman J, Luce M, Payne J (1998) Constructive consumer choice. J Cons Res 25(3):187–217CrossRef

50.

Felfernig A, Friedrich G, Isak K, Shchekotykhin K, Jannach D, Teppan E (2009) Automated debugging of recommender user interface descriptions. J Appl Intell 31(1):1–14, SpringerCrossRef

51.

Hu M, Liu B (2004) Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Seattle, USA, pp 168–177

52.

Zimmermann O, Koehler J, Leymann F, Polley R, Schuster N (2009) Managing architectural decision models with dependency relations, integrity constraints, and production rules. J Syst Softw 82(8):1249–1267CrossRef

53.

Leite JA (2002) Evolving knowledge bases, frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands

54.

Avgeriou P, Grundy J, Hall JG, Lago P, Mistrík I (2011) Relating software requirements and architectures. Springer, New YorkCrossRef

55.

MaRK Community www1.cs.tum.edu/mark/community

56.

Jones P (2011) Can requirements tool vendors tell us about user needs? Fourth international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK), Trento, Italy, pp76–81

57.

Meyer B (1997) Object-oriented software construction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle RiverMATH

58.

Hoenderboom B, Liang P (2009) A survey of semantic wikis for requirements engineering, technical report RUG-SEARCH-09-L03, University of Groningen

59.

Maalej W, Thurimella A (2009) Towards a research agenda for recommendation systems in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on managing requirements knowledge, Atlanta

60.

Mairiza D, Zowghi D (2010) An ontological framework to manage the relative conflicts between security and usability requirements. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK), Sydney, Australia, pp 1–6

61.

Schubanz M, Pleuss A, Botterweck G, Lewerentz C (2012) Modeling rationale over time to support product line evolution planning. In: VaMoS 2012, Leipzig, Germany, pp 193–199

Titel: Managing Requirements Knowledge: Conclusion and Outlook
verfasst von: A. K. Thurimella
W. Maalej
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Managing Requirements Knowledge
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34418-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-34419-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34419-0_17

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"