nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

46. Marine Protected Areas: Global Framework, Regional MPA Networks and a National Example

verfasst von : Henning von Nordheim

Erschienen in: Handbook on Marine Environment Protection

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the last 15 years considerable progress has been made regarding the establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and the implementation of a worldwide MPA network, despite of great regional differences and the long way still to go to reach the targeted 10% coverage of world’s oceans by MPAs set by CBD for 2020 for all seas.

This article gives an overview of the latest developments within MPA networks, the state of play on global level, some examples stemming from Regional Sea Conventions and a national case study of the establishment of MPAs.

Most promising advances in global MPA establishment are the current “UN Prep Com-Process” that may lead to a stronger commitment of the United Nations within the framework of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and, possibly even more “fruitful”, the achievements of the global Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The CBD has established a process to identify so-called “Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas” (EBSA) in the global oceans in 2008 to inform states and international institutions. In the meantime these efforts have covered a high percentage of the global ocean and a total number of 280 EBSAs could already be identified and globally agreed by 2017. These are situated both in international waters as well as waters under the jurisdiction of individual states. At the same time very promising MPA activities are conducted by a large number of nations and under several Regional Sea Conventions, one of which, the Helsinki-Convention for the Baltic Sea, has already met the 10% MPA-coverage target.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Marine Biodiversity: Opportunities for Global Governance and Management Coherence

Nächstes Kapitel Marine Environmental Protection and Climate Change

Agardy, T. & Staub, F. (2006) Marine protected areas and MPA networks: Educational module. Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP)

Ardron JA (2008) Three initial OSPAR tests of ecological coherence: heuristics in a data-limited situation. ICES J MarSci 65:1527–1533CrossRef

Ardron, J., Dunn, D., Corrigan, C., Gjerde, K., Halpin, P., Rice, J., Vanden Berghe, E. & Vierros, M. (2009) Defining ecologically or biologically significant areas in the open oceans and deep seas: Analysis, tools, resources and illustrations. A Report of the Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI). Ottawa, Canada

Ban NC, Bax NJ, Gjerde KM et al (2013) Systematic conservation planning: A better recipe for managing the high seas for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. Cons Lett 7:41–54CrossRef

Bax NJ, Cleary J, Donnelly B, Dunn DC, Dunstan PK, Fuller M, Halpin PN (2015) Results and implications of the first global effort to identify ecologically or biologically significant marine areas. Conserv Biol 30:571–581. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cobi.12649/epdf CrossRef

CBD (2008). Decision IX/20: Section 18 and Annex 1.

CBD (2010a) Decision X/2 and Annex. The strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets

CBD (2010b) Decision X/29: Sections 4, 32, 37, 41, 42

CCAMLR (2011) Report of the thirtieth Meeting of the Commission https://www.ccamlr.org/en/system/files/e-cc-xxx.pdf

Dinter W (2001) Biogeography of the OSPAR Maritime Area. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster

Druel, E. (2012) Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs): the identification process under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CB) and possible ways forward (No. 17/12). IDDRI Working Paper, pp 1–24

Dunn D, Ardron J, Bax N, Bernal P, Cleary J, Cresswell I, Donnelly B, Dunstan P, Gjerde K, Johnson D, Kaschner K, Lascelles B, von Nordheim H, Rice J, Wood L, Halpin P (2014) The convention on biological diversity’s ecologically or biologically significant areas: origins, development and current status. Mar Policy 49:137–145CrossRef

EU Commission (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (The Habitats Directive)

EU-Commission (2009) Council Directive 2009/147/EC on the conservation of wild birds (The Birds Directive)

Gabrié C, Lagabrielle E, Bissery C, Crochelet E, Meola B, Webster C, Claudet J, Chassanite A, Marinesque S, Robert P, Goutx M, Quod C (2012) The status of marine protected areas in the Mediterranean Sea. MedPAN & RAC/SPA, Marseille

Gjerde KM (2012) Challenges to Protecting the Marine Environment beyond National Jurisdiction. Int J Mar Coast Law 27:839–847CrossRef

Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D'Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EM, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952CrossRef

HELCOM (1994) Recommendation 15/5

HELCOM (2010) Towards an ecologically coherent network of well-managed Marine Protected Areas. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 124A. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki

HELCOM (2013) Overview of the status of the network of Baltic Sea marine protected areas. Helsinki, Helsinki Commission

HELCOM (2014) Recommendation 35/1 (replacing Rec. 15/5 of 1994)

IUCN and UNEP-WCMC (2013) The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). UNEP- WCMC, Cambridge

IUCN-WCPA (2008) Establishing Resilient Marine Protected Area Networks—Making it Happen. IUCN-WCPA, Washington, DC

Johnson D (2016) Global Ocean Process of Identifying Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs)—what now, what next? In: Nordheim H, Wollny-Goerke K (eds) Progress in marine conservation in Europe 2015:Proceedings of the symposium, BfN-Skripten 451:22–28

Krause J, Wollny-Goerke K, Boller F, Hauswirth M, Heinicke K, Herrmann C, Körber P, Narberhaus I, Richter-Kemmermann A (2011) Die deutschen Meeresnaturschutzgebiete in Nord- und Ostsee. Themenheft Meeresnaturschutz. Nat Landschaft 86:397–409

Mora C, Andrefouet S, Costello MJ, Kranenburg C, Rollo A, Veron J, Gaston KJ, Myers RA (2006) Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas. Science 312:1750–1751CrossRef

Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Agardy T, Hyrenbach D, Scovazzi T, Van Klaveren P (2008) The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean marine mammals. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 18:367–391CrossRef

O’Leary BC, Brown RL, Johnson DE, von Nordheim H, Ardron J, Packeiser T (2012) The first network of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the high seas: the process, the challenges and where next. Mar Policy 36:598–605CrossRef

OSPAR (2003a) First joint ministerial meeting of the Helsinki and OSPAR commissions (JMM)—Record of the meeting, Annex 5: Statement on the Ecosystem Approach to the Management of Human Activities

OSPAR (2003b) First joint ministerial meeting of the Helsinki and OSPAR commissions (JMM)—Record of the meeting: Recommendation 2003/3

OSPAR (2013) An assessment of the ecological coherence of the OSPAR network of marine protected areas in 2012. OSPAR Commission, London

OSPAR (2016) 2015 Status of the OSPAR Network of Marine Protected Areas. OPSAR Commission, London

Parks JE, Pomeroy RS, Philibotte J (2006) Experiences and lessons learned from evaluating the management effectiveness of marine protected areas in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands. CBD/IUCN International Workshop for Better Management of Protected Areas.

Pusch C, Pedersen SA (eds) (2010) Environmental sound fisheries management in marine protected areas (EMPAS) in Germany. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt, 92 pp.

Quigley M (2016) Managing fishing in MPAs: making a start. In: Nordheim H, Wollny-Goerke K (eds) Progress in marine conservation in Europe 2015: Proceedings of the symposium, BfN-Skripten 451:76–81

Thiel H (2003) Approaches to the Establishment of Protected Areas on the High Seas. In: Kirchner A (ed) International Maritime Environmental Law. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 169–192

Thiel H, Koslow A (eds) (2001) Managing Risk to Biodiversity and the Environment on the High Sea, Including Tools such as Marine Protected Areas: Scientific Requirenments and Legal Aspects, BfN-Skripten 43. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn

UN (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

UN (1992) United Nation conference on environment and development (Convention on Biological Diversity): Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

UN (2002) Report of the World Summit of Sustainable Development—A/CONF.100/20. Johannesburg, South Africa

UN (2015) UN General Assembly resolution—Res/69/292

UNEP (2012) Synthesis report on the work carried out regarding the description of EBSAs in the Mediterranean—UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/INF/8

UNEP (2016) Progress report on describing areas meeting the criteria for ecologically and biologically significant marine areas - UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/20/3

Von Nordheim H, Wollny-Goerke K (2013) Marine biodiversity and networks of Marine Protected Areas—towards a global network of MPAs in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. In: von Norheim H, Maschner K, Wollny-Goerke K (eds) Progress in marine conservation in Europe 2012. BfN-Skripten 339:25–37

Von Nordheim H, Boedeker D, Krause JC (eds) (2006) Progress in Marine Conservation in Europe—Natura 2000 sites in German Offshore Waters. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

Von Nordheim H, Packeiser T, Durussel C (2011) Auf dem Weg zu einem weltweiten Netzwerk von Meeresschutzgebieten. Themenheft Meeresnaturschutz: Nat Landschaft 86:382–387

Von Nordheim H, Wollny-Goerke K, Schröder N (2016) The MPA networks of HELCOM and OSPAR by 2015. In: Nordheim H, Wollny-Goerke K (eds) Progress in marine conservation in Europe 2015: Proceedings of the symposium, BfN-Skripten 451:29–38

http://www.bfn.de/0314_daten-meeresflaeche+M52087573ab0.html. (Retrieved February 2016)

http://www.bfn.de/0314_meeresschutzgebiete+M52087573ab0.html. (Retrieved February 2016)

http://www.cbd.int/ebsa/. (Retrieved April 2016)

https://www.ccamlr.org/en/conservation-and-management/conservation-measures. (Retrieved February 2016)

http://www.charlie-gibbs.org/. (Retrieved February 2016)

http://www.gobi.org. (Retrieved February 2016)

http://www.helcom.fi/action-areas/marine-protected-areas/HELCOM-MPAs-and-Natura-2000-areas. (Retrieved February 2016)

https://www.cbd.int/pa/UN-Ocean-Conference/flyer-en.pdf

http://www.rac-spa.org/spami. (Retrieved February 2016)

Titel: Marine Protected Areas: Global Framework, Regional MPA Networks and a National Example
verfasst von: Henning von Nordheim
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Handbook on Marine Environment Protection
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60154-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60156-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60156-4_46