Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency 7/2018

15.01.2018 | Original Article

Marketing energy efficiency: perceived benefits and barriers to home energy efficiency

verfasst von: Jennifer C. Cole, Jessica B. McDonald, Xinyuan Wen, Randall A. Kramer

Erschienen in: Energy Efficiency | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Energy efficiency contributes significantly to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the associated mitigation of climate change. The uptake of energy efficiency measures in the residential sector requires significant effort on the part of homeowners or residents. Past research has revealed that cost savings and social interaction motivate energy efficiency behavior. This study expands on this research by examining the hypothesis that there are regional differences in what motivates individuals to implement home energy efficiency upgrades. Two surveys (N = 320 and N = 423) examine the perceived benefits of and barriers to undertaking home energy efficiency improvements in varying geographic regions across the USA and test marketing materials that target these benefits and barriers. The hypothesis that there are regional differences in perceptions of energy efficiency was confirmed. Cost savings were found to be the most important benefit to individuals across the country. Energy efficiency being a good investment is either the second or third most important benefit across all regions. Increased comfort is the last of the top three most important benefits to those in the South and Midwest, while those in the Northeast demonstrated interest in the increase in home retail value associated with energy efficiency, and those in the West found the environmental benefits to be important. High costs of energy efficiency improvements were found to be the most commonly perceived barrier. Reported likelihood to enroll in a home energy efficiency program offered by one’s employer was predicted by perceived likelihood that coworkers would enroll, income level, and personal opinions about the importance of energy efficiency.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aravena, C., Riquelme, A., & Denny, E. (2016). Money, comfort or environment? Priorities and determinants of energy efficiency investments in Irish households. Journal of consumer policy, 39(2), 159–186.CrossRef Aravena, C., Riquelme, A., & Denny, E. (2016). Money, comfort or environment? Priorities and determinants of energy efficiency investments in Irish households. Journal of consumer policy, 39(2), 159–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Asensio, O., & Delmas, M. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(6), E510–E515.CrossRef Asensio, O., & Delmas, M. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(6), E510–E515.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guerin, D. A., Yust, B. L., & Coopet, J. G. (2009). Occupant predictors of household energy behavior and consumption change as found in energy studies since 1975. Family and Consumer Science Research, 29(1), 48–80.CrossRef Guerin, D. A., Yust, B. L., & Coopet, J. G. (2009). Occupant predictors of household energy behavior and consumption change as found in energy studies since 1975. Family and Consumer Science Research, 29(1), 48–80.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers. McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer, K., Walls, M., Gordon, H., & Gerarden, T. (2011). Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: Results from a survey of home energy auditors. Energy Efficiency, 6(2), 271–292.CrossRef Palmer, K., Walls, M., Gordon, H., & Gerarden, T. (2011). Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: Results from a survey of home energy auditors. Energy Efficiency, 6(2), 271–292.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sheehan, K. B., & Pittman, M. (Eds.). (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for academics: The HIT handbook for social science research. Irvine: Melvin and Leigh. Sheehan, K. B., & Pittman, M. (Eds.). (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for academics: The HIT handbook for social science research. Irvine: Melvin and Leigh.
Metadaten
Titel
Marketing energy efficiency: perceived benefits and barriers to home energy efficiency
verfasst von
Jennifer C. Cole
Jessica B. McDonald
Xinyuan Wen
Randall A. Kramer
Publikationsdatum
15.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Energy Efficiency / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Elektronische ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-018-9614-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Energy Efficiency 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe