Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Perspectives

Measuring the development of a common scientific lexicon in nanotechnology

verfasst von: Sanjay K. Arora, Jan Youtie, Stephen Carley, Alan L. Porter, Philip Shapira

Erschienen in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Over the last two decades, nanotechnology has not only grown considerably but also evolved in its use of scientific terminology. This paper examines the growth in nano-prefixed terms in a corpus of nanotechnology scholarly publications over a 21-year time period. The percentage of publications using a nano-prefixed term has increased from <10 % in the early 1990s to nearly 80 % by 2010. A co-word analysis of nano-prefixed terms indicates that the network of these terms has moved from being densely organized around a few common nano-prefixed terms such as “nanostructure” in 2000 to becoming less dense and more differentiated in using additional nano-prefixed terms while continuing to coalesce around the common nano-prefixed terms by 2010. We further observe that the share of nanotechnology papers oriented toward biomedical and clinical medicine applications has risen from just over 5 % to more than 11 %. While these results cannot fully distinguish between the use of nano-prefixed terms in response to broader policy or societal influences, they do suggest that there are intellectual and scientific underpinnings to the growth of a collectively shared vocabulary. We consider whether our findings signify the maturation of a scientific field and the extent to which this denotes the emergence of a shared scientific understanding regarding nanotechnology.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
2
VOS is subject to the constraint that the average distance between elements {i, j, i < j} is equal to one (van Eck et al., 2010). Similarity is defined as the “association strength” of the co-occurrence relationship between {i, j} weighted by how often {i, j} co-occur with all keyword groups in the publication year.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2012) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–370. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0903-6 CrossRef Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2012) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–370. doi:10.​1007/​s11192-012-0903-6 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baneyx F, Park J-K (2013) Nanobio versus Bionano: what’s in a name? Biotechnol J 8(2):158–159CrossRef Baneyx F, Park J-K (2013) Nanobio versus Bionano: what’s in a name? Biotechnol J 8(2):158–159CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE, London, p 304 Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE, London, p 304
Zurück zum Zitat Braun T, Zsindely S, Dióspatonyi I, Zádor E (2007) Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics 70(3):651–667CrossRef Braun T, Zsindely S, Dióspatonyi I, Zádor E (2007) Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics 70(3):651–667CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cacciatore M, Anderson A, Choi D-H, Brossard D, Scheufele D, Liang X, Ladwig P, Xenos M, Dudo A (2012) Coverage of emerging technologies: a comparison between print and online media. New Media Soc 14(6):1039–1059CrossRef Cacciatore M, Anderson A, Choi D-H, Brossard D, Scheufele D, Liang X, Ladwig P, Xenos M, Dudo A (2012) Coverage of emerging technologies: a comparison between print and online media. New Media Soc 14(6):1039–1059CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DeBellis N (2009) Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, p 450 DeBellis N (2009) Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, p 450
Zurück zum Zitat Grieneisen M, Zhang M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: evolving definitions and growing footprint on the scientific landscape. Small 7(20):2836–2839CrossRef Grieneisen M, Zhang M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: evolving definitions and growing footprint on the scientific landscape. Small 7(20):2836–2839CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grieneisen M, Zhang M (2012) The ongoing proliferation of nano journals. Nat Nanotechnol 7(5):273–274CrossRef Grieneisen M, Zhang M (2012) The ongoing proliferation of nano journals. Nat Nanotechnol 7(5):273–274CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grienseisen M (2010) The proliferation of nano journals. Nat Nanotechnol 5:825CrossRef Grienseisen M (2010) The proliferation of nano journals. Nat Nanotechnol 5:825CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hersm M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the posthype era. ACS Nano 5(1):1–2CrossRef Hersm M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the posthype era. ACS Nano 5(1):1–2CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z-K, Roco MC (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5(3–4):333–363CrossRef Huang Z, Chen H, Yip A, Ng G, Guo F, Chen Z-K, Roco MC (2003) Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J Nanopart Res 5(3–4):333–363CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2010) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transf 36(2):145–172CrossRef Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2010) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transf 36(2):145–172CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khushf G (2004) A hierarchical architecture for nano-scale science and technology: taking stock of the claims about science made by advocates of NBIC convergence. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 21–33 Khushf G (2004) A hierarchical architecture for nano-scale science and technology: taking stock of the claims about science made by advocates of NBIC convergence. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 21–33
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Zurück zum Zitat Macnaghten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):268–291CrossRef Macnaghten P, Kearnes M, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27(2):268–291CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer M (2007) What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency. Scientometrics 70(3):779–810CrossRef Meyer M (2007) What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency. Scientometrics 70(3):779–810CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat NSET (2007) The national nanotechnology initiative: research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry. Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC NSET (2007) The national nanotechnology initiative: research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry. Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien JJ, Carley S, Porter AL (2013). Keyword field cleaning through ClusterSuite: a term-clumping tool for VantagePoint software. Poster presented at Global Tech Mining Conference, Atlanta, GA O’Brien JJ, Carley S, Porter AL (2013). Keyword field cleaning through ClusterSuite: a term-clumping tool for VantagePoint software. Poster presented at Global Tech Mining Conference, Atlanta, GA
Zurück zum Zitat Porter AL, Youtie J (2009a) Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nat Nanotechnol 4:534–536CrossRef Porter AL, Youtie J (2009a) Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nat Nanotechnol 4:534–536CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter AL, Youtie J (2009b) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11(5):1023–1041CrossRef Porter AL, Youtie J (2009b) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11(5):1023–1041CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2008) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10(5):715–728CrossRef Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2008) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10(5):715–728CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roco M (2010) Long view of nanotechnology development at NSF. 2010 NSF nanoscale science and engineering grantees conference, Arlington, Virginia, 6–8 Dec 2010 Roco M (2010) Long view of nanotechnology development at NSF. 2010 NSF nanoscale science and engineering grantees conference, Arlington, Virginia, 6–8 Dec 2010
Zurück zum Zitat Roco M, Mirkin C, Hersam M (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Roco M, Mirkin C, Hersam M (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shapira P, Youtie J, Porter AL (2010) The emergence of social science research in nanotechnology. Scientometrics 85(2):595–611CrossRef Shapira P, Youtie J, Porter AL (2010) The emergence of social science research in nanotechnology. Scientometrics 85(2):595–611CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, van den Berg J (2010) A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(12):2405–2416. doi:10.1002/asi.21421 CrossRef van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Dekker R, van den Berg J (2010) A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(12):2405–2416. doi:10.​1002/​asi.​21421 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Notten A, Surpatean A (2013) Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: a keyword mining approach. Scientometrics 94:877–892CrossRef Wang L, Notten A, Surpatean A (2013) Interdisciplinarity of nano research fields: a keyword mining approach. Scientometrics 94:877–892CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watts RJ, Porter AL (1997) Innovation forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change 56:25–47CrossRef Watts RJ, Porter AL (1997) Innovation forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change 56:25–47CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wood S, Jones R, Geldart A (2003) Nanotechnology: from the science to the social. The Economic and Social Research Council, London Wood S, Jones R, Geldart A (2003) Nanotechnology: from the science to the social. The Economic and Social Research Council, London
Zurück zum Zitat Wullweber J (2008) Nanotechnology an empty signifier à venir? Sci Technol Innov Stud 4(1):27–45 Wullweber J (2008) Nanotechnology an empty signifier à venir? Sci Technol Innov Stud 4(1):27–45
Metadaten
Titel
Measuring the development of a common scientific lexicon in nanotechnology
verfasst von
Sanjay K. Arora
Jan Youtie
Stephen Carley
Alan L. Porter
Philip Shapira
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2194-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Nanoparticle Research 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.