Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 3/2016

01.09.2016 | Original Paper

Meshfree analysis with the aid of NURBS boundary

verfasst von: Sheng-Wei Chi, Shih-Po Lin

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present a meshfree analysis framework to integrate the geometric exactness of non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS)-based isogeometric analysis (IGA) (Hughes et al., Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195, 2005) with the flexibility of meshfree approximations. In the framework, only the NURBS boundary surface immediately available from CAD tools is used to describe the exact problem domain, and meshfree particles are inserted inside the boundary surface, in a flexible manner, for construction of the approximation for analysis. Nitche’s method is employed for imposing essential boundary conditions and the domain integration in the Galerkin formulation is performed based on variationally consistent integration (VCI) to recover integration exactness. The NURBS boundary surface from CAD serves as an aid in selecting particle distributions and as the integration net for the boundary integration required both for the Nitche’s method and the VCI. As shown in numerical studies, the VCI is essential for the solution accuracy of the method. Several benchmarks are tested to examine the effectiveness of the proposed framework and numerical results are compared with those obtained by the IGA.
Nächster Artikel A meshfree continuous–discontinuous approach for the ductile fracture modeling in explicit dynamics analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(39–41):4135–4195MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
2.
Cottrell JA, Reali A, Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric analysis of structural vibrations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(41–43):5257–5296MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
3.
Hughes TJR, Reali A, Sangalli G (2008) Duality and unified analysis of discrete approximations in structural dynamics and wave propagation: Comparison of p-method finite elements with k-method NURBS. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(49–50):4104–4124MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
4.
Benson DJ, Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC, Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric shell analysis: the Reissner–Mindlin shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5–8):276–289MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
5.
Temizer I, Wriggers P, Hughes TJR (2011) Contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9–12):1100–1112MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
6.
Auricchio F, Da Veiga LB, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Sangalli G (2010) Isogeometric collocation methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 20(11):2075–2107MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
7.
Schillinger D, Evans JA, Reali A, Scott MA, Hughes TJR (2013) Isogeometric collocation: cost comparison with Galerkin methods and extension to adaptive hierarchical NURBS discretizations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 267:170–232MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
8.
Ma D, Lin F, Chua CK (2001) Rapid prototyping applications in medicine. Part 2: STL file generation and case studies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18(2):118–127CrossRef
9.
Martin T, Cohen E, Kirby RM (2009) Volumetric parameterization and trivariate B-spline fitting using harmonic functions. Comput Aid Geometric Des 26(6):648–664MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
Zhang YJ, BazilevS Y, GoswaMi S, Bajaj CL, Hughes TJR (2007) Patient-specific vascular NURBS modeling for isogeometric analysis of blood flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(29–30):2943–2959MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
11.
da Veiga LB, Buffa A, Cho D, Sangalli G (2011) IsoGeometric analysis using T-splines on two-patch geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(21–22):1787–1803MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
12.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Lipton S, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2010) Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5–8):229–263MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
13.
Schillinger D, Dede L, Scott MA, Evans JA, Borden MJ, Rank E, Hughes TJR (2012) An isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249:116–150MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
Dorfel MR, Juttler B, Simeon B (2010) Adaptive isogeometric analysis by local h-refinement with T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(5–8):264–275MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
15.
Kleiss SK, Juttler B, Zulehner W (2012) Enhancing isogeometric analysis by a finite element-based local refinement strategy. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213:168–182MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
Nguyen-Thanh N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bordas SPA, Rabczuk T (2011) Isogeometric analysis using polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes for two-dimensional elastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(21–22):1892–1908MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
17.
Scott MA, Li X, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJR (2012) Local refinement of analysis-suitable T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213:206–222MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
18.
19.
20.
Chen JS, Pan CH, Wu CT, Liu WK (1996) Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of non-linear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139(1–4):195–227MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) Numerical integration of the Galerkin weak form in meshfree methods. Comput Mech 23(3):219–230MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
22.
Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50(2):435–466CrossRefMATH
23.
Liu Y, Belytschko T (2010) A new support integration scheme for the weakform in mesh-free methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 82(6):699–715MathSciNetMATH
24.
Guo XH, Qin H (2009) Meshless methods for physics-based modeling and simulation of deformable models. Sci China Ser F 52(3):401–417MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
25.
Rosolen A, Arroyo M (2013) Blending isogeometric analysis and local maximum entropy meshfree approximants. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 264:95–107MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
26.
27.
Zhang HJ, Wang DD (2015) An isogeometric enriched quasi-convex meshfree formulation with application to material interface modeling. Eng Anal Bound Elem 60:37–50MathSciNetCrossRef
28.
Valizadeh N, Bazilevs Y, Chen JS, Rabczuk T (2015) A coupled IGA-Meshfree discretization of arbitrary order of accuracy and without global geometry parameterization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293:20–37
29.
Dahmen W, Micchelli CA, Seidel HP (1992) Blossoming begets B-Spline bases built better by B-patches. Math Comput 59(199):97–115MathSciNetMATH
30.
Jia Y, Zhang YJ, Xu G, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2013) Reproducing kernel triangular B-spline-based FEM for solving PDEs. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 267:342–358MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
31.
Melenk JM, Babuska I (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139(1–4):289–314MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
32.
33.
Simkins DC, Kumar A, Collier N, Whitenack LB (2007) Geometry representation, modification and iterative design using RKEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(41–44):4304–4320CrossRefMATH
34.
Liu WK, Han WM, Lu HS, Li SF, Cao H (2004) Reproducing kernel element method. Part I: theoretical formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(12–14):933–951MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
35.
Wang YW, Huang ZD, Zheng Y, Zhang SG (2013) Isogeometric analysis for compound B-spline surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 261:1–15MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
36.
Schmidt R, Wuchner R, Bletzinger KU (2012) Isogeometric analysis of trimmed NURBS geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 241:93–111MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
38.
Fernandez-Mendez S, Huerta A (2004) Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(12–14):1257–1275MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
39.
Chen JS, Hillman M, Ruter M (2013) An arbitrary order variationally consistent integration for Galerkin meshfree methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 95(5):387–418MathSciNetCrossRef
40.
41.
Kim HJ, Seo YD, Youn SK (2010) Isogeometric analysis with trimming technique for problems of arbitrary complex topology. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2796–2812MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
42.
Rank E, Ruess M, Kollmannsberger S, Schillinger D, Duster A (2012) Geometric modeling, isogeometric analysis and the finite cell method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249:104–115CrossRef
43.
Li S, Liu WK (2004) Meshfree particle methods. Springer, BerlinMATH
44.
45.
Chi SW, Chen JS, Hu HY, Yang JP (2013) A gradient reproducing kernel collocation method for boundary value problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 93(13):1381–1402MathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Liu WK, Li SF, Belytschko T (1997) Moving least-square reproducing kernel methods.1. Methodology and convergence. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 143(1–2):113–154MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
47.
Chen JS, Wang HP (2000) New boundary condition treatments in meshfree computation of contact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187(3–4):441–468MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
48.
Nitsche J (1971) Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Ver- wendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind. Abhandlungen aus dem mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 36(1):9–15MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
49.
Griebel M, Schweitzer MA (2003) A particle-partition of unity method part V: boundary conditions. In: Hildebrandt S, Karcher H (eds) Geometric analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 519–542CrossRef
50.
Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Mcgraw-Hill College, New YorkMATH
51.
Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Meshfree analysis with the aid of NURBS boundary
verfasst von
Sheng-Wei Chi
Shih-Po Lin
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1298-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Computational Mechanics 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

A structurally based viscoelastic model for passive myocardium in finite deformation

Original Paper

A meshfree continuous–discontinuous approach for the ductile fracture modeling in explicit dynamics analysis

Original Paper

Modeling orthotropic elasticity, localized plasticity and fracture in trabecular bone

Original Paper

2D–3D hybrid stabilized finite element method for tsunami runup simulations

Original Paper

Explicit mixed strain–displacement finite elements for compressible and quasi-incompressible elasticity and plasticity

Original Paper

EM modelling of arbitrary shaped anisotropic dielectric objects using an efficient 3D leapfrog scheme on unstructured meshes

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise