Skip to main content

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

69. Modeling Partner Networks for Systematic Architecture Derivation in Software Ecosystems

verfasst von : Andreas Schönberger, Christoph Elsner

Erschienen in: Marktplätze im Umbruch

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Partner networks have proven successful in delivering comprehensive customer offerings. Market leaders of various domains, from industry to online services, leverage the innovative strength and resource capacities of their partners to complement and extend existing offerings or to define completely new offerings. Examples such as Amazon’s sales platform or Google’s Android network are just prominent representatives of a rich universe of digital cooperation strategies. Software ecosystems have emerged as a digital cooperation strategy in partner networks. They leverage a common technological base to coordinate the contributions of multiple software and service providers to a shared market. The technological base may consist of an execution platform such as Android, an open solution framework such as Eclipse, or just a set of standards such as DICOM or PROFINET. For a software ecosystem to flourish, the interests of all members have to be considered and balanced and the common technological base needs appropriate architectural design and engineering practices. Based on an industry-grade system as a running example, we describe an integrated approach that uses ecosystem modeling for both aligning the interests of ecosystem members and for architectural design.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: principles and practices. Software, IEEE, 8(1). Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: principles and practices. Software, IEEE, 8(1).
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch, J. (2009). From software product lines to software ecosystems. 13th Int. Software Product Line Conf. (SPLC ’09). Pittsburgh, USA. Bosch, J. (2009). From software product lines to software ecosystems. 13th Int. Software Product Line Conf. (SPLC ’09). Pittsburgh, USA.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). E3-value: Design and evaluation of e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(4). Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, H. (2001). E3-value: Design and evaluation of e-business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(4).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Handoyo, E., et al. (2013). Software ecosystems modeling: The value chains. Conference on Management of Emergent Digital Ecosystems (MEDES ’13), New York, USA. Handoyo, E., et al. (2013). Software ecosystems modeling: The value chains. Conference on Management of Emergent Digital Ecosystems (MEDES ’13), New York, USA.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003). The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, Palgrave, Vol. 12. Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003). The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, Palgrave, Vol. 12.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Huemer, C., et al. (2008). A UML profile for the e3-value e-business model ontology, 3rd International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL’08) Montpellier, France. Huemer, C., et al. (2008). A UML profile for the e3-value e-business model ontology, 3rd International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL’08) Montpellier, France.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ionita, M. T., et al. (2002). Scenario-based software architecture evaluation methods: An overview. ICSE Workshop on Methods and Techniques for Software Architecture Review and Assessment (ICSE/SARA), Orlando, USA. Ionita, M. T., et al. (2002). Scenario-based software architecture evaluation methods: An overview. ICSE Workshop on Methods and Techniques for Software Architecture Review and Assessment (ICSE/SARA), Orlando, USA.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, S., et al. (2012). Defining software ecosystems: A survey of software platforms and business network governance. 4th Int. Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO ’12), Cambridge, USA. Jansen, S., et al. (2012). Defining software ecosystems: A survey of software platforms and business network governance. 4th Int. Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO ’12), Cambridge, USA.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen, S., et al. (2012). Shades of gray: Opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, 85(7). Jansen, S., et al. (2012). Shades of gray: Opening up a software producing organization with the open software enterprise model. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, 85(7).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazman, R., et al. (2012). Scaling up software architecture analysis. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, 85(7). Kazman, R., et al. (2012). Scaling up software architecture analysis. Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier, 85(7).
11.
Zurück zum Zitat McGregor, J. D. (2010). A method for analyzing software product line ecosystems. 4th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA ’10), New York, USA. McGregor, J. D. (2010). A method for analyzing software product line ecosystems. 4th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA ’10), New York, USA.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Popp, K. M. (2011). Hybrid revenue models of software companies and their relationship to hybrid business models, 3rd Int. Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO ’11), Brussels, Belgium. Popp, K. M. (2011). Hybrid revenue models of software companies and their relationship to hybrid business models, 3rd Int. Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO ’11), Brussels, Belgium.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, Elsevier, 43(2–3). Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, Elsevier, 43(2–3).
Metadaten
Titel
Modeling Partner Networks for Systematic Architecture Derivation in Software Ecosystems
verfasst von
Andreas Schönberger
Christoph Elsner
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43782-7_69