nach oben

Political Behavior

Erschienen in:

11.11.2020 | Original Paper

Modulating the Neural Bases of Political Communications: Political Involvement and Perception of the Economic Situation

verfasst von: Luis-Alberto Casado-Aranda, Juan Sánchez-Fernández, Teodoro Luque-Martínez

Erschienen in: Political Behavior | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Worldwide political parties devote more than half of their budgets to communication campaigns. Yet research on political behavior is not unanimous as to the effect of political campaign communications on the electorate. Certain studies interpret the discrepancy by indicating that individual characteristics may modulate the way citizens perceive political campaigns. The current study is the first to resort to neuroimaging (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fMRI) to explore to what extent two characteristics of the electorate, namely level of political involvement and perception of the economic context, affect the neural processing when exposed to political messages, notably corruption and positive practices. The data reveals that more politically sophisticated citizens experience greater activation of the brain regions linked to aversion and negative processing while viewing messages exposing corruption. Their reward circuit is not, moreover, activated more strongly when exposed to positive political actions. Interestingly, citizens with a better perception of the economic situation reveal stronger activation while exposed to positive political messages in brain regions linked to self-relevance and rewarding properties. The current analysis therefore represents the first neuroimaging study to reveal the psychological mechanisms by which individual characteristics of the electorate affect the processing of political communications.

Vorheriger Artikel Natural Disasters, ‘Partisan Retrospection,’ and U.S. Presidential Elections

Nächster Artikel Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Data, subjects’ characteristics, onsets and steps for fMRI data analysis for the production of the analysis in this paper are available at https://hdl.handle.net/10481/63114.

Ahn, W.-Y., Kishida, K. T., Gu, X., Lohrenz, T., Harvey, A., Alford, J. R., et al. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24(22), 2693–2699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.050CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRef

American Psychological Association (2019). Definition of aversion. Retrieved June 22, 2019, from https://dictionary.apa.org/aversion.

Andreano, J. M., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Sex differences in the persistence of the amygdala response to negative material. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1388–1394. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst127CrossRef

Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Muñoz, J. (2013). Turning a blind eye: Experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes toward corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1664–1692.CrossRef

Arceneaux, K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2010). Comparing negative and positive campaign messages: Evidence from two field experiments. American Politics Research, 38(1), 54–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09331613CrossRef

Banda, K. K., & Windett, J. H. (2016). Negative advertising and the dynamics of candidate support. Political Behavior, 38(3), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9336-xCrossRef

Bartra, O., McGuire, J. T., & Kable, J. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. NeuroImage, 76, 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.063CrossRef

Bennett, C. M., Wolford, G. L., & Miller, M. B. (2009). The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp053CrossRef

Blair, K. S., Otero, M., Teng, C., Jacobs, M., Odenheimer, S., Pine, D. S., et al. (2013). Dissociable roles of ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) in value representation and optimistic bias. NeuroImage, 78, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.063CrossRef

Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Kilibarda, A. (2015). Partisanship, information, and perceptions of government corruption. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv037CrossRef

Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2017). The effects of metaphorical framing on political persuasion: A systematic literature review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623CrossRef

Bortree, D. S., Ahern, L., Smith, A. N., & Dou, X. (2013). Framing environmental responsibility: 30 years of CSR messages in National Geographic Magazine. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 491–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.003CrossRef

Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.xCrossRef

Caliendo, S. M., McIlwain, C. D., & Dudash-Buskirk, E. (2016, October 4). Moment-to-moment responses to race-based messages in political campaign advertisements. Political Communication in Real Time. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669083-18.

Cao, Z., Bennett, M., Orr, C., Icke, I., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., et al. (2018). Mapping adolescent reward anticipation, receipt, and prediction error during the monetary incentive delay task. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24370CrossRef

Casado-Aranda, Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Sánchez-Fernández. (2018). A neuropsychological study on how consumers process risky and secure E-payments. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.03.001CrossRef

Casado-Aranda, L.-A., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Ibáñez-Zapata, J. -Á., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2020). How consumer ethnocentrism modulates neural processing of domestic and foreign products: A neuroimaging study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101961CrossRef

Casado-Aranda, Venkatraman, V., Sánchez-Fernández, & Luque-Martínez. (2019). Does partisan bias modulate neural processing of political information? An analysis of the neural correlates of corruption and positive messages. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12581CrossRef

Ceron, A., & d’Adda, G. (2016). E-campaigning on Twitter: The effectiveness of distributive promises and negative campaign in the 2013 Italian election. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1935–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815571915.CrossRef

Choi, S. (2014). Flow, diversity, form, and influence of political talk in social-media-based public forums. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 209–237.CrossRef

Chou, H.-Y., & Lien, N.-H. (2010). How do candidate poll ranking and election status affect the effects of negative political advertising? International Journal of Advertising, 29(5), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048710201476CrossRef

Chua, H. F., Liberzon, I., Welsh, R. C., & Strecher, V. J. (2009). Neural correlates of message tailoring and self-relatedness in smoking cessation programming. Biological Psychiatry, 65(2), 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.030CrossRef

Chung, S., & Sparks, J. V. (2015). Motivated processing of peripheral advertising information in video games. Communication Research, 43(4), 518–541.CrossRef

Coenen, V. A., Schumacher, L. V., Kaller, C., Schlaepfer, T. E., Reinacher, P. C., Egger, K., et al. (2018). The anatomy of the human medial forebrain bundle: Ventral tegmental area connections to reward-associated subcortical and frontal lobe regions. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18, 770–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.019CrossRef

Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650CrossRef

Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15(12), 806–813.CrossRef

Cunningham, W. A., Raye, C. L., & Johnson, M. K. (2005). Neural correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and prevention regulatory focus. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 202–211.CrossRef

Dassonneville, R. (2014). Political sophistication and vote intention switching: The timing of electoral volatility in the 2009 German Election Campaign. German Politics, 23(3), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2014.949682CrossRef

de Sousa, L., & Moriconi, M. (2013). Why voters do not throw the rascals out?—A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5), 471–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9483-5CrossRef

De Vries, C. E., & Solaz, H. (2017). The electoral consequences of corruption. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 391–408.CrossRef

Delgado, M. R., Jou, R. L., LeDoux, J., & Phelps, L. (2009). Avoiding negative outcomes: Tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.08.033.2009CrossRef

Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 2(34), 373–396.CrossRef

Dimoka, A. (2012). How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study in social science research. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 811–840.CrossRef

Dreu, Greer, Van Kleef, Shalvi, & Handgraaf. (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(4), 1262–1266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015316108CrossRef

Ebner, N. C., Johnson, M. R., Rieckmann, A., Durbin, K. A., Johnson, M. K., & Fischer, H. (2013). Processing own-age vs. other-age faces: Neuro-behavioral correlates and effects of emotion. NeuroImage, 78, 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.029CrossRef

Eckles, D. L., Kam, C. D., Maestas, C. L., & Schaffner, B. F. (2014). Risk attitudes and the incumbency advantage. Political Behavior, 36(4), 731–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9258-9CrossRef

Europa Press (2015). ¿Cuánto se han gastado los partidos en campaña? https://www.europapress.es/nacional/noticia-cuanto-gastado-partidos-campana-20151219080933.html.

Falk, E. B., O’Donnell, M. B., Tompson, S., Gonzalez, R., Dal Cin, S., Strecher, V., et al. (2016). Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv108CrossRef

Feng, L., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Li, J., Li, L., Ge, L., et al. (2011). The other face of the other-race effect: An fMRI investigation of the other-race face categorization advantage. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3739–3749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.031CrossRef

Fernandes, J. (2013). Effects of negative political advertising and message repetition on candidate evaluation. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.672615CrossRef

Fiddick. (2011). There is more than the amygdala: Potential threat assessment in the cingulate cortex. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(4), 1007–1018.CrossRef

Fu, H., Mou, Y., Miller, M. J., & Jalette, G. (2011). Reconsidering political cynicism and political involvement: A test of antecedents. American Communication Journal, 13(2), 44–61.

Funk, C. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18(1), 1–24.CrossRef

Gearhardt, A. N., Yokum, S., Stice, E., Harris, J. L., & Brownell, K. D. (2014). Relation of obesity to neural activation in response to food commercials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(7), 932–938. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst059CrossRef

Gospic, K., Mohlin, E., Fransson, P., Petrovic, P., Johannesson, M., & Ingvar, M. (2011). Limbic justice—Amygdala involvement in immediate rejection in the ultimatum game. PLoS Biology, 9(5), e1001054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001054CrossRef

Gozzi, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2010). Interest in politics modulates neural activity in the amygdala and ventral striatum. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20976CrossRef

Gross, J. H., & Johnson, K. T. (2016). Twitter taunts and tirades: Negative campaigning in the age of trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001700CrossRef

Han, E., Park, C., & Khang, H. (2018). Exploring linkage of message frames with personality traits for political advertising effectiveness. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1394333CrossRef

Herold, D., Spengler, S., Sajonz, B., Usnich, T., & Bermpohl, F. (2016). Common and distinct networks for self-referential and social stimulus processing in the human brain. Brain Structure and Function, 221(7), 3475–3485.CrossRef

Johann, D., Königslöw, K. K., Kritzinger, S., & Thomas, K. (2018). Intra-campaign changes in voting preferences: The impact of media and party communication. Political Communication, 35(2), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1339222CrossRef

Kaplan, J. T., Freedman, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2007). Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.024CrossRef

Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2016). Effects of consideration of future consequences and temporal framing on acceptance of the HPV vaccine among young adults. Health Communication, 31(9), 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1038774CrossRef

Krabbe, S., Gründemann, J., & Lüthi, A. (2018). Amygdala inhibitory circuits regulate associative fear conditioning. Biological Psychiatry, 83(10), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.006CrossRef

Krain, A. L., Wilson, A. M., Arbuckle, R., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2006). Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: A meta-analysis of decision-making. NeuroImage, 32(1), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.047CrossRef

Krastev, S., McGuire, J. T., McNeney, D., Kable, J. W., Stolle, D., Gidengil, E., et al. (2016). Do political and economic choices rely on common neural substrates? A systematic review of the emerging neuropolitics literature. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00264CrossRef

Krause, S., & Méndez, F. (2009). Corruption and elections: An empirical study for a cross-section of countries. Economics & Politics, 21(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00341.xCrossRef

Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2010). The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3CrossRef

Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Ruparel, K., Hakun, J. G., Busch-Winokur, S., Strasser, A., et al. (2009). Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads. NeuroImage, 46(1), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.062CrossRef

Liddell, B. J., Brown, K. J., Kemp, A. H., Barton, M. J., Das, P., Peduto, A., et al. (2005). A direct brainstem–amygdala–cortical ‘alarm’ system for subliminal signals of fear. NeuroImage, 24(1), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.016CrossRef

Luque-Martínez. (1996). Marketing político. Un análisis del intercambio político (Ariel.). Barcelona. Retrieved June 18, 2019, from https://www.lacentral.com/9788434421110.

Mahmoud, A. B., Grigoriou, N., Reisel, W. D., & Hack-Polay, D. (2020). Effects of wartime crisis perceptions on the effectiveness of political advertising: The moderating role of political involvement. In Developments in marketing science-proceedings of the academy of marketing science. Cham: Springer.

Martinez, M. D. (1988). Political involvement and the projection process. Political Behavior, 10(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991411CrossRef

Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2015). The positive case for negative campaigning. University of Chicago Press.

Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0.CrossRef

Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175006CrossRef

Murray, R. J., Schaer, M., & Debbané, M. (2012). Degrees of separation: A quantitative neuroimaging meta-analysis investigating self-specificity and shared neural activation between self- and other-reflection. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(3), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.013CrossRef

Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002CrossRef

Open Secrets (2020). Expenditures. Retrieved November 5, 2020, from https://www.opensecrets.org/campaign-expenditures.

Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (2002). Exploring relationships among media use frequency, perceived media importance, and media satisfaction in political disaffection and efficacy. Mass Communication & Society, 5(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0502_3CrossRef

Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., & Fortman, K. K. J. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159809364433CrossRef

Porcelli, A. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2009). Chapter 7—Reward processing in the human brain: Insights from fMRI. In J.-C. Dreher & L. Tremblay (Eds.), Handbook of reward and decision making (pp. 165–184). Cambridge: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374620-7.00007-8.CrossRef

Pujol, J., Blanco-Hinojo, L., Coronas, R., Esteba-Castillo, S., Rigla, M., Martínez-Vilavella, G., et al. (2018). Mapping the sequence of brain events in response to disgusting food. Human Brain Mapping, 39(1), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23848CrossRef

Rameson, L. T., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). The neural correlates of implicit and explicit self-relevant processing. NeuroImage, 50(2), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.098CrossRef

Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397–428.CrossRef

Riera, P., Barberá, P., Gómez, R., Mayoral, J. A., & Montero, J. R. (2013). The electoral consequences of corruption scandals in Spain. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9479-1CrossRef

Roberts, K. M., & Arce, M. (2016). Neoliberalism and lower-class voting behavior in peru. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031002004.CrossRef

Robinson, S., & Eilert, M. (2018). The role of message specificity in corporate social responsibility communication. Journal of Business Research, 90, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.028CrossRef

Scammell, M., & Langer, A. I. (2006). Political advertising: Why is it so boring? Media, Culture & Society, 28(5), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706067025CrossRef

Schmälzle, R., Häcker, F. E. K., Honey, C. J., & Hasson, U. (2015). Engaged listeners: Shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(8), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu168CrossRef

Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2019). Decision-making about broad- and narrowcasting: A neuroscientific perspective. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1572522CrossRef

Schreiber, D., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A. N., Dawes, C. T., Flagan, T., Fowler, J. H., et al. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in democrats and republicans. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e52970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052970CrossRef

Segerdahl, A. R., Mezue, M., Okell, T. W., Farrar, J. T., & Tracey, I. (2015). The dorsal posterior insula subserves a fundamental role in human pain. Nature Neuroscience, 18(4), 499–500.CrossRef

Siamagka, N.-T., & Balabanis, G. (2015). Revisiting consumer ethnocentrism: Review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.14.0085.CrossRef

Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H. (2003). You take the high road and I’ll take the low road? The interplay of attack strategies and tactics in presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics, 65(2), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00013CrossRef

Smoski, M. J., Felder, J., Bizzell, J., Green, S. R., Ernst, M., Lynch, T. R., et al. (2009). fMRI of alterations in reward selection, anticipation, and feedback in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.034CrossRef

Solnais, C., Andreu-Perez, J., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Andréu-Abela, J. (2013). The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.011CrossRef

Spezio, M. L., Rangel, A., Alvarez, R. M., O’Doherty, J. P., Mattes, K., Todorov, A., et al. (2008). A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn040CrossRef

Stoeckel, L. E., Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Twieg, D. B., Knowlton, R. C., & Cox, J. E. (2008). Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods. NeuroImage, 41(2), 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.031CrossRef

Tusche, A., Kahnt, T., Wisniewski, D., & Haynes, J.-D. (2013). Automatic processing of political preferences in the human brain. NeuroImage, 72, 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.020CrossRef

Vezich, I. S., Katzman, P. L., Ames, D. L., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2016). Modulating the neural bases of persuasion: Why/how, gain/loss, and users/non-users. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw113CrossRef

Weber, R., Huskey, R., Mangus, J. M., Westcott-Baker, A., & Turner, B. O. (2015). Neural predictors of message effectiveness during counterarguing in antidrug campaigns. Communication Monographs, 82(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.971414CrossRef

Webster, S. W. (2018). Anger and declining trust in government in the American electorate. Political Behavior, 40(4), 933–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9431-7CrossRef

Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 US presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1947–1958.CrossRef

Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.-P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in My insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655–664.CrossRef

Williams, L. K., Stegmaier, M., & Debus, M. (2017). Relaxing the constant economic vote restriction: Economic evaluations and party support in Germany. Party Politics, 23(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815593458.CrossRef

World Medical Association. (2013). Principios Éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. 64Asamblea General, Retrieved June 22, 2019, from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.

Xezonakis, G., Kosmidis, S., & Dahlberg, S. (2016). Can electors combat corruption? Institutional arrangements and citizen behaviour. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12114CrossRef

Xu, J. (2019). The impact of self-construal and message frame valence on reactance: A cross-cultural study in charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1536506CrossRef

Yoon, K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Ko, W. (2005). Effects of negative political advertising on voting intention: An exploration of the roles of involvement and source credibility in the development of voter cynicism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1352726042000315423CrossRef

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4–34.CrossRef

Zechmeister, E. J., & Zizumbo-Colunga, D. (2013). The varying political toll of concerns about corruption in good versus bad economic times. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472468.CrossRef

Titel: Modulating the Neural Bases of Political Communications: Political Involvement and Perception of the Economic Situation
verfasst von: Luis-Alberto Casado-Aranda
Juan Sánchez-Fernández
Teodoro Luque-Martínez
Publikationsdatum: 11.11.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Political Behavior / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09657-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy

Party Elites’ Preferences in Candidates: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment

The Income Gap in Voting: Moderating Effects of Income Inequality and Clientelism

The Partisanship of Bipartisanship: How Representatives Use Bipartisan Assertions to Cultivate Support

(Young) Generations as Social Identities: The Role of Latino*Millennial/Generation Z in Shaping Attitudes About Climate Change

Immigration Policies and Access to the Justice System: The Effect of Enforcement Escalations on Undocumented Immigrants and Their Communities

Premium Partner