nach oben

Empirical Economics

Erschienen in:

01.06.2014

More equal but not so fair: an analysis of Brazilian income distribution from 1995 to 2009

verfasst von: Erik Figueiredo, José Luis da Silva Netto Junior

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study measures unfair inequality in Brazil between 1995 and 2009. To achieve that, we used the statistical tool developed by Almås et al. (J Public Econ 95:488–499, 2011) and the concept of “responsibility-sensitive” fairness proposed by Bossert (Math Soc Sci 29:1–17, 1995), Konow (J Econ Behav Organ 31(1):13–35, 1996) and Cappelen and Tungodden (Fairness and the proportionality principle, Discussion paper SAM 31/2007. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, 2007). The results indicate that the fairness level in Brazil remained unchanged throughout the analyzed period.

Vorheriger Artikel Employment comovements at the sectoral level over the business cycle

Nächster Artikel On the redistributive effects of Germany’s feed-in tariff

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Most of these changes occurred after the second half of the 1990s. For further details on income distribution and poverty, see Neri (2006).

A criticism about this view is that inequality is not necessarily offensive or inoffensive; it can be just spurious. For this argument, see Formby et al. (1989).

Let \(C_{i}=\exp (\beta r_{i})\) and \(D_{i}=\exp (\gamma e_{i}+\epsilon _{i})\) , so \(f(r_{i},e_{i})=C_{i}D_{i}\). Then \(g(r_{i})/\sum _{j}g(r_{j})=n^{-1} \sum _{j}C_{i}D_{i}/(\sum _{h}n^{-1}\sum _{j}C_{h}D_{j})=C_{i}\sum _{j}D_{j}/ \sum _{h}C_{h}\sum _{j}D_{j}\). Since \(\sum _{j}D_{j}\) is a constant, this simplifies to \(C_{i}/\sum _{h}C_{h}\) (Almås 2008).

Based on the axioms of anonymity, scale invariance, generalized Pigou–Dalton and unfairism.

Calculated for \(y_{i}\ge 0,\forall i\). The unfairness Gini index can also be calculated from \(G^{U}={\frac{2}{n(n-1)\mu }}\sum _{i}iu_{i}\), which simplifies the computational procedure.

Denominated in 2009 Reais as in the deflation method proposed by Corseuil and Foguel (2002).

Defined as whether the observed municipality of residence is different from the one in which the individual was born.

Discussions related to the effects of causal equations in income can be found in Belzil and Hansen (2002), Cruz and Moreira (2005), and Fernández-Kranz et al. (2011), among others.

We thank an anonymous referee for this observation.

Categories: (1) Lower Bottom: agricultural laborers, fishermen, lumberjacks, etc.; (2) Upper Bottom: blue-collar workers, janitors, security guards, etc.; (3) Middle Bottom: masons, electricians, joiners, etc.; (4) Middle Middle: regional sales representatives, traveling salespersons, low-level managers, etc.; (5) Middle Top: consultants, high-level managers, CEOs, etc.; and (6) Top: large owners, magistrates, university-level professionals, etc.

Aaberge R, Colombino U (2009) Accounting for family background when designing optimal income taxes: a microeconometric simulation analysis, IZA Discussion Papers 4598. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

Almås I, Cappelen A, Lind J, Sørensen E, Tungodden B (2011) Measuring unfair (in)equality. J Public Econ 95:488–499CrossRef

Almås I (2008) Equalizing income versus equalizing opportunity: a comparison of the United States and Germany. Res Econ Inequal 16:129–156CrossRef

Angrist J, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Arneson R (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philos Stud 56:77–93CrossRef

Arkes J (2010) Using unemployment rates as instruments to estimate returns to schooling. South Econ J 76(3):711–722CrossRef

Azevedo J (2007) Avaliando a significância estatística da queda na desigualdade no Brasil. In: Barros R, Foguel M, Ullysea G (Orgs) Desigualdade de renda no Brasil: uma análise da queda recente. IPEA, Brasília

Barros R, Mendonça R (1995) A evolução do bem-estar, pobreza e desigualdade no Brasil ao longo das últimas décadas—1960/1990. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico 25(1):115–164

Betts J, Roemer J (2005) Equalizing opportunity for racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States through educational finance reform. Department of Economics UCSD, paper 2005’14.

Belzil C, Hansen J (2002) Unobserved ability and the return to schooling. Econometrica 70(5):2075–2091CrossRef

Bossert W (1995) Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics. Math Soc Sci 29:1–17CrossRef

Bossert W, Fleurbaey M (1996) Redistribution and compensation. Soc Choice Welfare 13:343–355CrossRef

Bourguignon F, Ferreira F, Menéndez M (2007) Inequality of opportunity in Brazil. Rev Income Wealth 53:585–618CrossRef

Cappelen A, Tungodden B (2007) Fairness and the proportionality principle, Discussion paper SAM 31/2007. Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration

Checchi D, Peragine V (2010) Inequality of opportunity in Italy. J Econ Inequal 8(4):429–450CrossRef

Corseuil C, Foguel M (2002) Uma sugestão de deflatores para rendas obtidas a partir de algumas pesquisas domiciliares do IBGE. Mercado de Trabalho- Conjuntura e Análise 1(19):1–8

Cruz L, Moreira M (2005) On the validity of econometric techniques with weak instruments inference on returns to education using compulsory school attendance laws. J Human Resour 40(2):393–410

Davidson R, Duclos J-Y (2000) Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68:1435–1464CrossRef

Devooght K (2008) To each the same and to each his own: a proposal to measure responsibility-sensitive income inequality. Economica 75:280–295CrossRef

Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10:185–246

Fernández-Kranz D, Paul M, Rodríguez-Planas N (2011) PT status, type of contract, and the returns to experience, IZA Discussion Papers. Berlin, p 5815

Figueiredo E, Ziegelmann F (2009) Mudança na distribuição de renda brasileira: significância estatística e bem estar econômico. Revista de Economia Aplicada 13:257–277

Formby J, Seaks T, Smith W (1989) On the measurement and trend of inequality: a reconsideration. Am Econ Rev 79(1):256–264

Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2011) Compensation and responsibility. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (eds) Handbooks in economics: social choice and welfare, vol II. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Konow J (1996) A positive theory of economic fairness. J Econ Behav Organ 31(1):13–35CrossRef

Manski C, Pepper J (2000) Monotone instrumental variables, with an application to the returns to schooling. Econometrica 68(4):997–1012CrossRef

Neri M (2006) Desigualdade, estabilidade e bem-estar social. EPGE-FGV: Ensaios Econômicos, p 637

O’Neill B, Sweetman D, Van de gaer D (2001) Equality of opportunity and kernel density estimation: an application to intergenerational mobility. In: Fomby T, Hill C (eds) Applying kernel and nonparametric estimation to economic topics. Advances in Econometrics, vol 14. JAI Press, Stanford

Pastore J, Silva N (1999) Mobilidade social no Brasil. Makron Books, São Paulo

Ramos C, Santana R (2003) Quão pobres são os pobres? Brasil: 1991–2001, Texto para Discussão, UNB

Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Roemer J (1998) Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, New York

Roemer J, Aaberge R, Colombino U, Fritzell J, Jenkins S, Lefranc A, Marx I, Page M, Pommer E, Ruiz-Castillo J, Tranaes T, Trannoy A, Wagner G, Zubiri I (2003) To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens. J Public Econ 87:539–565CrossRef

Sachsida A, Loureiro P, Mendonçça M (2004) Um estudo sobre retorno em escolaridade no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Economia 58(2):249–265CrossRef

Titel: More equal but not so fair: an analysis of Brazilian income distribution from 1995 to 2009
verfasst von: Erik Figueiredo
José Luis da Silva Netto Junior
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0714-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Testing for complementarities among countable strategies

Exchange rate pass-through and inflation targeting in Peru

Consumption multipliers of different types of public spending: a structural vector error correction analysis for the UK

Building the minimum wage: the distributional impact of Germany’s first sectoral minimum wage on wages and hours across different wage bargaining regimes

Default options and training participation

Savings and investments in the OECD: a panel cointegration study with a new bootstrap test

Premium Partner