nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Multimodal Dialogue Data Collection and Analysis of Annotation Disagreement

verfasst von : Kazunori Komatani, Shogo Okada, Haruto Nishimoto, Masahiro Araki, Mikio Nakano

Erschienen in: Increasing Naturalness and Flexibility in Spoken Dialogue Interaction

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We have been collecting multimodal dialogue data [1] to contribute to the development of multimodal dialogue systems that can take a user’s non-verbal behaviors into consideration. We recruited 30 participants from the general public whose ages ranged from 20 to 50 and genders were almost balanced. The consent form to be filled in by the participants was updated to enable data distribution to researchers as long as it is used for research purposes. After the data collection, eight annotators were divided into three groups and assigned labels representing how much a participant looks interested in the current topic to every exchange. The labels given among the annotators do not always agree as they depend on subjective impressions. We also analyzed the disagreement among annotators and temporal changes of impressions of the same annotators.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Dialogue System Live Competition: Identifying Problems with Dialogue Systems Through Live Event

Nächstes Kapitel Analyzing How a Talk Show Host Performs Follow-Up Questions for Developing an Interview Agent

These activities are being conducted by a working group (Human-System Multimodal Dialogue Sharing Corpus Building Group) under SIG-SLUD of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (JSAI).

https://developer.amazon.com/alexaprize.

http://www.mmdagent.jp/.

Two annotators gave labels to the data of all three groups.

Araki M, Tomimasu S, Nakano M, Komatani K, Okada S, Fujie S, Sugiyama H (2018) Collection of multimodal dialog data and analysis of the result of annotation of users’ interest level. In: Proceedings of international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC)

Carletta J (2007) Unleashing the killer corpus: experiences in creating the multi-everything AMI meeting corpus. Lang Resour Eval 41(2):181–190CrossRef

Chen L, Rose RT, Qiao Y, Kimbara I, Parrill F, Welji H, Han TX, Tu J, Huang Z, Harper M, Quek F, Xiong Y, McNeill D, Tuttle R, Huang T (2006) VACE multimodal meeting corpus. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on machine learning for multimodal interaction (MLMI05), pp 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/11677482_4

Chiba Y, Ito M, Nose T, Ito A (2014) User modeling by using bag-of-behaviors for building a dialog system sensitive to the interlocutor’s internal state. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue (SIGDIAL), pp 74–78. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-4310

Chollet M, Prendinger H, Scherer S (2016) Native vs. non-native language fluency implications on multimodal interaction for interpersonal skills training. In: Proceedings of international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI), pp 386–393. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2993148.2993196

Dhall A, Goecke R, Ghosh S, Joshi J, Hoey J, Gedeon T (2017) From individual to group-level emotion recognition: EmotiW 5.0. In: Proceedings of international conference on multimodal interaction (ICMI). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 524–528. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3136755.3143004

Higashinaka R, Funakoshi K, Araki M, Tsukahara H, Kobayashi Y, Mizukami M (2015) Towards taxonomy of errors in chat-oriented dialogue systems. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue (SIGDIAL), pp 87–95

Hirayama T, Sumi Y, Kawahara T, Matsuyama T (2011) Info-concierge: proactive multi-modal interaction through mind probing. In: The Asia Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA ASC 2011)

Inoue K, Lala D, Takanashi K, Kawahara T (2018) Latent character model for engagement recognition based on multimodal behaviors. In: Proceedings of international workshop on spoken dialogue systems (IWSDS)

10.

Janin A, Baron D, Edwards J, Ellis D, Gelbart D, Morgan N, Peskin B, Pfau T, Shriberg E, Stolcke A, Wooters C (2003) The ICSI meeting corpus. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech & signal processing (ICASSP), pp I–364–I–367. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1198793

11.

Kumano S, Otsuka K, Matsuda M, Ishii R, Yamato J (2013) Using a probabilistic topic model to link observers’ perception tendency to personality. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII), pp 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.103

12.

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

13.

Nakano YI, Ishii R (2010) Estimating user’s engagement from eye-gaze behaviors in human-agent conversations. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI), pp 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/1719970.1719990

14.

Ozkan D, Morency LP (2011) Modeling wisdom of crowds using latent mixture of discriminative experts. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL): human language technologies (HLT), pp 335–340. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2002736.2002806

15.

Ozkan D, Sagae K, Morency L (2010) Latent mixture of discriminative experts for multimodal prediction modeling. In: Proceedings of international conference on computational linguistics (COLING), pp 860–868. http://aclweb.org/anthology/C10-1097

16.

Shibasaki Y, Funakoshi K, Shinoda K (2017) Boredom recognition based on users’ spontaneous behaviors in multiparty human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of multimedia modeling, pp 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51811-4_55

17.

Sidner C, Kidd C, Lee C, Lesh N (2004) Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI), pp 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964458

18.

Stratou G, Morency LP (2017) Multisense—context-aware nonverbal behavior analysis framework: a psychological distress use case. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 8(2):190–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2614300CrossRef

19.

Tomimasu S, Araki M (2016) Assessment of users’ interests in multimodal dialog based on exchange unit. In: Proceedings of the workshop on multimodal analyses enabling artificial agents in human-machine interaction (MA3HMI’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 33–37. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3011263.3011269

20.

Vinciarelli A, Dielmann A, Favre S, Salamin H (2009) Canal9: a database of political debates for analysis of social interactions. In: 2009 3rd international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction and workshops, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2009.5349466

21.

Waibel A, Stiefelhagen R (2009) Computers in the human interaction loop, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, Berlin

Titel: Multimodal Dialogue Data Collection and Analysis of Annotation Disagreement
verfasst von: Kazunori Komatani
Shogo Okada
Haruto Nishimoto
Masahiro Araki
Mikio Nakano
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: Increasing Naturalness and Flexibility in Spoken Dialogue Interaction
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9322-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-9323-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9323-9_17