Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Multiple Criteria Performance Modelling and Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Systems—A Literature Review

verfasst von : Ting Wu, Dong-Ling Xu, Jian-Bo Yang

Erschienen in: Renewable Energies

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Renewable energy is essential for the world economy and the current and future generations’ welfare, and it contributes in a balanced way to attain the general goal of energy security and environmental protection. However, there are also challenges and barriers to the deployment of renewable energy generation, distribution and consumption, including technical, economic, cultural and financial challenges. In order to understand and overcome the challenges and barriers of promoting the growth of renewable energy, it is important to model, analyse and assess the cost-effectiveness, and societal and environmental impact of various renewable energy solutions systemically. This chapter aims to review relevant performance modelling, impact assessment and decision analysis techniques for renewable energy systems.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Towards Energy Self-sufficiency in Large Metropolitan Areas: Business Opportunities on Renewable Electricity in Madrid
Literatur
1.
Afgan NH, Carvalho MG (2002) Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants. Energy 27:739–755CrossRef
2.
Ahmad S, Tahar RM (2014) Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: a case of Malaysia. Renew Energy 63:458–466CrossRef
3.
Alstone P, Gershenson D, Kammen DM (2015) Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access. Nat Clim Change 5:305–314CrossRef
4.
Aras H, Erdoğmuş Ş, Koç E (2004) Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renew Energy 29:1383–1392CrossRef
5.
Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Lo Brano V (2008) Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(1):200–217CrossRef
6.
Beccali M et al (1998) Decision-making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a FUZZY-SETS methodology. Energy Convers Manag 39:1869–1881CrossRef
7.
Begona A, Hanley N (2002) Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms: an example from Spain. Energy Policy 30(2):107–116CrossRef
8.
Bergmann A, Hanley N, Wright R (2006) Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy 34(9):1004–1014CrossRef
9.
Bhat I, Prakash R, et al (2009) LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(5):1067–1073
10.
Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee, method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238CrossRef
11.
Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2010) Use of multi-criteria decision analysis to explore alternative domestic energy and electricity policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. Energy 35(2):518–528CrossRef
12.
Cai YP, Huang GH, Yang ZF, Lin QG, Tan Q (2009) Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty—an interval chance-constrained programming approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(4):721–735CrossRef
13.
Cavallaro F, Ciraolo L (2005) A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island. Energy Policy 033:235–244CrossRef
14.
Chatzimouratidis AI, Pilavachi PA (2008) Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 36:1074–1089CrossRef
15.
Chatzimouratidis AI, Pilavachi PA (2009) Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 37:778–787CrossRef
16.
Cristóbal JRS (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy 36:498–502CrossRef
17.
Diakoulaki D et al (1999) The use of a preference disaggregation method in energy analysis and policy making. Energy 24:157–166CrossRef
18.
Dong J, Chi Y, Zou D, Fu C, Huang Q, Ni M (2014) Energy–environment–economy assessment of waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: model development and case study. Appl Energy 114:400–408CrossRef
19.
Doukas HC, Andreas BM, Psarras JE (2007) Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables. Eur J Oper Res 182:844–855CrossRef
20.
EU ITRE (2010) European Parliament, Decentralized Energy Systems, Directorate General for Internal Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy Industry, Research and Energy
21.
EWEA (European Wind Energy Association) (2005) Wind Force 12, A blueprint to achieve 12% of the world’s electricity from wind power by 2020. Renewable Energy House, Brussels, Belgium
22.
Elliott D (2000) Renewable energy and sustainable futures. Futures 32(3):261–274CrossRef
23.
Energy DG (2008) Connecting Europe: new perspective for trans-european energy networks. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
24.
Enzensberger N et al (2002) Policy instruments fostering wind energy projects–a multi-perspective evaluation approach. Energy Policy 30:793–801CrossRef
25.
European Commission: Council Directive 2003/35/EC providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation
26.
European Commission, DG ENV (2009) Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive. COWI A/S, Denmark
27.
28.
Evans A, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2009) Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(5):1082–1088CrossRef
29.
Georgopoulou E et al (1997) A multicriteria decision aid approach for energy planning problems: the case of renewable energy option. Eur J Oper Res 103:38–54CrossRef
30.
Hanley N, Nevin C (1999) Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate Scotland. Energy Policy 27(9):527–547CrossRef
31.
Haralambopoulos DA, Polatidis H (2003) Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renew Energy 28:961–973CrossRef
32.
Hobbs BF, Horn GTF (1997) Building public confidence in energy planning: a multi-method MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas. Energy Policy 25:357–375CrossRef
33.
Hämäläinen RP, Karjalainen R (1992) Decision support for risk analysis in energy policy. Eur J Oper Res 56:172–183CrossRef
34.
35.
36.
ISO: 14040 (2006) Environmental management–Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework
37.
Kablan MM (2004) Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy 32:1151–1158CrossRef
38.
Karakosta C, Pappas C, Marinakis V, Psarras J (2013) Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: characteristics and prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 22:187–197CrossRef
39.
Keeney RL et al (1987) Structuring West Germany’s energy objectives. Energy Policy 15:352–362CrossRef
40.
Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197:1063–1074CrossRef
41.
Köne AÇ, Büke T (2007) An analytical network process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy 35:5220–5228CrossRef
42.
Lawrence DP (2007) Impact significance determination—Back to basics. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27(8):755–769CrossRef
43.
Lee SK, Mogi G, Kim JW (2009) Decision support for prioritizing energy technologies against high oil prices: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:915–920CrossRef
44.
Lo K (2014) A critical review of China’s rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:508–516CrossRef
45.
Lund H (2007) Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy 32(6):912–919CrossRef
46.
Løken E, Botterud A, Holen AT (2009) Use of the equivalent attribute technique in multi-criteria planning of local energy systems. Eur J Oper Res 197:1075–1083CrossRef
47.
Madlener R, Kowalski K, Stagl S (2007) New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: the case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energy Policy 35:6060–6074CrossRef
48.
Mamlook R, Akash BA, Nijmeh S (2001) Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan. Energy Convers Manag 42:1717–1726CrossRef
49.
Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2005) Combining participatory modeling and multi-criteria analysis for community-based forest management. For Ecol Manage 207(1–2):145–156CrossRef
50.
Menegaki A (2008) Valuation for renewable energy: a comparative review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:2422–2437CrossRef
51.
Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–88875
52.
Mourmouris JC, Potolias C (2013) A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: a case study Thassos, Greece. Energy Policy 52:522–530CrossRef
53.
Myllyviita T, Holma A, Antikainen R, Lahtinen K, Leskinen P (2012) Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains—application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). J Clean Prod 29:238–245CrossRef
54.
Nomura N, Akai M (2004) Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method. Appl Energy 78(4):453–463CrossRef
55.
Omer A (2008) Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(9):2265–2300CrossRef
56.
Önüt S et al (2008) Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy resources for Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Convers Manage 49:1480–1492CrossRef
57.
Painuly JP (2001) Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renew Energy 24(1):73–89CrossRef
58.
Papadopoulos A, Karagiannidis A (2008) Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems. Int J Manag Sci, Omega 36:766–776CrossRef
59.
Pawlak Z (2010) Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybern Syst 29(29):661–688
60.
Pilavachi PA, Roumpeas CP, Minett S, AfganN H (2006) Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options. Energy Convers Manag 47:3519–3529CrossRef
61.
Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8:365–381CrossRef
62.
63.
REN21 Steering Committee (2013) Renewables 2013, Global Status Report
64.
Rimal AT, Tugrul D (2013) Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature Review. Green Energy and Technology, Springer-Verlag, London, Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry, pp 17–30
65.
Roy B (1990) The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 155–183
66.
Soroudi A, Ehsan M, Zareipour H (2011) A practical eco-environmental distribution network planning model including fuel cells and non-renewable distributed energy resources. Renew Energy 36(1):179–188CrossRef
67.
Topcu YI, Ulengin F (2004) Energy for the future: an integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey. Energy 29:137–154CrossRef
68.
Twidell J, Weir T (2015) Renewable energy resources, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, London
69.
Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278CrossRef
70.
Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131(1):31–61CrossRef
71.
Yang JB, Xu DL (2013) Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination. Artif Intell 205:1–29CrossRef
72.
Yu W, Sheblé GB, Lopes JAP, Matos MA (2006) Valuation of switchable tariff for wind energy. Electr Power Syst Res 76(5):382–388CrossRef
73.
Zhao H, Guo S (2015) External benefit evaluation of renewable energy power in China for sustainability. Sustainability 7(5):4783–4805CrossRef
74.
Zhao J, Yang Z, Chen S (2009) Multi-criteria evaluation of alternative power supply using analytic hierarchy process. International conference on sustainable power generation and supply IEEE 2009, pp 1–7
75.
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: an update. Energy 31(14):2604–2622CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple Criteria Performance Modelling and Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Systems—A Literature Review
verfasst von
Ting Wu
Dong-Ling Xu
Jian-Bo Yang
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Renewable Energies

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45362-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-45364-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45364-4_1