nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. National Site Contamination Law

verfasst von : Elizabeth Brandon

Erschienen in: Global Approaches to Site Contamination Law

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter describes the range of national approaches to regulating site contamination. It categorises these into countries with extensive, specific laws on the issue, those with limited, specific laws, and those with no specific laws. This is followed by the identification of key regulatory trends, as well as issues that have emerged and factors that have influenced the development of site contamination law over time. The chapter contains detailed case studies of the regulatory approaches to site contamination in four jurisdictions (Germany, the United States, Massachusetts and British Columbia), highlighting particularly innovative features of each.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Current International Law Relating to Site Contamination

Nächstes Kapitel Responsibility for Site Contamination

The selection of Germany, the United States, Massachusetts and British Columbia is also based on project work undertaken by the Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Australia. This project work involved researching specific jurisdictions in Europe and North America for the purpose of compiling a database on national and sub-national approaches to contaminated sites law and policy in these regions (the CRC CARE Contaminated Sites Law and Policy Database, http://www.cslawpolicy.com/). Due to financial and time constraints, it was not possible to visit the individual jurisdictions and interview government representatives in person for the purpose of confirming the research and preparing the case studies. For this reason, significant reliance has been placed on documents that are currently available for each jurisdiction, although every effort has been made to ensure that the document reviews are thorough.

Abrams RH (1997) Superfund and the evolution of brownfields. William & Mary Environ Law Policy Rev 21:265–292

Anderson RC (2002) Incentive-based policies for environmental management in developing countries. Issue brief no. 02–07. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

Armstrong CS, Verma N (2005) The social construction of brownfields. Paper presented to the Association of European Schools of Planning Conference, Vienna, 13–17 July 2005

Benjamin SL, Belluck DA (2001) A practical guide to understanding, managing and reviewing environmental risk assessment reports. CRC Press, Boca Raton

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (1997) Guidance document on the management of contaminated sites in Canada

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2006) Recommended principles on contaminated sites liability

Carlon C (ed) (2007) Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe: a review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. European Commission

Cino R (2006) Soil pollution in the Netherlands. Paper presented to the Swedish Clean Soil Network, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 30 October 2006

Citizen Information Service (2012) Massachusetts facts. Available at http://www.sec.state.ma.us/cis/cismaf/maprof.htm

CMS Cameron McKenna (1995) Study of civil liability systems for remedying environmental damage - final report. London

Concerted Action on Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network (CABERNET) (2003) State of the art—country profile: Germany. Available at www.cabernet.org.uk

Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies in Europe (CLARINET) (2000) Management of contaminated sites and land in Denmark

Department of Communities and Local Government, Government of the United Kingdom (2011) Planning policy statement 3: housing

Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Government of New South Wales/Environment Protection Authority (1998) Planning guidelines: SEPP 55—remediation of land

Engineer S (2005) United Kingdom. Paper presented to the 7th meeting of the International Committee on Contaminated Land, Paris, 29–30 September 2005

Environmental Law Institute (2001) Analysis of 50 state superfund programs

Environmental Law Institute (2005) Estimating the cost of institutional controls

European Environment Agency (2007) CSI 015: progress in management of contaminated sites

Faure MG, Johnston JS (2007) The law and economics of environmental federalism: Europe and the United States compared. Paper prepared for the European Association of Law and Economics Annual Conference

Federal Environment Agency (Austria) (2002) 6th report on the state of the environment in Austria

Federal Environment Agency (Austria) (2004) 7th state of the environment report—contaminated sites

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety (Germany) (1999) Promulgation of methods and standards for derivation of test thresholds and measures thresholds

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety (Germany) (2002) Soil protection report

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety (Germany) (2009) Current state and future prospects of remedial soil protection

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety (Germany) (2010) Bodenschutz und altlasten—situation. Available at http://www.bmu.de/bodenschutz/doc/2494.php (in German)

Federal Statistical Office (Germany) (2011) Bodennutzungshaupterhebung—Brachflächen in Deutschland nach Bundesländern (in German)

Federal Statistical Office (Germany) (2012) Sustainable development in Germany—indicator report 2012

Federation of Statutory Accident Insurance Institutions for the Industrial Sector (Germany) (1997) Occupational safety and health protection rules for work in contaminated areas. Technical Committee for Civil Engineering

Ferguson CC (1999) Assessing risks from contaminated sites: policy and practice in 16 European countries. Land Contam Reclamation 7(2):33–54

Fletcher TH (2003) From Love Canal to environmental justice: the politics of hazardous waste on the Canada-U.S. border. Broadview Press¸ Peterborough

Fowler R (2006) Development of site contamination law and policy in developing countries in the Pacific Rim and Asia: lessons from the experience of developed countries. Paper presented to the Boston College Law School Symposium on Smart Brownfields Redevelopment in the 21st Century, Newton, Massachusetts, 16 November 2006

Fowler R (2007) Site contamination law and policy in Europe, North America and Australia—rends and challenges. Paper presented to the 8th meeting of the International Committee on Contaminated Land, Stockholm, 10–11 September 2007

Frauenstein J (2007) German country report—tour de table. Presentation to the NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Meeting on Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 17–22 June 2007

Gong Y (2010) International experience in policy and regulatory frameworks for brownfield site management. Discussion paper on sustainable development—East Asia and Pacific region. World Bank

Government of British Columbia (2012a) BC brownfield renewal funding program. Available at http://www.brownfieldrenewal.gov.bc.ca/financial.html

Government of British Columbia (2012b) BC facts. Available at http://www.gov.bc.ca/bcfacts/

Government of British Columbia (2012c) Brownfield basics. Available at http://www.brownfieldrenewal.gov.bc.ca/basics.html#opportunities

Griffiths CEM, Board NP (1992) Approaches to the assessment and remediation of polluted land in Europe and America. Water Environ J 6(2):720CrossRef

Grubb K, McNaughton WK (2011) Changes to the British Columbia contaminated sites process. Environmental Law News—Real Estate Edition

Herdman RC (1978) Love Canal: public health time bomb. Special Report to the Governor and Legislature of New York State. Office of Public Health

International Economic Development Council (2005) Executive summary: international brownfields redevelopment

Kizner M (2009) New ‘Site Remediation Reform Act’ to revolutionize environmental remediation process in New Jersey. 10 August 2009. Available at http://www.flastergreenberg.com/home/news/in-the-news.aspx?d=759

Kohls M (2006) German soil protection law. J Eur Environ Plann Law 3:250–257CrossRef

LaFalce J (1980) Congressional record. 126 Cong Rec 26765. 23 September 1980

Layard A (2006) The Europeanisation of contaminated land. In: Betlem G, Brans E (eds) Environmental liability in the EU: the 2004 directive compared with US and Member State law. Cameron, London, pp 129–147

Luo Q, Catney P, Lerner D (2009) Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: lessons for China? J Environ Manag 90(2):1123–1134CrossRef

Lyster R, Lipman Z, Franklin N (2007) Environmental and planning law in New South Wales. Federation Press, Sydney

Marker A, Nieters A, Ullrich D (2007) Contaminated site management and brownfield redevelopment in Latin America. Paper presented to the 2nd International Conference on Managing Urban Land, Stuttgart, Germany, 25–27 April 2007

Massachusetts Board of Registration of Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Professionals (2007) Guide to licensed site professionals and the LSP Board

Massachusetts Board of Registration of Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Professionals (2012). Available at http://www.mass.gov/lsp/

MassDEP (1999) Interim final policy—guidance on implementing activity and use limitations

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (2006a) Brownfields success stories

MassDEP (2006b) Fact sheet: brownfields and waste site cleanup programs

MassDEP (2008a) Fact sheet: The Massachusetts waste site cleanup program—the basics

MassDEP (2008b) The Massachusetts brownfields program: a decade of progress in economic development

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (2012a) Cleanup of sites and spills: statistics on cleaning up oil and hazardous waste sites in Massachusetts. Available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/priorities/progeval.htm

MassDEP (2012b) NPL-Superfund sites in Massachusetts. Available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/sites/superfnd.htm

MassDEP (2012c) Summary of the Brownfields Act: Chapter 206 of the Acts of 1998. Available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup/bfhdout2.htm

Meijer M (2005) New developments in the policy on contaminated soil in the Netherlands. Paper presented to the 7th meeting of the International Committee on Contaminated Land, Paris, 29–30 September 2005

Mellenbergh R (2006) The comparative survey—five questions on soil protection: the Netherlands. J Eur Environ Plann Law 3:285–286

Ministry for the Environment, Government of New Zealand (2006) Working towards a comprehensive policy framework for managing contaminated land in New Zealand—a discussion paper

Ministry for the Environment, Government of New Zealand (2012) Contaminated land. Available at http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/hazardous/contaminated/

Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Government of British Columbia (2012) BC brownfield renewal strategy. Available at http://www.al.gov.bc.ca/clad/ccs/brownfields/renewal_strategy.html

Ministry of Community Services, Government of British Columbia (2008) Revitalization tax exemptions: a primer on the provisions in the Community Charter

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (1998) Protocol 2—site-specific numerical soil standards

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2005) Factsheet # 14—demystifying risk assessment

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2006) Factsheet # 20: the site registry

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2007) Protocol 8—security for contaminated sites

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2008) Protocol 13—screening level risk assessment

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2009a) Factsheet # 1—an introduction to contaminated sites in British Columbia

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2009b) Factsheet # 3—highlights of legislation and regulations

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2009c) Factsheet # 13—environmental quality standards

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2009d) Ministry procedures for the roster of approved professionals

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2010a) Factsheet # 19: the site profile system

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2010b) Factsheet # 30: the roster of approved professionals

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2010c) Factsheet # 46: contaminated sites legal instruments

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2010d) Protocol 6—eligibility of applications for review by approved professionals

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2011) 2009/10-2010/11 Land remediation section report

Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia (2012) Independent remediation. Available at http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/independent/index.htm

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Government of British Columbia (2011) Brownfield funding helps revitalize communities. Press release, 30 March 2011

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Government of British Columbia (2012) Crown land restoration branch. Available at http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/clad/ccs/summary.html#database

Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management, Government of British Columbia (2008) Management of provincial contaminated sites policy

Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2012) Conservation of soil environment. Available at www.env.go.jp/en/water/wq/wemj/soil.html

Ministry of the Environment, Government of Sweden (2001) The Swedish Environmental Code: a resumé of the text of the code and related ordinances

Morissette L, Hourcle LR (1989) State environmental laws redefine ‘substantial and meaningful involvement’. Air Force Law Rev 31:137

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (United States) (2004) Environmental justice and federal facilities: recommendations for improving stakeholder relations between federal facilities and environmental justice communities

Netherlands Soil Partnership (2012) NSP in China. Available at http://www.nsp-soil.com/pagina.asp?id=304

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Government of the United Kingdom (2004) Planning policy statement 23: planning and pollution control

Ozawa H (2007) International comparative legal guide to environment law: Japan. Global Legal Group, London

Pajukallio AM (2005) Contaminated land management in Finland. Paper presented to the 7th meeting of the International Committee on Contaminated Land, Paris, 29–30 September 2005

Percival RV, Miller AS, Schroeder CH, Leape JE (1992) Environmental regulation: law, science and policy, 1st edn. Little, Brown & Co, Boston

Purifoy DM (2012) EPCRA at 25: a case study in environmental right to know laws. Presentation to the National Training Conference on the Toxics Release Inventory and Environmental Conditions in Communities, Washington, DC, 11–13 April 2012

Robinson G (2006) Clean and pleasant land: the changing world of land remediation. Waste Management World, 125

Rose-Ackerman S (1994) Environmental policy and federal structure: a comparison of the United States and Germany. Vanderbilt Law Rev 47:1587–1622

Schutyser R, Deketelaere K (eds) (2000) Belgium. In international encyclopaedia of environmental law, Supplement No 25. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

Scorecard (2012) The universe of potential contaminated sites in the US. Available at http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/def/land_other_sites.html

Sheehan P, Firth S (2008) Client’s guide to contaminated land risk assessment. In Environmental Industries Commission. Land Remediation Yearbook 2008:71

Sigman H, Stafford S (2010) Management of hazardous waste and contaminated land. Working paper no. 2010/08, Department of Economics, Rutgers University

Sowinski JM (2008) Environmental liability transfer in British Columbia—final report. Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia

Spieth WF, Ramb M (2010) International comparative legal guide to environment law: Germany. Global Legal Group, London

Stockman D (1980) Congressional record. 126 Cong Rec 26765. 23 September 1980

Stolfa MR (2003) Massachusetts’ activity and use limitations. In: Edwards AL (ed) Implementing institutional controls at brownfields and other contaminated sites. American Bar Association, Chicago, pp 179–185

Superfund Senior Regional Management Acquisition Council (2011) Contracts 2010 strategy report

Thornton G, Vanheusden B, Nathanail CP (2005) Are incentives for brownfield regeneration sustainable? A comparative survey. J Eur Environ Plann Law 5(2)

USEPA (1986) RCRA facility assessment guidance

USEPA (1987) Superfund program: covenants not to sue. Federal Register, vol 52, No. 143

USEPA (1988) Guidance for conducting remedial investigations and feasibility studies under CERCLA – interim final

USEPA (1989a) Interim final—RCRA facility investigation (RFI) guidance

USEPA (1989b) Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, vol II: environmental evaluation manual—interim final

USEPA (1990a) EPA oversight of remedial designs and remedial actions performed by potentially responsible parties—interim final

USEPA (1990b) Guidance on CERCLA section 106(a) unilateral administrative orders for remedial designs and remedial actions

USEPA (1991a) Guidance for performing preliminary assessments under CERCLA

USEPA (1991b) Guidance on oversight of potentially responsible party remedial investigations and feasibility studies—final (vol 1)

USEPA (1992a) Guidance for performing site inspections under CERCLA—interim final

USEPA (1992b) Operation manual for Superfund

USEPA (1995) Remedial design/remedial action handbook

USEPA (1996a) Policy on the issuance of comfort/status letters

USEPA (1996b) RCRA public participation manual

USEPA (1997a) Clarification of the role of applicable, or relevant and appropriate requirements in establishing preliminary remediation goals under CERCLA

USEPA (1997b) Revised policy for federal facilities

USEPA (1999) A guide to preparing Superfund proposed plans, records of decision, and other remedy selection decision documents

USEPA (2000a) Interim guidance on implementing the Superfund administrative reform on PRP oversight

USEPA (2000b) Questions and answers about the state role in remedy selection at non-fund-financed enforcement sites

USEPA (2000c) Use of non-time critical removal authority in Superfund response actions

USEPA (2001a) Memorandum—comfort/status letters for RCRA brownfield properties

USEPA (2001b) RCRA brownfields prevention initiative: lessons learned from pilots

USEPA (2002) Memorandum—enforcement first for remedial action at Superfund sites

USEPA (2003a) Final guidance on completion of corrective action activities at RCRA facilities. Federal Register, vol 68, No. 37

USEPA (2003b) RCRA brownfields prevention initiative: targeted site efforts 2003

USEPA (2004) OSWER guidance for the regional public liaisons

USEPA (2005a) Federal facilities remedial preliminary assessment summary guide

USEPA (2005b) Institutional controls: a citizen’s guide to understanding institutional controls at Superfund, brownfields, federal facilities, underground storage tank, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act cleanups

USEPA (2005c) Superfund community involvement handbook

USEPA (2006) Final rule—RCRA burden reduction initiative. Federal Register, vol 71, No. 64

USEPA (2007) Cooperative agreements and Superfund state contracts for Superfund response actions—final rule. Federal Register, vol 72, No. 84

United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009a) EPA discusses site remediation and brownfields with Chinese officials. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ogc/china/cooperation.htm

USEPA (2009b) Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, vol I: human health evaluation manual—interim final. Parts A-F

USEPA (2010a) Institutional controls: a guide to planning, implementing, maintaining and enforcing institutional controls at contaminated sites—interim final

USEPA (2010b) National enforcement strategy for RCRA corrective action

USEPA (2010c) Superfund national accomplishments summary fiscal year 2010. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/accomp/numbers10.htm

USEPA (2011a) A guide to federal tax incentives for brownfields redevelopment

USEPA (2011b) Close-out procedures for National Priorities List sites

USEPA (2011c) Federal facilities—basic information. Available at http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/about_ffrro.htm

USEPA (2011d) Memorandum—program priorities for federal facility five-year review

USEPA (2011e) Proposal guidelines for brownfields assessment grants

USEPA (2011f) RCRA orientation manual

USEPA (2011g) Superfund contract management—background. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/contracts/2bkgrnd.htm

USEPA (2012a) Brownfields and land revitalization. Available at http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/basic_info.htm#plan

USEPA (2012b) Brownfields program accomplishments. June 2012. Available at http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/overview/bf-monthly-report.html

USEPA (2012c) Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office—basic information. Available at http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/about_ffrro.htm

USEPA (2012d) National Priorities List (NPL). Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/index.htm

USEPA (2012e) National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan overview. Available at http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/content/lawsregs/ncpover.htm

USEPA (2012f) NPL site totals by status and milestone. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/query/queryhtm/npltotal.htm

USEPA (2012g) RCRA sites. Available at http://www.epa.gov/region7/land_revitalization/program/RCRAsites.htm

USEPA (2012h) Superfund financial responsibility. Available at http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/financialresponsibility/

USEPA (2012i) Types of contaminated sites. Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/cleanup/revitalization/site-types.html

USEPA/Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office (2012) National priorities list sites by State/U.S. territory. Available at http://www.epa.gov/fedfac/ff/nplstates2.htm

USEPA Office of Inspector General (2011) Annual Superfund report to congress for fiscal year 2010

Vestbro DU (ed) (2007) Managing the built environment and remediation of brownfields. Baltic University Urban Forum

Vanheusden B (2006) The comparative survey—five questions on soil protection: Belgium. J Eur Environ Plann Law 3:276–279CrossRef

Vrijheid M (2000) Health effects of residence near hazardous waste landfill sites: a review of epidemiologic literature. Environ Heal Perspect Suppl 108(S1):101–112CrossRef

Xie J, Li F (2010) Overview of the current situation on brownfield remediation and redevelopment in China. Discussion paper on sustainable development—East Asia and Pacific region. World Bank

Young JP (1990) Expanding state initiation and enforcement under Superfund. Univ Chicago Law Rev 57:985–1007CrossRef

Charben Haulage Pty Ltd v Environmental and Earth Sciences Pty Ltd (2004) FCA 403 (Australia)

Münster Higher Administrative Court, Decision 20A 1774/99, 16 November 2000 (Germany)

Steel Co. v Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) (United States Supreme Court)

Thuringia Higher Administrative Court, Decision 4 KO 52/97, 11 July 2001 (Germany)

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009, Pub.L. 111–5 (United States)

An Act Relative to Environmental Cleanup and Promoting the Redevelopment of Contaminated Property (Brownfields Act) 1998, Ch. 206 (Massachusetts)

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany 1949 (Germany)

Clean Air Act 1970, 42 U.S.C. §7401 (United States)

Clean Water Act (formerly the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 1972, 33 U.S.C. §1251 (United States)

Code of Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 239–299 (United States)

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601 (United States)

Contaminated Sites Regulation 1996, B.C. Reg. 375/96 (British Columbia)

Decree on Assessment of Soil Contamination and Need for Remediation 2007, No. 214/2007 (Finland)

Directive on Environmental Liability with Regard to the Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage (2004/35/EC) O.J. L. 143/56-75 (European Union)

Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act 1986, Pub. L. 99–499 (United States)

Emissions Control Act 2002 (Germany)

Environmental Code 1999, D.S. 2000: 61 (Sweden)

Environmental Damage Prevention and Remediation Act 2007 (Germany)

Environmental Management Act 2003 [SBC 2003] c. 53 (British Columbia)

Environmental Protection Act 1990 c. 43 (United Kingdom)

Environmental Protection Act 2000, No. 86/2000 (Finland)

Hazardous Waste Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 260–279 (United States)

Land Title Act 1996 [RSBC 1996] c. 250 (British Columbia)

Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention and Response Act 1992, Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 21E

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan 40 C.F.R. 300 (United States)

Oil Pollution Act 1990, 33 U.S.C. 40 (United States)

Regulations of the Board of Registration of Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Professionals, Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 21A, Sect. 19A (Massachusetts)

Resource Management Act 1991, Public Act 1991 No. 69 (New Zealand)

Site Remediation Reform Act 2009, P.L. 2009, c. 60 (New Jersey)

Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act 2002, Pub. L. No. 107–118 (United States)

Soil Protection Act 1998 (Germany)

Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites Ordinance 1999 (Germany)

Soil Protection Encumbrances Registration Ordinance 1999 (Germany)

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act 1986, Pub. L. 99–499 (1986) (United States)

Toxic Substances Control Act 1976, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 (United States)

Water Management Act 2009 (Germany)

Titel: National Site Contamination Law
verfasst von: Elizabeth Brandon
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Buch: Global Approaches to Site Contamination Law
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5744-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-5745-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5745-5_4