Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Dimensions Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Negative Juxtaposition

verfasst von : Michael Roe

Erschienen in: Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

It has taken a while to get here but we are nearing the end of our journey towards an understanding of governance and policy-making and more specifically that for the maritime sector and its problems and needs. In the final chapter, we shall provide an overview of the whole process and see where this might take the reader to the next but here, we focus on a last look at juxtaposition, policy and governance and in particular, the difficulties and drawbacks faced in attempting to develop such an approach for although it might sound like an obvious and desirable thing to achieve, the problems that remain reflect the general failure that exists. We begin with a look at private governance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Positive Juxtaposition
Nächstes Kapitel The End
Literatur
Abrahamson, E., & Baumard, P. (2008). What lies behind organizational facades and how organizational facades lie; An untold story of organizational decision-making. In G. Gerard, P. Hodgkinson, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision-making (pp. 437–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acharya, A. (2007). State sovereignty after 9/11; Disorganised hypocrisy. Political Studies, 55, 274–296.CrossRef
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience; Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.CrossRef
Andersen, R. (2002). The time dimension in international regime interplay. Global Environmental Politics, 2(3), 98–117.CrossRef
Arcarazo, D. A., & Freier, L. F. (2015). Turning the immigration policy paradox upside down? Populist liberalism and discursive gaps in South America. International Migration Review, 3, 659–696.CrossRef
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning; A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Belintsev, B. N. (1983). Dissipative structures and the problem of biological pattern formation. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 26(9), 775–800.CrossRef
Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: Enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.CrossRef
Biermann, F. (2008). Earth system governance: A research agenda. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change; Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 287–290). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biermann, F., & Brohm, R. (2005). Implementing the Kyoto protocol without the United States; The strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border. Climate Policy, 4(3), 289–302.CrossRef
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures; A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.CrossRef
Biersteker, T., & Weber, C. (1996). State sovereignty as a social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blazquez, J., Fuentes-Bracamontes, R., Bollino, C. A., & Nezamuddin, N. (2018). The renewable energy policy paradox. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1–5.CrossRef
Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy; Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt Forlag.
Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buijs, J. (2010). Understanding connective capacity of program management from a self-organization perspective. Emergence, Complexity and Organization, 12(1), 29–38.
Buijs, B., Sievers, H., & Tercero Espinoza, L. (2012). Limits to the critical raw materials approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 165(4), 201–208.
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational facades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.CrossRef
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism; Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Clark, I. (1997). Globalization and fragmentation. International relations in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coglianese, C. (1999). The limits of consensus. Environment, 41(3), 28–33.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping. Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: Wiley.
Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or; Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.CrossRef
Darier, E. (1996). Environmental governability; The case of Canada’s green plan. Environmental Politics, 5, 585–606.CrossRef
Davis, S. (1982). Transforming organizations; The key to strategy is context. Organizational Dynamics, 10, 64–80.CrossRef
De Burca, G., O’Keohane, R. O., & Sabel, C. (2012). New modes of pluralist global governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45, 723–786.
De Jong, S. P. L., Smit, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2016). Scientists’ response to societal impact policies; A policy paradox. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 102–114.CrossRef
Derkx, B., & Glasbergen, P. (2014). Elaborating global private meta-governance: An inventory in the realm of voluntary sustainability standards. Global Environmental Change, 27, 41–50.CrossRef
Dewulf, J., Blengini, G. A., Pennington, D., Nuss, P., & Nassar, N. T. (2016). Criticality on the international scene: Quo vadis? Resources Policy, 50, 169–176.CrossRef
Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.CrossRef
Egnell, R. (2010). The organised hypocrisy of international state-building. Conflict, Security and Development, 10(4), 465–491.CrossRef
Eichenbaum, J., & Gale, S. (1971). Form, function and process: A methodological inquiry. Economic Geography, 47(4), 525–544.CrossRef
Erdmann, L., & Graedel, T. E. (2011). Criticality of non-fuel minerals; A review of major approaches and analyses. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(18), 7620–7630.CrossRef
Essletzbichler, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2010). Generalized Darwinism and evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 43–61). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Falkner, R., & Gupta, A. (2009). Limits of regulatory convergence; Globalization and GMO politics in the south. International Environmental Agreements, 9(2), 113–133.CrossRef
Forster, E. M. (1909). The machine stops. In E. M. Forster (Ed.), The machine stops and other stories. London: Andre Deutsch.
Fox, N. J., & Ward, K. J. (2008). What governs governance, and how does it evolve? The sociology of governance-in-action. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 519–538.CrossRef
Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law Review, 45(1), 1–98.
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent complex systems. Futures, 26(6), 568–582.CrossRef
Gemmill, G., & Smith, C. (1985). A dissipative structure model of organization transformation. Human Relations, 38(8), 751–766.CrossRef
Golombiewski, R., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1975). Measuring change and resistance in human affairs; Types of change generated by OD design. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 12, 133–157.CrossRef
Graedel, T. E., & Reck, B. K. (2016). Six years of criticality assessments; What have we learned so far? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 692–699.CrossRef
Gupta, A. (2008). Global biosafety governance; The current state of play. In O. R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, J. A. Kim, & C. ten Have (Eds.), Institutional interplay: The case of biosafety (pp. 19–46). Yokohama: UNU Press.
Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1985a). The geopolitics of capitalism. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.
Harvey, D. (1985b). The urbanization of capital. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
Hirschmann, G. (2012). Peacebuilding in the UN peacekeeping exit strategies; Organized hypocrisy and institutional reform. International Peacekeeping, 19(2), 170–185.CrossRef
Holling, C. S., Schindler, D. W., Walker, B. W., & Roughgarden, J. (1995). Biodiveristy in the functioning of ecosystems; And ecological synthesis. In C. Perrings, K. G. Maler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, & B. O. Jansson (Eds.), Biodiveristy loss; Economic and ecological issues (pp. 44–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Jacobs, M. (1995). Sustainability and ‘the market’; A typology of environmental economics. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Markets the state and the environment (pp. 46–70). London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the culture of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Jantsch, E. (1981). The evolutionary vision. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jasanoff, J. (2000). Remarks at Workshop on Science and Governance, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Brussels, March 29–30.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance; On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kanie, N. (2007). Governance with multilateral environmental agreements; A healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation. In L. Swart & E. Perry (Eds.), Global environmental governance; Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 69–86). New York: Center for UN Reform.
Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R., & Turner, B. L., II. (1996). Regions at risk. Exploring environmental criticality. Environment, 38(10), 4–29.
Kickert, W. J. M. (2003). Beneath consensual corporatism; Traditions of governance in The Netherlands. Public Administration, 81(1), 119–140.CrossRef
Kouzmin, A. (2002). Symposium—The new ‘political’ economy of the ‘smart’ state. Transitions in governance capacities. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(1), 25–30.CrossRef
Kouzmin, A., Dixon, J., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2001). From self-referential economics to managerialism and the ‘economic holocaust’ of down-sizing/re-engineering; A global reckoning begins! In K. Thorne & G. Turner (Eds.), Global business regulation; Some research perspectives (pp. 1–37). Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Krasner, S. D. (2013). Recognition; Organized hypocrisy once again. International Theory, 5(1), 170–176.CrossRef
Kumar, S. (2014, November). Why we can’t (or won’t) govern. The Hindu.
Kumar, S. (2019, January). The Modi government’s reservation gambit is neither sound nor smart politics. The Hindu.
Laughland, J. (2008, October). Bloom off the rose; Georgian ‘democracy’ owes more to Josef Stalin than Thomas Jefferson. Abkhaz World.
Lee, H. Y. (2013). A policy paradox from paternalism to populism; The case of foot and mouth disease in South Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 18(3), 233–255.CrossRef
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.
Lindroos, A., & Mehling, M. (2005). Dispelling the chimera of ‘self-contained regimes’. International law and the WTO. European Journal of International Law, 16(5), 857–877.CrossRef
Lipson, M. (2007). Peacekeeping; Organized hypocrisy? European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 5–34.CrossRef
Mackinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2012). From resilience to resourcefulness; A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253–270.CrossRef
Mangat, R. (2001). The death of distance? Globalism in international relations. E-merge, 2, 1–13.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2010). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 93–119). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marx, K. (1969). Theories of surplus value, part 2. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Masten, A. S., & Powell, J. L. (2003). A resilience framework for research policy and practice. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptations in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGinnis, M. D. (2005). Costs and challenges of polycentric governance. In Workshop on Analyzing Problems of Polycentric Governance in the Growing EU. Berlin: Humboldt University.
McGrew, A. (1992). A global society? In S. Hall, D. Held, & A. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press/Open University.
Mee, A. (2007). E-learning funding for schools; A policy paradox. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 63–71.CrossRef
Mendoza, R. (2007). Shaking up international development. What one hand gives, the other takes. Industrial countries’ policy coherence for development. Challenge, 50(5), 28–56.CrossRef
Menzel, U. (1998). Globalisierung versus Fragmentierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Meuleman, L. (2010). The cultural dimension of metagovernance; Why governance doctrines may fail. Public Organization Review, 10, 49–70.CrossRef
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1982). Structural change and performance; Quantum versus piecemeal-incremental approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 867–892.
Morison, E. E. (Undated) Poetry and policy. Working Paper No. 3, Program in Science, Technology and Society. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Neuhoff, K. (1990). Private funding for university research in Europe—Some models and conceptions. Higher Education Quarterly, 44(2), 163–173.CrossRef
Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty; Outline of a conceptual history. Alternatives, 16, 425–446.CrossRef
Ostrom, V. (1995). The meaning of democracy: The vulnerability of democracies. Bloomington, IN: Indian University.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide; Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.CrossRef
Perlmutter, H. V. (1991). On the rocky road to the first civilization. Human Relations, 44(9), 897–920.CrossRef
Peters, B. G. (2012). The meta-governance of policy networks; Steering at a distance but still steering. Working Papers. Roskilde: Democratic Network Governance in Europe.
Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1977). Self organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York: Wiley.
Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G., & Babloyantz, A. (1972). Thermodynamics of evolution. Physics Today, 25, 23–28.CrossRef
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos; Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam New Age Books.
Rashish, M. (1982). Statement of Myer Rashish to the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, August 13.
Ravetz, J. (2003). A paradoxical future for safety in the global knowledge economy. Futures, 35, 811–826.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3, 275–284.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. (2011). Post normal science and the maturing of the structural contradictions of modern European science. Futures, 43, 142–148.CrossRef
Roe, M. (2016). Maritime governance. Speed, flow, form, process. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Rutter, M. (2000). Resilience reconsidered; Conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 651–682). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sack, R. D. (1974). The spatial separatist theme in geography. Economic Geography, 50(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2003). Mapping institutional linkages in European air pollution politics. Global Environmental Politics, 3(3), 14–46.CrossRef
Sheldon, A. (1980). Organizational paradigms; A theory of organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 61–80.CrossRef
Sidaway, R. (1994). Political geography in the time of cyberspaces; New agendas? Geoforum, 25, 487–503.CrossRef
Sonnemann, G., Gemechu, E. D., Adibi, N., De Bruille, V., & Bulle, C. (2015). From a critical review to a conceptual framework for integrating the criticality of resources into life cycle sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 20–34.CrossRef
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.CrossRef
Stokke, O. S. (2001). The interplay of international regimes; Putting effectiveness theory to work? (FNI Report 10/2001). Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Torfing, J., Peters, G. B., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Tseng, P., & Pilcher, N. (2017). Port governance in Taiwan: How hypocrisy helps meet aspirations of change. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 22, 38–48.CrossRef
Turner, R. K., Pearce, D., & Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Voets, J., Verhoest, K., & Molenveld, A. (2015). Coordinating for integrated youth care. The need for smart metagovernance. Public Administration Review, 17(7), 981–1001.
Wang, G. (2003, January). Policy escapism during the implementation of policies. Guihong Tribune (in Chinese).
Weber, C. (1995). Simulating sovereignty: Intervention the state and symbolic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weingast, B. R. (1993). Constitutions as governance structures; The political foundations of secure markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 286–311.
Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions; Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(1), 1–31.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions; A cultural theory of preference formation. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3–22.CrossRef
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. (1994). The institutions and governance of economic development and reform. Berkeley, CA: University of California.CrossRef
Wuisan, L., Van Leeuwen, J., & Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance; A case study of the clean shipping project. Marine Policy, 36, 165–173.CrossRef
Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society. Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2(1), 1–24.CrossRef
Zelli, N. (2008). Regime conflicts in global environmental governance. A framework for analysis. Global Governance Working Paper No. 36, The Global Governance Project, Amsterdam.
Zelli, F., & Van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance; Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Negative Juxtaposition
verfasst von
Michael Roe
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Buch
Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31847-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-31848-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_8

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise