Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2013

Open Access 01.12.2013 | Research

Neighborhoods and partial sums of certain subclass of starlike functions

verfasst von: Zhi-Gang Wang, Xin-Sheng Yuan, Lei Shi

Erschienen in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Ausgabe 1/2013

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
loading …

Abstract

The main purpose of the present paper is to derive the neighborhoods and partial sums of a certain subclass of starlike functions.
MSC: 30C45.
Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors completed the paper together. They also read and approved the final manuscript.

1 Introduction

Let A m denote the class of functions f of the form
f ( z ) = z + k = m + 1 a k z k ( m N : = { 1 , 2 , 3 , } ) ,
(1.1)
which are analytic in the open unit disk
U : = { z : z C  and  | z | < 1 } .
A function f A m is said to be in the class S m ( β ) of starlike functions of order β if it satisfies the inequality
( z f ( z ) f ( z ) ) > β ( z U ; 0 β < 1 ) .
(1.2)
Assuming that α 0 , 0 β < 1 and f A m , we say that a function f H m ( α , β ) if it satisfies the condition
( z f ( z ) f ( z ) + α z 2 f ( z ) f ( z ) ) > α β ( β + m 2 1 ) + β m α 2 ( z U ) .
(1.3)
For convenience, throughout this paper, we write
γ m : = α β ( β + m 2 1 ) + β m α 2 .
(1.4)
Recently, Ravichandran et al. [1] proved that H m ( α , β ) S m ( β ) . Subsequently, Liu et al. [2] derived various properties and characteristics such as inclusion relationships, Hadamard products, coefficient estimates, distortion theorems and cover theorems for the class H m ( α , β ) and a subclass of H m ( α , β ) with negative coefficients. Furthermore, Singh et al. [3] generalized the class H m ( α , β ) and found several sufficient conditions for starlikeness. In the present paper, we aim at proving the neighborhoods and partial sums of the class H m ( α , β ) .

2 Main results

Following the earlier works (based upon the familiar concept of a neighborhood of analytic functions) by Goodman [4] and Ruscheweyh [5], and (more recently) by Altintaş et al. [69], Cǎtaş [10], Frasin [11], Keerthi et al. [12] and Srivastava et al. [13], we begin by introducing here the δ-neighborhood of a function f A m of the form (1.1) by means of the definition
N δ ( f ) : = { g A m : g ( z ) = z + k = m + 1 b k z k  and k = m + 1 k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m | a k b k | δ ( δ , α 0 ; 0 β < 1 ; γ m < 1 ) } .
(2.1)
By making use of the definition (2.1), we now derive the following result.
Theorem 1 If f A m satisfies the condition
f ( z ) + ε z 1 + ε H m ( α , β ) ( ε C ; | ε | < δ ; δ > 0 ) ,
(2.2)
then
N δ ( f ) H m ( α , β ) .
(2.3)
Proof By noting that the condition (1.3) can be rewritten as follows:
| z f ( z ) f ( z ) + α z 2 f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 z f ( z ) f ( z ) + α z 2 f ( z ) f ( z ) ( 2 γ m 1 ) | < 1 ( z U ) ,
(2.4)
we easily find from (2.4) that a function g H m ( α , β ) if and only if
z g ( z ) + α z 2 g ( z ) g ( z ) z g ( z ) + α z 2 g ( z ) ( 2 γ m 1 ) g ( z ) σ ( z U ; σ C ; | σ | = 1 ) ,
which is equivalent to
( g h ) ( z ) z 0 ( z U ) ,
(2.5)
where
h ( z ) = z + k = m + 1 c k z k ( c k : = k + α k ( k 1 ) 1 [ k + α k ( k 1 ) ( 2 γ m 1 ) ] σ 2 ( γ m 1 ) σ ) .
(2.6)
It follows from (2.6) that
| c k | = | k + α k ( k 1 ) 1 [ k + α k ( k 1 ) ( 2 γ m 1 ) ] σ 2 ( γ m 1 ) σ | k + α k ( k 1 ) 1 + [ k + α k ( k 1 ) ( 2 γ m 1 ) ] | σ | 2 ( 1 γ m ) | σ | = k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m ( | σ | = 1 ) .
If f A m satisfies the condition (2.2), we deduce from (2.5) that
( f h ) ( z ) z ε ( | ε | < δ ; δ > 0 ) ,
or, equivalently,
| ( f h ) ( z ) z | δ ( z U ; δ > 0 ) .
(2.7)
We now suppose that
q ( z ) = z + k = m + 1 d k z k N δ ( f ) .
It follows from (2.1) that
| ( ( q f ) h ) ( z ) z | = | k = m + 1 ( d k a k ) c k z k 1 | | z | k = m + 1 k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m | d k a k | < δ .
(2.8)
Combining (2.7) and (2.8), we easily find that
| ( q h ) ( z ) z | = | ( [ f + ( q f ) ] h ) ( z ) z | | ( f h ) ( z ) z | | ( ( q f ) h ) ( z ) z | > 0 ,
which implies that
( q h ) ( z ) z 0 ( z U ) .
Therefore, we conclude that
q ( z ) N δ ( f ) H m ( α , β ) .
We thus complete the proof of Theorem 1. □
Next, we derive the partial sums of the class H m ( α , β ) . For some recent investigations involving the partial sums in analytic function theory, one can refer to [1416] and the references cited therein.
Theorem 2 Let f A m be given by (1.1) and define the partial sums f n ( z ) of f by
f n ( z ) = z + k = m + 1 n a k z k ( n N ; n m + 1 ) .
(2.9)
If
k = m + 1 k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m | a k | 1 ( α 0 ; 0 β < 1 ; γ m < 1 ) ,
(2.10)
then
(1) f H m ( α , β ) ;
(2)
( f ( z ) f n ( z ) ) n ( 1 + α + n α ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( n N ; n m + 1 ; z U )
(2.11)
and
( f n ( z ) f ( z ) ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) + 1 2 γ m ( n N ; n m + 1 ; z U ) .
(2.12)
The bounds in (2.11) and (2.12) are sharp.
Proof (1) Suppose that f 1 ( z ) = z . We know that z H m ( α , β ) , which implies that
f 1 ( z ) + ε z 1 + ε = z H m ( α , β ) .
From (2.10), we easily find that
k = m + 1 k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m | a k 0 | 1 ,
which implies that f N 1 ( z ) . In view of Theorem 1, we deduce that
f N 1 ( z ) H m ( α , β ) .
(2) It is easy to verify that
( n + 1 ) [ 1 + ( n + 1 ) α α ] γ m 1 γ m = ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m > n ( 1 + n α α ) γ m 1 γ m > 1 ( n N ) .
Therefore, we have
k = m + 1 n | a k | + ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 | a k | k = m + 1 k ( 1 + k α α ) γ m 1 γ m | a k | 1 .
(2.13)
We now suppose that
ψ ( z ) = ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m ( f ( z ) f n ( z ) n ( 1 + α + n α ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ) = 1 + ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 a k z k 1 1 + k = m + 1 n a k z k 1 .
(2.14)
It follows from (2.13) and (2.14) that
| ψ ( z ) 1 ψ ( z ) + 1 | ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 | a k | 2 2 k = m + 1 n | a k | ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 | a k | 1 ( z U ) ,
which shows that
( ψ ( z ) ) 0 ( z U ) .
(2.15)
Combining (2.14) and (2.15), we deduce that the assertion (2.11) holds true.
Moreover, if we put
f ( z ) = z + 1 γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m z n + 1 ( n N { 1 , 2 , , m 1 } ; m N ) ,
(2.16)
then for z = r e i π / n , we have
f ( z ) f n ( z ) = 1 + 1 γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m z n n ( 1 + α + n α ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( r 1 ) ,
which implies that the bound in (2.11) is the best possible for each n N { 1 , 2 , , m 1 } .
Similarly, we suppose that
φ ( z ) = ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) + 1 2 γ m 1 γ m ( f n ( z ) f ( z ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) + 1 2 γ m ) = 1 ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) + 1 2 γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 a k z k 1 1 + k = m + 1 a k z k 1 .
(2.17)
In view of (2.13) and (2.17), we conclude that
| φ ( z ) 1 φ ( z ) + 1 | ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) + 1 2 γ m 1 γ m k = n + 1 | a k | 2 2 k = m + 1 n | a k | n ( 1 + α + n α ) 1 γ m k = n + 1 | a k | 1 ( z U ) ,
which implies that
( φ ( z ) ) 0 ( z U ) .
(2.18)
Combining (2.17) and (2.18), we readily get the assertion (2.12) of Theorem 2. The bound in (2.12) is sharp with the extremal function f given by (2.16).
The proof of Theorem 2 is thus completed. □
Finally, we turn to ratios involving derivatives. The proof of Theorem 3 below is much akin to that of Theorem 2, we here choose to omit the analogous details.
Theorem 3 Let f A m be given by (1.1) and define the partial sums f n ( z ) of f by (2.9). If the condition (2.10) holds, then
( f ( z ) f n ( z ) ) ( n + 1 ) ( n α + γ m ) γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( n N ; n m + 1 ; z U )
(2.19)
and
( f n ( z ) f ( z ) ) ( n + 1 ) ( 1 + n α ) γ m ( n + 1 ) ( 2 + n α γ m ) γ m ( n N ; n m + 1 ; z U ) .
(2.20)
The bounds in (2.19) and (2.20) are sharp with the extremal function given by (2.16).
Remark By setting α = 0 and m = 1 in Theorems 2 and 3, we get the corresponding results obtained by Silverman [16].

Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.
The present investigation was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation under Grants 11226088 and 11101053, the Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education under Grant 211118, the Excellent Youth Foundation of Educational Committee of Hunan Province under Grant 10B002, the Open Fund Project of Key Research Institute of Philosophies and Social Sciences in Hunan Universities under Grants 11FEFM02 and 12FEFM02, and the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Educational Committee of Henan Province under Grant 12A110002 of the People’s Republic of China.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors completed the paper together. They also read and approved the final manuscript.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravichandran V, Selvaraj C, Rajalaksmi R: Sufficient conditions for starlike functions of order α . J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2002., 3: Article ID 81 (electronic) Ravichandran V, Selvaraj C, Rajalaksmi R: Sufficient conditions for starlike functions of order α . J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2002., 3: Article ID 81 (electronic)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu M-S, Zhu Y-C, Srivastava HM: Properties and characteristics of certain subclasses of starlike functions of order β . Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 48: 402–419. 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.09.026MathSciNetCrossRef Liu M-S, Zhu Y-C, Srivastava HM: Properties and characteristics of certain subclasses of starlike functions of order β . Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 48: 402–419. 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.09.026MathSciNetCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Gupta S, Singh S: Starlikeness of analytic maps satisfying a differential inequality. Gen. Math. 2010, 18: 51–58.MathSciNet Singh S, Gupta S, Singh S: Starlikeness of analytic maps satisfying a differential inequality. Gen. Math. 2010, 18: 51–58.MathSciNet
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman AW: Univalent functions and nonanalytic curves. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1957, 8: 598–601. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1957-0086879-9CrossRef Goodman AW: Univalent functions and nonanalytic curves. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1957, 8: 598–601. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1957-0086879-9CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruscheweyh S: Neighborhoods of univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1981, 81: 521–527. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1981-0601721-6MathSciNetCrossRef Ruscheweyh S: Neighborhoods of univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1981, 81: 521–527. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1981-0601721-6MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Altintaş O: Neighborhoods of certain p -valently analytic functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 187: 47–53. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.101MathSciNetCrossRef Altintaş O: Neighborhoods of certain p -valently analytic functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 187: 47–53. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.08.101MathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Altintaş O, Owa S: Neighborhoods of certain analytic functions with negative coefficients. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1996, 19: 797–800. 10.1155/S016117129600110XCrossRef Altintaş O, Owa S: Neighborhoods of certain analytic functions with negative coefficients. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1996, 19: 797–800. 10.1155/S016117129600110XCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Altintaş O, Özkan Ö, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of a class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett. 2000, 13: 63–67.CrossRef Altintaş O, Özkan Ö, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of a class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett. 2000, 13: 63–67.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Altintaş O, Özkan Ö, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of a certain family of multivalent functions with negative coefficients. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47: 1667–1672. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.014MathSciNetCrossRef Altintaş O, Özkan Ö, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of a certain family of multivalent functions with negative coefficients. Comput. Math. Appl. 2004, 47: 1667–1672. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.014MathSciNetCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cǎtaş A: Neighborhoods of a certain class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Banach J. Math. Anal. 2009, 3: 111–121.MathSciNetCrossRef Cǎtaş A: Neighborhoods of a certain class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Banach J. Math. Anal. 2009, 3: 111–121.MathSciNetCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasin BA: Neighborhoods of certain multivalent functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 193: 1–6. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.03.026MathSciNetCrossRef Frasin BA: Neighborhoods of certain multivalent functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 193: 1–6. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.03.026MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Keerthi BS, Gangadharan A, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order with negative coefficients. Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 47: 271–277. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.04.004MathSciNetCrossRef Keerthi BS, Gangadharan A, Srivastava HM: Neighborhoods of certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order with negative coefficients. Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 47: 271–277. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.04.004MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivastava HM, Eker SS, Seker B: Inclusion and neighborhood properties for certain classes of multivalently analytic functions of complex order associated with the convolution structure. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 212: 66–71. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.077MathSciNetCrossRef Srivastava HM, Eker SS, Seker B: Inclusion and neighborhood properties for certain classes of multivalently analytic functions of complex order associated with the convolution structure. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009, 212: 66–71. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.077MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasin BA: Partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions. Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyházi. 2005, 21: 135–145. (electronic)MathSciNet Frasin BA: Partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions. Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyházi. 2005, 21: 135–145. (electronic)MathSciNet
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasin BA: Generalization of partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2008, 21: 735–741. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.08.002MathSciNetCrossRef Frasin BA: Generalization of partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2008, 21: 735–741. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.08.002MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman H: Partial sums of starlike and convex functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 209: 221–227. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5361MathSciNetCrossRef Silverman H: Partial sums of starlike and convex functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 209: 221–227. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5361MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Neighborhoods and partial sums of certain subclass of starlike functions
verfasst von
Zhi-Gang Wang
Xin-Sheng Yuan
Lei Shi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Ausgabe 1/2013
Elektronische ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-163

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner