Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 3/2020

01.12.2020 | Review

New horizons in practical liquefaction prediction and mitigation measures for existing structures

verfasst von: Shinji Sassa

Erschienen in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper presents some recent research advances on practical liquefaction prediction and mitigation measures for existing structures. A new simplified generalized liquefaction prediction and assessment method that is capable of considering the influence of the waveforms and durations of earthquakes has been developed. The validity of this method adopting the effective number of waves concept has been comprehensively verified using the case histories of past major earthquakes for the cases of liquefaction and no liquefaction. A unique feature of the new simplified method is its universality, allowing it to be applied to all types of liquefaction charts based on SPT N-values, CPT q-values, and shear-wave velocities. The paper also presents a new compaction grouting that can reduce the ground upheaval quantity, which has remained an issue for more than 50 years, by 80–90%. The new compaction grouting, up-and-down method, has substantially higher efficiency of upheaval/uplift control and higher efficacy as liquefaction countermeasures around existing structures.
Vorheriger Artikel Finite difference probabilistic slope stability analysis based on collocation-based stochastic response surface method (CSRSM)
Nächster Artikel Column repair and strengthening using RC jacketing: a brief state-of-the-art review

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
2.
Sassa S (2020) Cascading mechanisms behind the 2018 Indonesia Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami disasters: inland/coastal liquefaction, landslides and tsunami. Springer series in geomechanics and geoengineering, Keynote Paper. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-030-46351-9_​4
3.
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Eng ASCE 97(9):1249–1273
4.
Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111(12):1425–1445CrossRef
5.
Tokimatsu K, Yoshimi Y (1983) Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils Found 23(4):56–74CrossRef
6.
Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, Dobry R, Finn WDL, Harder LF Jr, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Liao SSC, Marcuson WF III, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, Moriwaki Y, Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH II (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 127(10):817–833CrossRef
7.
Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 130(12):1314–1340CrossRef
8.
Boulanger R, Wilson D, Idriss IM (2012) Examination and Reevalaution of SPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Case Histories. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 138(8):898–909CrossRef
9.
10.
Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442–459CrossRef
11.
Moss RES, Seed RB, Kayen RE, Stewart JP, Der Kiureghian A, Cetin KO (2006) CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 132(8):1032–1051CrossRef
12.
13.
Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126(11):1015–1025CrossRef
14.
Kayen R, Moss RES, Thompson EM, Seed RB, Cetin KO, Der Kiureghian A, Tanaka Y, Tokimatsu K (2013) Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 139(3):407–419CrossRef
15.
Aki K, Richards PG (2009) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. Univ. Science Books
16.
Kokusho T, Ito F, Nagao Y, Green A (2012) Influence of non/low-plastic fines and associated aging effects on liquefaction resistance. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 138(6):747–756CrossRef
17.
18.
19.
Sassa S, Yamazaki H, Konishi T, Adachi M, Shinsaka T, Takenouchi K, Morohashi H, Saito H, Okada H, Takada K, Watanabe S, Kaneko C, Takahashi T (2019) Development of a new compaction grouting method with improved upheaval control and efficacy of liquefaction countermeasures. Tech Note PARI 1354
20.
Takenouchi K, Sassa S (2020) The new compaction grouting method with improved upheaval control. lecture notes civil eng 62: Geotechnics for sustainable infrastructure development, pp 611–618
21.
Takenouchi K, Sassa S, Yamazaki H, Konishi T, Shinsaka T, Kanno Y, Okada H, Takahashi T (2018) Development and field verification of a new compaction grouting method with improved upheaval control. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 296:283–293
22.
Dobry R, Abdoun T (2011) An investigation into why liquefaction charts work: a necessary step toward integrating the states of art and practice. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, pp 13–45
23.
Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE—a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. University of California, Berkeley. Report EERC, pp 72–12
24.
Liu AH, Stewart JP, Abrahamson NA, Moriwaki Y (2001) Equivalent number of uniform stress cycles for soil liquefaction analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(12):1017–1026CrossRef
25.
MLIT: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan (2007) Ground liquefaction. Technical standards and commentaries for port and harbor facilities of Japan
26.
MLIT: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan (2018) Ground liquefaction. Technical standards and commentaries for port and harbor facilities of Japan
27.
Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. Oakland, CA
28.
Sassa S, Sekiguchi H (2001) Analysis of wave-induced liquefaction of sand beds. Géotechnique 51(2):115–126CrossRef
29.
Ishihara K, Yasuda S (1973) Sand liquefaction under random earthquake loading. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on earthquake engineering, Rome, vol 1, pp 329–338
30.
Ishihara K, Yasuda S (1975) Sand liquefaction in hollow cylinder torsion under irregular excitation. Soils Found 15(1):45–59CrossRef
31.
Meyerhof GG (1957) Discussion of session 1. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, London, vol 3, p 110
32.
Ishihara K (1996) Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford engineering science series. Oxford University Press, Oxford
33.
Sassa S, Sekiguchi H, Miyamoto J (2001) Analysis of progressive liquefaction as a moving boundary problem. Géotechnique 51(10):847–857CrossRef
34.
ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2019) Compaction grouting consensus guide. ASCE/G-I 53–19:1–67
35.
Warner J (1982) Compaction grouting—first thirty years. In: Proceedings of grouting in geotechnical engineering, pp 694–707
36.
Nichols SC, Goodings DJ (2000) Physical model testing of compaction grouting in cohesionless soil. J Geotech Geoenv Eng ASCE 126(9):848–852CrossRef
37.
Essler RD, Drooff ER, Falk E (2000) Compensation grouting: concept, theory and practice. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 104:1–15
38.
Baez JI, Henry JP (1993) Reduction of liquefaction potential by compaction grouting at Pinopolis West Dam, SC. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 35:493–506
39.
Boulanger RW, Hayden RF (1995) Aspects of compaction grouting of liquefiable soil. J Geotech Eng 121(12):845–855
40.
Miller EA, Roycroft GA (2004) Compaction grouting test program for liquefaction control. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 130(4):355–361CrossRef
41.
El-Kelesh AM, Matsui T, Tokida K (2012) Field investigation into effectiveness of compaction grouting. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 138(4):451–460CrossRef
42.
Brown DR, Warner J (1973) Compaction grouting. J Soil Mech Found Div 99(8):589–601
43.
Warner J (1992) Compaction grout: rheology vs effectiveness. ASCE Geotech Spec Publ 30:229–239
44.
El-Kelesh AM, Mossaad ME, Basha IM (2001) Model of compaction grouting. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 127(11):955–964CrossRef
45.
Graf ED (1969) Compaction grouting technique and observations. J Soil Mech Found Div 95(5):1151–1158
46.
Geraci J (2005) Compaction grouting for in-situ ground improvement. In: Structure magazine, pp 30–33
Metadaten
Titel
New horizons in practical liquefaction prediction and mitigation measures for existing structures
verfasst von
Shinji Sassa
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Elektronische ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00324-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Case study

Site selection methodology for emergency centers in Silk Road based on compatibility with Asian Highway network using the AHP and ArcGIS (case study: I. R. Iran)

Technical paper

Effect of alccofine and fly ash on analytical methods of self-compacting concrete

Technical paper

Experimental studies on single reinforced stone columns with various positions of geotextile

Technical paper

Subsurface object detection and characterization using Ground Penetrating Radar

Technical paper

Influence of recycled concrete aggregates and blended cements on the mechanical properties of pervious concrete

Technical paper

Improving the geotechnical properties of high expansive clay using limestone powder