Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Erschienen in: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2-3/2020

04.12.2019

Numerical Investigations of Phase-Separation During Multi-Component Mixing at Super-Critical Conditions

verfasst von: P. Tudisco, S. Menon

Erschienen in: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion | Ausgabe 2-3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the effect of phase separation in multi-component mixing at super-critical conditions using a novel framework based on vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) thermodynamics in a real gas mixture. This approach is combined with a non-conservative Double-Flux (DF) numerical model to overcome numerical instabilities that arise when high-pressure, low-temperature mixtures are considered. The formulation developed and validated can handle VLE in multi-component mixtures even though most of the initial studies are focussed on binary mixtures. The challenges to get a robust solution of VLE thermodynamics are highlighted and we demonstrate the ability and the accuracy of the algorithms to account for VLE in canonical test cases, as well as in a shear layer binary mixing in a canonical temporal-mixing layer. Results are also compared against the classical, “dense-fluid” approach where an equation of state (EoS) is used with the assumption of a single-phase within each computational cell. Differences are highlighted and explained from a thermodynamic point of view with emphasis on the relevance and the applicability of VLE.
Vorheriger Artikel LES of the Gas-Exchange Process Inside an Internal Combustion Engine Using a High-Order Method
Nächster Artikel Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of a Multistage High-Pressure Compressor

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Reitz, R.D., Diwakar, R.: Structure of high-pressure fuel sprays. SAE Trans. 96, 492–509 (1987)
2.
Sirignano, W.A.: Fluid dynamics and transport of droplets and sprays. Cambridge University Press (1999)
3.
Jiang, X., Siamas, G., Jagus, K., Karayiannis, T.: Physical modelling and advanced simulations of gas–liquid two-phase jet flows in atomization and sprays. Prog. Energy. Comb. Sci. 36, 131–167 (2010)
4.
Roa, M., Talley, D.: Wave dynamic mechanisms in coaxial hydrogen/liquid-oxygen jet flames. J. Prop. Pow. 35(2), 369–381 (2018)
5.
Chehroudi, B.: Recent experimental efforts on high-pressure supercritical injection for liquid rockets and their implications, Int. J. of Aer. Eng. (2012)
6.
Mayer, W., Smith, J.: Fundamentals of supercritical mixing and combustion of cryogenic propellants, Liquid Rocket Thrust Chambers: Aspects of Modeling, Analysis and Design, pp. 200 (2004)
7.
Candel, S., Juniper, M., Singla, G., Scouflaire, P., Rolon, C.: Structure and dynamics of cryogenic flames at supercritical pressure, Combust. Sci. Technol. 178, 161–192 (2006)
8.
Roy, A., Segal, C.: Experimental study of fluid jet mixing at supercritical conditions. J. Prop. Pow. 26, 1205 (2010)
9.
Mayer, W., Telaar, J., Branam, R., Schneider, G., Hussong, J.: Raman measurements of cryogenic injection at supercritical pressure. Heat Mass Trans 39, 709–719 (2003)
10.
Mayer, W., Schik, A. H., Vielle, B., Chauveau, C., Gökalp, I., Talley, D., Woodward, R.: Atomization and breakup of cryogenic propellants under high-pressure subcritical and supercritical conditions. J. Prop. Pow. 14, 835–842 (1998)
11.
Chehroudi, B., Talley, D., Coy, E.: Visual characteristics and initial growth rates of round cryogenic jets at subcritical and supercritical pressures. Phys. Fluids 14, 850–861 (2002)MATH
12.
Oschwald, M., Schik, A., Klar, M., Mayer, W.: Investigation of coaxial ln2/gh2-injection at supercritical pressure by spontaneous raman scattering. AIAA, 1999–2887 (1999)
13.
Oschwald, M., Smith, J., Branam, R., Hussong, J., Schik, A., Chehroudi, B., Talley, D.: Injection of fluids into supercritical environments. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178, 49–100 (2006)
14.
Habiballah, M., Orain, M., Grisch, F., Vingert, L., Gicquel, P.: Experimental studies of high-pressure cryogenic flames on the mascotte facility. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178, 101–128 (2006)
15.
Lin, K. -C., Cox-Stouffer, S., Jackson, T.: Structures and phase transition processes of supercritical methane/ethylene mixtures injected into a subcritical environment. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178, 129–160 (2006)
16.
Segal, C., Polikhov, S.: Subcritical to supercritical mixing. Phys. Fluids 20, 052101 (2008)MATH
17.
Roy, A., Joly, C., Segal, C.: Disintegrating supercritical jets in a subcritical environment. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 193–202 (2013)MATH
18.
Miller, R., Harstad, K., Bellan, J.: Direct numerical simulations of supercritical fluid mixing layers applied to heptane–nitrogen. J. Fluid Mech. 436, 1–39 (2001)MATH
19.
Okongó, N., Harstad, K., Bellan, J.: Direct numerical simulations of o/h temporal mixing layers under supercritical conditions. AIAA J. 40, 914–926 (2002)
20.
Peng, D.Y., Robinson, D.B.: A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 15, 59–64 (1976)
21.
Ma, P., Lv, Y., Ihme, M.: An entropy-stable hybrid scheme for simulations of transcritical real-fluid flows. J. Comp. Phys. 340, 330–357 (2017)MathSciNetMATH
22.
Meng, H., Yang, V.: A unified treatment of general fluid thermodynamics and its application to a preconditioning scheme. J. Comp. Phys. 189, 277–304 (2003)MATH
23.
Zong, N., Yang, V.: Cryogenic fluid dynamics of pressure swirl injectors at supercritical conditions. Phys. Fluids 20, 056103 (2008)MATH
24.
Petit, X., Ribert, G., Lartigue, G., Domingo, P.: Large-eddy simulation of supercritical fluid injection. J. Sup. F. 84, 61–73 (2013)
25.
Petit, X., Ribert, G., Domingo, P.: Framework for real-gas compressible reacting flows with tabulated thermochemistry. J. Sup. F. 101, 1–16 (2015)
26.
Masquelet, M., Menon, S., Jin, Y., Friedrich, R.: Simulation of unsteady combustion in a LOX-GH2 fueled rocket engine. Aer. Sci. Tech. 13, 466–474 (2009)
27.
Guezennec, N., Masquelet, M., Menon, S.: Large eddy simulation of flame-turbulence interactions in a LOX-CH4 shear coaxial injector (2012)
28.
Lacaze, G., Oefelein, J.: Modeling of high density gradient flows at supercritical pressures (2013)
29.
Lacaze, G., Misdariis, A., Ruiz, A., Oefelein, J.: Analysis of high-pressure diesel fuel injection processes using les with real-fluid thermodynamics and transport. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 1603–1611 (2015)
30.
Ruiz, A., Lacaze, G., Oefelein, J., Mari, R., Cuenot, B., Selle, L., Poinsot, T.: Numerical benchmark for high-reynolds-number supercritical flows with large density gradients. AIAA J. (2015)
31.
Schmitt, T., Selle, L., Ruiz, A., Cuenot, B.: Large-eddy simulation of supercritical-pressure round jets. AIAA J. 48, 2133–2144 (2010)
32.
Terashima, H., Koshi, M.: Approach for simulating gas–liquid-like flows under supercritical pressures using a high-order central differencing scheme. J. Comp. Phys. 231, 6907–6923 (2012)MathSciNetMATH
33.
Kawai, S., Terashima, H., Negishi, H.: A robust and accurate numerical method for transcritical turbulent flows at supercritical pressure with an arbitrary equation of state. J. Comp. Phys. 300, 116–135 (2015)MathSciNetMATH
34.
Matheis, J., Hickel, S.: Multi-component vapor-liquid equilibrium model forLES of high-pressure fuel injection and application to ecn spray a. Int. J. Multiph. Fl. 99, 294–311 (2018)
35.
Müller, H., Pfitzner, M., Matheis, J., Hickel, S.: Large-eddy simulation of coaxial ln2/gh2 injection at trans-and supercritical conditions. J. Prop. Pow. (2015)
36.
Abgrall, R., Karni, S.: Computations of compressible multifluids. J. Comp. Phys. 169, 594–623 (2001)MathSciNetMATH
37.
Billet, G., Abgrall, R.: An adaptive shock-capturing algorithm for solving unsteady reactive flows. Comp. and Fluids 32, 1473–1495 (2003)MATH
38.
Ma, P., Wu, H., Banuti, D., Ihme, M.: On the numerical behavior of diffuse-interface methods for transcritical real-fluids simulations, Int. J. of Multiph. Fl. (2019)
39.
Ma, P., Wu, H., Jaravel, T., Bravo, L., Ihme, M.: Large-eddy simulations of transcritical injection and auto-ignition using diffuse-interface method and finite-rate chemistry. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37, 3303–3310 (2019)
40.
Lacaze, G., Schmitt, T., Ruiz, A., Oefelein, J.: Comparison of energy-, pressure-and enthalpy-based approaches for modeling supercritical flows. Comp. and Fluids (2019)
41.
Dahms, R., Oefelein, J.: Non-equilibrium gas–liquid interface dynamics in high-pressure liquid injection systems. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 1587–1594 (2015)
42.
Dahms, R.: Understanding the breakdown of classic two-phase theory and spray atomization at engine-relevant conditions. Phys. Fluids 28, 042108 (2016)
43.
Edwards, J., Franklin, R., Liou, M.-S.: Low-diffusion flux-splitting methods for real fluid flows with phase transitions. AIAA J. 38, 1624–1633 (2000)
44.
Star, A., Edwards, J., Lin, K.-C., Cox-Stouffer, S., Jackson, T.: Numerical simulation of injection of supercritical ethylene into nitrogen. J. Prop. Pow. 22, 809–819 (2006)
45.
Qiu, L., Wang, Y., Reitz, R.: On regular and retrograde condensation in multiphase compressible flows. Int. J. Multiph. Fl. 64, 85–96 (2014)
46.
Qiu, L., Reitz, R.: An investigation of thermodynamic states during high-pressure fuel injection using equilibrium thermodynamics 72, 24–38 (2015)
47.
Anderson, D., Tannehill, J., Pletcher, R.: Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)MATH
48.
Chung, T., Ajlan, M., Lee, L., Starling, K.: Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 27, 671–679 (1988)
49.
Riazi, M., Whitson, C.: Estimating diffusion coefficients of dense fluids. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32, 3081–3088 (1993)
50.
Hirschfelder, J., Curtiss, C., Bird, R., Mayer, M.: Molecular theory of gases and liquids, vol. 165. Wiley, New York (1964)
51.
Harstad, K., Miller, R., Bellan, J.: Efficient high-pressure state equations. AIChE J. 43, 1605–1610 (1997)
52.
Lacaze, G., Misdariis, A., Ruiz, A., Oefelein, J.C.: Analysis of high-pressure diesel fuel injection processes using les with real-fluid thermodynamics and transport. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35, 1603–1611 (2015)
53.
Elliott, J., Lira, C.: Introductory Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, vol. 184. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1999)
54.
Poling, B.E., Prausnitz, J., O’connell, J.P.: The properties of gases and liquids, vol. 5. Mcgraw-hill, New York (2001)
55.
Nichita, D., Khalid, P., Broseta, D.: Calculation of isentropic compressibility and sound velocity in two-phase fluids. Fluid Ph. Equil. 291, 95–102 (2010)
56.
Firoozabadi, A.: Thermodynamics and applications in hydrocarbon energy production. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2016)
57.
Qiu, L., Reitz, R.: Simulation of supercritical fuel injection with condensation. ijhmt 79, 1070–1086 (2014)
58.
Michelsen, M.: The isothermal flash problem. part ii. phase-split calculation. Fluid Ph. Equil. 9, 21–40 (1982)
59.
Castier, M.: Thermodynamic speed of sound in multiphase systems. Fluid Ph. Equil. 306, 204–211 (2011)
60.
Picard, D., Bishnoi, P.: Calculation of the thermodynamic sound velocity in two-phase multicomponent fluids. Int. J. Multiph. Fl. 13, 295–308 (1987)MATH
61.
Firoozabadi, A., Pan, H.: Two-phase isentropic compressibility and two-phase sonic velocity for multicomponent-hydrocarbon mixtures. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Soc. of Petr. Eng.
62.
Lamarre, E., Melville, W.: Instrumentation for the measurement of sound speed near the ocean surface. J. Atm. Ocean. Tech. 12, 317–329 (1995)
63.
Wood, A., Lindsay, R.: A textbook of sound. Phys. Today 9, 37 (1956)
64.
Michelsen, M.: The isothermal flash problem. part i. stability. Fluid Ph. Equil. 9, 1–19 (1982)
65.
Castier, M.: Solution of the isochoric–isoenergetic flash problem by direct entropy maximization. Fluid Ph. Equil. 276, 7–17 (2009)
66.
Eliosa-Jiménez, G., Silva-Oliver, G., García-sánchez, F., de Ita de la Torre, A.: High-pressure vapor-liquid equilibria in the nitrogen+ n-hexane system. J. Chem. Eng. Data 52, 395–404 (2007)
67.
Poston, R., McKetta, J.: Vapor-liquid equilibrium in the n-hexane-nitrogen system. J. Chem. Eng. Data 11, 364–365 (1966)
68.
Génin, F., Menon, S.: Studies of shock/turbulent shear layer interaction using large-eddy simulation. Comput. Fluids 39, 800–819 (2010)MathSciNetMATH
69.
Kouremenos, D.: The normal shock waves of real gases and the generalized isentropic exponents. Forschung Ingenieurwesen 52, 23–31 (1986)
70.
Miller, R., Bellan, J.: Direct numerical simulation and subgrid analysis of a transitional droplet laden mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 12, 650–671 (2000)MATH
71.
Qiu, L., Wang, Y., Jiao, Q., Wang, H., Reitz, R.: Development of a thermodynamically consistent, robust and efficient phase equilibrium solver and its validations. Fuel 115, 1–16 (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Numerical Investigations of Phase-Separation During Multi-Component Mixing at Super-Critical Conditions
verfasst von
P. Tudisco
S. Menon
Publikationsdatum
04.12.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion / Ausgabe 2-3/2020
Print ISSN: 1386-6184
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-019-00101-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2-3/2020

Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 2-3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Impact of Spray Droplet Distribution on the Performances of a Kerosene Lean/Premixed Injector

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of Flame Area Based on Detailed Chemistry DNS of Premixed Turbulent Hydrogen-Air Flames in Different Regimes of Combustion

OriginalPaper

LES of the Gas-Exchange Process Inside an Internal Combustion Engine Using a High-Order Method

OriginalPaper

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations of a Multistage High-Pressure Compressor

OriginalPaper

Assessment of a Coolant Injection Model on Cooled High-Pressure Vanes with Large-Eddy Simulation

OriginalPaper

Analysis of the Soot Particle Size Distribution in a Laminar Premixed Flame: A Hybrid Stochastic/Fixed-Sectional Approach

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise