In (J. Inequal. Appl. 2006:9532, 2006), Peng and Zhu discussed interrelations among D-preinvexity, D-semistrict preinvexity, and D-strict preinvexity for vector-valued functions. In this note, we show that the same results or even more general ones can be obtained under weaker assumptions. We also give a new characterization of D-preinvexity and D-semistrict preinvexity under mild conditions.
MSC:90C26.
Hinweise
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The main theorems are proved by TL. Both authors drafted the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.
1 Introduction
Convexity and some generalizations of convexity play a crucial role in mathematical economics, engineering, management science, and optimization theory. Therefore, it is important to consider wider classes of generalized convex functions and also to seek practical criteria for convexity or generalized convexity (see Refs. [1‐9] and the references therein). A significant generalization of convex functions is the introduction of preinvex functions, which is due to Ben and Mond [4]. Yang and Li [1] presented some properties of preinvex functions; in [2] they introduced two new classes of generalized convex functions called semistrictly preinvex functions and strictly preinvex functions. They established relationships between preinvex functions and semistrictly preinvex functions under a certain set of conditions. Very recently, Peng and Zhu [7] introduced the vector cases of strict preinvexity and semistrict preinvexity and established some relations between them. In this paper, we show that the same results or even a generalized version of their results can be obtained under weaker assumptions. Moreover, we give a new characterization of D-preinvexity and D-semistrict preinvexity under mild conditions. The outline of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminaries. The main results of the paper are presented in Section 3.
2 Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, we will use the following assumptions. Let X be a real topological vector space and Y be a real locally convex vector space, let be a nonempty subset. Let be a nonempty pointed closed convex cone and be the dual space of Y. The dual cone of cone D is defined by
Anzeige
From the bipolar theorem, we have the following
Lemma 2.1For all , if and only if .
Now we will describe some definitions of generalized convexity.
The vector-valued function is ∗-upper semicontinuous if for every , is upper semicontinuous on K.
In order to prove our main result, we need Condition C introduced by Mohan and Neogy [11] as follows.
Condition C Let . We say that the function η satisfies Condition C iff, , ,
3 Properties of D-preinvex functions
In this section, we assume always that:
(i)
is a nonempty invex set with respect to ;
(ii)
η satisfies Condition C; f is a vector-valued function on K.
The following result was proved in Ref. [7]; see Theorem 2.2 in Ref. [7].
Theorem 3.1LetKbe a nonempty open invex set inXwith respect to . Ifis ∗-upper semicontinuous and satisfies , , thenfis aD-preinvex function for the sameηonKif and only if there exists ansuch that
Now we improve the above theorem as follows.
Theorem 3.2Letbe ∗-upper semicontinuous and satisfy , , thenfis aD-preinvex function for the sameηonKif and only if there exists ansuch that
(3.1)
Proof The necessity follows directly from the definition of D-preinvexity for the vector-valued function f. We only need to prove the sufficiency. By Lemma 2.1 in Ref. [7], the set is dense in the interval . Then , such that for each n and , as . Give , denote
Define, for each n,
(3.2)
Thus,
Since , we have
which in turn implies that , by (3.2) and K is invex with respect to η. From Condition C, we have
As , we have
By the ∗-upper semicontinuity of f on K, for every , is upper semicontinuous, it follows that for any , there exists an such that the following holds:
(3.3)
Hence,
Since may be arbitrarily small, then for all , we have
Since q is linear, by Lemma 2.1, we have
Hence, f is a D-preinvex function for the same η on K, this completes the proof. □
Remark 3.1 We see from Theorem 3.2 that the condition of openness in Theorem 3.1 can be deleted in order to obtain the same results.
Now, we state another result in Ref. [7]; see Theorem 3.3 in Ref. [7].
Theorem 3.3Letfbe aD-preinvex function onK. If there exists ansuch that, for each pair , ,
(3.4)
thenfis aD-strictly preinvex function onK.
The above theorem can be improved as follows.
Theorem 3.4Letfbe aD-preinvex function with respect toonK. For each pair , , if there exists ansuch that
(3.5)
thenfis a strictlyD-preinvex function onK.
Proof By contradiction, suppose that there exist , , such that
(3.6)
Denote
Since f is D-preinvex, we have
(3.7)
We note that the pair x, z and the pair z, y are both distinct under condition (3.5). There exist such that
(3.8)
(3.9)
Denote
From Condition C,
Let , , . It is easy to verify that . Again from Condition C,
Since f is D-preinvex, we have
(3.10)
Thus, from (3.7)-(3.10), we have
Where
which contradicts (3.6). This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.2 In Theorem 3.3, a uniform is needed, while in Theorem 3.4 this condition has been weakened to great extent.
By Theorem 2.3 in Ref. [7] and Theorem 3.4 above, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 3.1Letfbe a ∗-lower semicontinuous function onKand satisfy , . For each pair , , if there exists ansuch that
thenfis a strictlyD-preinvex function onK.
Corollary 3.2Letfbe a ∗-upper semicontinuous function onKand satisfy , . If there exists ansuch that, for each pair , ,
thenfis a strictlyD-preinvex function onK.
Proof This result is obtained by Theorems 3.2 and 3.4 above. □
Theorem 3.5Letfbe a ∗-lower semicontinuous function onKand satisfy , . If there exists ansuch that, for each pair , implies
(3.11)
thenfis both aD-preinvex function onKand aD-semistrictly preinvex function onK.
Proof First, we prove that f is a D-preinvex function on K. By Theorem 2.3 in Ref. [7], we need to show that for each , there exists such that
Assume, by contradiction, that there exists such that
(3.12)
If , condition (3.11) implies
which contradicts (3.12). Thus, we have , and then (3.12) implies
(3.13)
Since D is a closed convex pointed cone, by the strong separation theorem for a convex set, it follows that there exists such that
(3.14)
Let , and let , then the above inequality reduces to
(3.15)
and
(3.16)
Define
From Condition C, we obtain
Since , it follows from (3.14) that
(3.17)
Conditions (3.11) and (3.13) give
It follows that
which together with (3.15) yields
(3.18)
From (3.17) and condition (3.11), we get
It follows that
which together with (3.17) yields
which contradicts (3.18), hence f is a D-preinvex function on K. Next, the D-semistrict preinvexity of f on K follows from Theorem 3.9 of Ref. [7]. □
4 Conclusions
In this paper, we firstly obtain a property of D-preinvex functions. We then get a sufficient condition of the strictly D-preinvex functions in terms of intermediate-point D-preinvex functions. We finally obtain a sufficient condition of D-preinvex functions and D-semistrictly preinvex functions. Our results improve and extend the existing ones in the literature.
Acknowledgements
The research of the authors is partially supported by the Foundation of Department of Education of Zhejiang Province under Grant Y201121204 and by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Y7100544). The authors would like to express their thanks to the referees for helpful suggestions.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The main theorems are proved by TL. Both authors drafted the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.