Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2018

23.01.2018 | RESEARCH PAPER

On the ensemble of metamodels with multiple regional optimized weight factors

verfasst von: Hanfeng Yin, Hongbing Fang, Guilin Wen, Matthew Gutowski, Youye Xiao

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Metamodels are often used as surrogates for expensive high fidelity computational simulations (e.g., finite element analysis). Ensemble of metamodels (EM), which combines various types of individual metamodels in the form of a weighted average ensemble, is found to have improved accuracy over the individual metamodels used alone. Currently, there are mainly two kinds of EMs called as pointwise EM and average EM. The pointwise EM generally has better prediction accuracy than the average EM, but it is much more time-consuming than the average EM. In most cases, as a metamodel, EM is often used in the engineering design optimization which needs to invoke EM tens of thousands of times. Therefore, the average EM is still the most extensively used EM. To the authors’ best knowledge, the most accurate average EM is the EM with optimized weight factors proposed by Acar et al. However, the EM proposed by Acar et al. is often too “rigid” and may not have sufficient accuracy over some regions of the design space. In order to deal with this problem and further improve the prediction accuracy, a new EM with multiple regional optimized weight factors (EM-MROWF) is proposed in this study. In this new EM, the design space is divided into multiple subdomains each of which is assigned a set of optimized weight factors. This new EM was constructed by combining three typical individual metamodels, i.e., polynomial regression (PR), radial basis function (RBF), and Kriging (KRG). The proposed technique was evaluated by ten benchmark problems and two engineering application problems. The ten benchmark problems are typical mathematical functions for evaluating the approximation performance in previous studies. And, the two engineering application problems refer to the vehicular passive safety in the field of crashworthiness design. The study results showed that the EM-MROWF performed much better than the other existing average EMs as well as the three individual metamodels.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acar E (2010) Various approaches for constructing an ensemble of metamodels using local measures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(6):879–896CrossRef Acar E (2010) Various approaches for constructing an ensemble of metamodels using local measures. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(6):879–896CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Acar E (2015) Effect of error metrics on optimum weight factor selection for ensemble of metamodels. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2703–2709CrossRef Acar E (2015) Effect of error metrics on optimum weight factor selection for ensemble of metamodels. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2703–2709CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(3):279–294CrossRef Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37(3):279–294CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press Inc., New YorkMATH Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press Inc., New YorkMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New YorkMATH Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New YorkMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Buhmann MD (2003) Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefMATH Buhmann MD (2003) Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Des 127(11):1077–1087CrossRef Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Des 127(11):1077–1087CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diana LM, Dachuan TS, Victoria CPC, Seoung BK (2015) A convex version of multivariate adaptive regression splines. Comput Stat Data Anal 81:89–106MathSciNetCrossRef Diana LM, Dachuan TS, Victoria CPC, Seoung BK (2015) A convex version of multivariate adaptive regression splines. Comput Stat Data Anal 81:89–106MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dyn N, Levin D, Rippa S (1986) Numerical procedures for surface fitting of scattered data by radial basis functions. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7(2):639–659CrossRefMATH Dyn N, Levin D, Rippa S (1986) Numerical procedures for surface fitting of scattered data by radial basis functions. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7(2):639–659CrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121–2136CrossRef Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121–2136CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fang JG, Sun GY, Qiu N, Kim NH, Li Q (2017) On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(3):1091–1119MathSciNetCrossRef Fang JG, Sun GY, Qiu N, Kim NH, Li Q (2017) On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(3):1091–1119MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira WG, Serpa AL (2016) Ensemble of metamodels: the augmented least squares approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(5):1019–1046CrossRef Ferreira WG, Serpa AL (2016) Ensemble of metamodels: the augmented least squares approach. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(5):1019–1046CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45:50–79CrossRef Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45:50–79CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):199–216CrossRef Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(3):199–216CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gu XG, Lu JW, Wang HZ (2015) Reliability-based design optimization for vehicle occupant protection system based on ensemble of metamodels. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(2):533–546CrossRef Gu XG, Lu JW, Wang HZ (2015) Reliability-based design optimization for vehicle occupant protection system based on ensemble of metamodels. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(2):533–546CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gunn SR (1997) Support vector machines for classification and regression. Technical Report, Image Speech and Intelligent Systems Research Group, University of Southampton, UK Gunn SR (1997) Support vector machines for classification and regression. Technical Report, Image Speech and Intelligent Systems Research Group, University of Southampton, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Hallquist JO (1998a) LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livemore Software Technology Corporation, California Hallquist JO (1998a) LS-DYNA theoretical manual. Livemore Software Technology Corporation, California
Zurück zum Zitat Hallquist JO (1998b) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual. Livemore Software Technology Corporation, California Hallquist JO (1998b) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual. Livemore Software Technology Corporation, California
Zurück zum Zitat Hou SJ, Li Q, Long SY, Yang XJ, Li W (2007) Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(6–7):555–565CrossRef Hou SJ, Li Q, Long SY, Yang XJ, Li W (2007) Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(6–7):555–565CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jerome HF (1990) Multivariate dynamic regression splines. Technical Report 102, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and Department of Statistics, Stanford University, USA Jerome HF (1990) Multivariate dynamic regression splines. Technical Report 102, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center and Department of Statistics, Stanford University, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23(1):1–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS (2002) New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency. Thin Wall Struct 40(4):311–327CrossRef Kim HS (2002) New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency. Thin Wall Struct 40(4):311–327CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee Y, Dong-Hoon C (2014) Pointwise ensemble of metamodels using v nearest points cross-validation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:383–394CrossRef Lee Y, Dong-Hoon C (2014) Pointwise ensemble of metamodels using v nearest points cross-validation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50:383–394CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacKay DJC (1998) Introduction to Gaussian processes. In: Bishop CM (ed) Neural networks and machine learning. NATO ASI series, vol 168. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–165 MacKay DJC (1998) Introduction to Gaussian processes. In: Bishop CM (ed) Neural networks and machine learning. NATO ASI series, vol 168. Springer, Berlin, pp 133–165
Zurück zum Zitat Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New YorkMATH Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, New YorkMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1–28CrossRef Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005) Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 41:1–28CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. The MIT Press, CambridgeMATH Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. The MIT Press, CambridgeMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez E, Pintos S, Queipo NV (2008) Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(3):247–261CrossRef Sanchez E, Pintos S, Queipo NV (2008) Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications. Struct Multidiscip Optim 36(3):247–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241CrossRef Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(12):2233–2241CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smith M (1993) Neural networks for statistical modeling. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkMATH Smith M (1993) Neural networks for statistical modeling. Von Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Song XG, Sun GY, Li GY, Gao WZ, Li Q (2013) Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):221–231MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Song XG, Sun GY, Li GY, Gao WZ, Li Q (2013) Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47(2):221–231MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Zurück zum Zitat Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. ASME J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRef Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. ASME J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yin HF, Wen GL, Gan NF (2011) Crashworthiness design for honeycomb structure under axial dynamic loading. Int J Comput Methods 8(4):863–877CrossRef Yin HF, Wen GL, Gan NF (2011) Crashworthiness design for honeycomb structure under axial dynamic loading. Int J Comput Methods 8(4):863–877CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yin HF, Wen GL, Fang HB, Qing QX, Kong XZ, Xiao JR, Liu ZB (2014) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization design of functionally graded foam-filled tapered tube based on dynamic ensemble metamodel. Mater Des 55:747–757CrossRef Yin HF, Wen GL, Fang HB, Qing QX, Kong XZ, Xiao JR, Liu ZB (2014) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization design of functionally graded foam-filled tapered tube based on dynamic ensemble metamodel. Mater Des 55:747–757CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zerpa LE, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J-L (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Pet Sci Eng 47:197–208CrossRef Zerpa LE, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J-L (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Pet Sci Eng 47:197–208CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Chowdhury S, Messac A (2012) An adaptive hybrid surrogate model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(2):223–238CrossRef Zhang J, Chowdhury S, Messac A (2012) An adaptive hybrid surrogate model. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(2):223–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XJ, Jiang T (2016) Metamodel selection based on stepwise regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(3):641–657MathSciNetCrossRef Zhou XJ, Jiang T (2016) Metamodel selection based on stepwise regression. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(3):641–657MathSciNetCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XJ, Ma YZ, Li XF (2011) Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(5):651–671CrossRef Zhou XJ, Ma YZ, Li XF (2011) Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44(5):651–671CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
On the ensemble of metamodels with multiple regional optimized weight factors
verfasst von
Hanfeng Yin
Hongbing Fang
Guilin Wen
Matthew Gutowski
Youye Xiao
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1891-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.