nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

On the (In)Security of SNARKs in the Presence of Oracles

verfasst von : Dario Fiore, Anca Nitulescu

Erschienen in: Theory of Cryptography

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this work we study the feasibility of knowledge extraction for succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) in a scenario that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been analyzed before. While prior work focuses on the case of adversarial provers that may receive (statically generated) auxiliary information, here we consider the scenario where adversarial provers are given access to an oracle. For this setting we study if and under what assumptions such provers can admit an extractor. Our contribution is mainly threefold.

First, we formalize the question of extraction in the presence of oracles by proposing a suitable proof of knowledge definition for this setting. We call SNARKs satisfying this definition O-SNARKs. Second, we show how to use O-SNARKs to obtain formal and intuitive security proofs for three applications (homomorphic signatures, succinct functional signatures, and SNARKs on authenticated data) where we recognize an issue while doing the proof under the standard proof of knowledge definition of SNARKs. Third, we study whether O-SNARKs exist, providing both negative and positive results. On the negative side, we show that, assuming one way functions, there do not exist O-SNARKs in the standard model for every signing oracle family (and thus for general oracle families as well). On the positive side, we show that when considering signature schemes with appropriate restrictions on the message length O-SNARKs for the corresponding signing oracles exist, based on classical SNARKs and assuming extraction with respect to specific distributions of auxiliary input.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The GGM Function Family Is a Weakly One-Way Family of Functions

Nächstes Kapitel Leakage Resilient One-Way Functions: The Auxiliary-Input Setting

Further motivation can be to keep the privacy of m by relying on zero-knowledge SNARKs.

The other case of statements not in the language can be easily reduced to the soundness of the SNARK.

The notion is parametrized by the family \(\mathbb O\), i.e., we say \(\varPi \) is an O-SNARK for \(\mathbb O\).

We do believe that many more applications along the same line – proving knowledge of valid signatures – are conceivable. Two recent examples which considered our work in such a setting are [DLFKP16, NT16].

The need of this final heuristic step is that hash-and-sign signatures use a random oracle in verification and in our applications the SNARK is used to prove knowledge of valid signatures, i.e., one would need a SNARK for \(\mathsf{NP}^{\mathcal{O}}\).

The exact reason is rather technical and requires to see the precise definitions and constructions of these primitives first. For the familiar reader, the intuition is that in these primitives/constructions an adversary that queries almost the entire message space of the underlying signature scheme becomes able to trivially break their security.

The CS proofs of knowledge definition used by Valiant considers adversaries that are non-adaptive in choosing the statement. However it easy to see that the construction and the proof work also for the adaptive case.

Here vk is an arbitrary choice; any symbol not in \(\mathcal{M}\) would do so. Introducing the extra query simplifies the presentation, otherwise \(\mathsf{vk}\) should be treated as an auxiliary input from a distribution generated together with the oracle sampling.

This relies on the fact that sufficiently many bits of w remain unpredictable, even given \(\pi \).

We note that the proof requires an exact match and it is not sufficient that the O-SNARK adversary’s queries are a subset of the sampled messages. A more precise explanation of this fact is given at the end of the proof in the full version.

Previous work hinted the possibility of achieving multi-hop homomorphic signatures by using SNARKs with recursive composition. However, given the issues we already notice in using classical SNARKs, it is unclear to us whether such a multi-hop construction would allow for a proof.

The only major difference is that one has to consider a specification of our definitions to the case of pre-processing SNARKs.

[BBFR15]

Backes, M., Barbosa, M., Fiore, D., Reischuk, R.M.: ADSNARK: nearly practical and privacy-preserving proofs on authenticated data. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 271–286. IEEE Computer Society Press (2015)

[BCC88]

Brassard, G., Chaum, D., Crépeau, C.: Minimum disclosure proofs of knowledge. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 37(2), 156–189 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[BCC+14]

Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., Goldwasser, S., Lin, H., Rubinstein, A., Tromer, E.: The hunting of the SNARK. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2014/580 (2014). http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/580

[BCCT12]

Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., Tromer, E.: From extractable collision resistance to succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge, and back again. In: Goldwasser, S. (ed.) ITCS 2012, pp. 326–349. ACM, January 2012

[BCCT13]

Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., Tromer, E.: Recursive composition and bootstrapping for SNARKS and proof-carrying data. In: Boneh, D., Roughgarden, T., Feigenbaum, J. (eds.) 45th ACM STOC, pp. 111–120. ACM Press, June 2013

[BCI+13]

Bitansky, N., Chiesa, A., Ishai, Y., Paneth, O., Ostrovsky, R.: Succinct non-interactive arguments via linear interactive proofs. In: Sahai, A. (ed.) TCC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7785, pp. 315–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36594-2_18 CrossRef

[BCPR14]

Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Paneth, O., Rosen, A.: On the existence of extractable one-way functions. In: Shmoys, D.B. (ed.) 46th ACM STOC, pp. 505–514. ACM Press, May/June 2014

[BCTV14]

Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Tromer, E., Virza, M.: Scalable zero knowledge via cycles of elliptic curves. In: Garay, J.A., Gennaro, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2014. LNCS, vol. 8617, pp. 276–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44381-1_16 CrossRef

[BF11]

Boneh, D., Freeman, D.M.: Homomorphic signatures for polynomial functions. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6632, pp. 149–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20465-4_10 CrossRef

[BG08]

Barak, B., Goldreich, O.: Universal arguments and their applications. SIAM J. Comput. 38(5), 1661–1694 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[BGI14]

Boyle, E., Goldwasser, S., Ivan, I.: Functional signatures and pseudorandom functions. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) PKC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8383, pp. 501–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54631-0_29 CrossRef

[BHZ87]

Boppana, R.B., Hastad, J., Zachos, S.: Does co-NP have short interactive proofs? Inf. Process. Lett. 25(2), 127–132 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[BP15]

Boyle, E., Pass, R.: Limits of extractability assumptions with distributional auxiliary input. In: Iwata, T., Cheon, J.H. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9453, pp. 236–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48800-3_10 CrossRef

[BSCG+13]

Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Genkin, D., Tromer, E., Virza, M.: SNARKs for C: verifying program executions succinctly and in zero knowledge. In: Canetti, R., Garay, J.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 2013. LNCS, vol. 8043, pp. 90–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40084-1_6 CrossRef

[CF13]

Catalano, D., Fiore, D.: Practical homomorphic MACs for arithmetic circuits. In: Johansson, T., Nguyen, P.Q. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7881, pp. 336–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_21 CrossRef

[CFW14]

Catalano, D., Fiore, D., Warinschi, B.: Homomorphic signatures with efficient verification for polynomial functions. In: Garay, J.A., Gennaro, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2014. LNCS, vol. 8616, pp. 371–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2_21 CrossRef

[CL08]

Crescenzo, G., Lipmaa, H.: Succinct NP proofs from an extractability assumption. In: Beckmann, A., Dimitracopoulos, C., Löwe, B. (eds.) CiE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5028, pp. 175–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69407-6_21 CrossRef

[DLFKP16]

Delignat-Lavaud, A., Fournet, C., Kohlweiss, M., Parno, B.: Cinderella: Turning shabby x. 509 certificates into elegant anonymous credentials with the magic of verifiable computation. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2016)

[FN16]

Fiore, D., Nitulescu, A.: On the (in)security of SNARKs in the presence of oracles. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/112 (2016)

[GGPR13]

Gennaro, R., Gentry, C., Parno, B., Raykova, M.: Quadratic span programs and succinct NIZKs without PCPs. In: Johansson, T., Nguyen, P.Q. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7881, pp. 626–645. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_37 CrossRef

[GH98]

Goldreich, O., Håstad, J.: On the complexity of interactive proofs with bounded communication. Inf. Process. Lett. 67(4), 205–214 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[GMR89]

Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rackoff, C.: The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. SIAM J. Comput. 18(1), 186–208 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[Gro10]

Groth, J.: Short pairing-based non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 321–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17373-8_19 CrossRef

[GVW02]

Goldreich, O., Vadhan, S., Wigderson, A.: On interactive proofs with a laconic prover. Comput. Complex. 11(1–2), 1–53 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[GVW15]

Gorbunov, S., Vaikuntanathan, V., Wichs, D.: Leveled fully homomorphic signatures from standard lattices. In: Servedio, R.A., Rubinfeld, R. (eds.) 47th ACM STOC, pp. 469–477. ACM Press, June 2015

[GW11]

Gentry, C., Wichs, D.: Separating succinct non-interactive arguments from all falsifiable assumptions. In Fortnow, L.P. Vadhan, S. (eds.) 43rd ACM STOC, pp. 99–108. ACM Press, June 2011

[GW13]

Gennaro, R., Wichs, D.: Fully homomorphic message authenticators. In: Sako, K., Sarkar, P. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8270, pp. 301–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-42045-0_16 CrossRef

[HT98]

Hada, S., Tanaka, T.: On the existence of 3-round zero-knowledge protocols. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) CRYPTO 1998. LNCS, vol. 1462, pp. 408–423. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/BFb0055744 CrossRef

[Kil92]

Kilian, J.: A note on efficient zero-knowledge proofs and arguments (extended abstract). In 24th ACM STOC, pp. 723–732. ACM Press, May 1992

[Lam79]

Lamport, L.: Constructing digital signatures from a one-way function. Technical report SRI-CSL-98, SRI International Computer Science Laboratory, October 1979

[Lip12]

Lipmaa, H.: Progression-free sets and sublinear pairing-based non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) TCC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7194, pp. 169–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28914-9_10 CrossRef

[Mic94]

Micali, S.: CS proofs (extended abstracts). In: 35th FOCS, pp. 436–453. IEEE Computer Society Press, November 1994

[Mic00]

Micali, S.: Computationally sound proofs. SIAM J. Comput. 30(4), 1253–1298 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

[Mie08]

Mie, T.: Polylogarithmic two-round argument systems. J. Math. Crypt. 2(4), 343–363 (2008)MathSciNetMATH

[Nao03]

Naor, M.: On cryptographic assumptions and challenges. In: Boneh, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2729, pp. 96–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45146-4_6 CrossRef

[NT16]

Naveh, A., Tromer, E.: Photoproof: cryptographic image authentication for any set of permissible transformations. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2016)

[PHGR13]

Parno, B., Howell, J., Gentry, C., Raykova, M.: Pinocchio: nearly practical verifiable computation. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 238–252. IEEE Computer Society Press, May 2013

[Rom90]

Rompel, J.: One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures. In 22nd ACM STOC, pp. 387–394. ACM Press, May 1990

[Val08]

Valiant, P.: Incrementally verifiable computation or proofs of knowledge imply time/space efficiency. In: Canetti, R. (ed.) TCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4948, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78524-8_1 CrossRef

[Wee05]

Wee, H.: On round-efficient argument systems. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 140–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11523468_12 CrossRef

Titel: On the (In)Security of SNARKs in the Presence of Oracles
verfasst von: Dario Fiore
Anca Nitulescu
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Theory of Cryptography
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53640-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-53641-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53641-4_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner