Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 1/2020

23.04.2020

Optimization of Metascheduler for Cloud Machine Learning Services

verfasst von: A. Suresh, P. Ganesh Kumar

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Cloud meta scheduler act as a global resource manager that discover the resource mapping, job submission and monitoring services in a distributed environment. Machine learning services are offered as pay-per-use by the leading cloud providers such as Amazon, Microsoft and IBM etc., Most of the cloud machine learning service architecture had a constraint that cloud users are allowed to choose the predefined listed algorithms for their experimentation and architecture like Amazon uses a single classification or regression algorithm irrespective of the input dataset. The resource utilization by cloud service user (CSU) is too low with respect to time. Here we proposed and construct the economic metascheduler in cloud machine learning architecture using a decision tree algorithm that selects the suitable classification or prediction algorithm based on the users need and achieve maximum profit for both cloud machine learning service providers (CMLSP) and cloud service user (CSU). The experimentation is carried out using Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, WEKA and the number results show that the proposed metascheduler architecture is superior to the real time CMLSP.
Vorheriger Artikel Smart Fall Prediction for Elderly Care Using iPhone and Apple Watch
Nächster Artikel Workload Mining in Cloud Computing using Extended Cloud Dempster–Shafer Theory (ECDST)

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Kumrai, T., Ota, K., Dong, M., Kishigami, J., & Sung, D. K. (2016). Multiobjective optimization in cloud brokering systems for connected Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(2), 404–413.CrossRef
2.
Junior, O. A. C., Bruschi, S. M., Santana, R. H. C., & Santana, M. J. (2016). Green Cloud Meta-Scheduling: A flexible and automatic approach. Journal of Grid Computing, 1(14), 109–126.CrossRef
3.
Nesmachnow, S., Iturriaga, S., & Dorronsoro, B. (2015). Efficient heuristics for profit optimization of virtual cloud brokers. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 10(1), 33–43.CrossRef
4.
Kim, S. H., Kang, D. K., Kim, W. J., Chen, M., & Youn, C. H. (2016). A science gateway cloud with cost-adaptive VM management for computational science and applications. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(1), 173–185.CrossRef
5.
Karthick, A. V., Ramaraj, E., & Kannan, R. (2013, December). An efficient Tri Queue job Scheduling using dynamic quantum time for cloud environment. In 2013 International Conference on Green Computing, Communication and Conservation of Energy (ICGCE) (pp. 871–876). IEEE.
6.
Peixoto, M. L., Santana, M. J., Estrella, J. C., Tavares, T. C., Kuehne, B. T., & Santana, R. H. (2010, April). A metascheduler architecture to provide QoS on the cloud computing. In 2010 17th International Conference on Telecommunications (pp. 650–657). IEEE.
7.
Li, X., Ma, H., Zhou, F., & Gui, X. (2014). Service operator-aware trust scheme for resource matchmaking across multiple clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(5), 1419–1429.CrossRef
8.
Prasad, A. S., & Rao, S. (2013). A mechanism design approach to resource procurement in cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 63(1), 17–30.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
9.
Guzek, M., Gniewek, A., Bouvry, P., Musial, J., & Blazewicz, J. (2015). Cloud brokering: Current practices and upcoming challenges. IEEE Cloud Computing, 2(2), 40–47.CrossRef
10.
Chard, K., & Bubendorfer, K. (2009). Using secure auctions to build a distributed meta-scheduler for the grid. New York: Wiley.
11.
Zhang, R., Wu, K., Li, M., & Wang, J. (2015). Online resource scheduling under concave pricing for cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 27(4), 1131–1145.CrossRef
12.
Tang, L., He, S., & Li, Q. (2017). Double-sided bidding mechanism for resource sharing in mobile cloud. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(2), 1798–1809.CrossRef
13.
Moltó, G., Hernández, V., & Alonso, J. M. (2008). A service-oriented WSRF-based architecture for metascheduling on computational Grids. Future Generation Computer Systems, 24(4), 317–328.CrossRef
14.
Zhang, J., Gu, C., Wang, X., & Huang, H. (2013, March). A unified metascheduler architecture for telecom grade cloud computing. In 2013 IEEE Third International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST) (pp. 354–360). IEEE.
15.
Jackson, K. R., Ramakrishnan, L., Muriki, K., Canon, S., Cholia, S., Shalf, J., et al. (2010, November). Performance analysis of high performance computing applications on the amazon web services cloud. In 2010 IEEE second international conference on cloud computing technology and science (pp. 159–168). IEEE.
16.
Grivas, S. G., Kumar, T. U., & Wache, H. (2010, July). Cloud broker: Bringing intelligence into the cloud. In 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing (pp. 544–545). IEEE.
17.
Mahalle, H. S., Tayde, S., & Kaveri, P. R. (2015, November). Implementing service broker policies in cloud computing environment. In 2015 International Conference on Communication Networks (ICCN) (pp. 186–190). IEEE.
18.
Aazam, M., Huh, E. N., St-Hilaire, M., Lung, C. H., & Lambadaris, I. (2015). Cloud customer’s historical record based resource pricing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 27(7), 1929–1940.CrossRef
19.
Bihis, M., & Roychowdhury, S. (2015, October). A generalized flow for multi-class and binary classification tasks: An Azure ML approach. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 1728–1737). IEEE.
20.
Kaplunovich, A., & Yesha, Y. (2017, December). Cloud big data decision support system for machine learning on AWS: Analytics of analytics. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 3508–3516). IEEE.
21.
Đorđević, B. S., Jovanović, S. P., & Timčenko, V. V. (2014, November). Cloud Computing in Amazon and Microsoft Azure platforms: Performance and service comparison. In 2014 22nd Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR) (pp. 931–934). IEEE.
22.
Amato, A., Di Martino, B., & Venticinque, S. (2013, October). Cloud brokering as a service. In 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (pp. 9–16). IEEE.
23.
Leng, L., & Wang, L. (2012, August). Research on cloud computing and key technologies. In 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Processing (CSIP) (pp. 863–866). IEEE.
24.
Abderrahim, W., & Choukair, Z. (2015, August). Trust assurance in cloud services with the cloud broker architecture for dependability. In 2015 IEEE 17th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 2015 IEEE 7th International Symposium on Cyberspace Safety and Security, and 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (pp. 778–781). IEEE.
25.
Di Martino, B., Cretella, G., Esposito, A., & Sperandeo, R. G. (2014, September). Semantic representation of cloud services: a case study for microsoft windows azure. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (pp. 647–652). IEEE.
26.
Czajkowski, K., Foster, I., Karonis, N., Kesselman, C., Martin, S., Smith, W., & Tuecke, S. (1998, March). A resource management architecture for metacomputing systems. In Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing (pp. 62–82). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
27.
Maheshwari, P., Singhal, A., & Qadeer, M. A. (2017, September). Data analytics using cloud computing. In 2017 9th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) (pp. 82–87). IEEE.
28.
Garg, S. K., Venugopal, S., & Buyya, R. (2008, December). A meta-scheduler with auction based resource allocation for global grids. In 2008 14th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (pp. 187–194). IEEE.
29.
Kotas, C., Naughton, T., & Imam, N. (2018, January). A comparison of Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure cloud platforms for high performance computing. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
30.
Herger, L., Fonseca, C., Rippon, B., & Bodarky, M. (2017, October). Ibm research cloud evolution & efficiencies. In 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) (pp. 352–355). IEEE.
Metadaten
Titel
Optimization of Metascheduler for Cloud Machine Learning Services
verfasst von
A. Suresh
P. Ganesh Kumar
Publikationsdatum
23.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07367-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Wireless Personal Communications 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Reduced-Dimensional Polynomial Rooting-Based Multiple Parameter Estimation for Polarization Sensitive Coprime Arrays: A Full Array Extraction Perspective

OriginalPaper

Differential Evolution Based Reliable Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in the Presence of Malicious Users

OriginalPaper

An Adaptive Covariance Matrix Based on Combined Fully Blind Self Adapted Method for Cognitive Radio Spectrum Sensing

OriginalPaper

Design and Implementation of Hardware-Based Remote Attestation for a Secure Internet of Things

OriginalPaper

Linearization of Photonic Link Based on Phase-Controlled Dual Drive Dual-Parallel Mach–Zehnder Modulator

ReviewPaper

A Survey on Hybrid, 3D, Interference Mitigation and Secure Data Beamforming Techniques for 5G System

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise