Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Other Human Rights in Aviation Security

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As discussed, the rights to privacy and data protection are inadequate to capture all the aspects of aviation security, and all human rights are interdependent, indivisible and interrelated. Thus, aviation security versus privacy dilemma is actually broader than privacy and data protection rights only.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Bordunov. International Air Law (2007) p. 29.
 
2
See “Customer Bill of Rights”, “Conditions of Carriage”, or “Contract of Carriage” published by some of the carriers.
 
3
Averkiev. Why does a man need human rights? In: Civitas. Vol. 1 (2003) p. 19.
 
4
United Nations. The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System: An introduction to the core human rights treaties and the treaty bodies. Fact sheet No.30. United Nations Office in Geneva, 2005.
 
5
Adopted by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, was opened for signature on 19 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976.
 
6
Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 3 January 1976.
 
7
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed at Rome on 4 November 1950, effective 3 September 1953.
 
8
See, for example, Preambles of UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR, Art. 1 (3), 2 of ICCPR, Art. 1 (3), 2 of ICESCR.
 
9
The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970–1979). http://​encyclopedia2.​thefreedictionar​y.​com/​State+Territory
 
10
See Chap. 4.
 
11
See Chap. 4.
 
13
Art. 2(1) of ICESCR.
 
14
See, for example, ICCPR Art. 2(2).
 
15
ICCPR Art. 2 (3).
 
16
Kochenova. Respect to privacy in Russia: diagnosis and prognosis (2007) http://​www.​pgpalata.​ru/​reshr/​privacy/​art10.​shtml#n77
 
17
Ibid.
 
18
E.g. Article 15(4) of Constitution of the Russian Federation of 12 December 1993; §3 of Norwegian Human Rights Act of 21 May 1999.
 
19
United Nations. Office of the United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights, World Health Organization. The right to health. Fact sheet No.31 (2008).
 
20
Scheinin and Vermeulen. Unilateral Exceptions to International Law: Systematic legal analysis and critique of doctrines to deny or reduce the applicability of Human Rights norms in the fight against terrorism. In: Essex Human Rights Review. Vol. 8 (2011) p. 28.
 
21
Ibid. pp. 28–29.
 
22
The ECtHR addressed these derogations in respective cases Lawless v. Ireland (1 July 1961), Ireland v. the UK (18 Jan 1978), Brannigan and McBride v. the UK (25 May 1993), Aksoy v. Turkey (18 Dec 1996), A. and Others v. the UK (19 Feb 2009, Grand Chamber).
 
23
Fact Sheet No.2 (Rev.1), The International Bill of Human Rights. United Nations, Geneva, June 1996.
 
24
Constitution of the Russian Federation of 12 December 1993.
 
25
Scheinin and Vermeulen (2011) p. 50.
 
26
UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9, § 13.
 
27
Scheinin and Vermeulen (2011) p. 51.
 
28
Ibid. referring to A/HRC/13/37, § 17, and Etzioni. Implications of Select New Technologies for Individual Rights and Public Safety. In: Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Vol. 15 (2002).
 
29
See Council of Europe (2005).
 
30
Kornblatt (2007) p. 403.
 
31
See The Council of Europe Guidelines. Human Rights and the fight against terrorism, March 2005.
 
32
No.13462/06, 10 Jan 2012.
 
33
See Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, No. 46477/99, 14 Mar 2002, § 55; and Bromiley v. the United Kingdom (dec.), No. 33747/96, 23 Nov 1999, §83.
 
34
Bromiley v. the United Kingdom (Dec.), No. 33747/96, 23 Nov 1999, §83.
 
35
Ibid.
 
36
Although the probability of this is in fact much lower than other risks; see Chap. 4.
 
37
Finogenov and others v. Russia, No. 18299/03 and 27311/03, 20 Dec 2011.
 
38
Article 7(3) of Russian Federal law of 6 March 2006 N 35-FZ On counteraction against terrorism.
 
39
§153, Judgment of the First Senate of 15 February 2006. Zitierung: BVerfG, 1 BvR 357/05, http://​www.​bverfg.​de/​entscheidungen/​rs20060215_​1bvr035705en.​html
 
40
First President of the Supreme Court, Judgment of 30 September 2008, K 44/07. Permissibility of shooting down a passenger aircraft in the event of a danger that it has been used for unlawful acts, and where state security is threatened, http://​trybunal.​gov.​pl/​fileadmin/​content/​omowienia/​K_​44_​07_​GB.​pdf.
 
41
Adopted 18 October 1961, revised in 1966.
 
42
United Nations (2008).
 
44
Neeman. Radiation in passenger screening: busting the myths. In: Aviation Security International. Vol. 21 (2015) p. 26.
 
45
Strasbourg, 16 Sept 1963.
 
46
Art.27 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 Apr 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.
 
48
Flight 31 Oct 2015 from Sharm el-Sheikh to St. Petersburg, 224 persons were killed.
 
49
No. 31008/02, 13 Oct 2005.
 
50
No. 23592/07, 24 Jan 2012.
 
51
No. 32190/96, 17 Mar 2013, § 96.
 
52
See respectively Prescher v. Bulgaria, No. 6767/04, 7 Jun 2011, § 47, and Riener v. Bulgaria, No. 46343/99, 23 May 2006, § 106.
 
53
No. 29713/05, 27 Nov 2012.
 
54
See, e.g. § 19 of Norwegian Regulation of 1 March 2011 No. 214 on the prevention of attacks against aviation security and Article 85(3) of Russian Air Code of 19 March 1997 N 60-FZ.
 
56
Articles 19 to 22 of the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement (1990).
 
57
See Atger. The Abolition of Internal Border Checks in an Enlarged Schengen Area: Freedom of movement or a scattered web of security checks? (2008) p. 4, 18.
 
58
See Geyer. Taking Stock: Databases and Systems of Information Exchange in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (2008).
 
59
Amicelli. Surveillance and freedom of movement In: Surveillance, fighting crime and violence (2012b) p. 270.
 
60
Leese (2013) p. 486.
 
61
Bazian. The ‘Randomness’ of Islamophobia at US Airports, 3 September 2014, http://​www.​turkeyagenda.​com/​the-randomness-of-islamophobia-at-us-airports-1111.​html
 
62
Articles 2, 7 of UDHR, Article 26 ICCPR and Article 21 of CFREU.
 
63
Vermeulen and Bellanova (2013) p. 306.
 
64
Rome, 4 Nov 2000.
 
65
Halstead. Unlocking human rights (2014) p. 298.
 
66
Ibid.
 
67
United Nations (2008).
 
68
Wright et al. (2015) p. 288.
 
70
Common examples are personalized advertising and different “smart” applications which work best when they know a lot about a person.
 
71
Lyon (2004) p. 143 citing Zureik. Constructing Palestine through surveillance practices. In: British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. Vol. 28 (2001).
 
72
FRA. Handbook on European non-discrimination law (2011a) p. 22.
 
73
Ibid. p. 29.
 
74
Huber v Bundesrepublic Deutschland, C-524/06, 16 Dec 2008, §80.
 
75
Rangelov v. Germany, No. 5123/07, 22 Mar 2012, §85.
 
76
Ibid.§86.
 
77
Ibid.§87.
 
78
Huber v Bundesrepublic Deutschland, C-524/06, 16 Dec 2008, § 75.
 
79
Rangelov v. Germany, §88.
 
80
Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, No. 27996/06 and 34836/06, 22 Dec 2009, §44.
 
81
Quinlan. Discrimination: the questionable effectiveness of screening based on race, religion, national origin or behavior. In: Aviation Security International. Vol. 21 (2015) p. 37.
 
82
Cyprus v. Turkey, No. 25781/94, 10 May 2001.
 
84
E.g. Dahlab v. Switzerland, No. 42393/98, declared inadmissible 15 Feb 2001.
 
85
No. 43563/08, declared inadmissible 30 Jun 2009.
 
86
Leyla Sahin v. Turkey, No. 44774/98, 10 Nov 2005, Kervanci v. France, No. 31645/04, 4 Dec 2008.
 
87
No. 41135/98, 23 Feb 2010.
 
88
No. 15585/06, declared inadmissible 04 Mar 2008.
 
89
Peterson. Emperor’s New Scanner: Muslim Women at the Intersection of the First Amendment and Full-Body Scanners, The. In: Hastings Women’s LJ. Vol. 22 (2011).
 
90
Fiqh Council of North America, Statement on the use of full body scanners for security at the airports and other places (Issued 9 February 2010). http://​www.​fiqhcouncil.​org/​node/​4 (date accessed: 31 Jan 2012).
 
92
Mustapha. Aviation security provisions vs. basic fundamental human rights: an Islamic law perspective. In: Aviation Security International. Vol. 21 (2015) p. 35.
 
93
Bayatyan v. Armenia, No 23459/03, 7 July 2011, Erçep v. Turkey, No. 43965/04, 22 Nov 2011.
 
94
Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 Nov 1989.
 
95
Ibid. Art. 1.
 
96
La Fors-Owczynik. Minor protection or major injustice? – Children’s rights and digital preventions directed at youth in the Dutch justice system. In: Computer Law & Security Review. Vol. 31 (2015) p. 652.
 
97
Convention on the Rights of the Child Art. 3.
 
98
Ibid. Art. 3, CFREU Art. 24.
 
99
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data in the context of profiling adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 23 Nov 2010.
 
100
See Chap. 2.
 
101
Federal law of 29 December 2010 N 436-FZ On protection of children from information which may harm their health and development.
 
102
State of democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Europe. Report by the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Vienna, May 2014. SG (2014)1-FINAL, p. 69.
 
103
Travis. New scanners break child porn laws, The Guardian, 4 January 2010, http://​www.​theguardian.​com/​politics/​2010/​jan/​04/​new-scanners-child-porn-laws.
 
104
Elias. Airport Body Scanners: The Role of Advanced Imaging Technology in Airline Passenger Screening (2012) p. 5.
 
105
UK Department for Transport. Equality Impact Assessment on the use of security scanners at UK airports (2013).
 
106
TSA. Advanced Imaging Technology. http://​www.​tsa.​gov/​traveler-information/​advanced-imaging-technology (date accessed: 31 Jan 2015).
 
107
See more detail on margin of appreciation in Chap. 5.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Kornblatt, Sara. “Are emerging technologies in airport passenger screening reasonable under the fourth amendment”. Loy. LAL Rev 41 (2007): 385. Kornblatt, Sara. “Are emerging technologies in airport passenger screening reasonable under the fourth amendment”. Loy. LAL Rev 41 (2007): 385.
Zurück zum Zitat Leese, Matthias. “Blurring the dimensions of privacy? Law enforcement and trusted traveler programs”. Computer Law & Security Review 29 (2013): 480–90.CrossRef Leese, Matthias. “Blurring the dimensions of privacy? Law enforcement and trusted traveler programs”. Computer Law & Security Review 29 (2013): 480–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, David. “Globalizing Surveillance Comparative and Sociological Perspectives”. International Sociology 19 (2004): 135–49.CrossRef Lyon, David. “Globalizing Surveillance Comparative and Sociological Perspectives”. International Sociology 19 (2004): 135–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyon, David. “Surveillance, security and social sorting emerging research priorities”. International criminal justice review 17 (2007): 161–70.CrossRef Lyon, David. “Surveillance, security and social sorting emerging research priorities”. International criminal justice review 17 (2007): 161–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scheinin, Martin and Mathias Vermeulen. “Unilateral Exceptions to International Law: Systematic legal analysis and critique of doctrines to deny or reduce the applicability of Human Rights norms in the fight against terrorism”. Essex Human Rights Review 8 (2011): 20–56. Scheinin, Martin and Mathias Vermeulen. “Unilateral Exceptions to International Law: Systematic legal analysis and critique of doctrines to deny or reduce the applicability of Human Rights norms in the fight against terrorism”. Essex Human Rights Review 8 (2011): 20–56.
Zurück zum Zitat Vermeulen, Mathias and Rocco Bellanova. “European ‘smart’ surveillance: What’s at stake for data protection, privacy and non-discrimination?” Security and Human Rights 23 (2013): 297–311.CrossRef Vermeulen, Mathias and Rocco Bellanova. “European ‘smart’ surveillance: What’s at stake for data protection, privacy and non-discrimination?” Security and Human Rights 23 (2013): 297–311.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wright, David et al. “Questioning surveillance”. Computer Law & Security Review 31 (2015): 280–92.CrossRef Wright, David et al. “Questioning surveillance”. Computer Law & Security Review 31 (2015): 280–92.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Council of Europe (2005) Council of Europe Guidelines. Human Rights and the fight against terrorism, Strasbourg, March 2005. Council of Europe (2005) Council of Europe Guidelines. Human Rights and the fight against terrorism, Strasbourg, March 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations (2008) United Nations. Office of the United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights, World Health Organization. The right to health. Fact sheet No.31. United Nations Office in Geneva, 2008. United Nations (2008) United Nations. Office of the United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights, World Health Organization. The right to health. Fact sheet No.31. United Nations Office in Geneva, 2008.
Metadaten
Titel
Other Human Rights in Aviation Security
verfasst von
Olga Mironenko Enerstvedt
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58139-2_3