Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Risk and Resilience: Similarities and Differences Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Panarchy: Thinking in Systems and Networks

verfasst von : Igor Linkov, Benjamin D. Trump

Erschienen in: The Science and Practice of Resilience

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As a concept and disciplinary practice, resilience analysis has evolved rapidly within the twenty-first century. This is driven in large part by the growing complexity in everyday systems that dominate daily life, from energy and transportation networks to medical and even entertainment systems. Such complexity is derived to provide potentially vast benefits to society through innovative technology development and organization, and subsequently makes daily life for individuals easier, more enjoyable, or increasingly integrated.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Resilience as Function of Space and Time
Nächstes Kapitel Lessons from History
Literatur
Allen, C., Angeler, D., Garmestani, A., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2014). Panarchy: Theory and application (Paper 127). Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit—Sta Publications.
Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Working Papers, 2012(405), 1–61.CrossRef
Cutter, S. L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards, 80(2), 741–758.CrossRef
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.CrossRef
Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–307.CrossRef
Gunderson, L. H. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island press.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Washington, DC: Island.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.CrossRef
Larkin, S., Fox-Lent, C., Eisenberg, D. A., Trump, B. D., Wallace, S., Chadderton, C., & Linkov, I. (2015). Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2), 185–195.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Anklam, E., Collier, Z. A., DiMase, D., & Renn, O. (2014a). Risk-based standards: Integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(1), 134–137.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., & Lambert, J. H. (2014b). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 407–409.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Keisler, J., Sala, S. D., & Sieweke, J. (2014c). Risk and resilience lessons from Venice. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(3), 378–382.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Ditmer, R., & Hazle, M. (2014d). Munitions and explosives of concern: International governance and applications for the United States. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 30.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Trump, B., Jin, D., Mazurczak, M., & Schreurs, M. (2014e). A decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 20.CrossRef
Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013). A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 62–75.CrossRef
Sempier, T. T., Swann, D. L., Emmer, R., Sempier, S. H., & Schneider, M. (2010). Coastal community resilience index: A community self assesment (MASGP-08-014).
Simon, H. (1974). The organization of a complex system. In H. H. Patee (Ed.), Hierachy theory. New York: George Braziller.
Todini, E. (2000). Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water, 2(2), 115–122.CrossRef
Tversky, A. (1975, June). Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. In a conference on Public Economics, Jerusalem.
Ungar, M. (Ed.). (2012). The social ecology of resilience. Berlin: Springer.
Zellmer, S., & Gunderson, L. (2009). Why resilience may not always be a good thing: Lessons in ecosystem restoration from Glen Canyon and the everglades, 87 Nebraska Law Review, 893, 913–923.
Metadaten
Titel
Panarchy: Thinking in Systems and Networks
verfasst von
Igor Linkov
Benjamin D. Trump
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
The Science and Practice of Resilience

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04563-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-04565-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04565-4_3