Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Interactive Approach for Inspecting Software System Measurements Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Paper or Pixel? Comparing Paper- and Tool-Based Participatory Design Approaches

verfasst von : Matthias Heintz, Effie Lai-Chong Law, Samaneh Soleimani

Erschienen in: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Traditionally, in participatory design (PD) workshops, pens and paper are often used by participants to provide their design ideas. However, using a software tool to gather their feedback can have certain advantages. While some attempts to develop such tools have been undertaken, the basic question whether the tool-based approach is better or worse than its paper-based counterpart in terms of the quality of feedback gathered is rarely explored. We aim to address this research question by conducting three PD workshops with the paper-based and tool-based approach. In addition to the findings about the comparability of the two approaches, one of our main contributions to the future research on this question is the development of the coding scheme CAt+. It enables systematic comparisons of PD data collected with different methods and aims to support designers and developers to exploit PD results.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Kwento: Using a Participatory Approach to Design a Family Storytelling Application for Domestic Helpers
Nächstes Kapitel Participatory Design in Practice
Literatur
1.
Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M.: Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)
2.
Muller, M.J.: Participatory design: the third space in HCI (revised). In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) Handbook of HCI, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2007)
3.
Schuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.): Participatory design: principles and practices. CRC Press (1993)
4.
Sanders, E.B.N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, pp. 195–198 (2010)
5.
Walsh, G., Foss, E., Yip, J., Druin, A.: FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 2893–2902. ACM (2013)
6.
Weibel, N., Signer, B., Norrie, M.C., Hofstetter, H., Jetter, H.C., Reiterer, H.: PaperSketch: a paper-digital collaborative remote sketching tool. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 155–164. ACM (2011)
7.
Lin, J., Newman, M.W., Hong, J.I., Landay, J.A.: DENIM: finding a tighter fit between tools and practice for Web site design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 510–517. ACM (2000)
8.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)
9.
Sundar, S.S., Oh, J., Bellur, S., Jia, H., Kim, H.S.: Interactivity as self-expression: a field experiment with customization and blogging. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 395–404. ACM (2012)
10.
Teo, H.H., Oh, L.B., Liu, C., Wei, K.K.: An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 58(3), 281–305 (2003)CrossRef
11.
Zhao, L., Lu, Y.: Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: an empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 825–834 (2012)CrossRef
12.
Govaerts, S., et al.: Towards an online lab portal for inquiry-based STEM learning at school. In: Wang, J.-F., Lau, R. (eds.) ICWL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8167, pp. 244–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRef
13.
Read, J.C., Gregory, P., MacFarlane, S.J., McManus, B., Gray, P., Patel, R.: An investigation of participatory design with children – informant, balanced and facilitated design. In: Interaction Design and Children, pp. 53–64 (2002)
14.
Hundhausen, C., Trent, S., Balkar, A., Nuur, M.: The design and experimental evaluation of a tool to support the construction and wizard-of-oz testing of low fidelity prototypes. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing, VL/HCC 2008, pp. 86–90 (2008)
15.
Segura, V.C.V.B., Barbosa, S.D.J., Simões, F.P.: UISKEI: a sketch-based prototyping tool for defining and evaluating user interface behavior. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 18–25. ACM (2012)
16.
MacDonald, F., Miller, J.: A comparison of tool-based and paper-based software inspection. Empirical Softw. Eng. (Kluwer Academic Publishers) 3, 233–253 (1998)CrossRef
17.
Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A.: Are informal tools better?: comparing DEMAIS, pencil and paper, and authorware for early multimedia design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 313–320. ACM (2003)
18.
Law, E.L.-C., van Schaik, P., Roto, V.: Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72(6), 526–541 (2014)CrossRef
19.
Stumpf, S., Rajaram, V., Li, L., Burnett, M., Dietterich, T., Sullivan, E., Drummond, R., Herlocker, J.: Toward harnessing user feedback for machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2007), pp. 82–91. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)
20.
Kindred, J., Mohammed, S.N.: “He will crush you like an academic ninja!”: exploring teacher ratings on Ratemyprofessors.com. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 10, 00 (2005)CrossRef
21.
Madden, A., Ruthven, I., McMenemy, D.: A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. J. Documentation 69, 693–714 (2013)CrossRef
22.
Könings, K.D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J.J.: An approach to participatory instructional design in secondary education: an exploratory study. Educ. Res. 52, 45–59 (2010)CrossRef
23.
Naghsh, A.M., Andy, D.: GABBEH: a tool to support collaboration in electronic paper prototyping. In: CSCW 2004 the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, USA (2004)
24.
Walsh, G., Druin, A., Guha, M.L., Bonsignore, E., Foss, E., Yip, J.C., et al.: DisCo: a co-design online tool for asynchronous distributed child and adult design partners. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2011), pp. 11–19. ACM (2012)
25.
Newman, M.W., Lin, J., Hong, J.I., Landay, J.A.: DENIM: an informal web site design tool inspired by observations of practice. Hum. Comput. Interact. 18(3), 259–324 (2003)CrossRef
26.
Walsh, G., Druin, A., Guha, M.L., Foss, E., Golub, E., Hatley, L., …, Franckel, S.: Layered elaboration: a new technique for co-design with children. In: Proceedings CHI 2010, pp. 1237–1240. ACM (2010)
27.
Heintz, M., Law, E.L.-C., Govaerts, S., Holzer, A., Gillet, D.: Pdot: participatory design online tool. In: CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2581–2586. ACM (2014)
28.
Druin, A.: Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of CHI 1999, pp. 592–599. ACM Press (1999)
29.
Hallgren, K.A.: Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 8(1), 23–34 (2012)
30.
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 2nd edn. SAGE, London (2004)
31.
Vilbergsdottir, S.G., Hvannberg, E.T., Law, E.L.-C.: Assessing the reliability, validity and acceptance of a classification scheme of usability problems (CUP). J. Syst. Softw. 87, 18–37 (2014)CrossRef
32.
Hornbaek, K., Stage, J.: The interplay between usability evaluation and user interaction design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 21, 117–123 (2006)CrossRef
33.
Fleiss, J.L., Cohen, J.: The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 33, 613–619 (1973)CrossRef
34.
Altman, D.G.: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)
35.
Fleiss, J.L., Levin, B., Paik, M.C.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)CrossRefMATH
36.
Maltby, J., Liza, D.: Early Success in Statistics. Pearson Education, New York (2002)
37.
McDonald, J.H.: Handbook of Biological Statistics, 3rd edn. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore (2014)
Metadaten
Titel
Paper or Pixel? Comparing Paper- and Tool-Based Participatory Design Approaches
verfasst von
Matthias Heintz
Effie Lai-Chong Law
Samaneh Soleimani
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22697-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-22698-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22698-9_34