Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 2/2021

06.10.2020

Parsing argued opinion structure in Twitter content

verfasst von: Asma Ouertatani, Ghada Gasmi, Chiraz Latiri

Erschienen in: Journal of Intelligent Information Systems | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, we address the opinion argumentation mining issue from Twitter data with the objective of further analyzing Twitter users’ preferences and motivations. After introducing the argued opinion definition and its different elements, we propose an argued opinion mining system called TOMAS where we present an end-to-end approach to parse the structure of the argued opinion in order to identify its elements. Our suggested system consists of four consecutive sub-tasks, namely: (1) opinion-topic detection, (2) argumentative opinions identification, (3) argument components detection, and (4) argumentative relation recognition. The proposed system optimizes the argued opinion structure using different classification models. The experimental study is conducted on the MC2 Lab CLEF2017 tweets corpus while considering various comparative baselines. We highlight that our system significantly outperforms the majority baselines and significantly outperforms challenging existing approaches.
Vorheriger Artikel Representing unstructured text semantics for reasoning purpose
Nächster Artikel Modeling information diffusion in online social networks using a modified forest-fire model

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
Literatur
Arun, R., Suresh, V., Veni Madhavan, C., Narasimha Murthy, M. (2010). On finding the natural number of topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some observations. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 391–402.
Barnaghi, P., Ghaffari, P., Breslin, J.G. (2016). Opinion mining and sentiment polarity on twitter and correlation between events and sentiment. In: 2016 IEEE Second international conference on big data computing service and applications (bigdataservice) (pp. 52–57).
Blair, S. J., Bi, Y., Mulvenna, M. D. (2020). Aggregated topic models for increasing social media topic coherence. Applied Intelligence, 50(1), 138–156.CrossRef
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M.I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.MATH
Boltužić, F., & Šnajder, J. (2014). Back up your stance: Recognizing arguments in online discussions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 49–58). Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bosc, T., Cabrio, E., Villata, S. (2016a). DART: a Dataset of Arguments and their Relations on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 10th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 1258–1263). Slovenia: Portoroz.
Bosc, T., Cabrio, E., Villata, S. (2016b). Tweeties squabbling: Positive and negative results in applying argument mining on social media. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA (pp. 21–32). Potsdam.
Cabrio, E., & Villata, S. (2013). A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions. Argument & Computation, 4 (3), 209–230.CrossRef
Cao, J., Xia, T., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Tang, S. (2009). A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing, 72(7), 1775–1781.CrossRef
Chazal, F., Lieutier, A., Montana, N. (2009). Discrete critical values: a general framework for silhouettes computation. Comput. Graph. Forum, 28(5), 1509–1518.CrossRef
Chen, T., Xu, R., He, Y., Wang, X. (2017). Improving sentiment analysis via sentence type classification using biLSTM-CRF and CNN. Expert Systems With Applications, 72, 221–230.CrossRef
Coates, A., & Ng, A. Y. (2012). Learning feature representations with K-Means. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade - second edition (pp. 561–580).
Collobert, R., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Karlen, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Kuksa, P. (2011). Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Machine Learning Research, 12, 2493–2537.MATH
Cossu, J., Gonzalo, J., Hajjem, M., Hamon, O., Latiri, C., Sanjuan, E. (2018). CLEF MC2 2018 lab technical overview of cross language microblog search and argumentative mining. In Working notes of CLEF 2018 - conference and labs of the evaluation forum. Avignon.
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B. (2006). The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. In Machine learning challenges. Evaluating predictive uncertainty, visual object classification, and recognising tectual entailment (pp. 177–190): Springer.
Dusmanu, M., Cabrio, E., Villata, S. (2017). Argument mining on Twitter: Arguments, facts and sources. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2317–2322). Copenhagen: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Eckle-Kohler, J., Kluge, R., Gurevych, I. (2015). On the role of discourse markers for discriminating claims and premises in argumentative discourse. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2236–2242). Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ermakova, L., Mothe, J., Sanjuan, E. (2017). CLEF 2017 microblog cultural contextualization content analysis task overview. In Working notes of CLEF 2017 - conference and labs of the evaluation forum. Dublin.
Forman, G., & Scholz, M. (2010). Apples-to-apples in cross-validation studies: pitfalls in classifier performance measurement. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 12(1), 49–57.CrossRef
Freeman, J. B. (2011). Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments: A theory of argument structure. Walter de Gruyter.
Garcia-Villalba, M. P., Saint-Dizier, P. (2012). A framework to extract arguments in opinion texts. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 6(3), 62–87.CrossRef
Ghosh, D., Muresan, S., Wacholder, N., Aakhus, M., Mitsui, M. (2014). Analyzing argumentative discourse units in online interactions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 39–48). Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Goudas, T., Louizos, C., Petasis, G., Karkaletsis, V. (2014). Argument extraction from news, blogs, and social media. In Likas, A., Blekas, K., & Kalles, D. (Eds.) Artificial intelligence: Methods and applications (pp. 287–299). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5228–5235.CrossRef
Grosse, K., Chesṅevar, C. I., Maguitman, A. G. (2012). An argument-based approach to mining opinions from Twitter. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Agreement Technologies, AT 2012 (pp. 408–422). Dubrovnik.
Grosse, K., González, M., Chesñevar, C., Maguitman, A.G. (2015). Integrating argumentation and sentiment analysis for mining opinions from Twitter. AI Communications, 28(3), 387–401.MathSciNetCrossRef
Hajjem, M., Cossu, J., Latiri, C., Sanjuan, E. (2018). CLEF MC2 2018 lab overview. In Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction - 9th international conference of the CLEF association, CLEF 2018 (pp. 302–308). Avignon.
Imran, M., Elbassuoni, S., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., Meier, P. (2013). Extracting information nuggets from disaster- related messages in social media. In Inproceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Baden-Baden.
Jain, A. K. (2010). Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-Means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(8), 651–666.CrossRef
Lafferty, J. D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F. C. N. (2001). Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 282–289). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Le, Q., & Mikolov, T. (2014). Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 32, ICML’14. JMLR.org (pp. 1188–1196).
Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N. (2014). Context dependent claim detection. In Proceedings of COLING, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 1489–1500). Dublin: Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016). MARGOT: a web server for argumentation mining. Expert Systems With Applications, 65, 292–303.CrossRef
Magnini, B., Zanoli, R., Dagan, I., Eichler, K., Neumann, G., Noh, T. G., Pado, S., Stern, A., Levy, O. (2014). The excitement open platform for textual inferences. In Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 43–48).
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2, NIPS’13 (pp. 3111–3119). Red Hook: Curran Associates Inc.
Mochales, R., & Moens, M. F. (2011). Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Nakahara, T., Uno, T., Yada, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (2010). extracting promising sequential patterns from RFID data using the LCM sequence. In Setchi, R., & Jordanov, I. (Eds.) Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (pp. 244–253). Berlin: Springer.
Nguyen, N., & Guo, Y. (2007). Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’07 (pp. 681–688). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Nguyen, H., & Litman, D. (2015). Extracting argument and domain words for identifying argument components in texts. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 22–28). Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ouertatani, A., & Latiri, C. (2017). Opinion polarity detection in Twitter data combining sequence mining and topic modeling. In Working notes of CLEF 2017 - conference and labs of the evaluation forum. Dublin.
Ouertatani, A., Gasmi, G., Latiri, C. (2018). Argued opinion extraction from festivals and cultural events on Twitter. In Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference KES-2018 (pp. 205–213). Belgrade.
Palau, R. M., & Moens, M. F. (2009). Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of arguments in text. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL ’09 (pp. 98–107). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Palau, R. M., & Moens, M. (2011). Argumentation mining. Artifical Intelligence and Law, 19(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1–2), 1–135.CrossRef
Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. arXiv preprint 0205070.
Park, J., & Cardie, C. (2014). Identifying appropriate support for propositions in online user comments. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 29–38). Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Park, J., Katiyar, A., Yang, B. (2015). Conditional random fields for identifying appropriate types of support for propositions in online user comments. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 39–44). Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ramshaw, L., & Marcus, M. (1995). Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In Third workshop on very large corpora.
Rinott, R., Dankin, L., Alzate Perez, C., Khapra, M. M., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N. (2015). Show me your evidence - an automatic method for context dependent evidence detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 440–450). Lisbon: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ritter, A., Clark, S., Mausam, E.O. (2011). Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1524–1534). Edinburgh: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Sardianos, C., Katakis, I. M., Petasis, G., Karkaletsis, V. (2015). Argument extraction from news. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL (pp. 56–66). Denver.
Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. (2014). Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 46–56). Doha: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Stab, C., & Gurevych, I. (2017). Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays. Computational Linguistics, 43(3), 619–659.MathSciNetCrossRef
Toni, F., & Torroni, P. (2012). Bottom-up argumentation. In Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (Eds.) Theorie and applications of formal argumentation (pp. 249–262). Berlin: Springer.
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1 (pp. 173–180): Association for Computational Linguistics.
Zainuddin, N., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R. (2018). Hybrid sentiment classification on Twitter aspect-based sentiment analysis. Applied Intelligence, 48(5), 1218–1232.
Metadaten
Titel
Parsing argued opinion structure in Twitter content
verfasst von
Asma Ouertatani
Ghada Gasmi
Chiraz Latiri
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0925-9902
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7675
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-020-00620-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

A machine learning approach for performance-oriented decision support in service-oriented architectures

OriginalPaper

Empirical study of sentiment analysis tools and techniques on societal topics

OriginalPaper

Modeling information diffusion in online social networks using a modified forest-fire model

OriginalPaper

Case studies on using natural language processing techniques in customer relationship management software

OriginalPaper

A novel scheme for employee churn problem using multi-attribute decision making approach and machine learning

OriginalPaper

Representing unstructured text semantics for reasoning purpose