Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

12. Participatory Approaches

verfasst von : Olivier Barreteau, Pieter Bots, Katherine Daniell, Michel Etienne, Pascal Perez, Cécile Barnaud, Didier Bazile, Nicolas Becu, Jean-Christophe Castella, William’s Daré, Guy Trebuil

Erschienen in: Simulating Social Complexity

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter aims to describe the diversity of participatory approaches in relation to social simulations, with a focus on the interactions between the tools and participants. We consider potential interactions at all stages of the modelling process: conceptual design, implementation, use and simulation outcome analysis. After reviewing and classifying existing approaches and techniques, we describe two case studies with a focus on the integration of various techniques. The first case study deals with fire hazard prevention in Southern France, and the second one with groundwater management on the atoll of Kiribati. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the advantages and limitations of participatory approaches.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel How Many Times Should One Run a Computational Simulation?
Nächstes Kapitel Combining Mathematical and Simulation Approaches to Understand the Dynamics of Computer Models
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
More details about the AtollGame can be found online at http://​cormas.​cirad.​fr/​en/​applica/​atollGame.​htm.
 
Literatur
Abel, N., Ross, H., & Walker, P. (1998). Mental models in rangeland research, communication and management. The Rangeland Journal, 20, 77–91.CrossRef
Akkermans, H. A. (1995). Developing a logistics strategy through participative business modelling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 100–112.CrossRef
Akkermans, H. A., & Vennix, J. A. M. (1997). Clients’ opinions on group model building: An exploratory study. System Dynamics Review, 13, 3–31.CrossRef
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216–224.
Barreteau, O. (2007). Modèles et processus de décision collective: entre compréhension et facilitation de la gestion concertée de la ressource en eau. HDR thesis, Paris Dauphine University, Paris.
Barreteau, O., & Bousquet, F. (1999). Jeux de rôles et validation de systèmes multi-agents. In M.-P. Gleizes & P. Marcenac (Eds.), Ingénierie des systèmes multi-agents, actes des 7èmes JFIADSMA (pp. 67–80). Paris: Hermès.
Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., & Attonaty, J.-M. (2001). Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: Method and teachings of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 4(2). http://​jasss.​soc.​surrey.​ac.​uk/​4/​2/​5.​html
Barreteau, O., Hare, M., Krywkow, J., & Boutet, A. (2005). Model designed through participatory processes: whose model is it? In N. Ferrand, P. Perez, & D. Batten (Eds.), Joint conference on multiagent modelling for environmental management, CABM-HEMA-SMAGET 2005, Bourg St Maurice – Les Arcs, France, 21–25 March, 2005.
Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., & Perez, P. (2007). Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction. Simulation & Gaming, 38(2), 185–194.CrossRef
Becu, N. (2006). Identification et modélisation des représentations des acteurs locaux pour la gestion des bassins versants. PhD thesis, Sciences de l'eau, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Becu, N., Barreteau, O., Perez, P., Saising, J., & Sungted, S. (2006). A methodology for identifying and formalizing farmers’ representations of watershed management: A case study from Northern Thailand. In F. Bousquet, G. Trebuil, & B. Hardy (Eds.), Companion modeling and multi-agent systems for integrated natural resource management in Asia (pp. 41–62). Los Baños: IRRI.
Bharwani, S. (2006). Understanding complex behavior and decision making using ethnographic knowledge elicitation tools (KnETs). Social Science Computer Review, 24, 78–105.CrossRef
Bousquet, F., Bakam, I., Proton, H., & Le Page, C. (1998). Cormas: common-pool resources and multi-agent systems. In A. Pasqual del Pobil, J. Mira, & M. Ali (Eds.), Tasks and methods in applied artificial intelligence. IEA/AIE 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence) (Vol. 1416, pp. 826–837). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., d’Aquino, P., Etienne, M., Boissau, S., Aubert, S., et al. (2002). Multi-agent systems and role games: An approach for ecosystem co-management. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent approaches (pp. 248–285). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., Mullon, C., & Weber, J. (1999). An environmental modelling approach: The use of multi-agent simulations. In F. Blasco & A. Weill (Eds.), Advances in environmental and ecological modelling (pp. 113–122). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bousquet, F., & Voinov, A. (Eds.). (2010). Thematic issue - Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1267–1488.
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2006). Economic experiments and the construction of markets. In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 163–189). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cardenas, J.-C., Stranlund, J., & Willis, C. (2000). Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Development, 28, 1719–1733.CrossRef
Cockes, D., & Ive, J. (1996). Mediation support for forest land allocation: The SIRO-MED system. Environmental Management, 20(1), 41–52.CrossRef
D’Aquino, P., Le Page, C., Bousquet, F., & Bah, A. (2003). Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: The SelfCormas Experiment in Senegal. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 6(3). http://​jasss.​soc.​surrey.​ac.​uk/​6/​3/​5.​html
Daniell, K. A., Ferrand, N., & Tsoukias, A. (2006). Investigating participatory modelling processes for group decision aiding in water planning and management. In S. Seifert & C. Weinhardt (Eds.),Proceedings of the international conference Group decision and negotiation (GDN) 2006, Karlsruhe, Germany, June 25–28 2006 (pp. 207–210). Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe.
Davidson, E. J. (1999). Joint application design (JAD) in practice. Journal of Systems and Software, 45, 215–223.CrossRef
DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589–609.CrossRef
Dewulf, A., Bouwen, R., & Tailleu, T. (2006). The multi-actor simulation ‘Podocarpus National Park’ as a tool for teaching and researching issue framing. In Proceedings of IACM 2006 Montreal meetings. http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​915943
Dray, A., Perez, P., Le Page, C., D’Aquino, P., & White, I. (2006). AtollGame: A companion modelling experience in the Pacific. In P. Perez & D. Batten (Eds.), Complex science for a complex world: Exploring human ecosystems with agents (pp. 255–280). Canberra: ANU E Press.
Driessen, P. P. J., Glasbergen, P., & Verdaas, C. (2001). Interactive policy making: A model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 322–337.CrossRefMATH
Drogoul, A., Vanbergue, D., & Meurisse, T. (2003). Multi-agent based simulation: Where are the agents? In J.S. Sichman, F. Bousquet, & P. Davidsson (Eds.), Multi-agent-based simulation II: third international workshop, MABS 2002, Bologna, Italy, July 15–16, 2002, revised papers (Lecture notes in computer science, 2581) (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer.
Dudley, R. G. (2003). Modeling the effects of a log export ban in Indonesia. System Dynamics Review, 20, 99–116.CrossRef
Duke, R. D., & Geurts, J. L. A. (2004). Policy games for strategic management. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
Étienne, M. (2006). Companion modelling: A tool for dialogue and concertation in biosphere reserves. In M. Bouamrane (Ed.), Biodiversity and stakeholders: Concertation itineraries, biosphere reserves - Technical notes 1 (pp. 44–52). Paris: UNESCO.
Étienne, M. (Ed.). (2011). Companion modeling: A participatory approach to support sustainable development. Versailles: QUAE.
Eversole, R. (2003). Managing the pitfalls of participatory development: Some insight from Australia. World Development, 31, 781–795.CrossRef
Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoti, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 482–512.CrossRef
Friedman, D., & Sunder, S. (1994). Experimental methods, a primer for economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefMATH
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & Ravetz, J. R. (1999). Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity, Environmental issues series (Vol. 9). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the social scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Green, K. C. (2002). Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role-playing and unaided judgment. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 321–344.CrossRef
Guyot, P. (2006). Simulations multi-agents participatives. PhD thesis, Informatique, Université Paris VI, Paris.
Hamel, A., & Pinson, S. (2005). Conception participative de simulations multi-agents basée sur une approche d’analyse multi-acteurs. In A. Drogoul & E. Ramat (Eds.), Systèmes multi-agents: Vers la conception de systèmes artificiels socio-mimétiques (JFSMA 2005) (pp. 1–15). Paris: Hermès.
Hanneman, R. A. (1995). Simulation modeling and theoretical analysis in sociology. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 457–462.CrossRef
Henriksen, H.J., Rasmussen, P., Brandt, G., von Bülow, D., & Jensen, F.V. (2004). Engaging stakeholders in construction and validation of Bayesian belief networks for groundwater protection. In Proceeding of IFAC workshop on modelling and control for participatory planning and managing water systems, September 29–October 1, 2004, Venice, Italy.
Henry, C. (1974). Investment decisions under uncertainty: The irreversibility effect. The American Economic Review, 64, 1006–1012.
Hochman, Z., Hearnshaw, H., Barlow, R., Ayres, J. F., & Pearson, C. J. (1995). X-breed: A multiple domain knowledge based system integrated through a blackboard architecture. Agricultural Systems, 48, 243–270.CrossRef
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort. Public Administration Review, 64, 55–65.CrossRef
Johannessen, J.-A., Olaisen, J., & Olsen, B. (2001). Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: The importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it. International Journal of Information Management, 21, 3–20.CrossRef
Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for participatory simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 347–359.CrossRef
Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22, 1–16.CrossRef
Landry, M., Banville, C., & Oral, M. (1996). Model legitimation in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 443–457.CrossRefMATH
Le Bars, M., Le Grusse, P., Allaya, M., Attonaty, J.-M., & Mahjoubi, R. (2004). NECC: Un jeu de simulation pour l’aide à la décision collective; Application à une région méditerranéenne virtuelle. In Projet INCO-WADEMED, Séminaire Modernisation de l’Agriculture Irriguée, Rabat, Morocco.
Loucks, D. P., Kindler, J., & Fedra, K. (1985). Interactive water resources modeling and model use: An overview. Water Resources Research, 21, 95–102.CrossRef
Maier, F. H., & Grössler, A. (2000). What are we talking about? A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning. System Dynamics Review, 16, 135–148.CrossRef
Manson, S. M. (2002). Validation and verification of multi-agent systems. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent approaches (pp. 63–74). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2003). How to construct and share a meaning for social interactions? In Conventions et Institutions: Approfondissements théoriques et Contributions au Débat Politique, Paris.
Martin, L., Magnuszewski, P., Sendzimir, J., Rydzak, F., Krolikowska, K., Komorowski, H., et al. (2007). Microworld gaming of a local agricultural production chain in Poland. Simulation and Gaming, 38(2), 211–232.CrossRef
Mayer, I. S., van Bueren, E. M., Bots, P. W. G., van der Voort, H. G., & Seijdel, R. R. (2005). Collaborative decision-making for sustainable urban renewal projects: A simulation-gaming approach. Environment and Planning B – Planning & Design, 32, 403–423.CrossRef
McKinnon, J. (2005). Mobile interactive GIS: Bringing indigenous knowledge and scientific information together; a narrative account. In A. Neef (Ed.), Participatory approaches for sustainable land use in Southeast Asia (pp. 217–231). White Lotus: Bangkok.
Mermet, L. (1993). Une méthode de prospective: Les exercices de simulation de politiques. Nature Sciences Sociétés, 1, 34–46.CrossRef
Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12, 437–456.CrossRef
Molin, E. (2005). A causal analysis of hydrogen acceptance. Transportation Research Records, 1941, 115–121.CrossRef
Moss, S., Downing, T., & Rouchier, J. (2000). Demonstrating the role of stakeholder participation: An agent based social simulation model of water demand policy and response (CPM Report, 00-76). Manchester: Centre for Policy Modelling, Manchester Metropolitan University. http://​cfpm.​org/​cpmrep76.​html
Mostert, E. (2006). Participation for sustainable water management. In C. Giupponi, A. J. Jakeman, D. Karssenberg, & M. P. Hare (Eds.), Sustainable management of water resources(pp. 153–176). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Nancarrow, B. (2005). When the modeller meets the social scientist or vice-versa. In A. Zerger & R. M. Argent (Eds.), MODSIM 2005 international congress on modelling and simulation (pp. 38–44). Melbourne, Australia: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., & Hare, M. (2004). Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 193–206.CrossRef
Pateman, C. (1990). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perez, P., Dray, A., White, I., Le Page, C., & Falkland, T. (2003). AtollScape: Simulating freshwater management in Pacific atolls, spatial processes and time dependence issues. In: D. Post (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress on modelling and simulation, Townsville, Australia, July 14–17 2003 (Vol. 4, pp. 514–518). Townsville: MODSIM.
Perez, P., Dray, A., Le Page, C., D'Aquino, P., & White, I. (2004). Lagoon, agents and kava: A companion modelling experience in the Pacific. In C. van Dijkum, J. Blasius & C. Durand (Eds.), Recent developments and applications in social research methodology: Proceedings of RC33 sixth international conference on social science methodology, Amsterdam 2004 (p. 282). Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Reitsma, R., Zigurs, I., Lewis, C., Wilson, V., & Sloane, A. (1996). Experiment with simulation models in water-resources negotiations. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 122, 64–70.CrossRef
Richard, A., & Barreteau, O. (2006). Concert’eau: un outil de sociologie expérimentale pour l'étude de dispositifs de gestion locale et concertée de l'eau. In Proceedoing of 2e Congrès de l'Association Française de Sociologie, Bordeaux, 5–8 Septembre, 2006.
Richard, A., & Trometter, M. (2001). Les caractéristiques d’une décision séquentielle: Effet irréversibilité et endogénéisation de l’environnement. Revue Economique, 52, 739–752.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef
Robinson, J. B. (1991). Modelling the interactions between human and natural systems. International Social Sciences Journal, 130, 629–647.
Rocha, E. M. (1997). A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17, 31–44.CrossRef
Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Vennix, J. A. M., & van Mullekorn, T. (2002). Group model building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review, 18, 5–45.CrossRef
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 512–556.CrossRef
Ryan, T. (2000). The role of simulation gaming in policy making. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17, 359–364.CrossRef
Schelling, T. C. (1961). Experimental games and bargaining theory. World Politics, 14, 47–68.CrossRef
Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shakun, M. E. (1996). Modeling and supporting task-oriented group processes: Purposeful complex adaptive systems and evolutionary systems design. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5, 305–317.CrossRef
Simon, H. (1977). The new science of management decision. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berleley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRef
Sterman, J. D. (1992). Teaching takes off – Flight simulators for management education. OR/MS Today, 35, 40–44.
Ticehurst, J., Rissik, D., Letcher, R. A., Newham, L. T. H., & Jakeman, A. J. (2005). Development of decision support tools to assess the sustainability of coastal lakes. In A. Zerger & R.M. Argent (Eds.), MODSIM 2005 international congress on modelling and simulation (pp. 2414–2420). Melbourne: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. http://​www.​mssanz.​org.​au/​modsim05/​papers/​ticehurst.​pdf
Toth, F. L. (1988). Policy exercises: Objectives and design elements. Simulation and Games, 19, 235–255.CrossRef
Van Asselt, M. B. A., Mellors, J., Rijkens-Klomp, N., Greeuw, S. C. H., Molendijk, K. G. P., Beers, P. J., et al. (2001). Building blocks for participation in integrated assessment: A review of participatory methods. Maastricht: ICIS.
van Daalen, C. E., & Bots, P. W. G. (2006). Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management. In Proceeding of the workshop on formalised and non-formalised methods in resource management - knowledge and learning in participatory processes, 21–22 September, 2006, Osnabrück, Germany. http://​www.​partizipa.​uni-osnabrueck.​de/​wissAbschluss.​html
van Daalen, C. E., Thissen, W. A. H., & Berk, M. M. (1998). The Delft process: Experiences with a dialogue between policy makers and global modellers. In J. Alcamo, R. Leemans, & E. Kreileman (Eds.), Global change scenarios of the 21st century: Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model (pp. 267–285). London: Elsevier.
Van den Belt, M. (2004). Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building, facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester: Wiley.
Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 443–463.CrossRef
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000). A cognitive three-process model of computer mediated group interaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 431–456.CrossRef
Wood, J., & Silver, D. (1995). Joint application development. New York: Wiley.
Metadaten
Titel
Participatory Approaches
verfasst von
Olivier Barreteau
Pieter Bots
Katherine Daniell
Michel Etienne
Pascal Perez
Cécile Barnaud
Didier Bazile
Nicolas Becu
Jean-Christophe Castella
William’s Daré
Guy Trebuil
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Simulating Social Complexity

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66947-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-66948-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66948-9_12

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise