Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Innovation, Catch-Up, and Sustainable Development: Introduction to the Proceedings from the 2018 ISS Conference Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Patent, Utility Model, and Economic Growth

verfasst von : Gokay Canberk Bulus, Ibrahim Bakirtas

Erschienen in: Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the impact of patent rights and utility model on both economic growth and firm performance. The research hypothesis is tested using the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) technique. Empirical findings imply that the impact of intellectual property rights protection on economic growth depends upon the level of development. While patent protection positively effect on economic growth for developed countries, utility model protection positively effect on economic growth for developing countries. Using Turkish firm-level data as a case study, analysis results show that patent protection and utility model do not contribute to firm performance in Turkey.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Embeddedness and local patterns of innovation: evidence from Chinese prefectural cities
Nächstes Kapitel Schumpeterian economic dynamics of greening: propagation of green eco-platforms
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
To avoid cluttering up the derivation of the growth equation, Kim et al. (2012) suppress depreciation rates of capital (δ) and technological knowledge (A) in the equations.
 
2
The country list is given in Appendix.
 
3
GDP and related data are in constant 2010 international purchasing power parity dollars.
 
Literatur
Adams, S. (2008). Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(5), 725–735.CrossRef
Adams, S. (2010). Intellectual property rights, investment climate and FDI in developing countries. International Business Research, 3(3), 201–209.CrossRef
Albert, H., & Ping, I. (2013). Patent rights and economic growth: Evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(3), 675–698.CrossRef
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRef
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRef
Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley.
Bond, R. S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141–162.CrossRef
Bosworth, R., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323–337.CrossRef
Branstetter, G. L., Fisman, R., & Foley, F. C. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321–349.
Buch, M. C., Döpke, J., & Strotmann, H. (2009). Does export openness increase firm-level output volatility? The World Economy, 32(4), 531–551.CrossRef
Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., & Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 363–389.CrossRef
Chan, M. S., & Tang, C. T. (2017). Foreign direct investment inflows and intellectual property rights: Empirical evidence from different income groups. Global Economic Review, 46(4), 1–30.CrossRef
Cho, K., Kim, C., & Shin, J. (2015). Differential Effects of intellectual property rights on innovation and economic performance: A cross-industry investigation. Science and Public Policy, 42(6), 827–840.
Drahos, P. (1998). The universality of intellectual property rights: Origins and development. Intellectual Property and Human Rights, 1–36.
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40(3-4), 251–278.CrossRef
Eom, B. Y., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research Policy, 39(5), 625–639.CrossRef
Evan, T., Vazarova, P., & Bolotov, I. (2018). Some effects of intellectual property protection on national economies: Theoretical and econometric study. Prague Economic Papers, 27(1), 73–91.CrossRef
Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700–719.CrossRef
Ginarte, J. C., & Park, W. G. (1997). Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy, 26, 283–301.CrossRef
Gold, E. R., Shadeed, E., & Morin, J. (2019). Does intellectual property lead to economic growth? Insights from a novel IP dataset. Regulation & Governance, 13, 107–124.CrossRef
Gould, M. D., & Gruben, C. W. (1996). The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323–350.CrossRef
Helpman, E. (1993). Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica, 61(6), 1247–1280.CrossRef
Hu, A., & Png, I. (2013). Patent rights and economic growth: Evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(3), 675–698.CrossRef
Hu, J., Chen, H., & Tsai, F. (2014). Exploring the endogenous relationship between intellectual property rights protection and economic growth. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 35(3), 255–274.CrossRef
Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: A unified empirical investigation. World Development, 46, 66–78.CrossRef
Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127–1170.CrossRef
Javorcik, S. B. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62.CrossRef
Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics. MIT Press.
Kim, K. Y., Lee, K., Park, W. G., & Choo, K. (2012). Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development. Research Policy, 41(2), 359–375.CrossRef
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Protecting intellectual property rights: Are small firms handicapped? The Journal of Law & Economics, 47(1), 45–74.CrossRef
Lee, K. (2016). Economic catch-up and technological leapfrogging: Path to development and macroeconomic stability in Korea. Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Lee, M., Alba, D. J., & Park, D. (2018). Intellectual property rights, informal economy, and FDI into developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 40, 1067–1081.CrossRef
Liu, W. (2016). Intellectual property rights, FDI, R&D and economic growth: A cross-country empirical analysis. The World Economy, 39(7), 983–1004.CrossRef
Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D., & Weil, N. D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.CrossRef
Maskus, E. K. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Institute for International Economics.
Maskus, E. K., & McDaniel, C. (1998). Impacts of the Japanese patent system on productivity growth. Japan and the World Economy, 11(4), 557–574.CrossRef
Mohtadi, H., & Ruediger, S. (2008). Intellectual property rights and growth: Is there a threshold effect? International Economic Journal, 28(1), 1–42.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Park, W. (2005). Do intellectual property rights stimulate R&D and productivity growth? Evidence from cross-national and manufacturing industries data. In J. Putnam (Ed.), Intellectual property rights and innovation in the knowledge-based economy (pp. 1–51). University of Calgary Press.
Raizada, G., & Dhillon, S. S. (2017). Impact of intellectual property rights on international trade: Evidence from India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22(4), 200–210.
Reichman, H. J., & Samuelson, P. (1997). Intellectual property rights in data. Hein Online, 52–166.
Schneider, H. P. (2005). International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 529–547.CrossRef
Sesay, B., Yulin, Z., & Wang, F. (2018). Does the national innovation system spur economic growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa economies? Evidence from panel data. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Seyeum, B. (1996). The impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 50–59.CrossRef
Sudsawasd, S., & Chaisrisawatsuk, S. (2014). Foreign direct investment, intellectual property rights, and productivity growth. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 5(3), 1–19.CrossRef
Zhang, H., & Yang, X. (2016). Intellectual property rights protection and export quality. International Journal of Development Issues, 15(2), 1–12.CrossRef
Zhao, M. (2006). Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8), 1185–1189.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patent, Utility Model, and Economic Growth
verfasst von
Gokay Canberk Bulus
Ibrahim Bakirtas
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Innovation, Catch-up and Sustainable Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84930-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-84931-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84931-3_13

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise