nach oben

Erschienen in:

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. Patients’ Preferences

verfasst von : A. Mühlbacher, Susanne Bethge

Erschienen in: Handbook Integrated Care

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The presented studies reviewed in this chapter support efforts for increased consideration of patient benefit as an essential quality criterion in the assessment of integrated care. Especially where it is difficult to clearly differentiate between services in terms of medical and financial aspects, comprehensive information on patient benefits (and to that of communities as well) can be very useful in prioritizing approaches to care and treatment. Studies of this type can thus help to stimulate fresh discussion and lead to the formulation of increasingly person-centred care concepts in the long term.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Values in Integrated Care

Nächstes Kapitel Integrating Health- and Social Care Systems

Adams, K., & Corrigan, J. (2003). Priority areas for national action: Transforming health care quality. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, The National Academies Press.

Antonelli, R., McAllister, J., & Popp, J. (2009). Making care coordination a critical component of the pediatric health system: A multidisciplinary framework. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.

Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bethge, S., Mühlbacher, A., & Amelung, V. (2015, November). The importance of the communicator for an integrated care program—A comparative preference analysis with Discrete Choice Experiments. In International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 18th Annual European Congress, Milan, Italy.

Bridges, J., Hauber, A., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L., Regier, D., et al. (2011). Conjoint analysis applications in health—A checklist: A Report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value in Health, 14(4), 403–413.CrossRef

Bryan, S., & Parry, D. (2002). Structural reliability of conjoint measurement in health care: An empirical investigation. Applied Economics, 34(5), 561–568.CrossRef

Bryan, S., Gold, L., Sheldon, R., & Buxton, M. (2000). Preference measurement using conjoint methods: An empirical investigation of reliability. Health Economics, 9(5), 385–395.CrossRef

Campbell, S. M., Roland, M. O., & Buetow, S. A. (2000). Defining quality of care. Social Science and Medicine, 51(11), 1611–1625.CrossRef

Chapple, A., Campbell, S., Rogers, A., & Roland, M. (2002). Users’ understanding of medical knowledge in general practice. Social Science and Medicine, 54(8), 1215–1224.CrossRef

Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Hole, A. R., Mead, N., McDonald, R., Whalley, D., Bower, P., & Roland, M. (2008). What patients want from primary care consultations: A discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(2), 107–115.CrossRef

Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014). Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Pharmaco Economics, 32(9), 883–902.CrossRef

Coulter, A. (2005). What do patients and the public want from primary care? BMJ, 331(7526), 1199–1201.CrossRef

Criscione, T., Walsh, K. K., & Kastner, T. A. (1995). An evaluation of care coordination in controlling inpatient hospital utilization of people with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 33(6), 364–373.

Danner, M., Hummel, J. M., Volz, F., Van Manen, J. G., Wiegard, B., Dintsios, C. M., et al. (2011). Integrating patients’ views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 27(04), 369–375.

Davis, K., Schoenbaum, S. C., & Audet, A. M. (2005). A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(10), 953–957.CrossRef

de Bekker Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2010). Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Economics, 21(2), 145–172.CrossRef

Ferrer, L. (2015). Engaging patients, carers and communities for the provision of coordinated/ integrated health services. Working paper, WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen.

Fung, C. H., Elliott, M. N., Hays, R. D., Kahn, K. L., Kanouse, D. E., McGlynn, E. A., et al. (2005). Patients’ preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician. Health Services Research, 40(4), 957–977.CrossRef

Gerard, K., & Lattimer, V. (2005). Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: A discrete choice experiment. Family Practice, 22(1), 28–36.CrossRef

Hauber, A. B. (2009). Healthy-years equivalent: Wounded but not yet dead. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 9(3), 265–270.CrossRef

Henke, K.-D., Mackenthun, B., & Schrey€ogg, J. (2002). Gesundheitsmarkt Berlin: Perspektiven fu€r Wachstum und Bescha€ftigung. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.

Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Johnson, F. R., Hauber, A. B., & Ozdemir, S. (2009). Using conjoint analysis to estimate healthy-year equivalents for acute conditions: An application to vasomotor symptoms. Value in Health, 12(1), 146–152.

Johnson, F. R., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D. A., et al. (2012). Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments. Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Task Force.

Johnson, F. R., Ozdemir, S., Mansfield, C., Hass, S., Miller, D. W., Siegel, C. A., & Sands, B. E. (2007). Crohn’s disease patients’ risk-benefit preferences: Serious adverse event risks versus treatment efficacy. Gastroenterology, 133(3), 769–779.CrossRef

Juhnke, C., & Mühlbacher, A. (2013). Patient-centredness in integrated healthcare delivery systems-needs, expectations and priorities for organised healthcare systems. International Journal of Integrated Care, 13, 1–14.CrossRef

Kleinman, L., McIntosh, E., Ryan, M., Schmier, J., Crawley, J., Locke, G. R., III., & De Lissovoy, G. (2002). Willingness to pay for complete symptom relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(12), 1361–1366.CrossRef

Laine, C., & Davidoff, F. (1996). Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA, 275(2), 152–156.CrossRef

Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Indianapolis, In: Bobbs-Merrill.

Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.

Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user’s guide. PharmacoEconomics, 26(8), 661–678.CrossRef

Lancsar, E., Louviere, J., & Flynn, T. (2007). Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Social Science and Medicine, 64(8), 1738–1753.CrossRef

Liptak, G. S., Burns, C. M., Davidson, P. W., & McAnarney, E. R. (1998). Effects of providing comprehensive ambulatory services to children with chronic conditions. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152(10), 1003–1008.CrossRef

Longo, M. F., Cohen, D. R., Hood, K., Edwards, A., Robling, M., Elwyn, G., & Russell, I. T. (2006). Involving patients in primary care consultations: Assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. The British Journal of General Practice, 56(522), 35–42.

Markham, F. W., Diamond, J. J., & Hermansen, C. L. (1999). The use of conjoint analysis to study patient satisfaction. Evaluation and The Health Professions, 22(3), 371–378.CrossRef

McAllister, J. W., Presler, E., & Cooley, W. C. (2007). Practice-based care coordination: A medical home essential. Pediatrics, 120(3), e723–e733.CrossRef

McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Morgan, A., Shackley, P., Pickin, M., & Brazier, J. (2000). Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5(4), 214–218.CrossRef

Mühlbacher, A. C., & Bethge, S. (2014). Patients’ preferences: A discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Journal of Health Economics, 6, 657–670.

Mühlbacher, A., & Bethge, S. (2015). Reduce mortality risk above all else: A discrete-choice experiment in acute coronary syndrome patients. PharmacoEconomics, 33(1), 71–81.CrossRef

Mühlbacher, A., Bethge, S., & Eble, S. (2015). Pra¨ferenzen für Versorgungsnetzwerke: Eigenschaften von integrierten Versorgungsprogrammen und deren Einfluss auf den Patientennutzen. Das Gesundheitswesen, 77(5), 340–350.

Mühlbacher, A. C., Bethge, S., Reed, S. D., & Schulman, K. A. (2015). Patient preferences for features of health care delivery systems: A discrete-choice experiment. Health Services Research, 51, 704–727.CrossRef

Mühlbacher, A., Bethge, S., & Tockhorn, A. (2013). Pra¨ferenzmessung im Gesundheitswesen: Grundlagen von Discrete-Choice-Experimenten. Gesundheitso€konomie & Qualita€tsmanagement, 18(4), 159–172.

Mühlbacher, A., Bridges, J. F. P., Bethge, S., Dintsios, C. M., Schwalm, A., Gerber-Grote, A., & Nübling, M. (2016). Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: A discrete choice experiment. European Journal of Health Economics.

Mühlbacher, A. C., Junker, U., Juhnke, C., Stemmler, E., Kohlmann, T., Leverkus, F., & Nubling, M. (2014). Chronic pain patients’ treatment preferences: A discrete-choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics, 16, 613–628.CrossRef

Mühlbacher, A., Lincke, H., & Nübling, M. (2008). Evaluating patients’ preferences for multiple myeloma therapy, a discrete choice experiment. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 5, PMC2736517.

Mühlbacher, A., Nübling, M., Rudolph, I., & Linke, H. J. (2009). Analysis of patient preferences in the drug treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Services Research.

Mulley, A., Trimble, C., & Elwyn, G. (2012). Patients’ preferences matter—Stop the silent misdiagnosis. London: The King’s Fund.CrossRef

National Quality Forum. (2006, August). National Quality Forum.

Ostermann, J., Njau, B., Mtuy, T., Brown, D. S., Muhlbacher, A., & Thielman, N. (2015). One size does not fit all: HIV testing preferences differ among high-risk groups in Northern Tanzania. AIDS Care, 27, 595–603.CrossRef

Peek, C. J. (2009). Integrating care for persons, not only diseases. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16(1), 13–20.CrossRef

Porter, M. E., & Teisberg, E. O. (2006). Redefining health care: Creating value-based competition on results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Rao, M., Clarke, A., Sanderson, C., & Hammersley, R. (2006). Patients’ own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: Cross sectional study. BMJ, 333(7557), 19.CrossRef

Rodriguez, H., von Glahn, T., Rogers, W., & Gelb Safran, D. (2009). Organizational and market influences on physician performance on patient experience measures. Health Services Research, 44, 880–901.CrossRef

Rosenbach, M., & Young, C. (2000). Care coordination and medicaid managed care: Emerging issues for states and managed care organizations. Spectrum, 73(4), 1–5.

Ryan, M., & Farrar, S. (2000). Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ, 320(7248), 1530–1533.CrossRef

Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2003). Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: Current practice and future research reflections. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2(1), 55–64.

Ryan, M., & Hughes, J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to assess women’s preferences for miscarriage management. Health Economics, 6(3), 261–273.CrossRef

Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2008). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Ryan, M., Bate, A., Eastmond, C. J., & Ludbrook, A. (2001). Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Quality in Health Care, 10(Suppl 1), i55–i60.CrossRef

Ryan, M., Scott, D. A., Reeves, C., Bate, A., van Teijlingen, E. R., Russell, E. M., et al. (2001). Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: A systematic review of techniques. Health Technology Assessment, 5(5), 1–186.CrossRef

Scott, A., & Vick, S. (1999). Patients, doctors and contracts: An application of principal-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46(2), 111–134.CrossRef

Scott, A., Watson, M. S., & Ross, S. (2003). Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 803–814.CrossRef

Sevin, C., Moore, G., Shepherd, J., Jacobs, T., & Hupke, C. (2009). Transforming care teams to provide the best possible patient-centered, collaborative care. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 32(1), 24–31.CrossRef

Tarzian, A. J., & Silverman, H. J. (2002). Care coordination and utilization review: Clinical case managers’ perceptions of dual role obligations. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 13(3), 216–229.CrossRef

Telser, H., Becker, K., & Zweifel, P. (2008). Validity and reliability of willingness-to-pay estimates: Evidence from two overlapping discrete-choice-experiments. The Patient, Patient-Centered Outcome Research, 1, 283–293.CrossRef

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2014). The patient preference initiative: Incorporating patient preference information into the medical device regulatory processes. Public Workshop, September 18–19, 2013. FDA White Oak Campus, Silver Spring, MD.

Ubach, C., Scott, A., French, F., Awramenko, M., & Needham, G. (2003). What do hospital consultants value about their jobs? A discrete choice experiment. BMJ, 326(7404), 1432.

Vick, S., & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17(5), 587–605.

Wensing, M., Jung, H. P., Mainz, J., Olesen, F., & Grol, R. (1998). A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Social Science and Medicine, 47(10), 1573–1588.

Wise, P., Huffman, L., & Brat, G. (2007). A critical analysis of care coordination strategies for children with special health care needs. Technical Review No. 14. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 07-0054.

Wismar, M., & Busse, R. (2002). Outcome-related health targets-political strategies for better health outcomes—A conceptual and comparative study (part 2). Health Policy, 59(3), 223–242.CrossRef

World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services. Interim report. WHO reference number: WHO/HIS/SDS/2015.6.

Titel: Patients’ Preferences
verfasst von: A. Mühlbacher
Susanne Bethge
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Handbook Integrated Care
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69261-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-69262-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9_5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Premium Partner