Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Communication in the Age of Twitter: The Nature of Online Deliberation Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. #PeoplesVoteMarch or #LosersVoteMarch? Tracing the Collective Identity of a Post-Brexit Referendum Movement on Twitter

verfasst von : Photini Vrikki

Erschienen in: Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines how, in a time of social and political upheaval, Twitter allows for the creation of a collective identity. Using Narrative Thematic Analysis to analyze responses to the 2018 People’s Vote March, this chapter seeks to understand how Twitter users collaborated to create meanings about the march, the Brexit referendum, and the future of the UK. Results show that Twitter’s affordances for cognitive and affective networking are widely used to create a sense of community and shared identity. However, these same affordances also create a space for an attack on this collective identity through abusive discourses. This reveals that the openness and connectivity that allows people to unite also opens them up to critique intended to destabilize their shared understandings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Political Candidates’ Discussions on Twitter During Election Season: A Network Approach
Nächstes Kapitel Civic Debate and Self-Care: Black Women’s Community Care Online
Fußnoten
1
Here it is important to note that this is not a complete archive of all the tweets tweeted under the hashtag but a sample anywhere from 1% of the tweets to over 40% of the complete hashtag dataset. By using the Twitter API option, which is the only free option available from Twitter, the dataset provided was limited, but still significant.
 
2
The dataset is fully available on request from the author.
 
Literatur
Ahmed, S. (2010). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977.CrossRef
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.CrossRef
Berry, C., Kim, S. Y., & Spigel, L. (Eds.). (2010). Electronic elsewheres: Media, technology, and the experience of social space. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2015). Is Habermas on Twitter?: Social media and the public sphere. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 56–73). New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011, July). Political polarization on twitter. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.CrossRef
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef
Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1–14.
Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871.CrossRef
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Discovery of substantive theory: A basic strategy underlying qualitative research. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(6), 5–12.
Kitchin, H. A. (2008). Research ethics and the Internet: Negotiating Canada’s Tri-Council policy statement. Fernwood Publishing Co., Ltd.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Kavada, A. (2012). Engagement, bonding, and identity across multiple platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace. MediaKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 28(52), 21.
Kumar, K. (2003). The making of English national identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kumar, K. (2015). The idea of Englishness: English culture, national identity and social thought. London: Routledge.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRef
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomad of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. Social Movements and Culture, 4, 41–63.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(9), 708–713.CrossRef
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political (thinking in action). New York: Routledge.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. London: Verso.
Orwell, G. (1941). England your England. London: Horizon Books.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Polletta, F. (1998). ‘It was like a fever’: Narrative and identity in social protest. Social Problems, 45, 137–159.CrossRef
Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Schlesinger, A., Chandrasekharan, E., Masden, C. A., Bruckman, A. S., Edwards, W. K., & Grinter, R. E. (2017, May). Situated anonymity: Impacts of anonymity, ephemerality, and hyper-locality on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 6912–6924). ACM.
Snow, D. A. (2001). Collective identity. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. London: Elsevier Sci.
Stone, D. (2003). Policy paradox. New York: Norton.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and politics (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.CrossRef
Vrikki, P. (2017). The story of Occupy Wall Street: Narratives of politics and identity on Twitter. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) King’s College London, UK.
Xu, B., Chang, P., Welker, C. L., Bazarova, N. N., & Cosley, D. (2016, February). Automatic archiving versus default deletion: what Snapchat tells us about ephemerality in design. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1662–1675). ACM.
Metadaten
Titel
#PeoplesVoteMarch or #LosersVoteMarch? Tracing the Collective Identity of a Post-Brexit Referendum Movement on Twitter
verfasst von
Photini Vrikki
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Buch
Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41420-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-41421-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_4