Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing 2/2014

01.05.2014 | Research Report

Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions

verfasst von: Bettina Gathmann, Mirko Pawlikowski, Tobias Schöler, Matthias Brand

Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that executive functions are crucial for advantageous decision making under risk and that therefore decision making is disrupted when working memory capacity is demanded while working on a decision task. While some studies also showed that emotions can affect decision making under risk, it is unclear how affective processing and executive functions predict decision-making performance in interaction. The current experimental study used a between-subjects design to examine whether affective pictures (positive and negative pictures compared to neutral pictures), included in a parallel executive task (working memory 2-back task), have an impact on decision making under risk as assessed by the Game of Dice Task (GDT). Moreover, the performance GDT plus 2-back task was compared to the performance in the GDT without any additional task (GDT solely). The results show that the performance in the GDT differed between groups (positive, negative, neutral, and GDT solely). The groups with affective pictures, especially those with positive pictures in the 2-back task, showed more disadvantageous decisions in the GDT than the groups with neutral pictures and the group performing the GDT without any additional task. However, executive functions moderated the effect of the affective pictures. Regardless of affective influence, subjects with good executive functions performed advantageously in the GDT. These findings support the assumption that executive functions and emotional processing interact in predicting decision making under risk.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Brand M (2008) Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions. J Neuropsychol 2:431–443. doi:10.1348/174866407X220607 PubMedCrossRef Brand M (2008) Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions. J Neuropsychol 2:431–443. doi:10.​1348/​174866407X220607​ PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brand M, Fujiwara E, Borsutzky S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ (2005) Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology 19:267–277. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267 PubMedCrossRef Brand M, Fujiwara E, Borsutzky S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ (2005) Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology 19:267–277. doi:10.​1037/​0894-4105.​19.​3.​267 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Markowitsch HJ (2009) Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:984–998. doi:10.1080/13803390902776860 PubMedCrossRef Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Markowitsch HJ (2009) Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:984–998. doi:10.​1080/​1380339090277686​0 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J, Cohen P, Aiken LS, West SG (2003) Applied multiple regression, correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London Cohen J, Cohen P, Aiken LS, West SG (2003) Applied multiple regression, correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
Zurück zum Zitat Dijker AJ, Koomen W (1996) Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time pressure. Eur J Soc Psychol 26:61–74. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199601)26:1<61::aid-ejsp737>3.0.co;2-#CrossRef Dijker AJ, Koomen W (1996) Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time pressure. Eur J Soc Psychol 26:61–74. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199601)26:1<61::aid-ejsp737>3.0.co;2-#CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Euteneuer F, Schaefer F, Stuermer R, Boucsein W, Timmermann L, Barbe MT, Ebersbach G, Otto J, Kessler J, Kalbe E (2009) Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia 47:2882–2890. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.014 PubMedCrossRef Euteneuer F, Schaefer F, Stuermer R, Boucsein W, Timmermann L, Barbe MT, Ebersbach G, Otto J, Kessler J, Kalbe E (2009) Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study. Neuropsychologia 47:2882–2890. doi:10.​1016/​j.​neuropsychologia​.​2009.​06.​014 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Mak 13:1–17CrossRef Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM (2000) The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Mak 13:1–17CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fond G, Bayard S, Capdevielle D, Del-Monte J, Mimoun N, Macgregor A, Boulenger J-P, Gely-Nargeot M-C, Raffard S (2012) A further evaluation of decision-making under risk and under ambiguity in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 263:249–257. doi:10.1007/s00406-012-0330-y PubMedCrossRef Fond G, Bayard S, Capdevielle D, Del-Monte J, Mimoun N, Macgregor A, Boulenger J-P, Gely-Nargeot M-C, Raffard S (2012) A further evaluation of decision-making under risk and under ambiguity in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 263:249–257. doi:10.​1007/​s00406-012-0330-y PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, Pogarell O, Kirsch V, Palm U, Karch S, Möller HJ, Nitsche MA, Mulert C (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55:644–657. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.004 PubMedCrossRef Keeser D, Padberg F, Reisinger E, Pogarell O, Kirsch V, Palm U, Karch S, Möller HJ, Nitsche MA, Mulert C (2011) Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 55:644–657. doi:10.​1016/​j.​neuroimage.​2010.​12.​004 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Labudda K, Woermann FG, Mertens M, Pohlmann-Eden B, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M (2008) Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 187:641–650. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1332-x PubMedCrossRef Labudda K, Woermann FG, Mertens M, Pohlmann-Eden B, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M (2008) Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 187:641–650. doi:10.​1007/​s00221-008-1332-x PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2008) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainsville Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2008) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainsville
Zurück zum Zitat Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW (2004) Neuropsychological assessment, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12:313–324PubMedCrossRef Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12:313–324PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schiebener J, Zamarian L, Delazer M, Brand M (2011) Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:1025–1039. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.595702 PubMedCrossRef Schiebener J, Zamarian L, Delazer M, Brand M (2011) Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33:1025–1039. doi:10.​1080/​13803395.​2011.​595702 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schiebener J, Wegmann E, Pawlikowski M, Brand M (2012) Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cogn Process 13:321–332. doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0522-4 PubMedCrossRef Schiebener J, Wegmann E, Pawlikowski M, Brand M (2012) Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cogn Process 13:321–332. doi:10.​1007/​s10339-012-0522-4 PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Spies K, Hesse F, Hummitzsch C (1996) Mood and capacity in Baddeley’s model of human memory. Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol [J Psychol J Appl Psychol] 204:367–381 Spies K, Hesse F, Hummitzsch C (1996) Mood and capacity in Baddeley’s model of human memory. Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol [J Psychol J Appl Psychol] 204:367–381
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Metadaten
Titel
Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions
verfasst von
Bettina Gathmann
Mirko Pawlikowski
Tobias Schöler
Matthias Brand
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cognitive Processing / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1612-4782
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-4790
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0584-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Cognitive Processing 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt