Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Physically Unclonable Functions: A Study on the State of the Art and Future Research Directions

verfasst von : Roel Maes, Ingrid Verbauwhede

Erschienen in: Towards Hardware-Intrinsic Security

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The idea of using intrinsic random physical features to identify objects, systems, and people is not new. Fingerprint identification of humans dates at least back to the nineteenth century [21] and led to the field of biometrics. In the 1980s and 1990s of the twentieth century, random patterns in paper and optical tokens were used for unique identification of currency notes and strategic arms [2, 8, 53]. A formalization of this concept was introduced in the very beginning of the twenty-first century, first as physical one-way functions [41, 42], physical random functions [13], and finally as physical(ly) unclonable functions or PUFs.1 In the years following this introduction, an increasing number of new types of PUFs were proposed, with a tendency toward more integrated constructions. The practical relevance of PUFs for security applications was recognized from the start, with a special focus on the promising properties of physical unclonability and tamper evidence.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Hardware Intrinsic Security from Physically Unclonable Functions
Fußnoten
1
Note that there is a slight semantical difference between physical and physically unclonable functions. Further on in this work, we argue why the term physically unclonable is more fitting. For the remainder of this text, we will hence speak of PUFs as physically unclonable functions.
 
2
Whenever not explicitly mentioned, a fixed environment is assumed.
 
3
Possibly because they were proposed before the name PUF had been coined, or they were introduced in fields other than cryptographic hardware, where the notion of PUFs has not yet been introduced. When the name of a PUF in the section headings is between quotation marks, it means that we have introduced this name in this work for simplicity and easy reference.
 
4
Note that we do not use the term silicon PUFs in this work. It has been used to describe (a class of) PUFs which can be implemented on silicon digital integrated circuits and use the intrinsic manufacturing variability in the production process as a source of randomness. As such, they can be considered a particular case of intrinsic PUFs.
 
5
Note that there are different meanings given to the term reconfigurable PUF. The interpretation used in this work is the one described in Sect. 3.5.3 and is not directly related to the use of reconfigurable logic devices like FPGAs as meant in [38].
 
6
By “\({{\mathsf{\Pi}}}_{{\ensuremath{\mathsf{\Gamma}}}} \neq {{\mathsf{\Pi}}}\)” here we mean that \({{\mathsf{\Pi}}}_{{\ensuremath{\mathsf{\Gamma}}}}\) and \({{\mathsf{\Pi}}}\) are (embedded in) physically distinct entities.
 
7
A response containing n bits of entropy optimally allows for a unique identification in a population with an average size of \(2^\frac{n}{2}\) because of the birthday paradox.
 
Literatur
1.
F. Armknecht, R. Maes, A.R. Sadeghi, B. Sunar, P. Tuyls, Memory leakage-resilient encryption based on physically unclonable functions, in Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2009, ed. by M. Matsui. Proceedings of the15th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Tokyo, Japan. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5912 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 685–702CrossRef
2.
D. Bauder, An Anti-counterfeiting Concept for Currency Systems. Technical Report PTK-11990, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, 1983
3.
N. Beckmann, M. Potkonjak, Hardware-based public-key cryptography with public physically unclonable functions, 2009, pp. 206–220
4.
C. Bösch, J. Guajardo, A.R. Sadeghi, J. Shokrollahi, P. Tuyls, in Efficient Helper Data Key Extractor on FPGA. CHES, 10–13 August 2008 Washington, DC, USA, 2008, pp. 181–197
5.
J. Bringer, H. Chabanne, T. Icart, in On physical Obfuscation of Cryptographic Algorithms. INDOCRYPT ’09: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cryptology in India, New Delhi, India (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 88–103
6.
J.D.R. Buchanan, R.P. Cowburn, A.V. Jausovec, D. Petit, P. Seem, G. Xiong, D. Atkinson, K. Fenton, D.A. Allwood, M.T. Bryan, Forgery: ‘fingerprinting’ documents and packaging. Nature 436(7050), 475 (2005)CrossRef
7.
8.
Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (CETS), Counterfeit Deterrent Features for the Next-Generation Currency Design, Appendix E (The National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 1993)
9.
G. Dejean, D. Kirovski, in RF-DNA: Radio-Frequency Certificates of Authenticity. CHES ’07: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Vienna, Austria, 10–13 September 2007 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2007), pp. 346–363
10.
Y. Dodis, R. Ostrovsky, L. Reyzin, A. Smith, Fuzzy extractors: How to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data. SIAM J. Comput. 38(1), 97–139 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
11.
B. Gassend, Physical Random Functions. Master’s thesis, MIT, MA, USA, 2003
12.
B. Gassend, D. Clarke, M. van Dijk, S. Devadas, in Controlled Physical Random Functions. ACSAC ’02: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2002), p. 149
13.
B. Gassend, D. Clarke, M. van Dijk, S. Devadas, in Silicon Physical Random Functions. ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ACM Press, New York, NY 2002), pp. 148–160
14.
B. Gassend, D. Lim, D. Clarke, M. van Dijk, S. Devadas, Identification and authentication of integrated circuits: Research articles. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 16(11), 1077–1098 (2004)CrossRef
15.
J. Guajardo, S.S. Kumar, G.J. Schrijen, P. Tuyls, in FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection. Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4727 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007), pp. 63–80
16.
J. Guajardo, S.S. Kumar, G.J. Schrijen, P. Tuyls, in Physical Unclonable Functions and Public-Key Crypto for FPGA IP Protection. International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 27–30 Aug 2007 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2007), pp. 189–195
17.
J. Guajardo, B. Škorić, P. Tuyls, S.S. Kumar, T. Bel, A.H. Blom, G.J. Schrijen, Anti-counterfeiting, key distribution, and key storage in an ambient world via physical unclonable functions. Inf. Syst. Front. 11(1), 19–41 (2009)CrossRef
18.
G. Hammouri, A. Dana, B. Sunar, in CDs Have Fingerprints Too. CHES ’09: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 348–362
19.
G. Hammouri, E. Öztürk, B. Birand, B. Sunar, in Unclonable Lightweight Authentication Scheme. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information and Communications Security (ICICS 2008) (Springer, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 33–48
20.
R. Helinski, D. Acharyya, J. Plusquellic, in A Physical Unclonable Function Defined Using Power Distribution System Equivalent Resistance Variations. DAC ’09: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference (ACM, New York, NY, 2009), pp. 676–681
21.
Sir W.J. Herschel, The Origin of Finger-Printing (Oxford University Press, London, 1916)
22.
D.E. Holcomb, W.P. Burleson, K. Fu, in Initial SRAM State as a Fingerprint and Source of True Random Numbers for RFID Tags.. Proceedings of the Conference on RFID Security, Malaga, Spain, 11–13 July 2007
23.
D.E. Holcomb, W.P. Burleson, K. Fu, Power-up SRAM state as an identifying fingerprint and source of true random numbers. IEEE Trans. Comput. 58(9), 1198–1210 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
N. Hopper, M. Blum, A Secure Human-Computer Authentication Scheme. Technical Report CMU-CS-00-139, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000
25.
T. Ignatenko, G.J. Schrijen, B. Škorić, P. Tuyls, F.M.J. Willems, in Estimating the Secrecy Rate of Physical Unclonable Functions with the Context-Tree Weighting Method. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Seattle, WA, USA, 9–14 July 2006, pp. 499–503
26.
R.S. Indeck, M.W. Muller, Method and apparatus for fingerprinting magnetic media . U.S. Patent No. 5365586, 1994
27.
M.S. Kirkpatrick, E. Bertino, in Software Techniques to Combat Drift in PUF-Based Authentication Systems. Workshop on Secure Component and System Identification (SECSI 2010), Cologne, Germany, 2010, p. 9
28.
S. Kumar, J. Guajardo, R. Maes, G.J. Schrijen, P. Tuyls, in Extended Abstract: The Butterfly PUF Protecting IP on Every FPGA. IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, 2008, HOST 2008, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2008, pp. 67–70
29.
K. Kursawe, A.R. Sadeghi, D. Schellekens, P. Tuyls, B. Škorić, in Reconfigurable Physical Unclonable Functions – Enabling Technology for Tamper-Resistant Storage. 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust - HOST 2009, San Francisco, CA, USA (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2009), pp. 22–29
30.
J.W. Lee, D. Lim, B. Gassend, G.E. Suh, M. van Dijk, S. Devadas, in A Technique to Build a Secret Key in Integrated Circuits for Identification and Authentication Application. Proceedings of the Symposium on VLSI Circuits, 2004, pp. 176–159
31.
D. Lim, Extracting Secret Keys from Integrated Circuits. Master’s thesis, MIT, MA, USA, 2004
32.
K. Lofstrom, W.R. Daasch, D. Taylor, in IC Identification Circuit Using Device Mismatch. Proceedings of ISSCC 2000, 2000, pp. 372–373
33.
R. Maes, P. Tuyls, I. Verbauwhede, in Intrinsic PUFs from Flip-Flops on Reconfigurable Devices. 3rd Benelux Workshop on Information and System Security (WISSec 2008), Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 2008
34.
R. Maes, P. Tuyls, I. Verbauwhede, in Statistical Analysis of Silicon PUF Responses for Device Identification. Workshop on Secure Component and System Identification (SECSI 2008), Berlin, Germany, 2008
35.
R. Maes, P. Tuyls, I. Verbauwhede, in Low-Overhead Implementation of a Soft Decision Helper Data Algorithm for SRAM PUFs. CHES ’09: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2009), pp. 332–347.
36.
37.
M. Majzoobi, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, in Testing Techniques for Hardware Security. IEEE International Test Conference (ITC 2008), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 28–30 Oct 2008 pp. 1–10
38.
M. Majzoobi, F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, Techniques for design and implementation of secure reconfigurable PUFs. ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. 2(1), 1–33 (2009)CrossRef
39.
E. Ozturk, G. Hammouri, B. Sunar, in Physical Unclonable Function with Tristate Buffers. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 2008), Seattle, WA, USA (IEEE, Washington, DC, 2008), pp. 3194–3197
40.
E. Öztürk, G. Hammouri, B. Sunar, in Towards Robust Low Cost Authentication for Pervasive Devices. PERCOM ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2008), pp. 170–178
41.
R.S. Pappu, Physical One-Way Functions. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001
42.
R.S. Pappu, B. Recht, J. Taylor, N. Gershenfeld, Physical one-way functions. Science 297, 2026–2030 (2002)CrossRef
43.
K. Pietrzak, in Provable Security for Physical Cryptography. Survey talk at WEWORC’09, Graz, Austria, 7–9 July 2009
44.
U. Rührmair, F. Sehnke, J. Sölter, G. Dror, S. Devadas, J. Schmidhuber, Modeling Attacks on Physical Unclonable Functions. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2010/251, 2010. http://​eprint.​iacr.​org/​
45.
U. Rührmair, Simpl Systems: On a Public Key Variant of Physical Unclonable Functions. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/255, 2009
46.
U. Rührmair, Q. Chen, P. Lugli, U. Schlichtmann, G.C. Martin Stutzmann, Towards Electrical, Integrated Implementations of SIMPL Systems. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/278, 2009
47.
U. Rührmair, J. Sölter, F. Sehnke, On the Foundations of Physical Unclonable Functions. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/277, 2009
48.
A. Rukhin, J. Soto, J. Nechvatal, E. Barker, S. Leigh, M. Levenson, D. Banks, A. Heckert, J. Dray, S. Vo, M. Smid, M. Vangel, A. Heckert, J. Dray, L.E.B. Iii, A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications. NIST Special Publication 800-22, 2001
49.
B. Škorić, Quantum Readout of Physical Unclonable Functions: Remote Authentication Without Trusted Readers and Authenticated Quantum Key Exchange Without Initial Shared Secrets. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/369, 2009
50.
B. Škorić, M.X. Makkes, Flowchart Description of Security Primitives for Controlled Physical Unclonable Functions. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2009/328, 2009
51.
Y. Su, J. Holleman, B. Otis, in A 1.6pj/bit 96% Stable Chip-ID Generating Circuit Using Process Variations. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2007. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2007), pp. 406–611
52.
G.E. Suh, S. Devadas, in Physical Unclonable Functions for Device Authentication and Secret Key Generation. Design Automation Conference (ACM Press, New York, NY, 2007), pp. 9–14
53.
K. Tolk, Reflective Particle Technology for Identification of Critical Components. Technical Report SAND-92-1676C, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, 1992
54.
P. Tuyls, G.J. Schrijen, B. Škorić, J. van Geloven, N. Verhaegh, R. Wolters, in Read-Proof Hardware from Protective Coatings. Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems Workshop. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4249 (Springer, New York, NY, 2006), pp. 369–383
55.
P. Tuyls, B. Škorić, in Physical Unclonable Functions for Enhanced Security of Tokens and Tags. ISSE 2006 – Securing Electronic Business Processes, Rome, Italy, 10–12 Oct 2006, pp. 30–37
56.
P. Tuyls, B. Škorić, S. Stallinga, A.H.M. Akkermans, W. Ophey, in Information-Theoretic Security Analysis of Physical Unclonable Functions. Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Roseau, Dominica, 28 Feb–3 Mar 2005, pp. 141–155
57.
V. Vivekraja, L. Nazhandali, in Circuit-Level Techniques for Reliable Physically Unclonable Functions. HOST ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust, San Francisco, CA, USA, 27 July 2009, pp. 30–35
58.
S. Vrijaldenhoven, Acoustical Physical Uncloneable Functions. Master’s thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 2005
59.
B. Škorić, S. Maubach, T. Kevenaar, P. Tuyls, Information-theoretic analysis of capacitive physical unclonable functions. J. Appl. Phys. 100(2), 024902 (2006)CrossRef
60.
B. Škorić, P. Tuyls, W. Ophey, in Robust Key Extraction from Physical Unclonable Functions. Applied Cryptography and Network Security (ACNS) 2005, New York, NY, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3531 (Springer, Berlin, 2005), pp. 407–422
61.
F.M.J. Willems, Y.M. Shtarkov, T.J. Tjalkens, The context tree weighting method: Basic properties. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41, 653–664 (1995)MATHCrossRef
62.
C.E. Yin, G. Qu, in Temperature-Aware Cooperative Ring Oscillator PUF. HOST ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Hardware-Oriented Security and Trust (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 2009), pp. 36–42
Metadaten
Titel
Physically Unclonable Functions: A Study on the State of the Art and Future Research Directions
verfasst von
Roel Maes
Ingrid Verbauwhede
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Towards Hardware-Intrinsic Security

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14451-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-14452-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14452-3_1

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise