Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity 3/2022

02.06.2021

Polarizing policy opinions with conflict framed information: activating negative views of political parties in a multi-party system

verfasst von: Dieter Dekeyser, Henk Roose

Erschienen in: Quality & Quantity | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Policy news often places emphasis on conflict between political parties. This partisan conflict is expected to motivate people to distance their own opinions away from the policy positions of antagonistic political parties (i.e., opinion polarization). This paper tests if opinion polarization occurs in a multi-party system when people are exposed to conflict framed information. We use an experimental design which exposes participants (N = 256) to a news article about unemployment benefits. This news article is adapted for each respondent to focus on the political party s/he dislikes the most. This ensures that each participant is exposed to polarizing policy information. The news article is then manipulated by altering the policy position of the antagonistic political party (i.e., support or opposition) and the framing of the story (i.e., conflict vs. no conflict). The results show that respondents are less in favor of the unemployment policy when the antagonistic political party supports this policy, and a conflict framing is applied. However, the policy positions of this antagonistic party do not affect policy support when partisan conflict is not emphasized.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The ethical concerns and protocol regarding the experimental design are discussed in the supplemental material.
 
2
We used the layout, visual style, and article structure of ‘vrtnws’ (https://​www.​vrt.​be/​vrtnws/​nl/​) which was previously called ‘deredactie’. This news website is the popular digital platform of the Flemish public service broadcaster.
 
3
We tested if these rating scores moderate the effects of our experimental manipulations, which they did not (see Table 9 in the supplemental material). This suggests that the remaining variation in rating scores do not capture relevant differences in party preferences for our study. To simplify the results presented in this paper, we exclude the party rating scores as an independent variable.
 
4
38.4% = 326 (partial and full completions of the online survey) / 850 (contacted email addresses).
 
5
The political parties in the Likert scales are the Flemish parties that were represented in the Flemish and Belgian parliaments in 2017: Vlaams Belang, N-VA, Open Vld, Cd&V, SP.A, & Groen.
 
6
The statements were written in Dutch.
 
7
The observed differences in framing effects can be further inspected by comparing the conditional regression equations based on the policy position of the antagonistic party.
(a) Equation for policy support: \(\widehat{\mathrm{y}}= 7.648-1.097\,\mathrm{ Conflict \,framing}\,-0. 589\,\mathrm{ State\, Interventionism}\,-0. 687\,\mathrm{ Social\, Inequality}+ \, 0.792\,\mathrm{ Economic\, Individualism}\)(b) Equation for policy opposition:
$$\widehat{\mathrm{y}}= 7.315-0.205\,\mathrm{ Conflict \,framing}\,-0. 589\,\mathrm{ State\, Interventionism}\,-0. 687\,\mathrm{ Social\, Inequality}+ \, 0.792\,\mathrm{ Economic\, Individualism}$$
 
8
Full results in the supplemental material (Table 5).
 
9
Full results in the supplemental material (Table 9). The interaction effects were tested for each issue preference separately to suppress multicollinearity.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Abramowitz, A., Webster, S.: The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral. Stud. 41, 12–22 (2016)CrossRef Abramowitz, A., Webster, S.: The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral. Stud. 41, 12–22 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ahler, D.: Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. J. Polit. 76(3), 607–620 (2014)CrossRef Ahler, D.: Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. J. Polit. 76(3), 607–620 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arceneaux, K.: Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability. Polit. Behav. 30(2), 139–160 (2008)CrossRef Arceneaux, K.: Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability. Polit. Behav. 30(2), 139–160 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Azrout, R., De Vreese, C.: The moderating role of identification and campaign exposure in party cuing effects. West Eur. Polit. 41(2), 384–399 (2017)CrossRef Azrout, R., De Vreese, C.: The moderating role of identification and campaign exposure in party cuing effects. West Eur. Polit. 41(2), 384–399 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bartholomé, G., Lecheler, S., De Vreese, C.: Towards a typology of conflict frames. J. Stud. 19(12), 1689–1711 (2018) Bartholomé, G., Lecheler, S., De Vreese, C.: Towards a typology of conflict frames. J. Stud. 19(12), 1689–1711 (2018)
Zurück zum Zitat Bechtel, M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., Helbling, M.: Reality bites: the limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Polit. Sci. Res. Methods 3(3), 683–695 (2015)CrossRef Bechtel, M., Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., Helbling, M.: Reality bites: the limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Polit. Sci. Res. Methods 3(3), 683–695 (2015)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bolsen, T., Druckman, J., Cook, D.: The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36(2), 235–262 (2014)CrossRef Bolsen, T., Druckman, J., Cook, D.: The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36(2), 235–262 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boudreau, C., MacKenzie, S.: Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58(1), 48–62 (2014)CrossRef Boudreau, C., MacKenzie, S.: Informing the electorate? How party cues and policy information affect public opinion about initiatives. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58(1), 48–62 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bullock, J.: Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(3), 496–515 (2011)CrossRef Bullock, J.: Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(3), 496–515 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, G.: Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85(5), 808–822 (2003)CrossRef Cohen, G.: Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85(5), 808–822 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Colombo, C., Kriesi, H.: Party, policy – or both? Partisan-biased processing of policy arguments in direct democracy. J. Election, Public Opinion and Parties. 27(3), 235–253 (2017)CrossRef Colombo, C., Kriesi, H.: Party, policy – or both? Partisan-biased processing of policy arguments in direct democracy. J. Election, Public Opinion and Parties. 27(3), 235–253 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Converse, P.: The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter, D. (ed.) Ideology and discontent, pp. 206–261. Free press, New York (1964) Converse, P.: The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Apter, D. (ed.) Ideology and discontent, pp. 206–261. Free press, New York (1964)
Zurück zum Zitat De Vreese, C.: The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. J. Mass Commun Quarter. 81(1), 36–52 (2004) De Vreese, C.: The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. J. Mass Commun Quarter. 81(1), 36–52 (2004)
Zurück zum Zitat De Vreese, C., Elenbaas, M.: Media in the game of politics: effects of strategic metacoverage on political cynicism. Int. J. Press/polit. 13(3), 285–309 (2008)CrossRef De Vreese, C., Elenbaas, M.: Media in the game of politics: effects of strategic metacoverage on political cynicism. Int. J. Press/polit. 13(3), 285–309 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Vreese, C., Peter, J., Semetko, H.: Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: a cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Polit. Commun. 18(2), 107–122 (2001)CrossRef De Vreese, C., Peter, J., Semetko, H.: Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: a cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Polit. Commun. 18(2), 107–122 (2001)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Derks, A.: Are the underprivileged really that economically ‘leftist’? Attitudes towards economic redistribution and the welfare state in Flanders. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 43(4), 509–521 (2004)CrossRef Derks, A.: Are the underprivileged really that economically ‘leftist’? Attitudes towards economic redistribution and the welfare state in Flanders. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 43(4), 509–521 (2004)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Druckman, J., Nelson, K.: Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. Am. J. Polit. Sci.47(4), 729–745 (2003)CrossRef Druckman, J., Nelson, K.: Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. Am. J. Polit. Sci.47(4), 729–745 (2003)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Druckman, J., Peterson, E., Slothuus, R.: How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107(1), 57–79 (2013)CrossRef Druckman, J., Peterson, E., Slothuus, R.: How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107(1), 57–79 (2013)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Entman, R.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)CrossRef Entman, R.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, S.: Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 32(2), 416–440 (1988)CrossRef Feldman, S.: Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 32(2), 416–440 (1988)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grant, T., Mockabee, S., Monson, A.: Campaign effects on the accessibility of party identification. Polit. Res. Q. 63(4), 811–821 (2010)CrossRef Grant, T., Mockabee, S., Monson, A.: Campaign effects on the accessibility of party identification. Polit. Res. Q. 63(4), 811–821 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Han, J., Federico, C.: Conflict-framed news, self-categorization, and partisan polarization. Mass Commun. Soc. 20(4), 455–480 (2017)CrossRef Han, J., Federico, C.: Conflict-framed news, self-categorization, and partisan polarization. Mass Commun. Soc. 20(4), 455–480 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heath, A., Evans, G., Martin, J.: The measurement of core beliefs and values: The development of balanced socialist/laissez faire and libertarian/authoritarian scales. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 24(1), 115–132 (1994)CrossRef Heath, A., Evans, G., Martin, J.: The measurement of core beliefs and values: The development of balanced socialist/laissez faire and libertarian/authoritarian scales. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 24(1), 115–132 (1994)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Houtman, D., Gogol, S.: Class and politics in contemporary social science: “Marxism lite” and its blind spot for culture. Transaction Publishers, New York (2003) Houtman, D., Gogol, S.: Class and politics in contemporary social science: “Marxism lite” and its blind spot for culture. Transaction Publishers, New York (2003)
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar, S., Krupenkin, M.: The strengthening of partisan affect. Polit. Psychol. 39(1), 201–218 (2018)CrossRef Iyengar, S., Krupenkin, M.: The strengthening of partisan affect. Polit. Psychol. 39(1), 201–218 (2018)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar, S., Westwood, S.: Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59(3), 690–707 (2015)CrossRef Iyengar, S., Westwood, S.: Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59(3), 690–707 (2015)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar, S., Sood, G., Lelkes, Y.: Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opin. Q. 76(3), 405–431 (2012)CrossRef Iyengar, S., Sood, G., Lelkes, Y.: Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opin. Q. 76(3), 405–431 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kam, C.: Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Polit. Behav. 27(2), 163–182 (2005)CrossRef Kam, C.: Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Polit. Behav. 27(2), 163–182 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kunda, Z.: The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108(3), 480–498 (1990)CrossRef Kunda, Z.: The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108(3), 480–498 (1990)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, N., McLeod, D., Shah, D.: Framing policy debates: issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues. Commun. Res. 35(5), 695–718 (2008)CrossRef Lee, N., McLeod, D., Shah, D.: Framing policy debates: issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues. Commun. Res. 35(5), 695–718 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leeper, T., Slothuus, R.: Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Polit. Psychol. 35(1), 129–156 (2014)CrossRef Leeper, T., Slothuus, R.: Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Polit. Psychol. 35(1), 129–156 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N.: Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Polit. Commun. 33(2), 283–301 (2016)CrossRef Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N.: Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Polit. Commun. 33(2), 283–301 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lipset, S.: Democracy and working-class authoritarianism. Am. Sociol. Rev. 24(4), 482–501 (1959)CrossRef Lipset, S.: Democracy and working-class authoritarianism. Am. Sociol. Rev. 24(4), 482–501 (1959)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mason, L.: “I disrespectfully agree”: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59(1), 128–145 (2015)CrossRef Mason, L.: “I disrespectfully agree”: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 59(1), 128–145 (2015)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer, S.: How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting. Res. Polit. 4(1), 1–7 (2017) Mayer, S.: How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional voting. Res. Polit. 4(1), 1–7 (2017)
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, P., Conover, P.: Red and blue states of mind: partisan hostility and voting in the United States. Polit. Res. Q. 68(2), 225–239 (2015)CrossRef Miller, P., Conover, P.: Red and blue states of mind: partisan hostility and voting in the United States. Polit. Res. Q. 68(2), 225–239 (2015)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mullinix, K.: Partisanship and preference formation: competing motivations, elite polarization, and issue importance. Polit. Behav. 38(2), 383–411 (2016)CrossRef Mullinix, K.: Partisanship and preference formation: competing motivations, elite polarization, and issue importance. Polit. Behav. 38(2), 383–411 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, T., Clawson, R., Oxley, Z.: Media framing of civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.91(3), 567–583 (1997a)CrossRef Nelson, T., Clawson, R., Oxley, Z.: Media framing of civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev.91(3), 567–583 (1997a)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, T., Oxley, Z., Clawson, R.: Towards a psychology of framing effects. Polit. Behav. 19(3), 221–245 (1997b)CrossRef Nelson, T., Oxley, Z., Clawson, R.: Towards a psychology of framing effects. Polit. Behav. 19(3), 221–245 (1997b)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neuberg, S., Smith, S., Hoffman, J., Russel, F.: When we observe stigmatized and “normal” individuals interacting: stigma by association. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20(2), 196–209 (1994)CrossRef Neuberg, S., Smith, S., Hoffman, J., Russel, F.: When we observe stigmatized and “normal” individuals interacting: stigma by association. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20(2), 196–209 (1994)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson, S.: Dominating cues and the limits of elite influence. J. Polit. 73(4), 1165–1177 (2011)CrossRef Nicholson, S.: Dominating cues and the limits of elite influence. J. Polit. 73(4), 1165–1177 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson, S.: Polarizing cues. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56(1), 52–66 (2012)CrossRef Nicholson, S.: Polarizing cues. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56(1), 52–66 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pappi, F.: Political behavior: Reasoning voters and multi-party systems. In: Goodin, R., Klingemann, H. (eds.) A new handbook of political science, pp. 255–275. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012) Pappi, F.: Political behavior: Reasoning voters and multi-party systems. In: Goodin, R., Klingemann, H. (eds.) A new handbook of political science, pp. 255–275. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Zurück zum Zitat Price, V., Tewksbury, D., Powers, E.: Switching trains of thought: the impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Commun. Res. 24(5), 481–506 (1997)CrossRef Price, V., Tewksbury, D., Powers, E.: Switching trains of thought: the impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Commun. Res. 24(5), 481–506 (1997)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rahn, W.: The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37(2), 472–496 (1993)CrossRef Rahn, W.: The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37(2), 472–496 (1993)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rokeach, M.: The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York (1973) Rokeach, M.: The nature of human values. The Free Press, New York (1973)
Zurück zum Zitat Rosema, M.: Partisanship, candidate evaluations, and prospective voting. Elect. Stud. 25(3), 467–488 (2006)CrossRef Rosema, M.: Partisanship, candidate evaluations, and prospective voting. Elect. Stud. 25(3), 467–488 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rudolph, T.: Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Polit. Psychol. 26(6), 905–928 (2005)CrossRef Rudolph, T.: Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Polit. Psychol. 26(6), 905–928 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rudolph, T.: The dynamics of ambivalence. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55(3), 561–573 (2011)CrossRef Rudolph, T.: The dynamics of ambivalence. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 55(3), 561–573 (2011)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rudolph, T., Popp, E.: An information processing theory of ambivalence. Polit. Psychol. 28(5), 563–585 (2007)CrossRef Rudolph, T., Popp, E.: An information processing theory of ambivalence. Polit. Psychol. 28(5), 563–585 (2007)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scheufele, B., Scheufele, S.: Of spreading activation, applicability and schemas: conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects. In: D’Angelo, P., Kuypers, J. (eds.) Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical perspective. Routledge, London (2010) Scheufele, B., Scheufele, S.: Of spreading activation, applicability and schemas: conceptual distinctions and their operational implications for measuring frames and framing effects. In: D’Angelo, P., Kuypers, J. (eds.) Doing news framing analysis: empirical and theoretical perspective. Routledge, London (2010)
Zurück zum Zitat Semetko, H., Valkenburg, P.: Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J. Commun. 50(2), 93–109 (2000)CrossRef Semetko, H., Valkenburg, P.: Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J. Commun. 50(2), 93–109 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shen, F., Edwards, H.: Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: a value-based account of framing effects. J. Commun. 55(4), 795–809 (2005)CrossRef Shen, F., Edwards, H.: Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: a value-based account of framing effects. J. Commun. 55(4), 795–809 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Slothuus, R., de Vreese, C.: Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. J. Polit. 72(3), 630–645 (2010)CrossRef Slothuus, R., de Vreese, C.: Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. J. Polit. 72(3), 630–645 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smidt, C.: Dynamics in partisanship during American presidential campaigns. Public Opin. Q. 78(1), 303–329 (2014)CrossRef Smidt, C.: Dynamics in partisanship during American presidential campaigns. Public Opin. Q. 78(1), 303–329 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taber, C., Lodge, M.: Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(3), 755–769 (2006)CrossRef Taber, C., Lodge, M.: Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50(3), 755–769 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M., Raymond, A., Vig, W.: The interaction of news and advocate frames: manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. J Mass Commun Quarter 7(44), 804–829 (2000) Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M., Raymond, A., Vig, W.: The interaction of news and advocate frames: manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. J Mass Commun Quarter 7(44), 804–829 (2000)
Zurück zum Zitat Valkenburg, P., Semetko, H., De Vreese, C.: The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Commun. Res. 26(5), 550–569 (1999)CrossRef Valkenburg, P., Semetko, H., De Vreese, C.: The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Commun. Res. 26(5), 550–569 (1999)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zaller, J.: The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRef Zaller, J.: The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Polarizing policy opinions with conflict framed information: activating negative views of political parties in a multi-party system
verfasst von
Dieter Dekeyser
Henk Roose
Publikationsdatum
02.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality & Quantity / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01168-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Quality & Quantity 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner